2026 NBA Extended Mock Draft: 9.0By: Aran_Smith

1. Washington Wizards – AJ Dybantsa

6’9”, 215, SF/PF, BYU, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 35 GP, 25.5 PPG, 51.0 FG%, 33.1 3P%, 77.4 FT%, 6.8 RPG, 3.7 APG, 1.1 SPG, 0.3 BPG, 3.1 TO

Dybantsa was one of the most consistent and dominant players in college basketball this season, combining elite physical tools with a steadily expanding offensive skill set. A fluid, explosive athlete, he led the nation in scoring while carrying a primary offensive role with strong efficiency. His length, anticipation, and motor translated defensively, where he rotated with purpose, disrupted passing lanes, and effectively guarded multiple positions. Offensively, he functioned as a true point forward, handling comfortably, initiating offense, and creating opportunities for teammates with improving vision and composure.

He reclaimed the top spot on the board following a dominant finish to the season, highlighted by a 35-point performance in the opening round of the NCAA Tournament, even in defeat. The outing reflected the growth he showed throughout the year, particularly as a shot creator and overall offensive weapon. While his perimeter shooting was inconsistent early, his efficiency improved, and he developed a highly reliable mid-range package featuring turnaround jumpers, pull-ups, and counters off the dribble to generate separation. He shot 1.4–4.2 from three (33.1%), and while the percentage and volume still leave room for growth, the trajectory remains encouraging. Dybantsa attacked downhill with power and balance, finished above the rim, rebounded effectively, and comfortably shifted between scoring and facilitating responsibilities. While Darryn Peterson may possess slightly greater long-term upside, Dybantsa was the more productive and dependable player throughout the season, making him the current favorite to be selected first overall.

Why the Wizards select AJ Dybantsa: All signs continue to point toward Dybantsa as the centerpiece of the franchise moving forward. While Peterson could receive legitimate consideration, Dybantsa offers the safer overall profile thanks to his combination of elite physical tools, production, versatility, and no significant durability concerns. At the top of the draft, teams prioritize franchise-changing talent, and Dybantsa checks every box. His ability to impact the game as a scorer, playmaker, defender, and transition weapon gives Washington a foundational piece capable of anchoring every aspect of the rebuild.

NBA Comparison: Tracy McGrady

2. Utah Jazz – Darryn Peterson

6’5”, 200, PG/SG, Kansas, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 24 GP, 20.2 PPG, 43.8 FG%, 38.2 3P%, 82.6 FT%, 4.2 RPG, 1.6 APG, 1.4 SPG, 0.6 BPG, 1.6 TO

Peterson is a supremely talented scoring guard whose blend of burst, strength, and shot-making gives him arguably the highest offensive ceiling in the class. He features a quick first step, deep pull-up range, and the ability to score at all three levels, consistently putting pressure on defenses both on and off the ball. His positional size and power are further enhanced by an extraordinary 8’7” standing reach, giving him rare physical advantages for a combo guard and legitimate two-way versatility. His perimeter shooting stood out as a major strength, knocking down 2.6-of-6.9 threes per game (38.2%), showcasing advanced shot-making ability and range.

His season, however, was not without questions. Kansas failed to make a deep tournament run, and Peterson finished the year somewhat quietly compared to the lofty expectations that followed him from high school. A mysterious cramping issue impacted portions of his season, affecting both availability and rhythm. While he flashed brilliance throughout the year, the sustained dominance that defined his prep career appeared only in stretches. Even so, his talent level remains undeniable, and few prospects possess his combination of scoring instincts, athletic tools, and upside.

Why the Jazz select Darryn Peterson: Recent reports have linked Utah to Cameron Boozer at No. 2, making this one of the more fascinating situations near the top of the draft. ESPN’s Tim MacMahon reported Wednesday that the Jazz are “strongly considering” Boozer at No. 2, and there are legitimate reasons to believe that could happen. On paper, Utah’s recent roster moves would seem to make Peterson the cleaner fit, as the Jazz still lack a true franchise perimeter creator. However, Peterson’s handling of his cramping issue throughout the season, including an explanation that failed to satisfy some evaluators, along with his reported unwillingness to work out for Utah, could be enough for the Jazz to go in a different direction. The Jazz could envision a jumbo lineup featuring Ace Bailey at shooting guard, Lauri Markkanen at small forward, Cameron Boozer at power forward, and Jaren Jackson Jr. at center, creating one of the biggest and most versatile lineups in the league. That said, Peterson remains the most logical projection. He offers the type of offensive centerpiece every rebuilding organization covets and possesses arguably the highest scoring upside in the class. A trade-down scenario targeting Keaton Wagler or Mikel Brown while adding additional assets could ultimately make more sense than selecting Boozer outright, particularly after acquiring Jackson. But if Utah elects to prioritize star perimeter creation over size and frontcourt versatility, Peterson remains a strong candidate and gives the franchise a potential face of the future.

NBA Comparison: Devin Booker

3. Memphis Grizzlies – Cameron Boozer

6’9”, 255, PF, Duke, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 38 GP, 22.5 PPG, 55.6 FG%, 39.1 3P%, 78.9 FT%, 10.2 RPG, 4.1 APG, 1.4 SPG, 0.6 BPG, 2.5 TO

Boozer was one of the steadiest and most dominant players in college basketball this season, combining strength, touch, motor, and elite fundamentals in a way that consistently translated to winning. A physically ready freshman, he averaged 22.5 points and 10.2 rebounds per game while operating as a face-up scorer, interior finisher, and offensive hub. He led Duke on a deep tournament run, earning National Player of the Year honors while showcasing a mature and polished all-around game.

Though not an explosive athlete, Boozer’s skill level consistently separated him from his peers. He knocked down 39.1% of his three-point attempts while averaging over four assists per game, highlighting his versatility and offensive IQ. His rebounding, toughness, and ability to impact games without relying on elite athleticism give him one of the highest floors in the class. While some scouts question how his physical style will translate against NBA athletes over an 82-game season, his production, feel, and consistency make him one of the safest prospects available.

Why the Grizzlies select Cameron Boozer: Following the trade that sent Jaren Jackson Jr. to Utah, Boozer becomes an especially clean fit for Memphis. One of the league’s more analytically driven organizations, the Grizzlies are likely to value his efficiency, passing, rebounding, and overall feel for the game. Boozer’s ability to contribute immediately while still offering long-term upside makes him a strong fit alongside Ja Morant and gives Memphis another foundational building block moving forward.

NBA Comparison: Al Horford

4. Chicago Bulls – Caleb Wilson

6’10”, 215, PF, North Carolina, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 24 GP, 19.8 PPG, 57.8 FG%, 25.9 3P%, 71.3 FT%, 9.4 RPG, 2.7 APG, 1.5 SPG, 1.4 BPG, 2.0 TO

Wilson was one of the most productive and impactful freshmen in the country, combining athleticism, efficiency, and defensive versatility to influence games on both ends. A fluid, explosive forward with excellent mobility, he thrived as a transition weapon, rim runner, and face-up scorer. He consistently finished above the rim, attacked closeouts effectively, and created mismatches through speed and activity.

His season was cut short after suffering two broken thumbs, but his body of work firmly established him as one of the premier talents in the class. While his outside shooting remains a work in progress, the touch and mechanics suggest room for growth. Compared to Cameron Boozer, Wilson offers superior athleticism and defensive upside, though Boozer’s polish gives him a slight edge in overall reliability.

Why the Bulls select Caleb Wilson: Chicago continues searching for franchise-level talent and lands one of the highest-upside players in the draft. Wilson’s blend of size, athleticism, defensive versatility, and long-term potential gives the Bulls a potential cornerstone to pair with Matas Buzelis moving forward. While refinement is still needed, the talent level is difficult to overlook.

NBA Comparison: Jermaine O’Neal / Chris Bosh

5. Los Angeles Clippers – Keaton Wagler

6’6”, 185, PG/SG, Illinois, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 37 GP, 17.9 PPG, 44.5 FG%, 39.7 3P%, 79.6 FT%, 5.1 RPG, 4.2 APG, 0.9 SPG, 0.4 BPG, 1.8 TO

6. Brooklyn Nets – Mikel Brown

6’4”, 190, PG, Louisville, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 21 GP, 18.2 PPG, 41.0 FG%, 34.4 3P%, 84.4 FT%, 3.3 RPG, 4.7 APG, 1.2 SPG, 0.1 BPG, 3.1 TO

Brown remained one of the most skilled and intriguing lead guards in the 2026 class, controlling tempo with poise and playing with a quiet confidence that consistently showed up in his decision-making. More quick and shifty than outright fast, he excelled at creating separation through change of pace, hesitation moves, and advanced ball handling. He generated offense efficiently out of ball screens, where his pull-up shooting and shot creation stood out, highlighted by a 45-point performance against NC State in which he knocked down 10-of-16 from three. Despite shooting 34.4% from deep, the raw percentage undersells his actual shooting ability, as many evaluators still view him as one of the most gifted perimeter shooters in the class based on shot difficulty, mechanics, and touch.

Durability remains part of the evaluation after back issues impacted portions of his high school and college career, though recent feedback throughout the pre-draft process has generally been encouraging. On our board, Brown ranks significantly higher than where he is projected here and grades out as one of the premier talents in the entire class. His combination of shot creation, perimeter shooting, pace, feel for the game, and offensive creativity is exceptionally advanced for a player his age. If the durability concerns ultimately prove minor, Brown has the type of talent that could make this draft position look far too low in hindsight. Among players projected outside the top five, few possess a stronger case to eventually emerge as one of the elite players from the 2026 NBA Draft.

Why the Nets select Mikel Brown: Brooklyn enters the draft searching for a potential franchise cornerstone, and Brown offers arguably the highest offensive upside of any player available in this range. Nate Ament is certainly a possibility here, particularly given his size and long-term upside, while Darius Acuff’s production and shooting make him another strong candidate. Ultimately, Brown gets the nod because of his rare shot creation ability, advanced handle, perimeter shooting potential, and overall offensive creativity. Despite an injury-shortened season, many evaluators still view him as one of the most naturally gifted guards in the entire class. His ability to create separation, score at all three levels, and control the pace of a game gives him legitimate star potential if he can stay healthy. For a rebuilding Nets team in need of a future offensive centerpiece, Brown represents the type of high-upside swing worth taking.

NBA Comparison: CJ McCollum 

7. Sacramento Kings – Darius Acuff

6’3”, 190, PG, Arkansas, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 36 GP, 23.5 PPG, 48.4 FG%, 44.0 3P%, 80.9 FT%, 3.1 RPG, 6.4 APG, 0.8 SPG, 0.3 BPG, 2.2 TO

Acuff emerged as one of the most productive and dynamic lead guards in college basketball, taking a major leap and establishing himself as a true offensive engine. He averaged 23.5 points and 6.4 assists while shooting an elite 44.0% from three on high volume (2.5-of-5.8), showcasing both efficiency and shot-making versatility. A strong, physical guard with excellent pace control, he consistently got downhill, used his tight handle to create separation, and played with the confidence of a true floor general. His ability to generate offense at all three levels, combined with his command and late-game shot creation, made him one of the most dangerous guards in the country. He also emerged as one of the major winners of the pre-draft measurement process, checking in at 6’2” barefoot with a strong 6’7” wingspan and an 8’2.5” standing reach.

He really came into his own as a dominant college player, often looking stronger and more impactful than higher-ranked guards despite giving up size. While undersized by NBA standards and likely to lean offense-first, his upside as a playmaker and shot creator is highly intriguing. Guards his size must be special to overcome physical limitations in today’s game, and Acuff fits that mold, blending elite shooting with creative ball handling, including flashes of the classic Tim Hardaway “UTEP two-step” ability to shake defenders and get into the paint. His combination of production, efficiency, improved measurements, and offensive creativity makes him one of the safest guard bets in the class.

Why the Kings select Darius Acuff: Sacramento appears to be laser focused on Acuff entering draft night, and it’s easy to understand why. Despite being projected here at No. 7, many evaluators view him as a top-five talent in the class based strictly on ability. Acuff was one of the most productive guards in college basketball, averaging 23.5 points and 6.4 assists while shooting 44 percent from three. His combination of shot creation, playmaking, toughness, and perimeter shooting gives him the tools to become a high-level NBA lead guard. Mikel Brown of Louisville is another player believed to be under serious consideration and offers tremendous upside in his own right, but Acuff’s production, efficiency, and overall offensive polish make him an extremely attractive option. For a Kings franchise searching for a long-term answer in the backcourt, Acuff represents a rare opportunity to land a player many believe should already be off the board.

NBA Comparison: Tim Hardaway

8. Atlanta Hawks (from New Orleans) – Kingston Flemings

6’4”, 185, PG, Houston, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 37 GP, 16.1 PPG, 47.6 FG%, 38.7 3P%, 84.5 FT%, 4.1 RPG, 5.2 APG, 1.5 SPG, 0.3 BPG, 1.8 TO

Flemings emerged as one of the most impactful freshman lead guards in the country, pairing elite athleticism with improving efficiency and growing command of Houston’s offense. An explosive downhill creator with a tight handle and excellent burst, he consistently generated penetration and finished above the rim with strength and creativity. He showed real progress as a perimeter shooter, converting 38.7% from three while maintaining strong efficiency from the free throw line. He played with confidence and edge as Houston’s primary initiator, showing comfort pulling up, collapsing defenses, and making timely reads out of ball screens while posting an impressive assist-to-turnover ratio.

Flemings arguably possesses the highest athletic ceiling among the point guards in this class. His explosiveness, first step, and ability to pressure defenses create tremendous upside, though he remains somewhat less polished than the guards selected ahead of him. His jumper has improved significantly, but continuing to develop as a consistent perimeter threat will be critical. Even so, his competitiveness, toughness, and overall talent make him one of the more intriguing long-term bets in the lottery.

Why the Hawks select Kingston Flemings: Atlanta begins the post-Trae Young era by selecting one of the most explosive lead guards in the draft. Flemings possesses elite athleticism, excellent open-floor speed, and the ability to consistently pressure defenses off the dribble. While Brayden Burries is another player believed to be under strong consideration in this range, Flemings offers greater upside as a primary ball handler and offensive creator. His combination of playmaking, downhill scoring ability, improving perimeter shooting, and defensive competitiveness gives him the tools to eventually develop into the face of Atlanta’s rebuild. With Young no longer in the picture, the Hawks need a long-term answer at point guard, and Flemings has as much upside as any lead guard remaining on the board. His athletic gifts, competitiveness, and steady improvement throughout his freshman season make him a logical building block for a franchise entering a new chapter.

NBA Comparison: De’Aaron Fox

9. Dallas Mavericks – Brayden Burries

6’4”, 185, PG/SG, Arizona, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 39 GP, 16.1 PPG, 49.1 FG%, 39.1 3P%, 80.5 FT%, 4.9 RPG, 2.4 APG, 1.5 SPG, 0.2 BPG, 1.5 TO

Burries established himself as one of the most productive and efficient freshman guards in the country, leading a No. 1 seed Arizona team in scoring while playing a key role in a dominant season. A strong, controlled combo guard, he played with excellent pace and balance, scoring efficiently at all three levels while making smart decisions within the flow of the offense. He proved comfortable both on and off the ball, consistently showing maturity in his shot selection and overall approach. His consistency throughout the year helped Arizona remain among the nation’s elite teams and highlighted a level of polish uncommon for a freshman.

He did struggle on the biggest stage in the Final Four against Michigan, where foul trouble and an inefficient performance limited his impact. Scouts, however, are unlikely to overreact given his body of work. Burries competes defensively, rebounds well for his position, and plays with toughness and feel. While continuing to improve his ability to create separation against elite athletes will be important, he projects as one of the safer guards in the class with the versatility to fit into almost any system.

Why the Mavericks select Brayden Burries: Dallas lands one of the safest and most complete guards in the draft at No. 9. Burries was the leading scorer on a No. 1 seeded Arizona team and consistently impacted winning with his combination of scoring efficiency, toughness, decision-making, and two-way play. New Mavericks head coach Dusty May also has extensive familiarity with several of the frontcourt prospects still on the board, having coached Aday Mara, Morez Johnson, and Yaxel Lendeborg at Michigan. Any of those players could receive strong consideration given Dallas’ need for additional frontcourt depth. Ultimately, however, the Mavericks are believed to be focused on selecting the best player available rather than drafting strictly for positional need. Burries fits that approach. His versatility allows him to play both on and off the ball, and his combination of production, efficiency, competitiveness, and winning pedigree makes him one of the safer bets in the lottery. Dallas views the value as simply too good to pass up at this stage of the draft.

NBA Comparison: Jrue Holiday

10. Milwaukee Bucks – Nate Ament

6’11”, 205, SF/PF, Tennessee, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 35 GP, 16.7 PPG, 39.9 FG%, 33.3 3P%, 79.0 FT%, 6.3 RPG, 2.3 APG, 1.0 SPG, 0.6 BPG, 2.3 TO

Ament has cemented himself as one of the more intriguing long-term prospects in the freshman class, combining size, mobility, and perimeter skill at nearly 6’11”. A smooth, fluid forward, he fits the modern NBA mold as a big wing capable of spacing the floor, attacking closeouts, and contributing across multiple areas. His production grew as his role expanded, and he showed the ability to score at multiple levels while contributing on the glass and flashing connective passing ability. He also displayed surprising toughness throughout the season, getting to the free throw line at a high rate and helping alleviate some of the early concerns surrounding his physicality.

The next step in his development is adding strength, consistency, and greater offensive assertiveness. His three-point shooting was somewhat underwhelming relative to expectations, but the mechanics and touch suggest it can become a real strength over time. He can still be knocked off spots by stronger defenders and will need to continue improving his ability to create separation in the half court. Defensively, he showed encouraging versatility with his length and mobility, even as his technique continues to develop. With added strength and continued growth, Ament projects as one of the higher-upside forwards in the class.

Why the Bucks select Nate Ament: Milwaukee swings on upside and long-term value by selecting one of the most physically gifted forwards in the draft. Ament’s combination of size, mobility, defensive versatility, and offensive potential gives him a ceiling few players outside the top five can match. With the franchise widely expected to navigate an inevitable Giannis Antetokounmpo trade at some point this offseason, the Bucks must begin prioritizing long-term building blocks alongside any assets acquired in a potential deal. Ament offers exactly the type of high-ceiling talent worth betting on during a transitional period. His physical tools and developmental upside give Milwaukee a chance to add a future cornerstone while maintaining flexibility as the organization reshapes its roster and charts its next era.

NBA Comparison: Lamar Odom / Jonathan Isaac

11. Golden State Warriors – Morez Johnson

6’9”, 235, PF/C, Michigan, So.
2025–26 Stats: 40 GP, 13.1 PPG, 62.3 FG%, 34.3 3P%, 78.2 FT%, 7.3 RPG, 1.2 APG, 0.7 SPG, 1.1 BPG, 1.3 TO

12. Oklahoma City Thunder (from LA Clippers) – Hannes Steinbach

6’10”, 240, PF, Washington  Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 30 GP, 18.5 PPG, 57.7 FG%, 34.0 3P%, 75.9 FT%, 11.8 RPG, 1.6 APG, 1.1 SPG, 1.2 BPG, 2.0 TO

Steinbach established himself as one of the most productive and physically imposing freshman big men in the country, combining strength, skill, and feel in a package that consistently translated to winning basketball. At 6’11” and 250 pounds, he already possesses an NBA-ready frame and routinely overwhelmed opponents with his combination of size, toughness, and interior scoring ability. He carved out deep position, finished through contact, and consistently generated high-efficiency offense around the basket. Despite his youth, he played with a maturity and composure uncommon for a freshman big, showing patience as a scorer and a willingness to make the extra pass when defenses collapsed.

While much of his production came around the rim, Steinbach also flashed intriguing perimeter skill and offensive versatility. He demonstrated solid passing instincts, averaging 2.8 assists per game, and showed comfort facilitating from the elbows and high post. His outside shot remains a work in progress after converting 29.4% from three, but the mechanics and touch suggest room for future growth. Defensively, he relied more on positioning, anticipation, and strength than elite athleticism, but still managed to impact games as a rebounder and rim protector. His combination of size, feel, skill, and production gives him one of the higher floors among frontcourt prospects in the class while still leaving room for considerable upside.

Why the Thunder select Hannes Steinbach: Oklahoma City continues to prioritize size, skill, versatility, and basketball IQ throughout the roster. Steinbach checks each of those boxes. His combination of strength, passing ability, rebounding, and long-term offensive upside makes him an ideal developmental fit within the Thunder organization. He also provides a potential succession plan in the frontcourt, as Isaiah Hartenstein is widely expected to decline his player option and enter free agency following next season. Steinbach’s size, physicality, feel for the game, and interior presence give Oklahoma City a young big man who could eventually help fill that role while developing within one of the league’s strongest player development systems

NBA Comparison: Alperin Sengun / Domantas Sabonis

13. Milwaukee Bucks (via Miami) – Cameron Carr

6’5”, 190, SG/SF, Tennessee, Jr.
2025–26 Stats: 34 GP, 18.9 PPG, 49.4 FG%, 37.4 3P%, 80.1 FT%, 5.8 RPG, 2.6 APG, 0.9 SPG, 1.3 BPG, 2.4 TO

Carr put together one of the more impressive breakout seasons among returning wings, emerging as a primary option after two quiet years at Tennessee where he struggled to find consistent opportunity. He made a major leap, showcasing his athleticism and skill set while averaging nearly 19 points per game with strong efficiency. A long, explosive athlete, he consistently attacked the rim and delivered highlight finishes, while also rediscovering the shooting ability that made him a highly regarded prospect out of high school. He converted 2.3-of-6.1 threes per game (37.4%), showing both volume and confidence as a perimeter scorer.

There are still areas for growth, particularly adding strength and toughness to better handle physical play, and his 2.4 turnovers per game stand out as an area that needs improvement as he continues to refine his decision-making. That said, the upside is significant. Carr flashes high-level three-and-D potential, with strong catch-and-shoot ability and the length and athleticism to disrupt passing lanes and guard multiple positions. While his development path took time, his breakout season reinforced his long-term upside as a two-way wing, and he has emerged as one of the biggest risers of the pre-draft process.

Why the Bucks select Cameron Carr: Milwaukee acquired this selection from Miami as part of the blockbuster Giannis Antetokounmpo trade and enters the draft focused on accumulating young talent with upside. Carr fits that objective perfectly. One of the biggest risers of the pre-draft process, he offers the athleticism, shooting ability, and two-way potential that rebuilding teams covet. With the Bucks beginning a new era, Carr gives the organization a high-upside wing to develop alongside Nate Ament and any additional assets acquired in the Antetokounmpo deal.

NBA Comparison: Zach LaVine

14. Charlotte Hornets – Aday Mara

7’4”, 255, C, Michigan, Jr.
2025–26 Stats: 40 GP, 23.4 MIN, 66.8 FG%, 30.0 3P%, 56.4 FT%, 6.8 RPG, 2.4 APG, 2.6 BPG, 0.4 SPG, 2.2 PF, 2.0 TO, 12.1 PPG

Mara played a major role in Michigan’s National Championship run, delivering some of his best basketball during the NCAA Tournament and emerging as one of the more intriguing long-term big men in the class. A former elite European prospect from Spain who initially struggled to fully adjust during his first two seasons at UCLA, Mara finally began putting everything together in a larger role at Michigan. Coming from a family of athletes, he possesses impressive coordination and feel for a player with his massive frame, showing advanced touch, passing instincts, and offensive IQ uncommon for a player his size. He further impressed evaluators during the pre-draft process by measuring a massive 7’3” barefoot with an enormous 9’9” standing reach.

Offensively, Mara thrives as a rim runner, interior finisher, and connective passer, shooting an outstanding 66.8% from the field while also flashing occasional perimeter touch. His 2.4 assists per game highlight his vision and ability to facilitate offense from the high post or short roll. Defensively, Mara’s length and timing make him a major rim protection presence, averaging 2.6 blocks per game while altering countless additional shots around the basket. There are still concerns regarding mobility, perimeter defense, and overall athleticism in space, but few prospects in the class can match his combination of size, feel, and production. Green room buzz has continued to build in recent weeks, and there is growing belief that Mara could ultimately hear his name called even earlier than this.

Why the Hornets select Aday Mara: Charlotte continues building around LaMelo Ball and Brandon Miller, and Mara gives the organization a potential long-term answer in the middle. His size, passing ability, and rim protection provide a skill set that is difficult to find, while his continued development at Michigan showed meaningful progress. The Hornets can afford patience with his development, allowing him to grow into a larger role over time. If everything comes together, Mara possesses one of the highest ceilings among the big men in this class.

NBA Comparison: Luke Kornet / Khaman Maluach

15. Chicago Bulls (via Trailblazers) – Labaron Philon

6’4”, 185, PG, Alabama, So.
2025–26 Stats: 33 GP, 22.0 PPG, 50.1 FG%, 39.9 3P%, 79.8 FT%, 3.5 RPG, 5.0 APG, 1.2 SPG, 0.2 BPG, 2.5 TO

Philon built on an impressive freshman campaign to become one of the most productive and dynamic guards in college basketball, making a major leap in both volume and efficiency. He averaged 22.0 points and 5.0 assists while dramatically improving as a three-point shooter, converting 39.9% from deep after hitting just 31.5% as a freshman. His development as a pick-and-roll operator stood out, showing improved pace, control, and the ability to manipulate defenders while consistently creating scoring opportunities for himself and others. With good positional size, elite end-to-end speed, and a strong first step, he applied constant pressure on defenses and emerged as a true offensive engine.

Philon plays with a brash, competitive edge, embracing physicality and never shying away from challenges. His confidence and toughness are major strengths, though his aggressive style can occasionally lead to turnovers and overextension as a decision-maker. Even so, his combination of scoring punch, improved shooting, and playmaking growth makes him one of the more intriguing backcourt prospects in the class. If he continues refining his decision-making, he projects as a high-level offensive guard capable of thriving in a modern NBA system.

Why the Bulls select Labaron Philon: After selecting Caleb Wilson at No. 4, Chicago turns its attention to the backcourt and lands one of the most productive guards in the class. Philon gives the Bulls a potential long-term lead guard capable of creating offense, pressuring defenses, and growing alongside Wilson and Matas Buzelis. His confidence, scoring ability, and playmaking upside provide Chicago with another foundational piece as the organization continues building toward a new era.

NBA Comparison: Dejounte Murray

16. Memphis Grizzlies (via Magic) – Christian Anderson 

6’2”, 180, PG, Texas Tech, So.
2025–26 Stats: 33 GP, 18.5 PPG, 47.2 FG%, 41.5 3P%, 80.5 FT%, 3.6 RPG, 7.4 APG, 1.5 SPG, 0.2 BPG, 3.3 TO

Anderson put together a major sophomore season, emerging as one of the most productive and efficient lead guards in college basketball. Despite standing just 6’2”, he consistently controlled games with pace, feel, and advanced pick-and-roll play. He excelled at creating opportunities for both himself and teammates, averaging 7.4 assists per game while maintaining excellent shooting efficiency. His 41.5% three-point shooting gives him legitimate floor-spacing value, and his ability to organize an offense consistently stood out throughout the season.

His size will naturally remain one of the primary questions evaluators focus on, as smaller guards must prove they can survive defensively at the NBA level. However, Anderson compensates with skill, toughness, decision-making, and basketball IQ. Born April 2, 2006, and holding dual citizenship in the United States and Germany, he remains relatively young for a sophomore and offers more upside than many realize. His combination of production, efficiency, and feel makes him one of the more analytically appealing guards in the class.

Why the Grizzlies select Christian Anderson: With Ja Morant expected to be traded as part of Memphis’ ongoing roster reset, point guard becomes one of the organization’s biggest long-term priorities. Anderson gives the Grizzlies a polished floor general capable of helping fill that void. He was one of the nation’s most productive lead guards this season, averaging 18.5 points and 7.4 assists while shooting 41.5 percent from three. His ability to run an offense, create for teammates, and stretch the floor makes him a strong fit alongside Cameron Boozer, whom Memphis selected earlier in the lottery. While Anderson lacks ideal size, he compensates with skill, toughness, and a high level of basketball IQ. Following the departures of both Jaren Jackson Jr. and Morant, the Grizzlies are focused on building a new foundation, and Anderson gives them a potential long-term answer at the most important position on the floor.

NBA Comparison: Mike Conley

17. Oklahoma City Thunder (via Philadelphia) – Karim Lopez

6’8”, 205, SF, Mexico, Intl. (New Zealand Breakers – NBL)
2025–26 Stats: 31 GP, 11.9 PPG, 50.2 FG%, 32.6 3P%, 71.7 FT%, 6.1 RPG, 2.0 APG, 1.2 SPG, 1.0 BPG, 3.0 TO

Lopez emerged as one of the more intriguing international wing prospects, offering a rare combination of size, fluid shooting mechanics, and all-around production while competing in Australia’s NBL. At 6’8”, he has an ideal frame for a modern wing, and his smooth perimeter stroke and confidence suggest more upside as a shooter than his 32.6% three-point percentage would indicate. There are flashes of a Klay Thompson-type profile in his size and pure shooting ability, though he is not yet close to that level of consistency. He contributed across the board with rebounding, defensive activity, and efficient finishing, showing a well-rounded foundation against professional competition.

The evaluation still hinges on consistency, toughness, and overall impact. His performance at events such as Adidas Eurocamp was uneven, and there are stretches where he can fade into the background. While his tools and shooting upside are clearly appealing, teams will want to see a more consistent motor and physical edge. Even so, Lopez remains one of the more intriguing international upside swings outside the lottery and possesses a skill set that fits the modern NBA extremely well.

Why the Thunder select Karim Lopez: Oklahoma City remains one of the most active teams to watch entering draft night, with league sources expecting the Thunder to explore both trade-up and trade-down scenarios. Given their roster depth and limited available roster spots, there is a legitimate chance this pick is moved before the selection is made. However, if Oklahoma City keeps the pick, Lopez would represent strong value at No. 17. He could come off the board five to six spots earlier, and his combination of size, shooting potential, versatility, and long-term upside fits the profile of player the Thunder have consistently targeted. Still just 19 years old and already battle-tested against professional competition in the NBL, Lopez offers significant developmental upside. With one of the league’s strongest player development programs already in place, Oklahoma City would be an ideal landing spot for a talented young wing whose best basketball may still be ahead of him.

NBA Comparison: Zaccharie Risacher

18. Charlotte Hornets (via Magic, Suns) – Yaxel Lendeborg

6’10”, 240, PF/C, Michigan, Sr.
2025–26 Stats: 40 GP, 15.1 PPG, 51.5 FG%, 37.2 3P%, 82.4 FT%, 6.8 RPG, 3.2 APG, 1.1 SPG, 1.2 BPG, 1.1 TO

Lendeborg remained one of the more unique and versatile senior prospects in the class, offering an uncommon blend of size, passing, and overall feel. In his first season at Michigan, he played a key role in helping guide the Wolverines to a National Championship, elevating his draft stock into the lottery conversation at various points during the season. While his scoring production dipped compared to his UAB days, his all-around impact and connective skill set stood out. He operated comfortably from the elbows and short roll, facilitating offense and keeping the ball moving while also developing into a legitimate floor-spacing threat. His improved perimeter shooting was one of the biggest developments in his game, converting 37.2% from three on solid volume.

There are still some mixed elements in his evaluation. His free throw rate was somewhat underwhelming relative to his physical tools, and teams will want to see more consistent offensive assertiveness and defensive reliability against NBA-level athletes. At 24 years old, his age naturally limits some of the long-term upside associated with younger prospects. However, his maturity, versatility, winning impact, and ability to contribute in a variety of ways make him one of the safer players in the class. His slide is much more about age than talent.

Why the Hornets select Yaxel Lendeborg: Charlotte continues adding versatile, high-feel players around LaMelo Ball and Brandon Miller, and Lendeborg fits that vision exceptionally well. One of the most productive and well-rounded players in college basketball, he helped lead Michigan to a National Championship while showcasing an uncommon blend of rebounding, passing, defensive versatility, and improving perimeter shooting. At 6-foot-10, he can impact the game in a variety of ways without requiring plays to be run for him, making him an easy fit alongside established offensive creators. While his age limits some of the long-term upside compared to younger prospects, the Hornets are getting one of the more proven and NBA-ready players in the class. His maturity, winning background, and ability to contribute on both ends of the floor could allow him to help Charlotte much sooner than many of the younger prospects still available at this stage of the draft.

NBA Comparison: OG Anunoby 

19. Toronto Raptors – Bennett Stirtz

6’4”, 185, PG, Iowa, Sr.
2025–26 Stats: 37 GP, 19.8 PPG, 47.7 FG%, 35.8 3P%, 84.8 FT%, 2.6 RPG, 4.4 APG, 1.4 SPG, 0.2 BPG, 1.8 TO

Stirtz proved his production translated seamlessly to the Big Ten, leading Iowa on a deep tournament run with a scrappy roster while continuing to produce at a high level. He played with excellent pace and composure, consistently making quick reads and organizing the offense, with his passing and facilitation standing out as a major strength. He also showed solid three-point volume at 2.5–6.9 per game (35.8%), reinforcing his ability to space the floor and keep defenses honest. His ability to overachieve against more athletic competition underscored his feel, competitiveness, and leadership, as he controlled games without forcing action and consistently elevated teammates.

There are still questions about how his game translates physically at the NBA level, particularly in terms of size, speed, and athleticism, but his intangibles and steady improvement are difficult to ignore. After progressing from the Division II level to Drake and then Iowa, he continued to get better each step of the way. His shooting, decision-making, and toughness give him a strong foundation as a rotation guard, and while his upside may be limited compared to younger prospects, his competitiveness, determination, and feel for the game should allow him to carve out a role.

Why the Raptors select Bennett Stirtz: Toronto continues to emphasize basketball IQ, competitiveness, and skill as it builds around Scottie Barnes and Brandon Ingram. Stirtz may not possess the elite athleticism of some prospects still on the board, but few players in this range can match his production, feel for the game, and ability to consistently make winning plays. He proved this season that his success translated to the Big Ten level, leading Iowa on a deep NCAA Tournament run while operating as one of the nation’s most efficient offensive engines. His passing, decision-making, shooting touch, and toughness give him a strong chance to outperform his draft position. With questions still remaining about the Raptors’ long-term point guard situation, Stirtz offers a mature, polished floor general capable of organizing an offense and contributing sooner rather than later. While some teams may prioritize upside, Toronto has often shown a willingness to bet on productive, high-character players with strong intangibles, making Stirtz a logical fit at No. 19.

NBA Comparison: Steve Blake

20. San Antonio (via Hawks) – Allen Graves

6’9”, 225, SF/PF, Santa Clara, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 35 GP, 11.8 PPG, 51.2 FG%, 41.3 3P%, 75.0 FT%, 6.5 RPG, 1.8 APG, 1.9 SPG, 0.9 BPG, 0.7 TO

Graves has emerged as one of the more intriguing analytics standouts in the class, producing highly efficient and well-rounded numbers despite coming off the bench for Santa Clara. A former point guard, he brings advanced feel, ball handling, and passing instincts for his size, allowing him to function as a connective piece offensively rather than a primary scorer. His defensive activity stands out, averaging nearly two steals and close to a block per game, showcasing his anticipation, length, and versatility. He also knocked down 1.1–2.6 threes per game (41.3%), a strong volume considering his role, giving him legitimate floor-spacing value to pair with his all-around impact.

He had a brief NCAA Tournament moment, delivering a clutch performance before Santa Clara was knocked out on a buzzer beater by Kentucky, slightly overshadowing his impact. Physically, he still has room to develop and become more assertive offensively, but his combination of size, efficiency, defensive instincts, and versatility is highly appealing. With his age, dimensions, and unique background, Graves has significant upside remaining and projects as a high-level connector at the next level, with the potential to grow into a much bigger role over time.

Why the Spurs select Allen Graves: This feels like a very Spurs-type selection. Graves offers the basketball IQ, versatility, unselfishness, and feel that San Antonio has historically valued. His ability to defend multiple positions, move the ball, and contribute without requiring touches should fit naturally alongside Victor Wembanyama and the Spurs’ growing core. For a franchise that has consistently prioritized smart, winning players, Graves checks a lot of boxes.

NBA Comparison: Boris Diaw / Kyle Anderson

21. Detroit Pistons (via Timberwolves) – Meleek Thomas

6’5”, 185, PG/SG, Arkansas, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 37 GP, 15.6 PPG, 43.5 FG%, 41.6 3P%, 84.3 FT%, 3.8 RPG, 2.5 APG, 1.5 SPG, 0.2 BPG, 1.0 TO

Thomas established himself as a natural scorer with a unique, unorthodox herky-jerky style that made him difficult to contain. He played with excellent pace and craft, using hesitation moves, sudden bursts, and long strides to create separation. His perimeter shooting was a major strength, knocking down 2.2–5.3 threes per game (41.6%) while also converting over 84% from the line, reinforcing his high-level scoring profile. Physically, he made significant strides over the course of the season, adding strength and appearing more filled out, a testament to Arkansas’ strength and conditioning program, which helped him better absorb contact and finish plays.

While he projects more as a combo guard than a true lead, his scoring instincts and shot-making ability give him clear value. Defensively, he showed active hands and competitiveness, and his low turnover rate reflected solid decision-making for a freshman. There is still room to grow in terms of playmaking and overall consistency, but his offensive skill set, improved frame, and ability to generate efficient scoring make him a strong sleeper candidate in this range with the potential to outperform his draft position.

Why the Pistons select Meleek Thomas: Detroit continues to build around Cade Cunningham and adds one of the more naturally gifted scorers in the draft. Thomas brings shooting, shot creation, and offensive versatility to a roster that still needs additional perimeter firepower. His ability to play both on and off the ball makes him a strong fit alongside Cunningham, allowing him to provide scoring punch without needing to function as a full-time lead guard. While some may view this as a slight reach, Thomas is younger than many players projected in this range and possesses a skill set that remains highly coveted in today’s NBA. His combination of perimeter shooting, scoring instincts, improving physicality, and long-term upside gives Detroit another talented offensive piece to develop as it continues building toward sustained playoff contention.

NBA Comparison: Leandro Barbosa / Jordan Hawkins

22. Philadelphia 76ers (via Thunder, Rockets) – Chris Cenac

6’11”, 240, PF/C, Houston, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 37 GP, 9.5 PPG, 48.5 FG%, 33.3 3P%, 62.1 FT%, 7.9 RPG, 0.7 APG, 0.8 SPG, 0.5 BPG, 0.9 TO

Cenac remained one of the more intriguing long-term big men in the class, offering a rare blend of size, mobility, and emerging perimeter skill for a 6’11” frontcourt prospect. His role within Houston’s structured system kept his scoring numbers modest, but his impact showed up through energy plays, rebounding, and efficient finishing around the rim. He ran the floor extremely well, played above the rim as a vertical threat, and flashed the ability to step out and hit perimeter shots. While his three-point numbers did not jump off the page, the form and touch suggest real long-term shooting potential, reinforcing his appeal as a modern floor-spacing big.

The overall production was somewhat underwhelming, highlighting that he is more of an upside selection who may take time to develop. His low block numbers also stand out as a concern, pointing to an area where he can improve as a rim protector. His consistency and defensive presence are still evolving, and continued strength gains will be important for him to handle physical matchups and anchor the paint more effectively. Even so, the combination of size, athleticism, and skill is difficult to ignore. Cenac’s development curve may be longer than some peers, but his tools and flashes of shooting and mobility give him significant long-term potential.

Why the Sixers select Chris Cenac Philadelphia takes a long-term view and invests in one of the more gifted frontcourt prospects available. Cenac’s size, mobility, rim protection, and emerging offensive skill set give him substantial upside if developed properly. With the ability to learn behind veteran players and develop without immediate pressure, this could prove to be one of the better value selections in the latter half of the first round.

NBA Comparison: Kel’el Ware

23. Atlanta Hawks (via Cavaliers) – Dailyn Swain

6’7”, 220, SF, Texas, Jr.
2025–26 Stats: 36 GP, 17.3 PPG, 7.5 RPG, 3.6 APG, 54.2 FG%, 34.4 3P%, 81.5 FT%

Swain put together a strong junior season in his lone year at Texas, emerging as a key piece on a team that made a deep NCAA Tournament run to the Sweet 16. An explosive slashing wing with an NBA-ready frame, he thrives attacking downhill, using his quick first step, improved handle, and high-level athleticism to pressure the rim and finish through contact. He showed real growth as an on-ball creator, operating effectively in isolation and pick-and-roll while flashing point-forward ability with solid vision and passing instincts (3.6 APG). Swain is especially dangerous in transition, where his speed and leaping ability make him a constant threat. He also impacted the game across multiple areas, rebounding at a high level for a wing (7.5 RPG) and generating turnovers defensively (1.6 SPG) with his length and anticipation. His efficiency jump as a junior, combined with an 81.5 percent free throw mark, points to encouraging long-term shooting development.

There are still areas that will determine his ultimate ceiling. While his three-point percentage (34.4%) is respectable, it comes on modest volume (0.9 makes on 2.6 attempts), leaving questions about how reliable his shooting will be at the next level. His handle, though improved, can still get loose in traffic, contributing to turnovers (2.7 per game), and his offensive approach can lean too heavily on isolation. He is not yet a polished shot creator, with footwork and decision-making still developing, particularly against higher-level defenses. Defensively, he has the tools to be impactful, but consistency and focus can waver at times. Swain is generally viewed as a first-round talent, offering an appealing blend of athleticism, versatility, and upward trajectory, but his draft range will depend on continued development as a shooter, decision-maker, and all-around offensive creator.

Why the Hawks select Dailyn Swain: After selecting Kingston Flemings earlier in the lottery, Atlanta continues adding athletic upside and positional versatility with Swain. While this may be viewed as a slight reach based on where many public boards currently rank him, Swain possesses several traits NBA teams covet, including an NBA-ready frame, strong athleticism, rebounding ability, and emerging playmaking skills for a wing. The Hawks are still in the early stages of reshaping the roster following the departure of Trae Young and can afford to prioritize upside over immediate production. Swain’s ability to handle the ball, attack the rim, defend multiple positions, and contribute in transition gives him intriguing long-term value. His shooting consistency remains a question, but the overall talent level and physical tools are evident. If his perimeter game continues to develop, Atlanta could ultimately look back on this selection as a worthwhile gamble rather than a reach.

NBA Comparison: Terrence Jones / Kelly Oubre Jr.

24. New York Knicks – Isaiah Evans

6’6”, 180, SG/SF, Duke, So.
2025–26 Stats: 38 GP, 15.0 PPG, 43.3 FG%, 36.1 3P%, 86.0 FT%, 3.2 RPG, 1.3 APG, 0.7 SPG, 0.7 BPG, 1.1 TO

Evans showed strong sophomore progression, displaying improved confidence and offensive polish while emerging as one of Duke’s primary perimeter scoring threats. He made a significant jump in production and delivered several strong performances during the NCAA Tournament, reinforcing his upside as a scorer. A smooth, natural shot-maker, he expanded beyond a spot-up role, adding a more reliable mid-range game, improved finishing through contact, and flashes of secondary creation. His length and high release allow him to generate clean looks over defenders, while his movement shooting remains one of his biggest strengths.

The swing factor in his evaluation remains physical development. Adding strength and muscle will be critical to unlocking additional aspects of his game, including rebounding, defense, and playmaking. While some evaluators question whether he currently impacts enough areas beyond scoring, his combination of length, shooting touch, and offensive instincts remains highly appealing. If his body continues to develop, Evans has a pathway to becoming one of the better scoring wings from this class.

Why the Knicks select Isaiah Evans: Fresh off winning the NBA championship, New York enters the draft in a position to prioritize upside rather than immediate need. Evans offers some of the best pure scoring potential available this late in the first round and gives the Knicks another long-term weapon on the wing. His combination of length, shooting ability, and natural shot-making talent fits well within New York’s offensive system, and he would benefit from developing behind an established veteran core rather than being forced into a major role immediately. While Evans still needs to add strength and become a more complete all-around player, his scoring instincts and offensive upside are difficult to ignore at this stage of the draft. For a contender drafting near the end of the first round, taking a swing on one of the class’s more talented perimeter scorers makes a great deal of sense.

NBA Comparison: Brandon Ingram

25. Los Angeles Lakers – Baba Miller

6’11”, 210, SF/PF, Cincinnati Sr.

2025-26 Stats: 31 GP, 13.0 PPG, 52.9 FG%, 19.2 3P%, 65.8 FT%, 10.3 RPG, 3.7 APG, 1.2 BPG, 0.7 SPG

Miller is one of the more unique prospects in the 2026 NBA Draft due to his rare combination of size, length, ball skills, and versatility. Standing nearly 6-foot-11, he moves exceptionally well for a player his size and possesses the passing instincts and feel of a perimeter player. After transferring to Florida Atlantic, he enjoyed the most productive season of his collegiate career, averaging 13.0 points, 10.3 rebounds, and 3.7 assists per game while impacting the game in virtually every statistical category. His ability to handle the ball in the open floor, facilitate offense from the elbows, and create opportunities for teammates makes him an intriguing modern frontcourt prospect. Miller’s versatility is his biggest selling point. He rebounds at a high level, blocks shots, moves well laterally, and has the length to defend multiple positions. His 10.3 rebounds per game ranked among the best marks of any forward prospect in the class, while his passing ability remains uncommon for a player his size. He sees the floor well, willingly moves the ball, and often functions as a connector who helps keep an offense flowing.

The offensive limitations remain significant. Despite possessing perimeter skills, Miller has yet to establish himself as a reliable shooter, converting just 19.2 percent from three and 65.8 percent from the free throw line as a senior. Opponents will often dare him to shoot, and his lack of perimeter efficiency creates questions about his ideal offensive role at the next level. He also remains relatively thin for a player approaching 7-feet tall and can struggle against stronger, more physical opponents. At times he can become overly passive offensively, relying on teammates to create rather than consistently looking to assert himself as a scorer. While his tools and versatility are appealing, teams will be betting heavily on continued skill development and improved shooting.

Why the Lakers select Baba Miller: The Lakers have often prioritized versatile frontcourt players who can contribute in multiple areas, and Miller fits that mold well. His ability to rebound, pass, defend multiple positions, and impact the game without needing touches makes him an appealing developmental piece. Los Angeles can afford patience while allowing him to continue refining his perimeter game and adding strength. We’ve also heard Miller’s name connected to the Lakers during the pre-draft process, making this a pairing that would not come as a surprise on draft night. While this may be viewed as a slight reach by some based on his inconsistency and limited offensive production, the talent has always been evident. Few players available in this range possess Miller’s combination of size, mobility, passing ability, and defensive versatility. If the shooting improves even modestly, his combination of size, feel, and versatility could allow him to become one of the more valuable role players in this draft class. For a Lakers team looking to add frontcourt depth and long-term upside, he represents an intriguing swing late in the first round.

NBA Comparison: Christian Wood / Kyle Kuzma

26. Denver Nuggets – Henri Veesaar

6’11”, 225, C/PF, North Carolina, Jr.

2025-26 Stats: 31 GP, 17.0 PPG, 60.8 FG%, 42.6 3P%, 61.5 FT%, 8.7 RPG, 2.1 APG, 1.2 BPG, 0.6 SPG

Veesaar emerged as one of the biggest breakout players in college basketball after transferring to North Carolina and thriving in an expanded role. The Estonian big man combines size, mobility, and perimeter skill in a package that fits perfectly with the modern NBA. He averaged 17.0 points and 8.7 rebounds while shooting an outstanding 60.8 percent from the field and 42.6 percent from three, establishing himself as one of the premier shooting big men in the country. His ability to stretch the floor creates difficult matchup problems for opposing centers, and he is comfortable operating as a pick-and-pop threat, rim finisher, and secondary playmaker.

Beyond the shooting, Veesaar offers a well-rounded skill set that continues to evolve. He runs the floor extremely well for his size, moves fluidly in space, and displays solid passing instincts from the elbows and high post. Defensively, he provides rim protection and positional versatility while using his mobility to hold up against a variety of frontcourt matchups. His combination of size, shooting touch, efficiency, and feel for the game gives him one of the safer projections among the big men available in this range. The primary concern remains his physical strength and interior toughness. Despite his size, he can still be pushed around by stronger post players, and his 61.5 percent free throw shooting is somewhat at odds with his excellent three-point percentage. Teams will also want to see continued improvement as a rebounder and interior defender. Even so, few big men in this class can match his combination of production, efficiency, floor spacing, and overall versatility.

Why the Nuggets select Henri Veesaar: Denver remains in win-now mode with Nikola Jokic still performing at an MVP level, making NBA readiness a major factor with this selection. Veesaar offers an appealing blend of immediate utility and long-term upside. His ability to space the floor, move the ball, and play within a structured offensive system makes him a natural fit alongside Jokic and within Denver’s offensive philosophy. He could eventually develop into a valuable backup center capable of replicating some of the offensive versatility Denver loses whenever Jokic leaves the floor. The Nuggets are also viewed as a potential trade-down candidate given their limited draft capital and desire to maximize the remainder of Jokic’s prime. If they keep the pick, however, Veesaar represents strong value and one of the most productive and NBA-ready frontcourt players likely to be available.

NBA Comparison: Kelly Olynik

27. Boston Celtics – Sergio De Larrea

6’7”, PG, Valencia Basket (Spain)
2025-26 Stats: EuroLeague: 3.6 PPG, 34.3 3P% Overall: 7.1 PPG, 40.9 3P%, 78.0 FT%, 3.9 APG

De Larrea is one of the more skilled and intelligent guards in the class, bringing the type of feel, vision, and creativity often associated with high-level European playmakers. The Spanish guard plays with tremendous pace and composure, consistently manipulating defenders and creating advantages through timing rather than pure athleticism. His pick-and-roll play stands out as a major strength, where he routinely makes advanced reads and delivers passes with precision. He also developed into a reliable perimeter shooter, converting over 40% of his three-point attempts across all competitions while continuing to gain experience against professional competition.

