This topic contains 9 replies, has 4 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar BothTeamsPlayedHard 15 years, 6 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #23529
    AvatarAvatar
    jaysmith1987
    Participant

    I believe the one and done rule has been a success.  I think its exposed players who have been overhyped and makes players earn there draft positions.  Gm’s still pick projects because of potential but it would be a bigger risk if they were coming out of high school.  If you look at past mock drafts players like Bryon Mullens were projected high first round picks then they went missing during the college season and they get picked later first round maybe second round.  Also there are the players who thought they were ready to go pro then they end up spending another year in college or another few years.  Last year coming out of high school John Henson was considered a legit big time Nba prospect he had horrible year and decided to return to school under the old system he would have been some Nba teams problem.  The only thing id like to see out of some of the players is that instead of going to the Ncaa maybe go to Dleague or Europe especially because some of these kids have no interest in education and there taking suspensions instead of playing a whole season and just taking classes online.  These kids dont have to actually go to a college campus to get a degree many adults have online degrees.  I think there is better ways to develop your game for the nba than college basketball.

    0
  • #445954
    AvatarAvatar
    blackflash234
    Participant

    I couldn’t agree more. The one and done rule really has determined the high school players that are for real and the ones that if they came out of high school straight to the NBA, they would’ve disappointed a whole alot of teams. For example, Bryon Mullens who probably would’ve been a lottery pick.

    0
  • #445961
    AvatarAvatar
    blackflash234
    Participant

    I couldn’t agree more. The one and done rule really has determined the high school players that are for real and the ones that if they came out of high school straight to the NBA, they would’ve disappointed a whole alot of teams. For example, Bryon Mullens who probably would’ve been a lottery pick.

    0
  • #445965
    AvatarAvatar
    blackflash234
    Participant

    I couldn’t agree more. The one and done rule really has determined the high school players that are for real and the ones that if they came out of high school straight to the NBA, they would’ve disappointed a whole alot of teams. For example, Bryon Mullens who probably would’ve been a lottery pick.

    0
  • #446016
    AvatarAvatar
    Platypus
    Participant

    I agree about the D league, its a way for the one and done players to play some bench nba players, its better than playing teams that will have one player in 30 yrs to barely make the nba for example a team playing central michigan, atleast in the D league they are getting paid because they probably need the money and then they dont have to go to the nba and receive illegal funds

    0
  • #446021
    AvatarAvatar
    Platypus
    Participant

    I agree about the D league, its a way for the one and done players to play some bench nba players, its better than playing teams that will have one player in 30 yrs to barely make the nba for example a team playing central michigan, atleast in the D league they are getting paid because they probably need the money and then they dont have to go to the nba and receive illegal funds

    0
  • #446025
    AvatarAvatar
    Platypus
    Participant

    I agree about the D league, its a way for the one and done players to play some bench nba players, its better than playing teams that will have one player in 30 yrs to barely make the nba for example a team playing central michigan, atleast in the D league they are getting paid because they probably need the money and then they dont have to go to the nba and receive illegal funds

    0
  • #446038
    AvatarAvatar
    BothTeamsPlayedHard
    Participant

    Elite level European clubs with money don’t want to waste a roster spot (and in many instances a spot for the limited number of American players) on an 18-year old on a one-year rental. Brandon Jennings made Roma money because of the buyout, but he didn’t really help them on the court. Tyler was a disaster for Maccabi Haifa. The clubs that would have the most to gain from the gamble are those that barely pay more than the NBDL.

    0
  • #446046
    AvatarAvatar
    BothTeamsPlayedHard
    Participant

    Elite level European clubs with money don’t want to waste a roster spot (and in many instances a spot for the limited number of American players) on an 18-year old on a one-year rental. Brandon Jennings made Roma money because of the buyout, but he didn’t really help them on the court. Tyler was a disaster for Maccabi Haifa. The clubs that would have the most to gain from the gamble are those that barely pay more than the NBDL.

    0
  • #446048
    AvatarAvatar
    BothTeamsPlayedHard
    Participant

    Elite level European clubs with money don’t want to waste a roster spot (and in many instances a spot for the limited number of American players) on an 18-year old on a one-year rental. Brandon Jennings made Roma money because of the buyout, but he didn’t really help them on the court. Tyler was a disaster for Maccabi Haifa. The clubs that would have the most to gain from the gamble are those that barely pay more than the NBDL.

    0

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login