This topic contains 6 replies, has 4 voices, and was last updated by GBee 11 years, 8 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Thu, 10/09/2014 - 6:57pm #58099

drk3351ParticipantI noticed ESPN’s Chad Ford has him ranked 25th his most recent big board. While this site has him 52nd and draft express #70.
I’m talking about the guard from Wichita St by the way.
Where would you rank him?
0 - Posted on: Fri, 10/10/2014 - 3:19am #950904

JoeWolf1In my opinion, I feel he’s somewhere inbetween where Ford and Aran have him. From what I’ve read from Chad, he feels he can make some sort of transition to the PG position, and I guess I’m just skeptical, as he is in the same class as FVV and will most likely never get extended time running the offense, at the NCAA level. Still, I think he’s a good enough ball handler and distributer to be a combo guard of sorts, and he knows the game enough to operate the pick and roll.
I love his toughness. He’s a pretty well built 6’4”, and his 6’8.5” wingspan don’t render him unusable for a SG, just a smaller off guard, but he’s not very good laterally, and will be one of those guys who doesn’t do a whole lot on defense when he hits the NBA.
He’s an awesome mid-range shooter, and definitely has potential as a long range shooter in the NBA. I’m pretty firm on the fact that I don’t really believe Baker is a 1st round talent, but I do think he’s a valid option in the 30-40 range where a guaranteed contract is off the table.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 10/10/2014 - 3:19am #950770

JoeWolf1In my opinion, I feel he’s somewhere inbetween where Ford and Aran have him. From what I’ve read from Chad, he feels he can make some sort of transition to the PG position, and I guess I’m just skeptical, as he is in the same class as FVV and will most likely never get extended time running the offense, at the NCAA level. Still, I think he’s a good enough ball handler and distributer to be a combo guard of sorts, and he knows the game enough to operate the pick and roll.
I love his toughness. He’s a pretty well built 6’4”, and his 6’8.5” wingspan don’t render him unusable for a SG, just a smaller off guard, but he’s not very good laterally, and will be one of those guys who doesn’t do a whole lot on defense when he hits the NBA.
He’s an awesome mid-range shooter, and definitely has potential as a long range shooter in the NBA. I’m pretty firm on the fact that I don’t really believe Baker is a 1st round talent, but I do think he’s a valid option in the 30-40 range where a guaranteed contract is off the table.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 10/10/2014 - 6:26am #950788
Magic JordanParticipantI see a lot of similarities between him and Nate Wolters. I think he could also be drafted in a smiliar spot and a serve a similar role.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 10/10/2014 - 6:26am #950922
Magic JordanParticipantI see a lot of similarities between him and Nate Wolters. I think he could also be drafted in a smiliar spot and a serve a similar role.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 10/10/2014 - 7:38am #950802
GBeeParticipanthe’s not like wolters. he doesn’t project to be a point. he’s tough, physical with a football player mentality. he can defend, but he might have issues with quickness at the next level. offensively, i think he projects to be a shooter and not much else. maybe he can attack in straight lines, but his lack of quickness limits him as a slasher as well.
i think he projects to be more of a high IQ, 3 and D bench guard. fringe 1st imo.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 10/10/2014 - 7:38am #950936
GBeeParticipanthe’s not like wolters. he doesn’t project to be a point. he’s tough, physical with a football player mentality. he can defend, but he might have issues with quickness at the next level. offensively, i think he projects to be a shooter and not much else. maybe he can attack in straight lines, but his lack of quickness limits him as a slasher as well.
i think he projects to be more of a high IQ, 3 and D bench guard. fringe 1st imo.
0 - AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |