This topic contains 10 replies, has 8 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar NYK2010 16 years, 8 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • Posted on: Mon, 10/19/2009 - 12:43pm #9534
    AvatarAvatar
    cp33
    Participant

    I sure hope so.

    http://www.slamonline.com/online/nba/2009/10/report-cavs-want-stephen-jackson/

    0
  • Posted on: Mon, 10/19/2009 - 12:46pm #222728
    AvatarAvatar
    JNixon
    Participant

    It would be a good addition, they would have to get rid of Delonte, but a rejuvenated Stephen Jackson is better than West in my opinion.

    0
  • Posted on: Mon, 10/19/2009 - 12:49pm #222729
    AvatarAvatar
    KevinDurantRocks
    Participant

    GoldenState would give up Jackson basically for free cause he has a bad contract and a bad attitude! But think of this line up

    c- Shaq
    pf-Jackson
    sf-James
    sg-West
    pg-Williams

    that would be the best cleveland could do and having big z that be pretty good

    0
  • Posted on: Mon, 10/19/2009 - 12:52pm #222730
    AvatarAvatar
    JNixon
    Participant

    Are you talking about STEPHEN Jackson playing PF or DARNELL Jackson? Either way, that wouldn’t be realistic, but just wondering…

    0
  • Posted on: Mon, 10/19/2009 - 12:56pm #222731
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    Cleavland is banking hard on winning it this season. And if they don’t have to give up much more then Ilgauskas, then i think it would be a smart trade for them. Stephen can play multiple positions and shoot.

    0
  • Posted on: Mon, 10/19/2009 - 12:57pm #222732
    AvatarAvatar
    AirJuggernaut

    that lineup is stupid as f*ck

    0
  • Posted on: Mon, 10/19/2009 - 1:20pm #222734
    AvatarAvatar
    dmo21
    Participant

    who would the cavs trade/who would the warriors want in this trade?
    this trade works:
    Stephen Jackson for Delonte West, JJ Hickson, and a draft pick

    warriors would want hickson, but west is a maybe cause he is also kinda a head case
    cavs probably dont wanna get rid of hickson, but they might have to throw something sweet into the deal

    0
  • Posted on: Mon, 10/19/2009 - 1:43pm #222741
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    i’ve read that the warriors would be willing to give him up for an expiring contract like Ilgauskas.

    0
  • Posted on: Mon, 10/19/2009 - 4:46pm #222804
    AvatarAvatar
    nateoak10
    Participant

    We would want Big Z… not hickson or west

    0
  • Posted on: Mon, 10/19/2009 - 9:36pm #222830
    AvatarAvatar
    Chicago1980
    Participant

    That would be an interesting trade but Jackson wouldnt play PF he is a guard of small forward he will be playing SG in cleveland I think and they would have some size at the sg with him the line up should be.
    C-Shaq
    PF-Varejo
    SF- James
    SG- Jackson
    PG Williams

    0
  • Posted on: Mon, 10/19/2009 - 11:26pm #222835
    AvatarAvatar
    NYK2010
    Participant

    Doubtful the Cavs get Jackson just can’t see the Cavs trading for a guy with 4 years on his contract.
    They just spent so much on Varajeo, Moon, Parker and they are tied up with Williams, and Gibson too.
    That team would need a lot of quality big men.

    He would definately help but I think the Warriors are going to wait and try to get more than Hickson, West and a pick.
    The pick would be almost a 2nd rounder considering how good the Cavs are in the reg. season.
    Then again if the Warriors just want to get rid of him now trading him for Z is a good option for both teams.

    0
  • Author
    Posts

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login