This topic contains 186 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by
JNixon 15 years, 7 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 1:39pm #23434

valentineI didn’t plan on really watching this game to much until i remembered Stanford will be facing UCLA and the arguments about which team will win and who is better. I haven’t gotten a chance to watch either team other than highlights so i dont know who will win but i do hope UCLA wins so when Stanford beats them it will look better on our resume:)
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 4:34pm #443435

llperezlets go bruins. Hopefully malcolm lee plays. Bruins will have to slow the pace and dominate the paint to win this.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 4:34pm #443448

llperezlets go bruins. Hopefully malcolm lee plays. Bruins will have to slow the pace and dominate the paint to win this.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 4:34pm #443461

llperezlets go bruins. Hopefully malcolm lee plays. Bruins will have to slow the pace and dominate the paint to win this.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 4:50pm #443450

JNixonParticipantThis will be a very close game. I look for Villanova to win in the closing seconds, but I wouldn’t be surprised at all if UCLA pulled it out.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 4:50pm #443462

JNixonParticipantThis will be a very close game. I look for Villanova to win in the closing seconds, but I wouldn’t be surprised at all if UCLA pulled it out.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 4:50pm #443476

JNixonParticipantThis will be a very close game. I look for Villanova to win in the closing seconds, but I wouldn’t be surprised at all if UCLA pulled it out.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 4:56pm #443453
stanford hoopslooks like i wont be really watching this game since its just about to start and the kentucky vs uconn game is about to start after the heat game
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 4:56pm #443465
stanford hoopslooks like i wont be really watching this game since its just about to start and the kentucky vs uconn game is about to start after the heat game
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 4:56pm #443479
stanford hoopslooks like i wont be really watching this game since its just about to start and the kentucky vs uconn game is about to start after the heat game
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 4:59pm #443460

JNixonParticipantVillanova is getting loose early. Their guards are killing UCLA’s off the dribble early.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 4:59pm #443471

JNixonParticipantVillanova is getting loose early. Their guards are killing UCLA’s off the dribble early.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 4:59pm #443485

JNixonParticipantVillanova is getting loose early. Their guards are killing UCLA’s off the dribble early.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 5:25pm #443472

JNixonParticipantUCLA plays 0 defense.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 5:25pm #443483

JNixonParticipantUCLA plays 0 defense.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 5:25pm #443497

JNixonParticipantUCLA plays 0 defense.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 5:52pm #443487

llperezits days like this i wish i wasnt a sports fan. Zero defense. Gaurds are getting beat off the dribble and there is no one in the way after that. Villanova finshed the half on like a 15-2 run
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 5:52pm #443498

llperezits days like this i wish i wasnt a sports fan. Zero defense. Gaurds are getting beat off the dribble and there is no one in the way after that. Villanova finshed the half on like a 15-2 run
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 5:52pm #443511

llperezits days like this i wish i wasnt a sports fan. Zero defense. Gaurds are getting beat off the dribble and there is no one in the way after that. Villanova finshed the half on like a 15-2 run
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 5:58pm #443490

HaleParticipantGood thing you took back the "UCLA wins or I’ll never come back" statement haha.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 5:58pm #443501

HaleParticipantGood thing you took back the "UCLA wins or I’ll never come back" statement haha.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 5:58pm #443514

HaleParticipantGood thing you took back the "UCLA wins or I’ll never come back" statement haha.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:00pm #443493

llperezyeah, i took that back like 5 seconds after i clicked save. Looks like my mouth wrote checks my bruins couldnt cash.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:00pm #443504

llperezyeah, i took that back like 5 seconds after i clicked save. Looks like my mouth wrote checks my bruins couldnt cash.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:00pm #443517

llperezyeah, i took that back like 5 seconds after i clicked save. Looks like my mouth wrote checks my bruins couldnt cash.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:01pm #443496

llperezand im sure people who havent seen honeycutt before are thinking why on earth is this guy predicted to go 10th?
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:01pm #443507

llperezand im sure people who havent seen honeycutt before are thinking why on earth is this guy predicted to go 10th?
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:01pm #443520

llperezand im sure people who havent seen honeycutt before are thinking why on earth is this guy predicted to go 10th?
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:04pm #443500

Mr.Knick 32ParticipantI like Honeycutt but I do think 10th is a little high. He reminds me more of a Jared Dudley type player at the next level.
Also, Josh Smith is a big dude, I do like that he’s a legit 6-10.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:04pm #443510

Mr.Knick 32ParticipantI like Honeycutt but I do think 10th is a little high. He reminds me more of a Jared Dudley type player at the next level.
Also, Josh Smith is a big dude, I do like that he’s a legit 6-10.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:04pm #443523

Mr.Knick 32ParticipantI like Honeycutt but I do think 10th is a little high. He reminds me more of a Jared Dudley type player at the next level.
Also, Josh Smith is a big dude, I do like that he’s a legit 6-10.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:22pm #443539

JNixonParticipantHoneycutt looks like a prospect, but top 10? HELL naw. He looks like a 2012 guy ideally. He doesn’t play strong or tough.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:22pm #443549

JNixonParticipantHoneycutt looks like a prospect, but top 10? HELL naw. He looks like a 2012 guy ideally. He doesn’t play strong or tough.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:22pm #443562

JNixonParticipantHoneycutt looks like a prospect, but top 10? HELL naw. He looks like a 2012 guy ideally. He doesn’t play strong or tough.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:24pm #443542

llperezhe has looked bad on offense but i dont see anything wrong with his toughness or strength. He has grabbed rebounds in traffic and blocked like 3 shots and affected a few others. His shooting, ball handling and passing are off tonight but what dont you like about his strength or toughness?
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:24pm #443552

llperezhe has looked bad on offense but i dont see anything wrong with his toughness or strength. He has grabbed rebounds in traffic and blocked like 3 shots and affected a few others. His shooting, ball handling and passing are off tonight but what dont you like about his strength or toughness?
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:24pm #443565

llperezhe has looked bad on offense but i dont see anything wrong with his toughness or strength. He has grabbed rebounds in traffic and blocked like 3 shots and affected a few others. His shooting, ball handling and passing are off tonight but what dont you like about his strength or toughness?
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:26pm #443545
stanford hoopsi guess that kid was right about villanova guards were gonna own the overrated ucla guards
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:26pm #443555
stanford hoopsi guess that kid was right about villanova guards were gonna own the overrated ucla guards
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:26pm #443568
stanford hoopsi guess that kid was right about villanova guards were gonna own the overrated ucla guards
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:28pm #443548

JNixonParticipantHe wouldn’t be very strong in NBA. I could see him struggling to defend stronger players, finish around the rim through contact, etc etc. He also doesn’t play very tough on either end really. His shooting touch seems nice and he shows decent floor vision, but he’d have to show an elite skill for him to be considered a top 10 pick. He has no elite skill right now. At all.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:28pm #443558

JNixonParticipantHe wouldn’t be very strong in NBA. I could see him struggling to defend stronger players, finish around the rim through contact, etc etc. He also doesn’t play very tough on either end really. His shooting touch seems nice and he shows decent floor vision, but he’d have to show an elite skill for him to be considered a top 10 pick. He has no elite skill right now. At all.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:28pm #443571

JNixonParticipantHe wouldn’t be very strong in NBA. I could see him struggling to defend stronger players, finish around the rim through contact, etc etc. He also doesn’t play very tough on either end really. His shooting touch seems nice and he shows decent floor vision, but he’d have to show an elite skill for him to be considered a top 10 pick. He has no elite skill right now. At all.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:29pm #443554

Mr.Knick 32ParticipantNo offense, even the comparison for him on the site ( Josh Childress) makes me believe that even Aran and the people who scouted him think he won’t be elite.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:29pm #443563

Mr.Knick 32ParticipantNo offense, even the comparison for him on the site ( Josh Childress) makes me believe that even Aran and the people who scouted him think he won’t be elite.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:29pm #443578

Mr.Knick 32ParticipantNo offense, even the comparison for him on the site ( Josh Childress) makes me believe that even Aran and the people who scouted him think he won’t be elite.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:30pm #443557

llperezdisagree about no elite skills. Name me a wing player in college who can get 3-4 blocks any night and protect tha basket like he does. And while hes not showing his passing off too well tonight, trust me, its elite.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:30pm #443566

llperezdisagree about no elite skills. Name me a wing player in college who can get 3-4 blocks any night and protect tha basket like he does. And while hes not showing his passing off too well tonight, trust me, its elite.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:30pm #443581

llperezdisagree about no elite skills. Name me a wing player in college who can get 3-4 blocks any night and protect tha basket like he does. And while hes not showing his passing off too well tonight, trust me, its elite.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:33pm #443570

JNixonParticipantSo he’s an elite shot-blocker? And I’ve seen him play before tonight. His passing is good, but elite? I don’t see him getting more than like 2 or 3 apg AT MOST in the NBA in a season. Elite passing on the wing is like 4 or 5 apg and up.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:33pm #443577

JNixonParticipantSo he’s an elite shot-blocker? And I’ve seen him play before tonight. His passing is good, but elite? I don’t see him getting more than like 2 or 3 apg AT MOST in the NBA in a season. Elite passing on the wing is like 4 or 5 apg and up.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:33pm #443593

JNixonParticipantSo he’s an elite shot-blocker? And I’ve seen him play before tonight. His passing is good, but elite? I don’t see him getting more than like 2 or 3 apg AT MOST in the NBA in a season. Elite passing on the wing is like 4 or 5 apg and up.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:35pm #443573

llperezhes blocked 3 shots tonight that i can rmeember and impacted about 3 more that i can remeber. I’ve seen him get 5 blocks in a game and he is the one guy on the bruins who is actually protecting the paint tonight. I would say for a guy who plays sf mostly around the three point line, thats pretty elite.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:35pm #443580

llperezhes blocked 3 shots tonight that i can rmeember and impacted about 3 more that i can remeber. I’ve seen him get 5 blocks in a game and he is the one guy on the bruins who is actually protecting the paint tonight. I would say for a guy who plays sf mostly around the three point line, thats pretty elite.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:35pm #443595

llperezhes blocked 3 shots tonight that i can rmeember and impacted about 3 more that i can remeber. I’ve seen him get 5 blocks in a game and he is the one guy on the bruins who is actually protecting the paint tonight. I would say for a guy who plays sf mostly around the three point line, thats pretty elite.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:37pm #443576

llperezthe bruins do not look like the top 25 team i was talking about. But i dont think the wildcats look all that great either.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:37pm #443584

llperezthe bruins do not look like the top 25 team i was talking about. But i dont think the wildcats look all that great either.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:37pm #443598

llperezthe bruins do not look like the top 25 team i was talking about. But i dont think the wildcats look all that great either.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:37pm #443579

Mr.Knick 32ParticipantI’m gonna watch more UCLA games but he just sounds like another Corey Brewer/ Jared Dudley ( less scoring) type.
Overall, I feel he’s not a lotto player. He’s a good upside pick right now, but I dunno on the overall talent.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:37pm #443586

Mr.Knick 32ParticipantI’m gonna watch more UCLA games but he just sounds like another Corey Brewer/ Jared Dudley ( less scoring) type.
Overall, I feel he’s not a lotto player. He’s a good upside pick right now, but I dunno on the overall talent.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:37pm #443601

Mr.Knick 32ParticipantI’m gonna watch more UCLA games but he just sounds like another Corey Brewer/ Jared Dudley ( less scoring) type.
Overall, I feel he’s not a lotto player. He’s a good upside pick right now, but I dunno on the overall talent.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:38pm #443588
stanford hoopsbut he only averages .8blks a game so this isnt a everyday thing for him
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:38pm #443596
stanford hoopsbut he only averages .8blks a game so this isnt a everyday thing for him
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:38pm #443610
stanford hoopsbut he only averages .8blks a game so this isnt a everyday thing for him
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:39pm #443591

llperezhes played 3 games.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:39pm #443599

llperezhes played 3 games.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:39pm #443614

llperezhes played 3 games.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:39pm #443594

JNixonParticipantHoneycutt really has a ways to go if you are making a case that his shot-blocking is his standout skill. I wonder how that will work for him in the NBA….
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:39pm #443602

JNixonParticipantHoneycutt really has a ways to go if you are making a case that his shot-blocking is his standout skill. I wonder how that will work for him in the NBA….
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:39pm #443616

JNixonParticipantHoneycutt really has a ways to go if you are making a case that his shot-blocking is his standout skill. I wonder how that will work for him in the NBA….
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:40pm #443597
stanford hoopshe averaged 1blk a game last year
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:40pm #443605
stanford hoopshe averaged 1blk a game last year
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:40pm #443620
stanford hoopshe averaged 1blk a game last year
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:41pm #443600

llperezi didnt say that was gonna be his calling card. You said he had no elite skills and i pointed one out. Obviously no one is gonna be drafted as a sf on shot blocking.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:41pm #443608

llperezi didnt say that was gonna be his calling card. You said he had no elite skills and i pointed one out. Obviously no one is gonna be drafted as a sf on shot blocking.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:41pm #443622

llperezi didnt say that was gonna be his calling card. You said he had no elite skills and i pointed one out. Obviously no one is gonna be drafted as a sf on shot blocking.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:41pm #443603
stanford hoopsi havent watched him enough to know if hes a elite defender but hes not a elite shot blocker. even after three games a elite shot blocker shows you they are elite. like a rebounder,scorer,passer
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:41pm #443611
stanford hoopsi havent watched him enough to know if hes a elite defender but hes not a elite shot blocker. even after three games a elite shot blocker shows you they are elite. like a rebounder,scorer,passer
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:41pm #443625
stanford hoopsi havent watched him enough to know if hes a elite defender but hes not a elite shot blocker. even after three games a elite shot blocker shows you they are elite. like a rebounder,scorer,passer
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:41pm #443606

JNixonParticipant"but he only averages .8blks a game so this isnt a everyday thing for him"
And all of his blocks tonight have come from Wayns and Fisher, 2 guards around 6′, overdribbling and him getting blocks just by being at the rim. Nothing about his shot-blocking will really translate to the NBA. And definitely not at an elite level.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:41pm #443613

JNixonParticipant"but he only averages .8blks a game so this isnt a everyday thing for him"
And all of his blocks tonight have come from Wayns and Fisher, 2 guards around 6′, overdribbling and him getting blocks just by being at the rim. Nothing about his shot-blocking will really translate to the NBA. And definitely not at an elite level.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:41pm #443629

JNixonParticipant"but he only averages .8blks a game so this isnt a everyday thing for him"
And all of his blocks tonight have come from Wayns and Fisher, 2 guards around 6′, overdribbling and him getting blocks just by being at the rim. Nothing about his shot-blocking will really translate to the NBA. And definitely not at an elite level.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:42pm #443609

Mr.Knick 32ParticipantI just asked Ryan Feldman on Twitter and he said: Good talent, potential 1st rounder, but still has a lot to prove
So time will tell.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:42pm #443617

Mr.Knick 32ParticipantI just asked Ryan Feldman on Twitter and he said: Good talent, potential 1st rounder, but still has a lot to prove
So time will tell.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:42pm #443632

Mr.Knick 32ParticipantI just asked Ryan Feldman on Twitter and he said: Good talent, potential 1st rounder, but still has a lot to prove
So time will tell.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:42pm #443612

llperezhis stats last year were highly skewed. He missed the first month and then didnt start for a few more weeks after he came back. He didnt even score more then 4 points until half the season was over last year. Just watching him play, you can see he blocks shots.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:42pm #443619

llperezhis stats last year were highly skewed. He missed the first month and then didnt start for a few more weeks after he came back. He didnt even score more then 4 points until half the season was over last year. Just watching him play, you can see he blocks shots.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:42pm #443633

llperezhis stats last year were highly skewed. He missed the first month and then didnt start for a few more weeks after he came back. He didnt even score more then 4 points until half the season was over last year. Just watching him play, you can see he blocks shots.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:43pm #443615

JNixonParticipant"You said he had no elite skills and i pointed one out."
Yeah, that elite 0.8 bpg he has to his name. And the 1 bpg he had last year. Really screams Dikembe Mutumbo out there.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:43pm #443623

JNixonParticipant"You said he had no elite skills and i pointed one out."
Yeah, that elite 0.8 bpg he has to his name. And the 1 bpg he had last year. Really screams Dikembe Mutumbo out there.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:43pm #443636

JNixonParticipant"You said he had no elite skills and i pointed one out."
Yeah, that elite 0.8 bpg he has to his name. And the 1 bpg he had last year. Really screams Dikembe Mutumbo out there.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:46pm #443618

llperezif were just talking last years stats, then honeycutt doesnt do anything worth being mentioned as a first rounder. This site has him going top 10 and the lastr espn tracker i saw had him going 19th.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:46pm #443626

llperezif were just talking last years stats, then honeycutt doesnt do anything worth being mentioned as a first rounder. This site has him going top 10 and the lastr espn tracker i saw had him going 19th.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:46pm #443639

llperezif were just talking last years stats, then honeycutt doesnt do anything worth being mentioned as a first rounder. This site has him going top 10 and the lastr espn tracker i saw had him going 19th.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:47pm #443621
stanford hoopsthe guys hasn’t proven in a year and some change that hes a elite shot blocker so theres no argument in that. one game doesn’t make him a elite shot blocker. Theres zero proof that says he’s a elite shot blocker
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:47pm #443628
stanford hoopsthe guys hasn’t proven in a year and some change that hes a elite shot blocker so theres no argument in that. one game doesn’t make him a elite shot blocker. Theres zero proof that says he’s a elite shot blocker
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:47pm #443642
stanford hoopsthe guys hasn’t proven in a year and some change that hes a elite shot blocker so theres no argument in that. one game doesn’t make him a elite shot blocker. Theres zero proof that says he’s a elite shot blocker
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:47pm #443624

llperezhave you been reading anything i’ve wrote? And why are you comparing him to a center, obviously im gonna compare his shotbloocking and passing to a sf where he will play. Remember you also said landry fields didnt do one single thing at an nba level.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:47pm #443631

llperezhave you been reading anything i’ve wrote? And why are you comparing him to a center, obviously im gonna compare his shotbloocking and passing to a sf where he will play. Remember you also said landry fields didnt do one single thing at an nba level.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:47pm #443646

llperezhave you been reading anything i’ve wrote? And why are you comparing him to a center, obviously im gonna compare his shotbloocking and passing to a sf where he will play. Remember you also said landry fields didnt do one single thing at an nba level.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:52pm #443652

JNixonParticipantI don’t really remember talking about Landry Fields. I watched him play part of one game in my life before the Summer League. Not that this really has anything to do with this anyway.
I wasn’t really comparing him to Mutumbo seriously. Just stressing that he has no elite shot-blocking skills.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:52pm #443630

JNixonParticipantI don’t really remember talking about Landry Fields. I watched him play part of one game in my life before the Summer League. Not that this really has anything to do with this anyway.
I wasn’t really comparing him to Mutumbo seriously. Just stressing that he has no elite shot-blocking skills.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:52pm #443637

JNixonParticipantI don’t really remember talking about Landry Fields. I watched him play part of one game in my life before the Summer League. Not that this really has anything to do with this anyway.
I wasn’t really comparing him to Mutumbo seriously. Just stressing that he has no elite shot-blocking skills.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:53pm #443658

llperezif you only watched fields part of one game your entire life before summer league, then why did you say he did nothign at an nba level the night of the draft?
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:53pm #443638

llperezif you only watched fields part of one game your entire life before summer league, then why did you say he did nothign at an nba level the night of the draft?
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:53pm #443643

llperezif you only watched fields part of one game your entire life before summer league, then why did you say he did nothign at an nba level the night of the draft?
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:56pm #443650

JNixonParticipantI don’t remember saying that, but if I did, I probably said something like "I watched him play against Kentucky and he didn’t show a trueNBA caliber skill."
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:56pm #443654

JNixonParticipantI don’t remember saying that, but if I did, I probably said something like "I watched him play against Kentucky and he didn’t show a trueNBA caliber skill."
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:56pm #443670

JNixonParticipantI don’t remember saying that, but if I did, I probably said something like "I watched him play against Kentucky and he didn’t show a trueNBA caliber skill."
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:57pm #443653
stanford hoopsif he averaged 2 blks a game he wouldn’t be considered a elite shot blocker. it doesn’t matter what position someone plays if you say they are elite at something. if the average pg averaged 12ppg and some other pg averaged 20 that wouldn’t make him a elite scorer. lebron james averages way above average for a small forward but hes not a elite assist man. When talking about elite you include all positions unless you are saying this guy is elite compared to the players at his position
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:57pm #443657
stanford hoopsif he averaged 2 blks a game he wouldn’t be considered a elite shot blocker. it doesn’t matter what position someone plays if you say they are elite at something. if the average pg averaged 12ppg and some other pg averaged 20 that wouldn’t make him a elite scorer. lebron james averages way above average for a small forward but hes not a elite assist man. When talking about elite you include all positions unless you are saying this guy is elite compared to the players at his position
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 6:57pm #443673
stanford hoopsif he averaged 2 blks a game he wouldn’t be considered a elite shot blocker. it doesn’t matter what position someone plays if you say they are elite at something. if the average pg averaged 12ppg and some other pg averaged 20 that wouldn’t make him a elite scorer. lebron james averages way above average for a small forward but hes not a elite assist man. When talking about elite you include all positions unless you are saying this guy is elite compared to the players at his position
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:02pm #443656
stanford hoops"New York are expecting too much out of a 2nd round pick. Even though is an all-around talent, Fields isn’t NBA level at anything really, so there is a good chance him not making the team"
you talking about this llperez?
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:02pm #443660
stanford hoops"New York are expecting too much out of a 2nd round pick. Even though is an all-around talent, Fields isn’t NBA level at anything really, so there is a good chance him not making the team"
you talking about this llperez?
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:02pm #443676
stanford hoops"New York are expecting too much out of a 2nd round pick. Even though is an all-around talent, Fields isn’t NBA level at anything really, so there is a good chance him not making the team"
you talking about this llperez?
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:02pm #443659

JNixonParticipantHoneycutt isn’t even an elite shot-blocker for a SF though lol.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:02pm #443663

JNixonParticipantHoneycutt isn’t even an elite shot-blocker for a SF though lol.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:02pm #443679

JNixonParticipantHoneycutt isn’t even an elite shot-blocker for a SF though lol.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:04pm #443662

llperezyeah. I just bumped that thread a week ago when fields had his 21-17 game and i went back and read the coments. Im not goona harp on those comments and make a deal out of them, but when you question how a guy translates to the nba that admit you barely watched, it makes me question this knoweldge you have about honeycutt based on tonight when ive never heard you talk about him before.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:04pm #443666

llperezyeah. I just bumped that thread a week ago when fields had his 21-17 game and i went back and read the coments. Im not goona harp on those comments and make a deal out of them, but when you question how a guy translates to the nba that admit you barely watched, it makes me question this knoweldge you have about honeycutt based on tonight when ive never heard you talk about him before.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:04pm #443682

llperezyeah. I just bumped that thread a week ago when fields had his 21-17 game and i went back and read the coments. Im not goona harp on those comments and make a deal out of them, but when you question how a guy translates to the nba that admit you barely watched, it makes me question this knoweldge you have about honeycutt based on tonight when ive never heard you talk about him before.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:06pm #443665

llperezhoneycutt blocked 2 or more shots in 10 games last year. ANd when i talk about his skills of course im gonna relate them to his position. Scoring is a bad comparison becasue in basketball every position has the ability to be a 20 point scoreer. How many sf’s are gonna block 2 shots a game?
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:06pm #443669

llperezhoneycutt blocked 2 or more shots in 10 games last year. ANd when i talk about his skills of course im gonna relate them to his position. Scoring is a bad comparison becasue in basketball every position has the ability to be a 20 point scoreer. How many sf’s are gonna block 2 shots a game?
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:06pm #443685

llperezhoneycutt blocked 2 or more shots in 10 games last year. ANd when i talk about his skills of course im gonna relate them to his position. Scoring is a bad comparison becasue in basketball every position has the ability to be a 20 point scoreer. How many sf’s are gonna block 2 shots a game?
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:06pm #443668
stanford hoopsHe scored nearly twice as much as Stephenson did, but what about his scoring translates? He was the best player on a very suspect Stanford team, and you have to know he won’t see the ball at nearly the rate he did for Stanford. I’d be shocked if Hill puts up better scoring numbers than Stephenson does, even as a rookie. I watched him play against Kentucky and 1 other game against Washington and I think he’s solid, but nothing about him makes me think he can be a true rotation player
Many people missed the boat on this guy (except me and llperez) thats why i always say if you havent watched a lot of games of a guy then most likely you cant make a good judgement on the guy
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:06pm #443672
stanford hoopsHe scored nearly twice as much as Stephenson did, but what about his scoring translates? He was the best player on a very suspect Stanford team, and you have to know he won’t see the ball at nearly the rate he did for Stanford. I’d be shocked if Hill puts up better scoring numbers than Stephenson does, even as a rookie. I watched him play against Kentucky and 1 other game against Washington and I think he’s solid, but nothing about him makes me think he can be a true rotation player
Many people missed the boat on this guy (except me and llperez) thats why i always say if you havent watched a lot of games of a guy then most likely you cant make a good judgement on the guy
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:06pm #443688
stanford hoopsHe scored nearly twice as much as Stephenson did, but what about his scoring translates? He was the best player on a very suspect Stanford team, and you have to know he won’t see the ball at nearly the rate he did for Stanford. I’d be shocked if Hill puts up better scoring numbers than Stephenson does, even as a rookie. I watched him play against Kentucky and 1 other game against Washington and I think he’s solid, but nothing about him makes me think he can be a true rotation player
Many people missed the boat on this guy (except me and llperez) thats why i always say if you havent watched a lot of games of a guy then most likely you cant make a good judgement on the guy
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:10pm #443674

llperezhe finished with 4 blocks tonight
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:10pm #443678

llperezhe finished with 4 blocks tonight
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:10pm #443694

llperezhe finished with 4 blocks tonight
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:10pm #443677
stanford hoopsthat still wouldnt make him a elite shot blocker. elite means all players not just a certain position. that would just make him a good shot blocker. elite is when you are up there with other elite shot blockers reguardless of position
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:10pm #443681
stanford hoopsthat still wouldnt make him a elite shot blocker. elite means all players not just a certain position. that would just make him a good shot blocker. elite is when you are up there with other elite shot blockers reguardless of position
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:10pm #443697
stanford hoopsthat still wouldnt make him a elite shot blocker. elite means all players not just a certain position. that would just make him a good shot blocker. elite is when you are up there with other elite shot blockers reguardless of position
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:11pm #443680

Mr.Knick 32ParticipantStanford, are you saying you was hyping up Landry Fields pre draft?
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:11pm #443684

Mr.Knick 32ParticipantStanford, are you saying you was hyping up Landry Fields pre draft?
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:11pm #443700

Mr.Knick 32ParticipantStanford, are you saying you was hyping up Landry Fields pre draft?
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:11pm #443683

JNixonParticipantI talked briefly about Honeycutt when I talked about UCLA in nmy countdown to the season. I didn’t watch Stanford play, but UCLA was on TV enough in the East for me to have seen him play more than once. More than twice actually. Stanford just never came on TV. I actually watched the Kentucky v. Stanford game on my computer. They never got national coverage.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:11pm #443687

JNixonParticipantI talked briefly about Honeycutt when I talked about UCLA in nmy countdown to the season. I didn’t watch Stanford play, but UCLA was on TV enough in the East for me to have seen him play more than once. More than twice actually. Stanford just never came on TV. I actually watched the Kentucky v. Stanford game on my computer. They never got national coverage.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:11pm #443703

JNixonParticipantI talked briefly about Honeycutt when I talked about UCLA in nmy countdown to the season. I didn’t watch Stanford play, but UCLA was on TV enough in the East for me to have seen him play more than once. More than twice actually. Stanford just never came on TV. I actually watched the Kentucky v. Stanford game on my computer. They never got national coverage.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:14pm #443686

JNixonParticipantI don’t think ANYONE expected Landry Fields to get the time or production he’s getting early on. I also don’t think anyone expected Lance Stephenson would screw up as bad as he did, and therefore he’s had no chance to prove how good he actually is.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:14pm #443690

JNixonParticipantI don’t think ANYONE expected Landry Fields to get the time or production he’s getting early on. I also don’t think anyone expected Lance Stephenson would screw up as bad as he did, and therefore he’s had no chance to prove how good he actually is.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:14pm #443706

JNixonParticipantI don’t think ANYONE expected Landry Fields to get the time or production he’s getting early on. I also don’t think anyone expected Lance Stephenson would screw up as bad as he did, and therefore he’s had no chance to prove how good he actually is.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:15pm #443689

llperezall i got to say, is i rather argue with you guys then watch that sorry a.ss game. And congrats to the villanova fan i talked smack to. It was the first real team ucla played this year, so hopefully it was a learning lessong for the young guys.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:15pm #443693

llperezall i got to say, is i rather argue with you guys then watch that sorry a.ss game. And congrats to the villanova fan i talked smack to. It was the first real team ucla played this year, so hopefully it was a learning lessong for the young guys.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:15pm #443709

llperezall i got to say, is i rather argue with you guys then watch that sorry a.ss game. And congrats to the villanova fan i talked smack to. It was the first real team ucla played this year, so hopefully it was a learning lessong for the young guys.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:15pm #443692
stanford hoopsmr knicks im starting to thing youre the only one who doesnt read post. everyone knows i was high on fields after the kentucky game. how come you seem to be the last one to catch on with these things
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:15pm #443696
stanford hoopsmr knicks im starting to thing youre the only one who doesnt read post. everyone knows i was high on fields after the kentucky game. how come you seem to be the last one to catch on with these things
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:15pm #443712
stanford hoopsmr knicks im starting to thing youre the only one who doesnt read post. everyone knows i was high on fields after the kentucky game. how come you seem to be the last one to catch on with these things
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:16pm #443695

llperezand ill admit, discussing blocks for a sf is stupid. I dont care if he is elite or not, the fact that we have to discuss blcoking ability is just not a good sign. He needs to pick it up or else he will be a 2012 prospect. He is better then he showed tonight.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:16pm #443699

llperezand ill admit, discussing blocks for a sf is stupid. I dont care if he is elite or not, the fact that we have to discuss blcoking ability is just not a good sign. He needs to pick it up or else he will be a 2012 prospect. He is better then he showed tonight.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:16pm #443715

llperezand ill admit, discussing blocks for a sf is stupid. I dont care if he is elite or not, the fact that we have to discuss blcoking ability is just not a good sign. He needs to pick it up or else he will be a 2012 prospect. He is better then he showed tonight.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:17pm #443698
stanford hoopsfields exceeded most peoples expectations but only a few of us considered him a first round talent who was gonna be a rotational player. i didnt think he would start but i did say he would beat out bill walker and could be the backup small forward because i watched alot of his games and knew his game translated well to the nba
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:17pm #443702
stanford hoopsfields exceeded most peoples expectations but only a few of us considered him a first round talent who was gonna be a rotational player. i didnt think he would start but i did say he would beat out bill walker and could be the backup small forward because i watched alot of his games and knew his game translated well to the nba
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:17pm #443719
stanford hoopsfields exceeded most peoples expectations but only a few of us considered him a first round talent who was gonna be a rotational player. i didnt think he would start but i did say he would beat out bill walker and could be the backup small forward because i watched alot of his games and knew his game translated well to the nba
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:19pm #443705
DraftDanteCunninghamParticipantgood game perez….we had our fun smack, but you guys were there the whole game for being as young as you are. If Josh Smith can stay out of foul trouble that guy is a beast, he’s got size, nimble feet and moves around the basket…Honeycutt was pretty impressive too.
Glad to see Yarou grab 17/18 boards whatever it was, Wayns and Fish disected the UCLA d as I expected, our bigs had problems finishing around the rim which got pretty annoying……we did get the better whistle, even as a homer I can admit that.
oh well now on to Tennessee….. good luck hope UCLA wins out, gotta make that Nova resume look better =}
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:19pm #443707
DraftDanteCunninghamParticipantgood game perez….we had our fun smack, but you guys were there the whole game for being as young as you are. If Josh Smith can stay out of foul trouble that guy is a beast, he’s got size, nimble feet and moves around the basket…Honeycutt was pretty impressive too.
Glad to see Yarou grab 17/18 boards whatever it was, Wayns and Fish disected the UCLA d as I expected, our bigs had problems finishing around the rim which got pretty annoying……we did get the better whistle, even as a homer I can admit that.
oh well now on to Tennessee….. good luck hope UCLA wins out, gotta make that Nova resume look better =}
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:19pm #443725
DraftDanteCunninghamParticipantgood game perez….we had our fun smack, but you guys were there the whole game for being as young as you are. If Josh Smith can stay out of foul trouble that guy is a beast, he’s got size, nimble feet and moves around the basket…Honeycutt was pretty impressive too.
Glad to see Yarou grab 17/18 boards whatever it was, Wayns and Fish disected the UCLA d as I expected, our bigs had problems finishing around the rim which got pretty annoying……we did get the better whistle, even as a homer I can admit that.
oh well now on to Tennessee….. good luck hope UCLA wins out, gotta make that Nova resume look better =}
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:20pm #443708

JNixonParticipant"but only a few of us considered him a first round talent who was gonna be a rotational player."
NOBODY said he was a 1st round prospect. Let’s not pat our backs too hard. Nobody was calling him a 1st round pick. Nobody even mentioned him really until the Knicks passed Lance Stephenson to get him.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:20pm #443710

JNixonParticipant"but only a few of us considered him a first round talent who was gonna be a rotational player."
NOBODY said he was a 1st round prospect. Let’s not pat our backs too hard. Nobody was calling him a 1st round pick. Nobody even mentioned him really until the Knicks passed Lance Stephenson to get him.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:20pm #443728

JNixonParticipant"but only a few of us considered him a first round talent who was gonna be a rotational player."
NOBODY said he was a 1st round prospect. Let’s not pat our backs too hard. Nobody was calling him a 1st round pick. Nobody even mentioned him really until the Knicks passed Lance Stephenson to get him.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:21pm #443711

llperezthanks for being a good sport and not rubbing it in. Tongight, i lick my wounds. But tommorow, im gonna be calling out those jayhawk fans. We got them coming up and we gonna run those fools.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:21pm #443713

llperezthanks for being a good sport and not rubbing it in. Tongight, i lick my wounds. But tommorow, im gonna be calling out those jayhawk fans. We got them coming up and we gonna run those fools.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:21pm #443731

llperezthanks for being a good sport and not rubbing it in. Tongight, i lick my wounds. But tommorow, im gonna be calling out those jayhawk fans. We got them coming up and we gonna run those fools.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:24pm #443717

llperezi metioned him a few times saying he was the bes tplayer in the pac 10 and wondered why no one seemed to know about him. But i never called him a first rounder. Although thats partly becasue i was brainwashed by all the draft sites ignoring him and i figured they must be right.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:24pm #443718

llperezi metioned him a few times saying he was the bes tplayer in the pac 10 and wondered why no one seemed to know about him. But i never called him a first rounder. Although thats partly becasue i was brainwashed by all the draft sites ignoring him and i figured they must be right.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:24pm #443737

llperezi metioned him a few times saying he was the bes tplayer in the pac 10 and wondered why no one seemed to know about him. But i never called him a first rounder. Although thats partly becasue i was brainwashed by all the draft sites ignoring him and i figured they must be right.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:26pm #443720

JNixonParticipant"i metioned him a few times saying he was the bes tplayer in the pac 10 and wondered why no one seemed to know about him."
Because the Pac-10 was horrible last year, and most of the users on here are from the East. So nobody went out of their way to watch Pac-10 basketball. Especially a team like Stanford that sucked and was never on nat’l TV.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:26pm #443721

JNixonParticipant"i metioned him a few times saying he was the bes tplayer in the pac 10 and wondered why no one seemed to know about him."
Because the Pac-10 was horrible last year, and most of the users on here are from the East. So nobody went out of their way to watch Pac-10 basketball. Especially a team like Stanford that sucked and was never on nat’l TV.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:26pm #443740

JNixonParticipant"i metioned him a few times saying he was the bes tplayer in the pac 10 and wondered why no one seemed to know about him."
Because the Pac-10 was horrible last year, and most of the users on here are from the East. So nobody went out of their way to watch Pac-10 basketball. Especially a team like Stanford that sucked and was never on nat’l TV.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:26pm #443723

Mr.Knick 32ParticipantI don’t remember you saying that honestly. Even we were talking draft talk, I don’t remember once you talking about him after that Stanford game.
Noone thought he was a 1st round pick. Let’s not lie now…
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:26pm #443724

Mr.Knick 32ParticipantI don’t remember you saying that honestly. Even we were talking draft talk, I don’t remember once you talking about him after that Stanford game.
Noone thought he was a 1st round pick. Let’s not lie now…
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:26pm #443743

Mr.Knick 32ParticipantI don’t remember you saying that honestly. Even we were talking draft talk, I don’t remember once you talking about him after that Stanford game.
Noone thought he was a 1st round pick. Let’s not lie now…
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:31pm #443726

llperezi know washingotn just lost back to back to kentucky and michigan state, but they are gonna be a hell of a team this year. They had halftime leads in both games and lost them in the final minutes. They are defenitely the class of the pac 10 this year.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:31pm #443727

llperezi know washingotn just lost back to back to kentucky and michigan state, but they are gonna be a hell of a team this year. They had halftime leads in both games and lost them in the final minutes. They are defenitely the class of the pac 10 this year.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 7:31pm #443746

llperezi know washingotn just lost back to back to kentucky and michigan state, but they are gonna be a hell of a team this year. They had halftime leads in both games and lost them in the final minutes. They are defenitely the class of the pac 10 this year.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 8:44pm #443769
stanford hoopsim still looking for where i said hes aa first round talent
mr knicks you must really have a bad memory if you dont remember me talking about fields.. maybe this link will refresh youre memory
http://www.nbadraft.net/forum/knick-are-idiots
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 8:44pm #443774
stanford hoopsim still looking for where i said hes aa first round talent
mr knicks you must really have a bad memory if you dont remember me talking about fields.. maybe this link will refresh youre memory
http://www.nbadraft.net/forum/knick-are-idiots
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 8:44pm #443788
stanford hoopsim still looking for where i said hes aa first round talent
mr knicks you must really have a bad memory if you dont remember me talking about fields.. maybe this link will refresh youre memory
http://www.nbadraft.net/forum/knick-are-idiots
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 8:47pm #443772

JNixonParticipantLOL, keep looking my friend. Keep looking.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 8:47pm #443777

JNixonParticipantLOL, keep looking my friend. Keep looking.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 8:47pm #443791

JNixonParticipantLOL, keep looking my friend. Keep looking.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 9:05pm #443778
stanford hoopsEventually ill find. after reading that post a couple of people on here need to rethink there talent evaluation obviously, especially for a player that y’all haven’t watched much. its no shame to say "i haven’t seen him much so I’m not sure what he can do"
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 9:05pm #443783
stanford hoopsEventually ill find. after reading that post a couple of people on here need to rethink there talent evaluation obviously, especially for a player that y’all haven’t watched much. its no shame to say "i haven’t seen him much so I’m not sure what he can do"
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 9:05pm #443797
stanford hoopsEventually ill find. after reading that post a couple of people on here need to rethink there talent evaluation obviously, especially for a player that y’all haven’t watched much. its no shame to say "i haven’t seen him much so I’m not sure what he can do"
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 9:15pm #443784

JNixonParticipantJust like there’s no shame in saying "I didn’t say Landry Fields was a 1st round talent"
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 9:15pm #443790

JNixonParticipantJust like there’s no shame in saying "I didn’t say Landry Fields was a 1st round talent"
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/24/2010 - 9:15pm #443801

JNixonParticipantJust like there’s no shame in saying "I didn’t say Landry Fields was a 1st round talent"
0 - AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |