This topic contains 18 replies, has 8 voices, and was last updated by 
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Thu, 09/25/2014 - 4:49pm #58024
The8thDeadlySinParticipantThere are no wrong answers. Just opinions.
If you can only have 1 for your team, would you choose elite size or elite speed?
Is it easier for a fast paced team to play slow or a slow paced team to speed up?
If you can only have 1 as the staple for your team, would it be a great 2-3 zone or a great full court press?
What is more important, great transition offense or a great half court offense?
Motion offense or Pick and Roll offense?
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/25/2014 - 5:12pm #949763
NCarmean18Participant#1. I would choose size over speed, personally. As a Nuggets fan, I have seen speed perform extremely well… during the regular season. Most teams that have a lot of success in the playoffs are teams with quality big men. You could argue that Miami won two championships with no true big men, but they also had the greatest player on the planet. Also, in the two series in which Miami lost to Dallas and San Antonio, Dallas had Tyson Chandler in the middle, and San Antonio had Tim Duncan who both played extremely good post defense. I’d go with size.
#2. I think that it is easier for a slow paced team to play fast. Again, thinking about the Nuggets a few seasons ago, they played extremely well in transition. However, whenever it came to slowing the game down and setting up a halfcourt offense against Golden State in the first round of the playoffs, the Warriors throttled us. The Warriors weren’t necessarily "slow", but they were able to effectively slow down and set up an efficient half-court offense.
#3. I love a good zone defense whenever it works to perfection, but man, if a full court press is on and working magically, it is very entertaining to watch. I’d choose both, because I cannot decide.
#4. I already hit on this, a great half-court offense is more vital on the bigger stage.
#5. As a big, I have always enjoyed the pick-and-roll/pick-and-pop. But again, just personal preference. I like both, and both have proven to be effective in various ways.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/25/2014 - 5:12pm #949627
NCarmean18Participant#1. I would choose size over speed, personally. As a Nuggets fan, I have seen speed perform extremely well… during the regular season. Most teams that have a lot of success in the playoffs are teams with quality big men. You could argue that Miami won two championships with no true big men, but they also had the greatest player on the planet. Also, in the two series in which Miami lost to Dallas and San Antonio, Dallas had Tyson Chandler in the middle, and San Antonio had Tim Duncan who both played extremely good post defense. I’d go with size.
#2. I think that it is easier for a slow paced team to play fast. Again, thinking about the Nuggets a few seasons ago, they played extremely well in transition. However, whenever it came to slowing the game down and setting up a halfcourt offense against Golden State in the first round of the playoffs, the Warriors throttled us. The Warriors weren’t necessarily "slow", but they were able to effectively slow down and set up an efficient half-court offense.
#3. I love a good zone defense whenever it works to perfection, but man, if a full court press is on and working magically, it is very entertaining to watch. I’d choose both, because I cannot decide.
#4. I already hit on this, a great half-court offense is more vital on the bigger stage.
#5. As a big, I have always enjoyed the pick-and-roll/pick-and-pop. But again, just personal preference. I like both, and both have proven to be effective in various ways.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/25/2014 - 5:42pm #949765
drk3351Participant1. size over speed
2. easier for a fast paced team to play slow
3. are we just talking nba or any level? anyway i say full court press over 2-3 zone.
4. half court offense over transition offense
5. motion offense.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/25/2014 - 5:42pm #949629
drk3351Participant1. size over speed
2. easier for a fast paced team to play slow
3. are we just talking nba or any level? anyway i say full court press over 2-3 zone.
4. half court offense over transition offense
5. motion offense.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/25/2014 - 9:51pm #949775
ExumInfernoParticipantSize.
Fast team has easier time slowing down.
Great zone.
Half court offense.
Pick and roll.
Nearly all the answers are about winning in the playoffs. The big team wins, the one that plays great defense and offense in the half court wins, pick and roll seems to be something champion teams do well.
For question 2, slow teams can’t really speed up because they are already slow. Not that fast teams play too well when they slow down, as they are fast becuase they don’t have the post scorers they need to play slow.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/25/2014 - 9:51pm #949639
ExumInfernoParticipantSize.
Fast team has easier time slowing down.
Great zone.
Half court offense.
Pick and roll.
Nearly all the answers are about winning in the playoffs. The big team wins, the one that plays great defense and offense in the half court wins, pick and roll seems to be something champion teams do well.
For question 2, slow teams can’t really speed up because they are already slow. Not that fast teams play too well when they slow down, as they are fast becuase they don’t have the post scorers they need to play slow.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 09/26/2014 - 3:21am #949787
ZouldiersParticipantDefensively, it’s good to have the size advantage. For the second one, i think it is easier for a fast-paced team
to slow down. For the third one, a great 2-3 zone will be the staple for the team sure you can give up a lot of threes but they won’t be able to score a lot in the paint that’s for sure and sooner or later the opposing team will go cold from the perimeter. For the fourth one, it is more important to have a great half-court offense because your team won’t get tired easily and teams tend to slow the pace especially in the playoffs. For the last one, pick-and-roll offense, just watch the Spurs.0 - Posted on: Fri, 09/26/2014 - 3:21am #949651
ZouldiersParticipantDefensively, it’s good to have the size advantage. For the second one, i think it is easier for a fast-paced team
to slow down. For the third one, a great 2-3 zone will be the staple for the team sure you can give up a lot of threes but they won’t be able to score a lot in the paint that’s for sure and sooner or later the opposing team will go cold from the perimeter. For the fourth one, it is more important to have a great half-court offense because your team won’t get tired easily and teams tend to slow the pace especially in the playoffs. For the last one, pick-and-roll offense, just watch the Spurs.0 - Posted on: Fri, 09/26/2014 - 5:47am #949795
Andrew1984ParticipantIf you can only have 1 for your team, would you choose elite size or elite speed?
Skill and technique are far more important than both. Between size and speed, all other things being equal, I would choose speed because defensively, there is a huge mental advantage in causing offenses to play with fear. Second, not all rebounds come off right at the hoop. Having speed can compensate for lack of size on long rebounds and loose balls. Really fast teams present more challenges to opponents than really tall teams.
Is it easier for a fast paced team to play slow or a slow paced team to speed up?
It’s easier for a fast-paced team to slow down than for a slow-paced team to speed up because they’re not really doing anything new. Even fast-paced teams still have a lot of half-court sets in a given game; no team is able to fast-break on every possession. So a fast-paced team has more experience executing in the half-court than a normally slow-paced team would have pushing the ball.
If you can only have 1 as the staple for your team, would it be a great 2-3 zone or a great full court press?
First, I will apply this question to college and high school because both 2-3 zones and full-court pressure are both rare in the NBA. You can’t really use a 2-3 in the NBA because perimeter shooters will you shoot you out of it quickly, and also because it gives up too many offensive rebounds. You also can’t press in the NBA because NBA players handle the ball too well and see the floor too well. They will look middle and long and turn it into non-stop 3-on-2s.
So at the college or high school level, it’s full-court press for sure. It’s a no-brainer. A 2-3 zone is designed to mitigate a massive talent deficiency by shortening the game and forcing more talented players to be patient. A good coach only plays a 2-3 because he has to, not because he wants to.(Although some lazy coaches prefer 2-3 because it’s harder and more time-consuming to teach man-to-man principles.)
Full-court pressure is something you can only do if you have the players for it. If you’ve got the horses, you’d be crazy not to. It allows you to intimidate opponents (see question 1), generate momentum, excitement, and easy buckets. If you’ve ever played against a great full-court press, you feel like your opponent has about eight players on the floor. Quick mistakes pile up and the pressing team can go on HUGE runs.
What is more important, great transition offense or a great half court offense?
A great half-court offense for sure, because eventually, even great running teams will face a defense that is disciplined enough to get back. To win games consistently, you have to be able to execute in the half-court. Transition offense is like A-1 sauce. It’s great if you can have it, but without the steak itself, it’s worthless.
Motion offense or Pick and Roll offense?
“Motion” is kind of a vague term. In the systems in which I’ve played and coached, “motion” meant that there is no set or continuity play, you just read and react, pass and pick away, drive-and-kick. It basically means, “go play basketball,” whereas a play or a set calls for pre-determined screening, passing, and cutting.
You really don’t see pick-and-roll as much in college and high school as you do in the NBA, and that is because its success depends on advanced skill. If you have two great P&R players, even when everyone in the building knows they’re going to run it, you still can’t stop it. It’s like a great running team in the NFL. You know it’s coming but you can’t stop it. But it takes a long time of honing individual skills to get to that point. Most NBA teams run a mix of sets, motion, and P&R.
If I had to choose, I’d take motion because it involves all five players. If three guys on the floor feel like they’re not part of the offense, they’ll be mentally disengaged on defense too. Everyone needs to feel like they’re part of the action to stay focused.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 09/26/2014 - 5:47am #949659
Andrew1984ParticipantIf you can only have 1 for your team, would you choose elite size or elite speed?
Skill and technique are far more important than both. Between size and speed, all other things being equal, I would choose speed because defensively, there is a huge mental advantage in causing offenses to play with fear. Second, not all rebounds come off right at the hoop. Having speed can compensate for lack of size on long rebounds and loose balls. Really fast teams present more challenges to opponents than really tall teams.
Is it easier for a fast paced team to play slow or a slow paced team to speed up?
It’s easier for a fast-paced team to slow down than for a slow-paced team to speed up because they’re not really doing anything new. Even fast-paced teams still have a lot of half-court sets in a given game; no team is able to fast-break on every possession. So a fast-paced team has more experience executing in the half-court than a normally slow-paced team would have pushing the ball.
If you can only have 1 as the staple for your team, would it be a great 2-3 zone or a great full court press?
First, I will apply this question to college and high school because both 2-3 zones and full-court pressure are both rare in the NBA. You can’t really use a 2-3 in the NBA because perimeter shooters will you shoot you out of it quickly, and also because it gives up too many offensive rebounds. You also can’t press in the NBA because NBA players handle the ball too well and see the floor too well. They will look middle and long and turn it into non-stop 3-on-2s.
So at the college or high school level, it’s full-court press for sure. It’s a no-brainer. A 2-3 zone is designed to mitigate a massive talent deficiency by shortening the game and forcing more talented players to be patient. A good coach only plays a 2-3 because he has to, not because he wants to.(Although some lazy coaches prefer 2-3 because it’s harder and more time-consuming to teach man-to-man principles.)
Full-court pressure is something you can only do if you have the players for it. If you’ve got the horses, you’d be crazy not to. It allows you to intimidate opponents (see question 1), generate momentum, excitement, and easy buckets. If you’ve ever played against a great full-court press, you feel like your opponent has about eight players on the floor. Quick mistakes pile up and the pressing team can go on HUGE runs.
What is more important, great transition offense or a great half court offense?
A great half-court offense for sure, because eventually, even great running teams will face a defense that is disciplined enough to get back. To win games consistently, you have to be able to execute in the half-court. Transition offense is like A-1 sauce. It’s great if you can have it, but without the steak itself, it’s worthless.
Motion offense or Pick and Roll offense?
“Motion” is kind of a vague term. In the systems in which I’ve played and coached, “motion” meant that there is no set or continuity play, you just read and react, pass and pick away, drive-and-kick. It basically means, “go play basketball,” whereas a play or a set calls for pre-determined screening, passing, and cutting.
You really don’t see pick-and-roll as much in college and high school as you do in the NBA, and that is because its success depends on advanced skill. If you have two great P&R players, even when everyone in the building knows they’re going to run it, you still can’t stop it. It’s like a great running team in the NFL. You know it’s coming but you can’t stop it. But it takes a long time of honing individual skills to get to that point. Most NBA teams run a mix of sets, motion, and P&R.
If I had to choose, I’d take motion because it involves all five players. If three guys on the floor feel like they’re not part of the offense, they’ll be mentally disengaged on defense too. Everyone needs to feel like they’re part of the action to stay focused.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 09/26/2014 - 6:01am #949797
prophetmeirParticipantIf you can only have 1 for your team, would you choose elite size or elite speed?
Elite Size , Having a rebounding advantage equals more shots and more opprotunities. Also creates better matchups and easier scorring opp
Is it easier for a fast paced team to play slow or a slow paced team to speed up?
Slow team to speed up, just a matter of getting in the offense quicker.
If you can only have 1 as the staple for your team, would it be a great 2-3 zone or a great full court press?
Full Court press , especially with a 24 sec shot clock that would eat that time and make a team think about their next shot
What is more important, great transition offense or a great half court offense?
Great half court offense , if you have that you can score at any time or situation
Motion offense or Pick and Roll offense?
All depends on whos team it is, but I would say motion offense gets everyone involved and keeps the ball moving.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 09/26/2014 - 6:01am #949661
prophetmeirParticipantIf you can only have 1 for your team, would you choose elite size or elite speed?
Elite Size , Having a rebounding advantage equals more shots and more opprotunities. Also creates better matchups and easier scorring opp
Is it easier for a fast paced team to play slow or a slow paced team to speed up?
Slow team to speed up, just a matter of getting in the offense quicker.
If you can only have 1 as the staple for your team, would it be a great 2-3 zone or a great full court press?
Full Court press , especially with a 24 sec shot clock that would eat that time and make a team think about their next shot
What is more important, great transition offense or a great half court offense?
Great half court offense , if you have that you can score at any time or situation
Motion offense or Pick and Roll offense?
All depends on whos team it is, but I would say motion offense gets everyone involved and keeps the ball moving.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 09/26/2014 - 6:25am #949805
Memphis MadnessParticipantIf you can only have 1 for your team, would you choose elite size or elite speed?
Elite SPEED. You can’t stop something you can’t catch. ELITE SIZE? Does that team have spacing? Can they get to the basket? Can they get free throws and hit 3’s? What about their transition size.
I will go with Elite SPEED. I am picturing a team that is not super small. Thinking of quicker guards like a Tony Parker-Monta Ellis backcourt or Conley-Bledsoe. DOMINANT point guards can have their way with teams. Give me an Andrew Wiggins on the wing even if he isn’t super skilled or a 6’9 freak. His SPEED and athleticism, paired with a dominant speedy point guard is a great way to go. At the 2 give me a solid guy with a QUICK release — Klay Thompson. Is he HUGE? Yeah, well, kind of. Not unheard of though. Then give me some ballers inside who can play some offense and defense and get me some hustle points. I don’t NEED a 7’1 guy or a twin towers lineup.
The WRINKLE here is ok, you put a speedy ATHLETIC stretch four their at the power forward spot and you are GOLDEN. LeBron — no he is not a 7 footer like Dirk or Duncan but he is one of the best guy ever to play minutes at the 4 spot. Or, Carmelo. Slimming down and the guy can SCORE. Rudy Gay is another quicker guy at the 4. About 6’9ish but not HUGE. Or, give me Jabari Parker at the 4. My backup 4? Aaon Gordon. Not the BIGGEST guy but he has ELITE speed. A high motor guy.
At center give me a mobile big over a big huge stiff. Bosh. 6’10, rangy. The ORIGINAL stretch five. A healthy Birdman is an ideal backup. Also, give me my guy Joey Dorsey. About 6’6 but LONG arms, QUICK, with some power, athleticism, and a quick first jump.
Is it easier for a fast paced team to play slow or a slow paced team to speed up?
The local YMCA team made up of 35-45 grizzled vets ain’t gonna speed it up.
If you can only have 1 as the staple for your team, would it be a great 2-3 zone or a great full court press?
No THREE POINTERS in the game? Great zone. WITH the 3 point era? Give me a great full court press. Get the game going up and down, and with my SPEED guys I WILL WIN.
What is more important, great transition offense or a great half court offense?
Ok, give me a great HALF COURT offense here. Watch the Spurs. GREAT half court offense. That is REAL basketball. Oh, I WANT transition scoring, which is why I want the full court press (turnovers, steals, fastbreaks), and guys who can push the ball all by themselves, basically one man fast breaks. BUT, nothing elaborate. Just get the ball to the guy with the fastest dribble, get some trailers to fill the lanes, and a shooter or two to flare out to the 3 point line. Have the 5 man lumber down the court into rebounding position OR stay back for a high pick and roll. I want the halfcourt offense though. Fastbreaks are about speed, and instincts and I am going with my SPEED guys. Also, paradoxically I don’t have the huge 7 footer like Shaq who makes the half court offense easy. Throw it into Shaq, get some 3 point shooters around him and watch things happen. No, with zone defenses, no handchecking, hack a bad foul shooter, and all that, I want a WELL ROUNDED offensive machine (like the Spurs) or a healthier, younger Heat team from a couple of years ago. A mixture of speed and size, but mostly shooting, passing, high basketball IQ, and spacing.
BUT, it depens on personnel. If you have a Shaq or a Wilt or an Olajuwon then you tweak your offense AND defense, although you would STILL go after a great half court offense. On D you can probably get away with a 3-2 zone if you have an athletic flyswatter like Bill Russell in the middle. But, wouldn’t Russell be an example of SPEED over SIZE (Wilt was bigger. Shaq was lots bigger).
Compare ALL TIME ELITE SPEED vs. ELITE SIZE teams. Not sure who would win, but it would be very, very interesting.
ELITE SPEED
PG Isiah Thomas
SG Michael Jordan (ok, he had GREAT size too, but his SPEED was off the charts)
SF Scottie Pippen (ok, really good SF size at 6’7 but there have been BIGGER small forwards)
PF LeBron James (best point 4 ever)
C Bill Russell (still a legit 6’10 but more SPEED than SIZE)
6th man Allen Iverson: SPEED, SPEED, and more SPEED at either guard spot. Possibly the best pound for pound scorer EVER.
ELITE SIZE
PG Magic Johnson: 6’9 point guard. Self explanatory. There were speedier 1’s too.
SG George Gervin: Ok, he was a stick, but about 6’8 or so. An OVERSIZED 2 guard who can SCORE.
SF Larry Bird: ELITE SIZE. Elite Speed? Not so much
PF Tim Duncan: Ok, he calls himself a 4 and he is the biggest power forward EVER. Also, the PF GOAT.
C Shaq: Ok, the guy had speed to, especially as a youngster, but his SIZE would make even Wilt look small(er).
6th man: Kevin McHale: Big, long, and pasty. Not much speed (ANY speed?). But, TALENT. Big for a 4 and can also play the 5. Classic old man, low post game.
WHO WINS?
WHO CARES!!!!
That would be the greatest game EVER!!!!!
0 - Posted on: Fri, 09/26/2014 - 6:25am #949669
Memphis MadnessParticipantIf you can only have 1 for your team, would you choose elite size or elite speed?
Elite SPEED. You can’t stop something you can’t catch. ELITE SIZE? Does that team have spacing? Can they get to the basket? Can they get free throws and hit 3’s? What about their transition size.
I will go with Elite SPEED. I am picturing a team that is not super small. Thinking of quicker guards like a Tony Parker-Monta Ellis backcourt or Conley-Bledsoe. DOMINANT point guards can have their way with teams. Give me an Andrew Wiggins on the wing even if he isn’t super skilled or a 6’9 freak. His SPEED and athleticism, paired with a dominant speedy point guard is a great way to go. At the 2 give me a solid guy with a QUICK release — Klay Thompson. Is he HUGE? Yeah, well, kind of. Not unheard of though. Then give me some ballers inside who can play some offense and defense and get me some hustle points. I don’t NEED a 7’1 guy or a twin towers lineup.
The WRINKLE here is ok, you put a speedy ATHLETIC stretch four their at the power forward spot and you are GOLDEN. LeBron — no he is not a 7 footer like Dirk or Duncan but he is one of the best guy ever to play minutes at the 4 spot. Or, Carmelo. Slimming down and the guy can SCORE. Rudy Gay is another quicker guy at the 4. About 6’9ish but not HUGE. Or, give me Jabari Parker at the 4. My backup 4? Aaon Gordon. Not the BIGGEST guy but he has ELITE speed. A high motor guy.
At center give me a mobile big over a big huge stiff. Bosh. 6’10, rangy. The ORIGINAL stretch five. A healthy Birdman is an ideal backup. Also, give me my guy Joey Dorsey. About 6’6 but LONG arms, QUICK, with some power, athleticism, and a quick first jump.
Is it easier for a fast paced team to play slow or a slow paced team to speed up?
The local YMCA team made up of 35-45 grizzled vets ain’t gonna speed it up.
If you can only have 1 as the staple for your team, would it be a great 2-3 zone or a great full court press?
No THREE POINTERS in the game? Great zone. WITH the 3 point era? Give me a great full court press. Get the game going up and down, and with my SPEED guys I WILL WIN.
What is more important, great transition offense or a great half court offense?
Ok, give me a great HALF COURT offense here. Watch the Spurs. GREAT half court offense. That is REAL basketball. Oh, I WANT transition scoring, which is why I want the full court press (turnovers, steals, fastbreaks), and guys who can push the ball all by themselves, basically one man fast breaks. BUT, nothing elaborate. Just get the ball to the guy with the fastest dribble, get some trailers to fill the lanes, and a shooter or two to flare out to the 3 point line. Have the 5 man lumber down the court into rebounding position OR stay back for a high pick and roll. I want the halfcourt offense though. Fastbreaks are about speed, and instincts and I am going with my SPEED guys. Also, paradoxically I don’t have the huge 7 footer like Shaq who makes the half court offense easy. Throw it into Shaq, get some 3 point shooters around him and watch things happen. No, with zone defenses, no handchecking, hack a bad foul shooter, and all that, I want a WELL ROUNDED offensive machine (like the Spurs) or a healthier, younger Heat team from a couple of years ago. A mixture of speed and size, but mostly shooting, passing, high basketball IQ, and spacing.
BUT, it depens on personnel. If you have a Shaq or a Wilt or an Olajuwon then you tweak your offense AND defense, although you would STILL go after a great half court offense. On D you can probably get away with a 3-2 zone if you have an athletic flyswatter like Bill Russell in the middle. But, wouldn’t Russell be an example of SPEED over SIZE (Wilt was bigger. Shaq was lots bigger).
Compare ALL TIME ELITE SPEED vs. ELITE SIZE teams. Not sure who would win, but it would be very, very interesting.
ELITE SPEED
PG Isiah Thomas
SG Michael Jordan (ok, he had GREAT size too, but his SPEED was off the charts)
SF Scottie Pippen (ok, really good SF size at 6’7 but there have been BIGGER small forwards)
PF LeBron James (best point 4 ever)
C Bill Russell (still a legit 6’10 but more SPEED than SIZE)
6th man Allen Iverson: SPEED, SPEED, and more SPEED at either guard spot. Possibly the best pound for pound scorer EVER.
ELITE SIZE
PG Magic Johnson: 6’9 point guard. Self explanatory. There were speedier 1’s too.
SG George Gervin: Ok, he was a stick, but about 6’8 or so. An OVERSIZED 2 guard who can SCORE.
SF Larry Bird: ELITE SIZE. Elite Speed? Not so much
PF Tim Duncan: Ok, he calls himself a 4 and he is the biggest power forward EVER. Also, the PF GOAT.
C Shaq: Ok, the guy had speed to, especially as a youngster, but his SIZE would make even Wilt look small(er).
6th man: Kevin McHale: Big, long, and pasty. Not much speed (ANY speed?). But, TALENT. Big for a 4 and can also play the 5. Classic old man, low post game.
WHO WINS?
WHO CARES!!!!
That would be the greatest game EVER!!!!!
0 - Posted on: Fri, 09/26/2014 - 8:41am #949821
Memphis MadnessParticipantHere is my all-time ELITE SPEED team:
Starters
PG Isiah Thomas
SG Michael Jordan
SF Scottie Pippen
PF LeBron James
C Bill Russell
Bench
PG Spud Webb
SG Allen Iverson
SF Dominique Wilkins
PF Dennis Rodman
C Birdman
Reserves
PG Nate Robinson
SF David Thompson
PF Robert Horry
My team gives you speed and quickness AND toughness and defense with enough outside shooting to spread the floor.
All Time ELITE SIZE Team
PG Magic Johnson
SG George Gervin
SF Larry Bird
PF Tim Duncan
C Shaq
Bench
PG Mark Jackson
SG Mitch Richmond
SF Kevin Durant
PF Kevin McHale
C Wilt
Reserves
SF Toni Kukoc
PF Boris Diaw
C Arvydas Sabonis
0 - Posted on: Fri, 09/26/2014 - 8:41am #949685
Memphis MadnessParticipantHere is my all-time ELITE SPEED team:
Starters
PG Isiah Thomas
SG Michael Jordan
SF Scottie Pippen
PF LeBron James
C Bill Russell
Bench
PG Spud Webb
SG Allen Iverson
SF Dominique Wilkins
PF Dennis Rodman
C Birdman
Reserves
PG Nate Robinson
SF David Thompson
PF Robert Horry
My team gives you speed and quickness AND toughness and defense with enough outside shooting to spread the floor.
All Time ELITE SIZE Team
PG Magic Johnson
SG George Gervin
SF Larry Bird
PF Tim Duncan
C Shaq
Bench
PG Mark Jackson
SG Mitch Richmond
SF Kevin Durant
PF Kevin McHale
C Wilt
Reserves
SF Toni Kukoc
PF Boris Diaw
C Arvydas Sabonis
0 - AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |