This topic contains 2 replies, has 3 voices, and was last updated by bobbyb 16 years, 7 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Sun, 11/08/2009 - 6:01pm #9992

marcusfizer21ParticipantWhat, nobody wants to trade for Stephen Jackson? No surprise that the disgruntled Warrior has not been moved. It’s not just that he is a pain to deal with, but few GMs want to take on his money, at his age and with his reputation. Besides getting $7.6 million this season, he has three years left and $27.6 million on his deal. “He’s 31,” said one GM. “Do you really want Stephen Jackson when he’s 34?”
New York Daily News
Well, the GM’s got a lot of points on that…LOL
0 - Posted on: Sun, 11/08/2009 - 6:24pm #227960
nateoak10Participantwarriors are looking for good offers. notthrow aways. hell be traded but not soon
0 - Posted on: Sun, 11/08/2009 - 10:28pm #228026
bobbybParticipantwho would want him, who wants a guy who signs a big contract, is the captain of your squad, then says for no reason he wants to be traded? Think about it, no contender wanted to deal with iverson’s crap and he is much better than jackson.
0 - AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |