This topic contains 13 replies, has 11 voices, and was last updated by
iguapops420 15 years ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Mon, 06/20/2011 - 2:00pm #30733

rickybobbyParticipantRockets, Jazz, Pacers, Bobcats all teams that need resh starts and faces
Houston: Al Jefferson
Utah: Danny Granger, Jordan Hill, James Posey
Pacers: Stephen Jackson, Luis Scola, DeSagana Diop
Bobcats: Paul Millsap, Brad Miller, Dahntay Jones, Houstons #14 pick
Houston gets the big and allstar they dragstically need to pair with Kevin Martin and Kyle Lowry
Jazz gets an allstar caliber wing scorer to help build with Derrick Favors and their 2 draft picks (Knight and a big) or (Kanter and Jimmer)
Pacers gets two good starters too help their young team develop while parting ways with Granger
Bobcats gets a potiental 20pts 10 reb guy in Millsap, and can use the #9, #14 picks to fill two of their 3 needs. SG,SF,C
0 - Posted on: Mon, 06/20/2011 - 2:06pm #547998
HadzialijagicParticipantThis trade doesnt seem to bad..maybe send houstons pick toward utah and it might be more fair
0 - Posted on: Mon, 06/20/2011 - 2:32pm #548014
mcbaileyParticipantExcept that I’m not entirely sure Indy wants Stephen Jackson back.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 06/20/2011 - 2:36pm #548019

sammybuckeye13ParticipantThe Jazz really really need shooting/a go to wing, and if they could get Granger w/o giving up Favors or a pick, that would just be amazing.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 06/20/2011 - 2:45pm #548025
aamir543ParticipantNice ideas. It gives all four teams some fresh blood to experiment with. But the sad truth is that the teams in this league dont have the balls to make trades like these. Nice ideas nonetheless. Basketball Guru, you should be taking notes.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 06/20/2011 - 2:52pm #548029
PulseGlazerParticipantIndy would never take Jax back, but besides that, really impressive.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 06/20/2011 - 2:55pm #548034
TMoney617Participantof giving up millsap and jefferson and the pacers probably wouldnt do this trade
0 - Posted on: Mon, 06/20/2011 - 3:09pm #548045

rickybobbyParticipantUtah eventually going to get rid of the both of them because they got Favors at their 4 position who has a tremendous amount of potential thats not going to be tapped if they keep either of them. Plus they got Okur at the 5 can pick up a quality big with either of their draft picks, and they desperatly need a legitament wing scorer
0 - Posted on: Mon, 06/20/2011 - 3:28pm #548063
scliddiardParticipantUtah’s giving up too much, 2 starters, maybe with 14th or 15th pick.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 06/20/2011 - 3:33pm #548070

rickybobbyParticipanti was going to give them the 14th pick, but i wanted to sweeten the deal for the struggling Bobcats
0 - Posted on: Mon, 06/20/2011 - 3:34pm #548074
- Posted on: Mon, 06/20/2011 - 3:39pm #548082

apb540ParticipantOnly team that might balk is Indy. Everyone else would say yes for sure.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 06/20/2011 - 3:51pm #548092

Scottoant93Participant*Congratulations… forgot the t haha
0 - Posted on: Mon, 06/20/2011 - 4:09pm #548102

iguapops420ParticipantNot a fan of this trade.
0 - AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |
