This topic contains 6 replies, has 5 voices, and was last updated by deepika 13 years, 9 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Thu, 03/18/2010 - 1:00pm #13899
Lotto StudParticipantwhich game is better NBA 2k10 or NBA Live10 and why?
I always been an ea sports fanatic and implus i don’t think 2k has a college game where you can import a draft class, so I say hands down live for that, the graphics and game play.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 04/17/2010 - 10:11pm #285710
BOBBYBOBBALBOAParticipantNBA Live gameplay sucks balls! I mean when you go to all-star difficulty, the opponent and you will hit approximately 38% from the field, even with the best shooters and no defenders, which is really retarded. Graphics are slightly better and when you go to rookie difficulty, it’s fun enough. 2K is good, but less arcade. Like you have to strategize a little to win. However, fatigue at the normal settings is bad and your players will always sub because they are tired.
Basically, NBA games aren’t that good enough yet but it’s comprehensible since it’s the hardest game to emulate since every body is different if the weight and size is the same and it’s too characterize how explosive Derrick Rose or Monta Ellis when Speed is on a scale.0 - Posted on: Sat, 04/17/2010 - 10:11pm #285944
BOBBYBOBBALBOAParticipantNBA Live gameplay sucks balls! I mean when you go to all-star difficulty, the opponent and you will hit approximately 38% from the field, even with the best shooters and no defenders, which is really retarded. Graphics are slightly better and when you go to rookie difficulty, it’s fun enough. 2K is good, but less arcade. Like you have to strategize a little to win. However, fatigue at the normal settings is bad and your players will always sub because they are tired.
Basically, NBA games aren’t that good enough yet but it’s comprehensible since it’s the hardest game to emulate since every body is different if the weight and size is the same and it’s too characterize how explosive Derrick Rose or Monta Ellis when Speed is on a scale.0 - Posted on: Sat, 04/17/2010 - 10:11pm #285946
BOBBYBOBBALBOAParticipantNBA Live gameplay sucks balls! I mean when you go to all-star difficulty, the opponent and you will hit approximately 38% from the field, even with the best shooters and no defenders, which is really retarded. Graphics are slightly better and when you go to rookie difficulty, it’s fun enough. 2K is good, but less arcade. Like you have to strategize a little to win. However, fatigue at the normal settings is bad and your players will always sub because they are tired.
Basically, NBA games aren’t that good enough yet but it’s comprehensible since it’s the hardest game to emulate since every body is different if the weight and size is the same and it’s too characterize how explosive Derrick Rose or Monta Ellis when Speed is on a scale.0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/06/2012 - 10:10pm #712557
romaozaooaParticipantwhich game is better NBA 2k10 or NBA Live10 and why?
0 - Posted on: Sat, 09/08/2012 - 8:58pm #713181
rozookoaooaParticipantWill the real Isaiah please stand up? That is the question surrounding Baylor’s big man this season.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 09/19/2012 - 9:12pm #715396
deepikaParticipantI will go for NBA 2K 10……
0 - AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |