This topic contains 14 replies, has 11 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar unaznized 16 years, 11 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • Posted on: Sat, 07/18/2009 - 2:46pm #6675
    AvatarAvatar
    MagikKnick
    Participant

    Without there star player that is..
    and I dont mean if the player got injured or something
    I mean, if that player was just never on that team..

    Lebron-less Cavaliers?

    CP3-less Hornets?

    Wade-less Heat?

    Iguodala-less Sixers?

    Johnson-less Hawks?

    Roy-less Blazers?

    or

    Nowitzki-less Mavericks?

    0
  • Posted on: Sat, 07/18/2009 - 2:51pm #184093
    AvatarAvatar
    JNixon
    Participant

    To big-time frontcourt players always give you a chance. And Ron Artest. Yea gotta be the Lake Show.

    0
  • Posted on: Sat, 07/18/2009 - 2:52pm #184094
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    Kobe less lakers would be best. They have other guys that could step up their games. They would’nt contend for a title though.

    0
  • Posted on: Sat, 07/18/2009 - 2:52pm #184095
    AvatarAvatar
    MagikKnick
    Participant

    ok, dumb question..

    Replace Kobe-less Lakers with CP3-less Hornets

    0
  • Posted on: Sat, 07/18/2009 - 2:53pm #184096
    AvatarAvatar
    jojososa
    Participant

    we all kno tha answer to this is tha lakers, then tha blazers bcuz they have a nice rotation, then tha hawks, mavs, sixers, and tha heat, i thinl tha cavs wuld contend for tha #1 pick wifout Lebron honestly!!

    0
  • Posted on: Sat, 07/18/2009 - 2:54pm #184098
    AvatarAvatar
    dwat4444
    Participant

    Out of all those teams L.A. would be the only team that could be good with their lineup…
    Fisher
    Artest
    Odom
    Gasol
    Bynum
    EH? Still a playoff team in my eyes. Just very big.

    0
  • Posted on: Sat, 07/18/2009 - 2:55pm #184099
    AvatarAvatar
    Michael.S.
    Participant

    in terms of success. in order

    Lakers
    Blazers
    Sixers

    IMO

    0
  • Posted on: Sat, 07/18/2009 - 2:55pm #184100
    AvatarAvatar
    bakimm

    the lakers then blazers, the blazers have 2 much young talent bayless, rudy,outlaw,and batum thats just the wings dont forget mr greg oden imma blazer head for real

    0
  • Posted on: Sat, 07/18/2009 - 2:55pm #184101
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    that you changed it, I would say the Roy less blazers would be the best. They have a lot of good wing talent in Bayless, Batum, Fernandez, outlaw, and webster. All those guys can ball.

    0
  • Posted on: Sat, 07/18/2009 - 3:15pm #184114
    AvatarAvatar
    Mattissick
    Participant

    Nice post I’ll rank them in my order from best to worst

    Best

    1. Mavs
    2. Hawks
    3. Sixers
    4. Cavs
    5. Blazers
    6. Heat
    7. Hornets

    Worst

    0
  • Posted on: Sat, 07/18/2009 - 3:28pm #184123
    AvatarAvatar
    boffacheerios
    Participant

    hawks

    0
  • Posted on: Sat, 07/18/2009 - 3:29pm #184125
    AvatarAvatar
    Lemons4Life
    Participant

    In the original post he didn’t even have Lakers! It’s obvious that they would if they were listed!

    0
  • Posted on: Sat, 07/18/2009 - 3:29pm #184090
    AvatarAvatar
    rickyD510
    Participant

    kobe less lakers they still have 3 stars and a big line up and match up problems

    0
  • Posted on: Sat, 07/18/2009 - 3:30pm #184127
    AvatarAvatar
    MagikKnick
    Participant

    ahh, thats my bad
    i edited

    0
  • Posted on: Sat, 07/18/2009 - 8:45pm #184269
    AvatarAvatar
    unaznized
    Participant

    i would say a kevin garnett-less celtics.

    even towards the end of the season when they lost garnett, the celtics were still able to make the playoffs, even advancing from the first round. add rasheed and then u have a 3 to 5 seed team in the east without KG.

    0
  • Author
    Posts

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login