2026 NBA Extended Mock Draft: 6.0By: Aran_Smith

1. Washington Wizards – AJ Dybantsa

6’9”, 210, SF/PF, BYU, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 35 GP, 25.5 PPG, 51.0 FG%, 33.1 3P%, 77.4 FT%, 6.8 RPG, 3.7 APG, 1.1 SPG, 0.3 BPG, 3.1 TO

Dybantsa was one of the most consistent and dominant players in college basketball this season, combining elite physical tools with a steadily expanding offensive skill set. A fluid, explosive athlete, he led the nation in scoring and carried a primary offensive role with strong efficiency. His length, anticipation, and motor translated defensively, where he rotated with purpose, disrupted passing lanes, and held his own across multiple positions. Offensively, he operated as a true point forward, handling comfortably, initiating sets, and creating opportunities for teammates with improving vision and composure.

He retook the top spot on the board following a dominant close to the season, highlighted by a 35-point performance in the opening round of the NCAA Tournament, even in a loss. The game reflected the steady progress he made throughout the year, particularly with his shot creation and overall polish. While his perimeter shooting was inconsistent early, his efficiency climbed, and he developed a highly reliable mid-range package featuring turnaround jumpers, pull-ups, and dribble counters to create separation. He shot 1.4–4.2 from three (33.1%), and while the volume and accuracy still had room for improvement, they were not far off and trending in the right direction. He attacked downhill with power and balance, finished above the rim, rebounded his position, and seamlessly shifted between scoring and facilitating roles. While Darryn Peterson may offer slightly more pure upside, Dybantsa was clearly the more dominant and durable player this season, making him a strong favorite to be selected first overall.

Why the Wizards select AJ Dybantsa: If Washington lands the No. 1 pick in the lottery, Dybantsa gives them a bona fide franchise cornerstone to build around. While his positional fit may not be as seamless as Darryn Peterson, his overall talent and upside are difficult to pass on. At the top of the draft, teams prioritize star power over fit, and Dybantsa’s ceiling justifies building the roster around him, even if it requires adjustments or future moves to maximize his impact. For a fan base searching for a true face of the franchise, landing Dybantsa would be a defining moment, bringing renewed excitement and hope with a player capable of anchoring the next era of Wizards basketball.

NBA Comparison: Tracy McGrady

2. Indiana Pacers – Darryn Peterson

6’5”, 195, PG/SG, Kansas, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 24 GP, 20.2 PPG, 43.8 FG%, 38.2 3P%, 82.6 FT%, 4.2 RPG, 1.6 APG, 1.4 SPG, 0.6 BPG, 1.6 TO

Peterson is a supremely talented scoring guard whose blend of burst, strength, and shot-making gives him arguably the highest upside in the class. He features a quick first step, deep pull-up range, and the ability to score at all three levels, consistently putting pressure on defenses both on and off the ball. His positional size and power are further enhanced by an extraordinary 8’7” standing reach, giving him rare physical advantages for a combo guard and legitimate two-way versatility. His three-point shooting stood out as a major strength, knocking down 2.6–6.9 per game (38.2%), showcasing both high volume and advanced shot-making ability from deep.

His season, however, was uneven. Kansas failed to make a deep tournament run, and Peterson finished the year on a relatively quiet note compared to expectations. Limited by a mysterious cramping issue that impacted his availability and rhythm, he was often managed throughout the season and never fully looked like himself for extended stretches. While he began to play more complete games toward the end of the year, the consistency and dominance that defined his historically great high school career only showed up in flashes.

Why the Pacers select Darryn Peterson: If Indiana lands the No. 2 pick in the lottery, Peterson presents an ideal long-term piece to pair with Tyrese Haliburton once he returns from injury. Peterson’s ability to create his own shot, score at all three levels, and operate as a secondary playmaker would ease the offensive burden on Haliburton while adding another dynamic initiator to the backcourt. His size and versatility allow him to play both on and off the ball, making the fit seamless alongside an established lead guard. With star upside and the ability to complement Haliburton, Peterson offers both immediate impact and long-term value for Indiana.

NBA Comparison: Devin Booker

3. Brooklyn Nets – Cameron Boozer

6’10”, 250, PF, Duke, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 38 GP, 22.5 PPG, 55.6 FG%, 39.1 3P%, 78.9 FT%, 10.2 RPG, 4.1 APG, 1.4 SPG, 0.6 BPG, 2.5 TO

Boozer was one of the steadiest and most dominant players in college basketball this season, combining strength, touch, motor, and elite fundamentals in a way that consistently translated to winning. A physically ready freshman, he averaged 22.5 points and 10.2 rebounds per game while operating as a face-up scorer, interior finisher, and offensive hub. He led Duke on a deep run, bringing them within a close loss to UConn of a Final Four appearance, falling just a step short of Cooper Flagg, and earned National Player of the Year honors. While much of his scoring came through physicality and bully-ball finishes around the rim, his feel, footwork, and ability to exploit mismatches consistently stood out.

Though not an explosive athlete, Boozer’s skill level and adaptability separated him. He showed advanced passing ability and knocked down 1.4–3.6 threes per game (39.1%), signaling real perimeter growth and long-term offensive versatility beyond the paint. Defensively, he was sturdy and disciplined, relying on positioning and toughness, while his rebounding made him a constant double-double threat. His combination of shooting, passing, and rebounding is rare, and while some question how his physical style will translate over an 82-game NBA season, his IQ, production, and consistency make him one of the safest and most unique prospects in the class.

Why the Nets select Cameron Boozer: If Brooklyn lands the No. 3 pick, Boozer gives them a high-floor, high-IQ frontcourt anchor to build around. One of the safest prospects in the class, he brings advanced feel, interior scoring, and elite passing for a big, capable of facilitating offense from the elbows and keeping the ball moving. His rebounding, toughness, and consistency provide immediate impact, while his skill set fits seamlessly alongside a variety of roster builds. With All-Star upside and a reliable all-around game, Boozer offers both stability and long-term value as a foundational piece for the Nets.

NBA Comparison: Al Horford

4. Utah Jazz – Darius Acuff

6’3”, 190, PG, Arkansas, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 36 GP, 23.5 PPG, 48.4 FG%, 44.0 3P%, 80.9 FT%, 3.1 RPG, 6.4 APG, 0.8 SPG, 0.3 BPG, 2.2 TO

Acuff emerged as one of the most productive and dynamic lead guards in college basketball, taking a major leap and establishing himself as a true offensive engine. He averaged 23.5 points and 6.4 assists while shooting an elite 44.0% from three on high volume (2.5–5.8), showcasing both efficiency and shot-making versatility. A strong, physical guard with excellent pace control, he consistently got downhill, used his tight handle to create separation, and played with the confidence of a true floor leader. His ability to generate offense at all three levels, combined with his command and late-game shot creation, made him one of the most dangerous guards in the country.

He really came into his own as a dominant college player, often looking stronger and more impactful than higher-ranked guards, including Darryn Peterson, despite giving up size. While undersized by NBA standards and likely to lean offense-first, his upside as a playmaker and shot creator is highly intriguing. Guards his size must be special to overcome physical limitations in today’s game, and Acuff fits that mold, blending elite shooting with creative ball handling, including some of that filthy Tim Hardaway “UTEP two-step” ability to shake defenders and get into the paint. His combination of production, efficiency, and offensive creativity makes him one of the biggest risers in the class.

Why the Jazz select Darius Acuff: At No. 4, Utah lands a potential point guard of the future in Acuff, giving them a true offensive engine to build around. Heading into the lottery, the Jazz appear well positioned to come away with either Acuff or Keaton Wagler in the 4–6 range if they don’t move into the top three or slide down to 7–8. At this spot, Acuff may be a slight reach, but his scoring and playmaking upside make the gamble worthwhile. He upgrades the lead guard position and offers more long-term reliability than the young, promising options currently in the fold like Keyonte George or Isaiah Collier. The decision on whether George is a true point guard or better suited as a scoring two alongside Acuff will be key. While Acuff gets the nod here, Caleb Wilson and Keaton Wagler remain enticing options as well.

NBA Comparison: Tim Hardaway

5. Sacramento Kings – Caleb Wilson

6’10”, 215, PF, North Carolina, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 24 GP, 19.8 PPG, 57.8 FG%, 25.9 3P%, 71.3 FT%, 9.4 RPG, 2.7 APG, 1.5 SPG, 1.4 BPG, 2.0 TO

Wilson was one of the most productive and impactful freshmen in the country, combining efficiency, athleticism, and motor to consistently influence games on both ends. A fluid, bouncy forward with excellent size and mobility, he thrived as a rim runner, transition weapon, and face-up scorer. He finished above the rim with ease, attacked closeouts effectively, and created mismatches with his speed and activity level. His season was cut short after missing the final month and a half with two broken thumbs, but his body of work firmly established him as a top-five talent.

While his three-point shooting remains a work in progress, the touch and mechanics suggest room for long-term growth. His lack of high-level passing production is a mild concern in more analytics-driven evaluations, but his overall two-way versatility and physical tools stand out. Compared to Cameron Boozer, Wilson held a clear edge in speed and athleticism, particularly in transition, and in a different era may have been prioritized higher. However, in today’s skill-heavy NBA, Boozer’s polish gives him a slight edge, even as Wilson’s dynamic athletic profile and upside remain extremely appealing.

Why the Kings select Caleb Wilson: With the lottery still to be decided on May 10, Wilson stands out as one of the highest-upside talents in the class and a strong option in this range. His combination of size, athleticism, and two-way versatility gives him clear franchise-level potential if he continues to develop. While he still needs to improve as a shooter and passer, the raw talent and impact are unmistakable. For Sacramento, Wilson offers a dynamic frontcourt piece who can run the floor, finish above the rim, and grow into a primary option over time, making him an appealing long-term building block.

NBA Comparison: Jermaine O’Neal / Chris Bosh

6. Memphis Grizzlies – Keaton Wagler

6’6”, 185, PG/SG, Illinois, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 37 GP, 17.9 PPG, 44.5 FG%, 39.7 3P%, 79.6 FT%, 5.1 RPG, 4.2 APG, 0.9 SPG, 0.4 BPG, 1.8 TO

Wagler was one of the biggest surprises in college basketball this season, rising from a lightly regarded recruit to one of the most productive and intriguing freshmen in the country. He guided Illinois to a Final Four run and consistently delivered in high-leverage moments, highlighted by a 46-point explosion against Purdue that showcased his deep range and shot-making versatility. Despite a narrow frame, he played with advanced poise, confidence, and a scorer’s instinct well beyond his years, controlling pace and creating offense with craft and feel. His reported 7-foot wingspan showed up in his ability to create separation, rise into pull-ups, and generate clean looks off the dribble.

His appeal lies in his blend of elite shooting, feel, and decision-making. Wagler knocked down 2.4–5.9 threes per game (39.7%), combining high volume with strong efficiency while rarely forcing action. He operated comfortably as both a scorer and facilitator, consistently making the right reads and impacting the game even when defenses keyed on him. While he will need to continue adding strength to handle physicality and improve his ability to create separation against top-tier athletes, the offensive foundation and IQ are clear. In a typical draft, he could push into the top-five conversation, and he remains firmly in that range here, with the upside to challenge Darius Acuff as one of the top guards off the board.

NBA Comparison: Tyrese Halburton

7. Atlanta Hawks (from New Orleans) –  Kingston Flemings

6’4”, 190, PG, Houston, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 37 GP, 16.1 PPG, 47.6 FG%, 38.7 3P%, 84.5 FT%, 4.1 RPG, 5.2 APG, 1.5 SPG, 0.3 BPG, 1.8 TO

Flemings emerged as one of the most impactful freshman lead guards in the country, pairing elite athleticism with improving efficiency and growing command of Houston’s offense. An explosive downhill creator with a tight handle and excellent burst, he consistently generated penetration and finished above the rim with strength and creativity. He showed real progress as a perimeter shooter, converting 1.1–2.9 threes per game (38.7%), though the relatively modest volume still leaves some questions about how consistently defenses will need to respect him at the next level. He played with confidence and edge as Houston’s primary initiator, showing comfort pulling up, collapsing defenses, and making timely reads out of ball screens, while posting a strong 5.2-to-1.8 assist-to-turnover ratio that reflects his control and decision-making.

Flemings arguably has the highest ceiling among the point guards in this class due to his athleticism, burst, and overall offensive package. However, he is not quite the same level of sure thing as some of the guards ahead of him, as his jumper and overall polish still have room to develop. That may lead to a slightly longer developmental curve at the NBA level, even as the upside remains extremely enticing. His competitiveness, toughness, and presence off the floor are major positives, and with continued refinement, he has the tools to grow into a dynamic lead guard capable of impacting the game on both ends.

NBA Comparison: De’Aaron Fox

8. Dallas Mavericks – Nate Ament

6’10”, 205, SF/PF, Tennessee, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 35 GP, 16.7 PPG, 39.9 FG%, 33.3 3P%, 79.0 FT%, 6.3 RPG, 2.3 APG, 1.0 SPG, 0.6 BPG, 2.3 TO

Ament has cemented himself as one of the more intriguing long-term prospects in the freshman class, combining size, mobility, and perimeter skill at 6’10”. A smooth, fluid forward, he fit the modern NBA mold as a big wing capable of spacing the floor and attacking closeouts. His production grew as his role expanded, and he showed the ability to score at multiple levels while contributing on the glass and flashing connective passing ability. He also displayed surprising toughness throughout the season, getting to the free throw line at a high rate (5.6–7.1, 79.0%), helping dispel early concerns about physicality and willingness to embrace contact.

The next step in his development is adding strength, consistency, and greater offensive assertiveness. His three-point shooting (1.3–3.9, 33.3%) was somewhat underwhelming, but the mechanics and touch suggest it can become a real strength over time. He can still be knocked off spots by stronger defenders and will need to continue improving his ability to create separation in the half court. Defensively, he showed encouraging versatility with his length and mobility, even as his technique continues to develop. With added strength and continued growth, Ament projects as a high-upside stretch forward with significant long-term two-way potential.

Why the Mavericks select Nate Ament: At No. 8, Dallas could consider adding a young point guard like Mikel Brown if the medicals check out, but Ament provides a strong alternative as a versatile, high-upside forward to pair with Cooper Flagg. His size, athleticism, and two-way potential give the Mavericks another foundational piece, complementing Flagg and helping shape the nucleus of the future. Ament’s ability to impact the game without needing heavy usage, while still offering long-term upside, makes him a clean fit for a team balancing development with building toward sustained success.

NBA Comparison: Lamar Odom / Jonathan Isaac

9. Chicago Bulls – Mikel Brown

6’4”, 190, PG, Louisville, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 21 GP, 18.2 PPG, 41.0 FG%, 34.4 3P%, 84.4 FT%, 3.3 RPG, 4.7 APG, 1.2 SPG, 0.1 BPG, 3.1 TO

Brown remained one of the most skilled and intriguing lead guards in the 2026 class, controlling tempo with poise and playing with a quiet confidence that showed in his decision-making. More quick and shifty than outright fast, he excelled at creating separation with change of pace, hesitation moves, and tight ball handling. He generated offense efficiently out of ball screens, where his pull-up shooting and shot creativity stood out, highlighted by a 45-point performance against NC State in which he knocked down 10-of-16 from three. Despite shooting 2.6–7.6 from three (34.4%), the numbers fell short of his true ability, as he remains arguably the best pure outside shooter in the class based on shot difficulty, mechanics, and overall touch.

Durability remains the defining variable in his evaluation, with back issues dating back three years that were heavily scrutinized and led to significant missed time, including the NCAA Tournament. He never fully established consistent availability, making it difficult to project sustained impact over a full season. Even so, his upside is as high as any guard in the class, with a ceiling that could surpass Darius Acuff, Keaton Wagler, and Kingston Flemings if healthy. At some point, the risk becomes worth the gamble, similar to a Michael Porter Jr. scenario, as Brown has the talent, size, and scoring ability to far exceed his draft slot and potentially emerge as one of the biggest steals in this range.

Why the Bulls select Mikel Brown: At No. 9, the gamble to select Brown despite the back injury concerns makes sense given his upside. A dynamic, shifty guard with advanced shot creation and playmaking ability, he can generate offense at all three levels and operate both on and off the ball. Pairing him with Matas Buzelis gives Chicago a high-upside young core, blending Brown’s perimeter creation with Buzelis’ size and versatility. If healthy, Brown has the talent to significantly outperform his draft slot and emerge as a cornerstone piece.

NBA Comparison: CJ McCollum / Darius Garland

10. Milwaukee Bucks – Hannes Steinbach

6’10”, 240, PF, Washington  Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 30 GP, 18.5 PPG, 57.7 FG%, 34.0 3P%, 75.9 FT%, 11.8 RPG, 1.6 APG, 1.1 SPG, 1.2 BPG, 2.0 TO

Steinbach established himself as one of the most productive and physically imposing freshman bigs in the country, posting monster point and rebound numbers while significantly elevating a Washington team that finished 16–17. At 6’10”, 240 pounds, he played with a mature interior presence, controlling the glass and producing double-doubles with regularity. He ran the floor well, carved out deep position, and finished through contact with touch and patience, consistently leveraging his size and strength to impact games.

Offensively, Steinbach showed some intrigue as a floor spacer, knocking down 0.6–1.8 threes per game (34.0%), though the volume remains low and his game is still primarily built around interior scoring and rebounding. He also flashed solid feel as a passer in short-roll situations. Defensively, he relied more on positioning and strength than elite athleticism, with mobility in space an area to monitor. Still, his combination of size, rebounding dominance, and emerging skill makes him a dependable frontcourt prospect with clear NBA rotation value.

Why the Bucks select Hannes Steinbach: At No. 10, Milwaukee leans into size, versatility, and long-term upside with Steinbach, adding a modern frontcourt piece who fits the evolving direction of the roster. A fluid, skilled big with the ability to handle, pass, and stretch the floor, Steinbach brings a unique offensive dimension with his face-up game and perimeter touch. He shows comfort operating in space, making reads as a passer, and attacking slower defenders off the dribble, giving him intriguing offensive versatility for his size. Defensively, his length and mobility offer potential to switch and provide weakside rim protection, though he is still developing consistency on that end. Pairing him with Milwaukee’s core gives the Bucks a high-upside frontcourt talent who can grow into a versatile two-way contributor. If his strength and defensive awareness continue to improve, Steinbach has the tools to emerge as a modern, multi-skilled big capable of impacting the game in a variety of ways.

NBA Comparison: Alperin Sengun / Domantas Sabonis

11. Golden State Warriors –  Labaron Philon

6’4”, 185, PG, Alabama, So.
2025–26 Stats: 33 GP, 22.0 PPG, 50.1 FG%, 39.9 3P%, 79.8 FT%, 3.5 RPG, 5.0 APG, 1.2 SPG, 0.2 BPG, 2.5 TO

Philon built on an impressive freshman campaign to become one of the most productive and dynamic guards in college basketball, making a major leap in both volume and efficiency. He averaged 22.0 points and 5.0 assists while dramatically improving as a three-point shooter, converting 2.5–6.2 per game (39.9%) after hitting just 31.5% as a freshman. His development as a pick-and-roll operator stood out, showing improved pace, control, and the ability to manipulate defenders while consistently creating scoring opportunities for himself and others. With good positional size, elite end-to-end speed, and a strong first step, he applied constant pressure on defenses and emerged as a true offensive engine.

Philon plays with a brash, competitive edge, embracing physicality and not shying away from trash talk or getting into opponents’ heads. His confidence and toughness are clear strengths, though his aggressive style can still lead to turnovers and occasional overextension as a decision-maker. Even so, his combination of scoring punch, improved shooting, and playmaking growth makes him one of the more intriguing backcourt prospects in the class. If he continues refining his decision-making, he projects as a high-level offensive guard capable of thriving in a modern NBA system.

Why the Warriors select Labaron Philon: At No. 11, Golden State adds a jolt of speed, creativity, and shot-making with Philon, injecting much-needed youth and dynamism into the backcourt. A flashy, ultra-quick guard with a tight handle and natural feel, he excels at breaking down defenses, playing with pace, and creating offense out of nothing. His confidence stands out, whether pulling up off the dribble, attacking gaps, or setting up teammates with instinctive reads. In Golden State’s system, his ability to play on or off the ball fits seamlessly, allowing him to develop alongside their core while providing immediate energy and scoring punch. While still refining consistency and decision-making, Philon’s burst, flair, and offensive upside give him real star-level potential. If he continues to harness his tools, he could develop into something special and become a long-term piece in the Warriors’ next wave.

NBA Comparison: Dejounte Murray

12. Oklahoma City Thunder (from LA Clippers) – Brayden Burries

6’4”, 185, PG/SG, Arizona, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 39 GP, 16.1 PPG, 49.1 FG%, 39.1 3P%, 80.5 FT%, 4.9 RPG, 2.4 APG, 1.5 SPG, 0.2 BPG, 1.5 TO

Burries established himself as one of the most productive and efficient freshman guards in the country, leading a No. 1 seed Arizona team in scoring while playing a key role in a dominant season that saw just two regular season losses by a combined seven points. A strong, controlled combo guard, he played with excellent pace and balance, scoring efficiently at all three levels while making smart decisions within the flow of the offense. He proved comfortable both on and off the ball, consistently showing maturity in his shot selection and approach, and delivered big performances throughout the year, including a 29-point outing against BYU.

He did struggle on the biggest stage in the Final Four against Michigan, where foul trouble and an inefficient night, particularly a scoreless first half, limited his impact. Even so, scouts are unlikely to overreact given his full body of work, as his consistency, efficiency, and two-way contributions stood out over the course of the season. Burries competes defensively, rebounds well for his position, and plays with toughness and feel. While continuing to improve his ability to create separation against elite athletes will be important, he projects as a reliable, well-rounded guard with strong lottery consideration.

Why the Thunder select Brayden Burries: Burries fits seamlessly with Oklahoma City’s roster-building philosophy, allowing them to prioritize upside while continuing to add to an already deep young core. A smooth scorer with strong instincts, he can create his own shot, space the floor, and make plays within the flow without needing high usage. His feel, toughness, and two-way potential align well with the Thunder’s identity. With multiple future first-round picks at their disposal, the Thunder have the flexibility to address a need for a big man later, making this an ideal spot to take a swing on Burries’ long-term upside.

NBA Comparison: Jrue Holiday

13. Miami Heat – Yaxel Lendeborg

6’10”, 240, PF/C, Michigan, Sr.
2025–26 Stats: 40 GP, 15.1 PPG, 51.5 FG%, 37.2 3P%, 82.4 FT%, 6.8 RPG, 3.2 APG, 1.1 SPG, 1.2 BPG, 1.1 TO

Lendeborg remained one of the more unique and versatile senior bigs in the class, offering an uncommon blend of size, passing, and overall feel. In his first season at Michigan, he played a key role in guiding the team to a National Championship, elevating his draft stock into the lottery conversation. While his scoring production dipped compared to his UAB days, his all-around impact and connective skill set stood out, as he operated comfortably from the elbows and short roll, facilitating offense and keeping the ball moving. His improved three-point shooting was a major development, converting 1.7–4.5 per game (37.2%), giving him legitimate floor-spacing value to pair with his high-IQ playmaking.

There are still some mixed elements in his evaluation. His free throw rate was somewhat underwhelming, though that was partly a reflection of role and usage, and teams will want to see more consistent offensive assertiveness and defensive reliability against NBA-level athletes. At 24, his age limits long-term upside, but his maturity, versatility, and winning impact make him an appealing option for teams seeking immediate contribution. With an outgoing personality and an unorthodox path to this level, Lendeborg continues to add new dimensions to his game, showing clear coachability and work ethic, and projects as a versatile rotation big who can facilitate, space the floor, and contribute across multiple areas.

Why the Heat select Yaxel Lendeborg: Miami capitalizes on value and roster balance, adding a proven, ready-made contributor in Lendeborg. His versatility, feel, and ability to impact the game without needing touches fit seamlessly into the Heat’s system, giving them a connective frontcourt piece who can pass, space the floor, and keep the offense flowing. A national champion at Michigan, he brings winning experience, maturity, and reliability, traits that align strongly with Miami’s culture. He also fits the more NBA-ready approach the Heat have leaned toward in recent drafts, targeting players who can contribute early. His improved three-point shooting and high-IQ decision-making make him an ideal complement to their core, offering immediate rotation value with the polish and toughness to contribute to winning basketball right away.

NBA Comparison: OG Anunoby 

14. Charlotte Hornets – Karim Lopez

6’8”, 205, SF, Mexico, Intl. (New Zealand Breakers – NBL)
2025–26 Stats: 31 GP, 11.9 PPG, 50.2 FG%, 32.6 3P%, 71.7 FT%, 6.1 RPG, 2.0 APG, 1.2 SPG, 1.0 BPG, 3.0 TO

Lopez emerged as one of the more intriguing international wing prospects, offering a rare combination of size, fluid shooting mechanics, and all-around production while competing in Australia’s NBL. At 6’8”, he has an ideal frame for a modern wing, and his smooth perimeter stroke and confidence suggest more upside as a shooter than his 32.6% indicates. There are flashes of a Klay Thompson-type profile in his size and pure shooting ability, though he is not yet close to that level of consistency. He contributed across the board with rebounding, defensive activity, and efficient finishing, showing a well-rounded foundation against professional competition.

The evaluation still hinges on consistency, toughness, and overall impact. His performance at events like Eurocamp was uneven, and there are stretches where he fades or lacks a strong defensive edge. While his tools and shooting upside are clearly appealing, teams will want to see a more consistent motor and physical presence. Still, his combination of size, touch, and versatility makes him a strong candidate in this range, with upside tied to how much his shooting and competitiveness continue to develop.

NBA Comparison: Zaccharie Risacher

15. Chicago Bulls (via Trailblazers) – Cameron Carr

6’5”, 190, SG/SF, Tennessee, So.
2025–26 Stats: 34 GP, 18.9 PPG, 49.4 FG%, 37.4 3P%, 80.1 FT%, 5.8 RPG, 2.6 APG, 0.9 SPG, 1.3 BPG, 2.4 TO

Carr put together one of the more impressive breakout seasons among returning wings, emerging as a primary option after two quiet years at Tennessee where he struggled to find consistent opportunity. He made a major leap, showcasing his athleticism and skill set while averaging nearly 19 points per game with strong efficiency. A long, explosive athlete, he consistently attacked the rim and delivered highlight finishes, while also rediscovering the shooting ability that made him a highly regarded prospect out of high school. He converted 2.3–6.1 threes per game (37.4%), showing both volume and confidence as a perimeter scorer.

There are still areas for growth, particularly adding strength and toughness to better handle physical play, and his 2.4 turnovers per game stand out as an area that needs improvement as he continues to refine his decision-making. That said, the upside is significant. Carr flashes high-level three-and-D potential, with strong catch-and-shoot ability and the length and athleticism to disrupt passing lanes and guard multiple positions. While his development path took time, his breakout season reinforced his long-term upside as a two-way wing, with the tools to grow into a high-impact starter.

Why the Bulls select Cameron Carr: Chicago adds much-needed athleticism and scoring punch to the backcourt with Carr, a dynamic wing coming off a breakout season. His ability to attack the rim, space the floor, and play above the rim brings an element the Bulls currently lack, while his length and tools give him upside as a two-way contributor. There’s also a natural connection here, as Carr’s game draws comparisons to Zach LaVine, a former Bull, and Chicago could see flashes of that same explosive scoring ability and shot-making upside. With his emergence as a high-volume, efficient perimeter scorer and his defensive potential, Carr fits as a high-upside wing who can grow into a major piece of the Bulls’ young core.

NBA Comparison: Zach LaVine

16. Memphis Grizzlies (via Magic) – Isaiah Evans

6’6”, 180, SG/SF, Duke, So.
2025–26 Stats: 38 GP, 15.0 PPG, 43.3 FG%, 36.1 3P%, 86.0 FT%, 3.2 RPG, 1.3 APG, 0.7 SPG, 0.7 BPG, 1.1 TO

Evans showed strong sophomore progression, displaying improved confidence and offensive polish while emerging as one of Duke’s primary perimeter scoring threats. He made a solid jump in production and showed flashes in the NCAA Tournament, reinforcing his scoring upside. A smooth, natural shot-maker, he expanded beyond a spot-up role, adding a more reliable midrange pull-up, improved finishing through contact, and flashes of secondary creation. His length and high release allowed him to generate clean looks over contests, and he moved well without the ball, consistently finding rhythm within the offense. His shooting profile stood out, converting 2.7–7.4 from three (36.1%) and 2.6–3.0 from the line (86.0%), reinforcing his status as a high-level perimeter shooter with strong touch.

The swing factor in his evaluation is his frame and overall physical development. Adding strength and muscle will be key to unlocking the rest of his game, as it should improve his ability to impact areas beyond scoring, including rebounding, defense, and playmaking. While his length and shooting combination are rare and highly appealing, some evaluators question whether he does enough outside of scoring at this stage to justify a firm lottery projection. Still, his confidence, scoring instincts, and shot-making ability give him a clear pathway to becoming a high-level wing if his body continues to develop.

Why the Grizzlies select Isaiah Evans: Duke sharpshooter Isaiah Evans gives Memphis another perimeter scoring weapon as they continue evolving their roster in the wake of the Desmond Bane trade. This being one of the picks acquired in that deal, targeting a younger, cheaper Bane-type replacement makes strong sense. After adding Cedric Coward to help replace Bane’s physical presence, Evans brings a similar emphasis on wing shooting and shot-making, helping to offset that loss with more size and length on the perimeter. His smooth scoring ability, off-ball movement, and shooting versatility fit well alongside Memphis’ core, providing spacing and secondary offense. While he still needs to add strength, the upside as a long, natural shot-maker makes him a strong value play in the mid-first round and a logical fit as the Grizzlies continue to reshape their wing rotation.

NBA Comparison: Brandon Ingram

17. Oklahoma City Thunder (via Philadelphia) –  Chris Cenac

6’11”, 240, PF/C, Houston, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 37 GP, 9.5 PPG, 48.5 FG%, 33.3 3P%, 62.1 FT%, 7.9 RPG, 0.7 APG, 0.8 SPG, 0.5 BPG, 0.9 TO

Cenac remained one of the more intriguing long-term big men in the class, offering a rare blend of size, mobility, and emerging perimeter skill for a 6’11” frontcourt prospect. His role within Houston’s structured system kept his scoring numbers modest, but his impact showed up through energy plays, rebounding, and efficient finishing around the rim. He ran the floor extremely well, played above the rim as a vertical threat, and flashed the ability to step out and hit perimeter shots. While his three-point numbers did not jump off the page, the form and touch suggest real long-term shooting potential, reinforcing his appeal as a modern floor-spacing big.

The overall production was somewhat underwhelming, highlighting that he is more of an upside selection who may take time to develop. His low block numbers also stand out as a concern, pointing to an area where he can improve as a rim protector. His consistency and defensive presence are still evolving, and continued strength gains will be important for him to handle physical matchups and anchor the paint more effectively. Even so, the combination of size, athleticism, and skill is difficult to ignore. Cenac’s development curve may be longer than some peers, but his tools and flashes of shooting and mobility give him significant long-term potential.

Why the Thunder select Chris Cenac: At No. 17, Oklahoma City can afford to take a longer-term swing, adding Cenac as a developmental big to groom behind their established core. He offers intriguing upside as a mobile, modern frontcourt prospect with size and emerging perimeter skill, capable of running the floor, finishing above the rim, and potentially spacing the floor over time. While still a project, his physical tools and growth trajectory fit well with OKC’s patient, development-focused approach. Jayden Quaintance is another option in this range, but Cenac’s combination of size, mobility, and long-term upside makes him an appealing investment for the Thunder.

NBA Comparison: Kel’el Ware

18. Charlotte Hornets (via Magic, Suns) – Meleek Thomas

6’5”, 185, PG/SG, Arkansas, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 37 GP, 15.6 PPG, 43.5 FG%, 41.6 3P%, 84.3 FT%, 3.8 RPG, 2.5 APG, 1.5 SPG, 0.2 BPG, 1.0 TO

Thomas established himself as a natural scorer with a unique, unorthodox herky-jerky style that made him difficult to contain. He played with excellent pace and craft, using hesitation moves, sudden bursts, and long strides to create separation. His perimeter shooting was a major strength, knocking down 2.2–5.3 threes per game (41.6%) while also converting over 84% from the line, reinforcing his high-level scoring profile. Physically, he made significant strides over the course of the season, adding strength and appearing more filled out, a testament to Arkansas’ strength and conditioning program, which helped him better absorb contact and finish plays.

While he projects more as a combo guard than a true lead, his scoring instincts and shot-making ability give him clear value. Defensively, he showed active hands and competitiveness, and his low turnover rate reflected solid decision-making for a freshman. There is still room to grow in terms of playmaking and overall consistency, but his offensive skill set, improved frame, and ability to generate efficient scoring make him a strong sleeper candidate in this range with the potential to outperform his draft position.

Why the Hornets select Meleek Thomas: At No. 18, Charlotte adds a dynamic scoring guard to bolster the backcourt. Thomas offers strong value as a plug-and-play offensive option who can provide instant scoring punch. For a young team still building out its roster, adding a player capable of creating offense and producing in bursts has real appeal. He fits as a bench weapon who can change momentum, giving the Hornets another layer of scoring depth without requiring heavy usage or extended development time to be effective.

NBA Comparison: Leandro Barbosa / Jordan Hawkins

19. Toronto Raptors – Bennett Stirtz

6’4”, 180, PG/SG, Iowa, Sr.
2025–26 Stats: 37 GP, 19.8 PPG, 47.7 FG%, 35.8 3P%, 84.8 FT%, 2.6 RPG, 4.4 APG, 1.4 SPG, 0.2 BPG, 1.8 TO

Stirtz proved his production translated seamlessly to the Big Ten, leading Iowa on a deep tournament run with a scrappy roster while continuing to produce at a high level. He played with excellent pace and composure, consistently making quick reads and organizing the offense, with his passing and facilitation standing out as a major strength. He also showed solid three-point volume at 2.5–6.9 per game (35.8%), reinforcing his ability to space the floor and keep defenses honest. His ability to overachieve against more athletic competition underscored his feel, competitiveness, and leadership, as he controlled games without forcing action and consistently elevated teammates.

There are still questions about how his game translates physically at the NBA level, particularly in terms of size, speed, and athleticism, but his intangibles and steady improvement are difficult to ignore. After progressing from the Division II level to Drake and then Iowa, he continued to get better each step of the way. His shooting, decision-making, and toughness give him a strong foundation as a rotation guard, and while his upside may be limited compared to younger prospects, his competitiveness, determination, and feel for the game should allow him to carve out a role.

Why the Raptors select Bennett Stirtz: At No. 19, Toronto takes a chance on a highly productive and steady lead guard to help address a long-standing need in the post–Kyle Lowry era. Stirtz brings elite passing, strong decision-making, and the ability to control tempo, giving the Raptors a true organizer who can get them into offense and elevate those around him. At this spot, he could be viewed as a slight reach, but his feel, competitiveness, and track record of improvement help a team in need of cohesion. If his game translates, Stirtz has the tools to develop into the type of reliable floor general Toronto has been searching for.

NBA Comparison: Steve Blake

20. San Antonio (via Hawks) – Allen Graves

6’9”, 225, SF/PF, Santa Clara, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 35 GP, 11.8 PPG, 51.2 FG%, 41.3 3P%, 75.0 FT%, 6.5 RPG, 1.8 APG, 1.9 SPG, 0.9 BPG, 0.7 TO

Graves has emerged as one of the more intriguing analytics standouts in the class, producing highly efficient and well-rounded numbers despite coming off the bench for Santa Clara. A former point guard, he brings advanced feel, ball handling, and passing instincts for his size, allowing him to function as a connective piece offensively rather than a primary scorer. His defensive activity stands out, averaging nearly two steals and close to a block per game, showcasing his anticipation, length, and versatility. He also knocked down 1.1–2.6 threes per game (41.3%), a strong volume considering his role, giving him legitimate floor-spacing value to pair with his all-around impact.

He had a brief NCAA Tournament moment, delivering a clutch performance before Santa Clara was knocked out on a buzzer beater by Kentucky, slightly overshadowing his impact. Physically, he still has room to develop and become more assertive offensively, but his combination of size, efficiency, defensive instincts, and versatility is highly appealing. With his age, dimensions, and unique background, Graves has significant upside remaining and projects as a high-level connector at the next level, with the potential to grow into a much bigger role over time.

Why the Spurs select Allen Graves: At No. 20, San Antonio lands a prospect who feels tailor-made for their system in Graves, a cerebral, versatile forward who thrives as a connector. His feel, passing instincts, and unselfish approach align perfectly with the Spurs’ style, giving them another high-IQ piece who can keep the ball moving and elevate those around him. He brings defensive activity, positional versatility, and efficient shooting, while fitting well with a young nucleus as a developmental upside piece. There is some uncertainty around his draft status, as he must decide whether to remain in the draft or follow through with the transfer portal.

NBA Comparison: Boris Diaw / Kyle Anderson

21. Detroit Pistons (via Timberwolves) – Thomas Haugh

6’9”, 210, SF/PF, Florida, Jr.
2025–26 Stats: 34 GP, 17.1 PPG, 46.0 FG%, 32.6 3P%, 77.4 FT%, 6.1 RPG, 2.1 APG, 1.1 SPG, 1.0 BPG, 1.5 TO

Haugh stepped into a significantly expanded role and produced as a steady, high-minutes contributor, averaging over 17 points while impacting multiple areas of the game. A scrappy, high-motor forward, he brought strong mobility, athleticism, and feel, thriving as a cutter, transition finisher, and opportunistic scorer within the flow of the offense. His competitiveness and energy consistently stood out, and he continued to show the instincts and toughness that made him a key piece in Florida’s title run the year prior, even if his tournament impact this season was not as strong.

There are some concerns tied to his profile, including a dip in shooting efficiency late in the season and a three-point mark of 1.7–5.2 (32.6%) that remains somewhat inconsistent. At 22 years old (born July 7, 2003), his age works against his long-term upside compared to younger prospects. Still, his NBA readiness, motor, and proven ability to contribute in winning environments give him a strong case in this range. With his toughness, versatility, and competitive edge, along with a reputation among scouts as a reliable performer, Haugh projects as a plug-and-play rotation forward.

Why the Pistons select Thomas Haugh: At No. 21, Haugh’s readiness and versatility align well with Detroit’s timeline as they push further into a competitive window. A high-motor, tough, and instinctive forward, he brings plug-and-play value with his ability to impact the game as a cutter, transition finisher, and multi-positional defender. His competitiveness and edge fit the gritty, hard-nosed identity often associated with Detroit basketball, and he projects as a reliable rotation piece who can contribute early. While his long-term upside may be more limited, his feel, toughness, and winning background make him a strong fit for a team looking to add dependable depth to a rising core.

NBA Comparison: Jaime Jaquez

22. Philadelphia 76ers (via Thunder, Rockets) – Morez Johnson

6’9”, 235, PF/C, Michigan, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 40 GP, 13.1 PPG, 62.3 FG%, 34.3 3P%, 78.2 FT%, 7.3 RPG, 1.2 APG, 0.7 SPG, 1.1 BPG, 1.3 TO

23. Atlanta Hawks (via Cavaliers) – Jayden Quaintance

6’10”, 250, PF/C Kentucky, So.
Stats (4 GP): 5.0 PPG, 5.0 RPG, 0.5 APG, 57.1 FG%, 0.0 3P%, 30.8 FT%

Quaintance is one of the more physically gifted frontcourt prospects in the class, bringing strength, explosiveness, and a high motor to the interior. A transfer from Arizona State who was not draft-eligible as a freshman, he entered the season with significant buzz but has struggled to stay on the floor due to injuries and limited availability. When healthy, his physical upside is evident. He plays above the rim, looks to finish everything with force, and impacts the game through energy, rebounding, and defensive activity. His tools, frame, and athleticism give him the foundation of a modern role-playing big who can run the floor, protect the paint, and provide physical presence.

Offensively, Quaintance remains a work in progress. While he shows occasional touch around the basket, his scoring skill level is still developing, and his limited range and free throw struggles highlight the need for continued refinement. His long-term value projects more around defense, rebounding, and finishing within a defined role rather than offensive creation. Despite early hype that placed him in the top-10 conversation, his current trajectory points more toward the late first-round range. With his physical tools and defensive potential, he fits the mold of a Kevon Looney-type contributor at the next level, capable of impacting games through toughness, interior defense, and effort while continuing to develop his offensive feel.

Why the Hawks select Jayden Quaintance: At No. 23, after adding Kingston Flemings at No. 7, Atlanta turns to the frontcourt and takes a developmental swing on Quaintance’s physical tools and long-term upside. His strength, explosiveness, and motor give him immediate value as a rim runner, rebounder, and defensive presence, capable of bringing energy in limited minutes. While his offensive game is still raw, the Hawks can afford patience, allowing him to focus on finishing, protecting the paint, and doing the dirty work. With time and improved feel, Quaintance has the potential to grow into a reliable rotation big, making him a worthwhile investment as Atlanta continues to build out its young core.

NBA Comparison: Kevon Looney

24. New York Knicks – Joshua Johnson

6’9”, 240, F, Iowa State, Sr.
2025–26 Stats: 35 GP, 30.9 MPG, 16.4 PPG, 7.4 RPG, 4.8 APG, 1.6 SPG, 0.8 BPG, 47.1% FG, 34.5% 3P%, 70.0% FT

Johnson is a strong, skilled point forward type who brings a mature, well-rounded game and the versatility to contribute immediately. At 6’9”, 240 pounds, he has the size and strength to match up at either forward spot, using his physicality and toughness to hold his own defensively and on the glass. His best attribute is his passing, as he consistently makes advanced reads, facilitates offense from the high post or perimeter, and keeps the ball moving with purpose. While not an explosive athlete, he compensates with feel, positioning, and skill, showing the ability to handle, create in a secondary role, and knock down perimeter shots at a respectable rate. His production across the board—particularly as a rebounder and playmaker—highlights his impact as a connector who fills gaps and elevates team play.

Why the Knicks select Joshua Johnson: New York adds a ready-made contributor who fits seamlessly into a competitive roster. Johnson’s versatility, toughness, and unselfish style align perfectly with the Knicks’ identity, giving them a dependable forward who can play within structure while adding another layer of playmaking. His ability to facilitate from the frontcourt and make quick decisions enhances offensive flow, particularly alongside high-usage scorers. With his size and strength, he can defend multiple positions and handle the physical demands of playoff basketball. For a team looking to contend, Johnson offers a high-floor option who can step into a rotation role early and impact winning without needing the ball in his hands to be effective.

NBA Comparison: Joe Ingles / Josh Giddey

25. Los Angeles Lakers – Christian Anderson 

6’3”, 180, PG, Texas Tech, So.
2025–26 Stats: 33 GP, 18.5 PPG, 47.2 FG%, 41.5 3P%, 80.5 FT%, 3.6 RPG, 7.4 APG, 1.5 SPG, 0.2 BPG, 3.3 TO

Anderson put together a big sophomore season, emerging as one of the more productive and efficient lead guards in the country. Despite standing just 6’2”, he consistently controlled games with his pace, feel, and ability to run a team. A smooth playmaker, he excelled in pick-and-roll situations, creating quality looks for both himself and teammates while posting strong assist numbers. His shooting was a major strength, knocking down 41.5% from three, giving him the ability to space the floor and punish defenses that played off him. Even after Texas Tech lost Toppin, the team continued to perform at a high level under Anderson’s leadership.

His size will be a key point of evaluation, as smaller guards must prove they can consistently hold up defensively and create advantages at the next level. While he may not have elite physical tools, his skill level, shooting, and decision-making stand out, supported by strong analytics and efficiency. Born April 2, 2006, and a dual citizen of the United States and Germany, Anderson brings a mature floor game and steady presence, projecting as a reliable rotation point guard who can organize an offense and provide scoring punch.

Why the Lakers select Christian Anderson: At No. 25, Los Angeles adds a polished, high-IQ guard in Anderson, giving them a change-of-pace option off the bench. His ability to control tempo, run pick-and-roll, and make consistent reads makes him a strong fit as a secondary ball handler who can stabilize second units. He brings a solid blend of readiness and upside as a sophomore, with the shooting ability to space the floor and complement star players. While his size presents some defensive limitations, his feel, poise, and decision-making should allow him to carve out a reliable rotation role early in his career.

NBA Comparison: Kennedy Chandler

26. Denver Nuggets – Dailyn Swain

6’7”, 220, SF, Texas, Jr.
2025–26 Stats: 36 GP, 17.3 PPG, 7.5 RPG, 3.6 APG, 54.2 FG%, 34.4 3P%, 81.5 FT%

Swain put together a strong junior season in his lone year at Texas, emerging as a key piece on a team that made a deep NCAA Tournament run to the Sweet 16. An explosive slashing wing with an NBA-ready frame, he thrives attacking downhill, using his quick first step, improved handle, and high-level athleticism to pressure the rim and finish through contact. He showed real growth as an on-ball creator, operating effectively in isolation and pick-and-roll while flashing point-forward ability with solid vision and passing instincts (3.6 APG). Swain is especially dangerous in transition, where his speed and leaping ability make him a constant threat. He also impacted the game across multiple areas, rebounding at a high level for a wing (7.5 RPG) and generating turnovers defensively (1.6 SPG) with his length and anticipation. His efficiency jump as a junior, combined with an 81.5 percent free throw mark, points to encouraging long-term shooting development.

There are still areas that will determine his ultimate ceiling. While his three-point percentage (34.4%) is respectable, it comes on modest volume (0.9 makes on 2.6 attempts), leaving questions about how reliable his shooting will be at the next level. His handle, though improved, can still get loose in traffic, contributing to turnovers (2.7 per game), and his offensive approach can lean too heavily on isolation. He is not yet a polished shot creator, with footwork and decision-making still developing, particularly against higher-level defenses. Defensively, he has the tools to be impactful, but consistency and focus can waver at times. Swain is generally viewed as a first-round talent, offering an appealing blend of athleticism, versatility, and upward trajectory, but his draft range will depend on continued development as a shooter, decision-maker, and all-around offensive creator.

Why the Nuggets select Dailyn Swain: At No. 26, Swain offers a blend of athleticism, versatility, and relative readiness that fits Denver’s win-now timeline in the heart of Nikola Jokić’s prime. As a junior, he brings more immediate polish than many prospects in this range, with the ability to contribute as a slashing wing who can attack closeouts, finish through contact, and add a needed dose of athleticism on the perimeter. His rebounding and secondary playmaking also align well with Denver’s system, where ball movement and cutting are emphasized. While his shooting consistency and decision-making remain areas to monitor, Swain gives the Nuggets an energetic, downhill presence who can complement their core and provide depth on the wing as they continue to chase contention.

NBA Comparison: Terrence Jones / Kelly Oubre Jr.

27. Boston Celtics – Koa Peat

6’8”, 235, PF, Arizona, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 36 GP, 14.1 PPG, 5.6 RPG, 2.6 APG, 52.8 FG%, 35.0 3P%, 62.3 FT%

Peat delivered a productive freshman season built around strength, skill, and physical maturity, showing the polish and interior feel that made him one of the most accomplished high school players in recent Arizona history. He played a key role in helping Arizona reach the Final Four, providing steady scoring, toughness, and reliability on both ends. At 6’8”, 235 pounds, he consistently used his powerful frame, balance, and advanced footwork to establish position, finish efficiently around the basket, and play through contact. His passing out of the post and comfort operating as both a scorer and facilitator inside the arc remained clear strengths, and his high-IQ, team-first approach translated to consistent winning impact.

His limitations became more evident late in the season against top competition. Arizona’s Final Four run highlighted his value, but also exposed some offensive constraints, particularly his lack of scoring versatility and ability to create outside of the paint. While his three-point percentage (35.0%) appears solid, it came on extremely low volume with just seven made threes on the season, limiting its reliability. Combined with a 62.3 percent free throw mark, there are legitimate concerns about his long-term shooting and spacing value. He is not an elite athlete and lacks ideal size or length for a full-time NBA power forward, which can make it more difficult to consistently finish or create against bigger, more athletic defenders. Those factors cap some of the upside, but in the late first-round range, his toughness, feel, and inside-the-arc productivity still project well as a reliable rotation forward if the shooting continues to improve.

Why the Celtics select Koa Peat: At No. 27, Peat fits the mold of the type of undervalued, tough-minded forward Boston has historically targeted. From Glen Davis to Grant Williams, those were Danny Ainge-era picks, but the broader philosophy of going against the grain to find value has remained intact under Brad Stevens. That makes this a logical spot to take a chance on a proven, productive player if he falls into this range. Peat’s strength, interior scoring, and passing feel give him a pathway to contribute as a rotation piece, and the perceived limitations in his shooting and athletic profile could make him a motivated, chip-on-his-shoulder addition in a winning environment.

NBA Comparison: Chuck Hayes / Trevor Booker 

28. Minnesota Timberwolves (via Pistons) – Trevon Brazile

6’10”, 230, PF/C, Arkansas, Sr.
2025–26 Stats: 36 GP, 31.5 MPG, 13.0 PPG, 7.3 RPG, 1.6 APG, 1.5 SPG, 1.6 BPG, 52.5 FG%, 34.1 3P%, 71.7 FT%

Brazile put together a strong senior season, showcasing his blend of length, athleticism, and defensive versatility while playing a major role for Arkansas. He also showed clear improvement in his outside shooting, adding another dimension to his offensive profile. A long and explosive 6’10 forward with a near 7’4 wingspan, he consistently impacted the game as a rim protector, rebounder, and high-energy finisher. He thrived as a lob threat and transition weapon, using his speed and leaping ability to generate easy offense, while also showing improved maturity in a high-minutes role. Defensively, his ability to block shots, generate steals, and switch onto smaller players stood out, giving him real value as a modern, multi-positional defender. His motor and activity level allowed him to affect the game in a variety of ways, often turning defense into offense.

There are still areas that will determine his long-term outlook. While his three-point percentage (34.1%) is respectable, it can be inconsistent, and his offensive game remains more dependent on energy plays than refined shot creation. His handle and decision-making can get loose in traffic, limiting his effectiveness in half-court situations. Despite his physical tools, his overall impact can fluctuate, and continued development in strength, focus, and consistency will be important. Still, his combination of size, athleticism, and defensive upside is difficult to find in this range. For Minnesota, Brazile adds needed athleticism and vertical spacing to a more skill-oriented frontcourt, projecting as an energetic rim runner with upside if his offensive game continues to evolve.

Why the Timberwolves select Trevon Brazile: At No. 28, Minnesota targets athleticism and defensive versatility to complement a more skill-based frontcourt. Brazile fills a clear need as a rim runner and vertical spacer, while also bringing switchability and energy on defense. In this range, his upside and physical tools make him a strong value play, giving the Timberwolves another dynamic piece to round out their rotation.

NBA Comparison: Jaxson Hayes

29. Cleveland Cavaliers (via Spurs) – Dash Daniels

6’5”, 190, PG/SG, Australia, Intl.

2025-26 Stats (2025–26 NBL): 4.4 PPG, 2.3 RPG, 0.8 APG, 0.7 SPG in 14.5 MPG, 40.7 FG%, 36.0 3P%, 50.0 FT%

Daniels is a fluid two-way guard whose defensive competitiveness, length, and intensity give him a strong foundation as a perimeter stopper. Earning rotation minutes as an 18-year-old in the NBL has presented a steep developmental curve, but he has handled the physicality and pace of the professional level well while showing encouraging flashes. He moves naturally on the perimeter, slides well in space, and uses his length and anticipation to pressure ball handlers, disrupt passing lanes, and guard multiple positions. His physicality and poise against high-level competition were evident in a 2025 preseason exhibition against the New Orleans Pelicans, where he recorded 11 points and 6 rebounds and drew positive reviews from scouts.

Offensively, Daniels shows slashing ability and secondary playmaking instincts, attacking closeouts with long strides and operating comfortably in the midrange. His 36 percent three-point shooting is a promising sign, though the overall efficiency and 50 percent free throw mark point to the need for continued shooting development and mechanical consistency. The limited statistical production reflects both his age and role rather than a lack of tools, and the experience of playing against grown professionals should accelerate his growth curve. He also benefits from the developmental blueprint of older brother Dyson Daniels, whose NBA success has reinforced confidence in his long-term trajectory. With his defensive tools, motor, and positional versatility, Daniels carries a high floor as a two-way connector, with upside to become a valuable perimeter defender if his offensive game continues to progress.

Why the Cavaliers select Dash Daniels: Cleveland takes a swing on a defensive-minded guard with long-term upside. Daniels brings a strong commitment to the defensive end, using his length, mobility, and toughness to guard multiple positions and disrupt opposing backcourts. He gives the Cavaliers a potential perimeter stopper who can come in and spell James Harden when the team needs to throw a hard-nosed defender at an opposing team’s top scorer. While his offensive game remains a work in progress and his season was somewhat uneven, the flashes, combined with his experience in the NBL, suggest room for growth. There is still some uncertainty about whether he ultimately stays in the draft, but the success of his older brother Dyson Daniels helps reinforce confidence in his development path

NBA Comparison: Thabo Sefolosha

30. Dallas Mavericks (via OKC Thunder) – Milan Momcilovic

Momcilovic put together a strong junior season, establishing himself as one of the premier shooters in college basketball and arguably the top three-point marksman in the country. He combined elite efficiency with outstanding volume, consistently stretching defenses with deep range, quick release, and excellent shot preparation. At 6’8”, 225 pounds, he offers good positional size and strength, allowing him to hold his own physically while operating primarily as a perimeter weapon. He thrives in structured offensive systems, showing a strong understanding of spacing, timing, and shot selection, rarely forcing looks and capitalizing on opportunities both spotting up and relocating off the ball. His 48.7 percent from three and 87.8 percent from the free throw line reinforce his legitimacy as an elite-level shooter with clear NBA translation, capable of swinging momentum quickly when he finds rhythm.

However, his overall profile remains heavily dependent on his shooting. He is not an elite athlete and lacks burst, lateral quickness, and vertical explosiveness, which impacts both his defensive versatility and ability to create offense. His limitations were evident at times against top competition, where he struggled to generate scoring outside of catch-and-shoot situations or against tighter, more physical defenders. He offers minimal shot creation and playmaking (1.0 apg), and his defensive limitations, particularly guarding in space, remain a concern. While his elite shooting gives him a clear NBA pathway, his role will likely be specialized, making fit and development critical. In the late first to early second round range, his shooting alone makes him an attractive option, but improving defensive consistency and adding even modest off-the-dribble scoring would significantly raise his ceiling.

Why the Mavericks select Milan Momcilovic: Dallas can look to add an elite shooting specialist, and Momcilovic fits that mold as arguably the top pure three-point shooter in the class. His ability to stretch the floor with deep range, quick release, and high-level efficiency makes him an ideal complementary piece alongside star creators like Cooper Flagg, providing valuable spacing and offensive balance. While his overall game is more limited, his shooting alone gives him a clear NBA role. There is some uncertainty around his draft status, as significant NIL opportunities could entice him to return to school, meaning a team may need to offer a promise to secure his commitment this late in the first round. For Dallas, taking that swing on an elite floor spacer at the end of the first round could prove worthwhile.

NBA Comparison: Nikola Mirotic / Davis Bertans