The primary questions surrounding De Larrea involve athletic upside and physical tools. He lacks elite foot speed and burst, and stronger, more athletic defenders can occasionally disrupt his rhythm. Even so, his combination of size, shooting, playmaking, and feel gives him a strong chance of carving out a role at the next level. Few players available in this range can match his overall basketball IQ.

Why the Celtics select Sergio De Larrea: League chatter suggests Boston may be prioritizing prospects firmly committed to remaining in the draft, making De Larrea an especially sensible fit. The Celtics have consistently valued smart, versatile players capable of making quick decisions and contributing within a team structure. De Larrea’s shooting, feel, and playmaking fit naturally within that philosophy, and he could prove to be one of the better values available late in the first round.

NBA Comparison: Nando De Colo / Jose Calderon

28. Brooklyn Nets (via Wolves, Pistons) – Jayden Quaintance

6’10”, 250, PF/C Kentucky, So.
Stats (4 GP): 5.0 PPG, 5.0 RPG, 0.5 APG, 57.1 FG%, 0.0 3P%, 30.8 FT%

Quaintance is one of the more physically gifted frontcourt prospects in the class, bringing strength, explosiveness, and a high motor to the interior. A transfer from Arizona State who was not draft-eligible as a freshman, he entered the season with significant buzz but has struggled to stay on the floor due to injuries and limited availability. When healthy, his physical upside is evident. He plays above the rim, looks to finish everything with force, and impacts the game through energy, rebounding, and defensive activity. He further boosted his profile during the pre-draft process by measuring a massive 7’5.25” wingspan at the NBA Draft Combine, confirming true center size and exceptional length on a 6’10” frame. His tools, strength, and athleticism give him the foundation of a modern role-playing big who can run the floor, protect the paint, and provide physical presence.

Offensively, Quaintance remains a work in progress. While he shows occasional touch around the basket, his scoring skill level is still developing, and his limited range and free throw struggles highlight the need for continued refinement. His long-term value projects more around defense, rebounding, and finishing within a defined role rather than offensive creation. Despite early hype that placed him in the top-10 conversation, his current trajectory points more toward the late first-round range. With his physical tools and defensive potential, he fits the mold of a Kevon Looney-type contributor at the next level, capable of impacting games through toughness, interior defense, and effort while continuing to develop his offensive feel.

Why the Nets select Jayden Quaintance: Brooklyn acquired this pick in the Julius Randle trade and uses it to take a chance on one of the most physically gifted big men in the draft. Quaintance possesses elite length, strength, and defensive upside, giving him the tools to become a highly impactful frontcourt player if he can stay healthy and continue developing offensively. With multiple first-round selections and a long-term rebuilding outlook, the Nets are in an excellent position to be patient.

NBA Comparison: Kevon Looney

29. Cleveland Cavaliers (via Spurs) – Ebuka Okorie

Okorie emerged as one of the most productive freshmen in college basketball, averaging 23.2 points per game while serving as the clear focal point of Stanford’s offense. A quick, aggressive scoring guard, he consistently put pressure on defenses with his ability to create off the dribble and generate offense from all three levels. He plays with excellent confidence and pace, using a tight handle, sudden changes of direction, and strong body control to create separation despite lacking ideal size. His scoring instincts stand out immediately, as he is capable of taking over stretches of games and carrying an offense for long periods. He also showed encouraging shooting indicators, connecting on 35.4 percent from three and 83.2 percent from the free throw line. Beyond the scoring, he flashed solid playmaking ability, averaging 3.6 assists per game while also generating 1.6 steals per contest with active hands and strong anticipation. Few freshmen in the country were asked to carry a larger offensive burden, and even fewer were as successful.

The primary concern revolves around size and role projection. At 6-foot-2, he lacks ideal dimensions for an NBA combo guard and will need to prove he can consistently create advantages against bigger and more athletic defenders. While his shooting numbers are solid, they are not yet elite, and he can occasionally fall in love with difficult shots. Cleveland adds a talented young scoring guard to help address the long-term outlook of the backcourt following the trade that sent Darius Garland to Los Angeles in exchange for James Harden. Okorie offers the type of shot creation and offensive upside that is difficult to find this late in the first round. His ability to create offense off the dribble, score at all three levels, and provide instant scoring punch gives the Cavaliers another young perimeter talent to develop. If he remains in the draft, this could ultimately prove to be one of the better value selections in the final third of the first round.

Why the Cavaliers select Ebuka Okorie: At No. 29, Cleveland adds a talented young scoring guard in Okorie to help address the long-term outlook of the backcourt following the trade that sent Darius Garland away in exchange for James Harden. One of the more productive freshmen in the country, Okorie brings shot creation, scoring punch, and the ability to generate offense off the dribble, giving the Cavaliers another young perimeter talent to develop over time. His aggressive scoring mentality and ability to create his own shot would add an offensive spark to the roster while fitting well within a developmental role early in his career. If he ultimately keeps his name in the draft, this could prove to be very solid value late in the first round given his production, youth, and long-term scoring upside.

NBA Comparison: Payton Prichard / Lou Williams

30. Dallas Mavericks (via OKC Thunder) – Koa Peat

6’8”, 235, PF, Arizona, Fr.
2025–26 Stats: 36 GP, 14.1 PPG, 5.6 RPG, 2.6 APG, 52.8 FG%, 35.0 3P%, 62.3 FT%

Peat delivered a productive freshman season built around strength, skill, and physical maturity, showing the polish and interior feel that made him one of the most accomplished high school players in recent Arizona history. He played a key role in helping Arizona reach the Final Four, providing steady scoring, toughness, and reliability on both ends. At 6’8”, 235 pounds, he consistently used his powerful frame, balance, and advanced footwork to establish position, finish efficiently around the basket, and play through contact. His passing out of the post and comfort operating as both a scorer and facilitator inside the arc remained clear strengths, and his high-IQ, team-first approach translated to consistent winning impact.

His limitations became more evident late in the season against top competition. Arizona’s Final Four run highlighted his value, but also exposed some offensive constraints, particularly his lack of scoring versatility and ability to create outside of the paint. While his three-point percentage (35.0%) appears solid, it came on extremely low volume with just seven made threes on the season, limiting its reliability. Combined with a 62.3 percent free throw mark, there are legitimate concerns about his long-term shooting and spacing value. He is not an elite athlete and lacks ideal size or length for a full-time NBA power forward, which can make it more difficult to consistently finish or create against bigger, more athletic defenders. Those factors cap some of the upside, but in the late first-round range, his toughness, feel, and inside-the-arc productivity still project well as a reliable rotation forward if the shooting continues to improve.

Why the Mavericks select Koa Peat: Dallas gladly takes the value if Peat remains available this late. After already selecting Kingston Flemings earlier in the lottery, the Mavericks add another highly accomplished young player whose toughness, feel, and versatility fit well alongside Cooper Flagg. While questions remain regarding his ultimate ceiling, Peat’s production, competitiveness, and winning background make him an appealing bet at the end of the first round.

NBA Comparison: Chuck Hayes / Trevor Booker