This topic contains 16 replies, has 7 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar paradigmn 15 years ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #31186
    AvatarAvatar
    paradigmn
    Participant

     This was the first year I did a MOCK DRAFT…I have to say I had a freakin ballllll as far as the whole process was concerned….good times 4 sure….with that being said I was interested on people opinions as far as who did the "best" out of the 3 main MOCK DRAFT sources…..I guess the top 3 are, (my opinion of course) Chad Ford with his Mock, Aran Smith with this site and Jonathan Givony with Draft express….I haven’t really compared how they did to really give a good opinion but from a quick glance it seems CHAD FORD did the worse out of the 3.  I could be wrong….opinions???

    0
  • #555886
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    would be interested in seeing this as well. Someone get to work. I know somewhere aran and jonathan are keeping tabs of who has the upper hand after each draft. But in reality the guy who should probably get more credit is the one who brings prosepcts to our attention earlier and not at the last minute when guys are already getting tons of coverage.

    0
  • #555943
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    would be interested in seeing this as well. Someone get to work. I know somewhere aran and jonathan are keeping tabs of who has the upper hand after each draft. But in reality the guy who should probably get more credit is the one who brings prosepcts to our attention earlier and not at the last minute when guys are already getting tons of coverage.

    0
  • #555888
    AvatarAvatar
    GottaBeTheShoes
    Participant

     Never trust ESPN’s specialists. They are always wrong.  Like Joe Lunardi got like nothing right on the tournament bracket on who would get in.  Chad Ford was the one that started screaming Kawhi Leonard top 5.  Kawhi went where he was supposed to at 15.  They always try and go big but get it wrong.  I think they get their sources from the octopus that guesses who wins the fifa world cup.

    0
  • #555946
    AvatarAvatar
    GottaBeTheShoes
    Participant

     Never trust ESPN’s specialists. They are always wrong.  Like Joe Lunardi got like nothing right on the tournament bracket on who would get in.  Chad Ford was the one that started screaming Kawhi Leonard top 5.  Kawhi went where he was supposed to at 15.  They always try and go big but get it wrong.  I think they get their sources from the octopus that guesses who wins the fifa world cup.

    0
  • #555907
    AvatarAvatar
    MagikKnick
    Participant

     I think ‘the forbidden site’ did best, i think they got 10 right out of 30 in the first, thats really good

    I used all 3 as ‘resources’, and a bunch of "tweets"

    Heres a good article that compares some of the mocks:

    http://uponfurtherreview.kansascity.com/?q=node/3296

    0
  • #555965
    AvatarAvatar
    MagikKnick
    Participant

     I think ‘the forbidden site’ did best, i think they got 10 right out of 30 in the first, thats really good

    I used all 3 as ‘resources’, and a bunch of "tweets"

    Heres a good article that compares some of the mocks:

    http://uponfurtherreview.kansascity.com/?q=node/3296

    0
  • #555925
    AvatarAvatar
    paradigmn
    Participant

     dude…that OCTOPUS got every pick RIGHT…lol….I think it went like 8 for 8…..plus I heard it was tastey as helll….love me some calamari!!!…good article post MAGIKKNICK….thanx

    0
  • #555984
    AvatarAvatar
    paradigmn
    Participant

     dude…that OCTOPUS got every pick RIGHT…lol….I think it went like 8 for 8…..plus I heard it was tastey as helll….love me some calamari!!!…good article post MAGIKKNICK….thanx

    0
  • #555931
    AvatarAvatar
    WizardofOz
    Participant

    I heard that Jonathan Givony had the most accurate mock out of the 3.

    0
  • #555990
    AvatarAvatar
    WizardofOz
    Participant

    I heard that Jonathan Givony had the most accurate mock out of the 3.

    0
  • #555939
    AvatarAvatar
    thparadox
    Participant

    Personally, it doesn’t matter who had the most right out of 30.

    Things change so much on the last day of the draf that it’s a huge craps shoot… shit, half the picks got traded, so the team + player weren’t even matched properly.

     

    I like nbadraft.net the best. The scouting reports, articles, player profiles, forums (mostly), are really great. I’ve loved the whole style of this site for many years

     

    0
  • #555997
    AvatarAvatar
    thparadox
    Participant

    Personally, it doesn’t matter who had the most right out of 30.

    Things change so much on the last day of the draf that it’s a huge craps shoot… shit, half the picks got traded, so the team + player weren’t even matched properly.

     

    I like nbadraft.net the best. The scouting reports, articles, player profiles, forums (mostly), are really great. I’ve loved the whole style of this site for many years

     

    0
  • #555950
    AvatarAvatar
    aamir543
    Participant

    Holy sh!t, we are second out of 10………………… but to our bitter rivals! Dont worry Aran, we will get them next year!!!!!!!

    0
  • #556007
    AvatarAvatar
    aamir543
    Participant

    Holy sh!t, we are second out of 10………………… but to our bitter rivals! Dont worry Aran, we will get them next year!!!!!!!

    0
  • #555954
    AvatarAvatar
    paradigmn
    Participant

     Why does WIZARD of OZ have negatives???….all he said was DX had the most accurate draft and Magikknicks article supports that statement…doesnt take away anything away from this site and how it is a better site than DX

    0
  • #556012
    AvatarAvatar
    paradigmn
    Participant

     Why does WIZARD of OZ have negatives???….all he said was DX had the most accurate draft and Magikknicks article supports that statement…doesnt take away anything away from this site and how it is a better site than DX

    0

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login