This topic contains 44 replies, has 18 voices, and was last updated by
SpartanGlory 12 years, 2 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 2:26pm #54678
aadParticipantWho should they pick if they stay at pick 8
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 2:58pm #885585

Chilbert arenasParticipantStuckey finally off the books next year. If they move on from him they need help at the two position. Win now: Gary Harris. Win in 3 years: Zach Lavine.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 2:58pm #885474

Chilbert arenasParticipantStuckey finally off the books next year. If they move on from him they need help at the two position. Win now: Gary Harris. Win in 3 years: Zach Lavine.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 3:08pm #885595

esperanzafleet69Participanteither gary harris or dante exum if he’s still there.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 3:08pm #885484

esperanzafleet69Participanteither gary harris or dante exum if he’s still there.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 3:25pm #885607
HomerKangParticipantThey need either a good SF to play alongside Josh Smith, or a new good combo guard. If SF, then I think they should take Rodney Hood. If combo guard, then I think they should go with Dante Exum. If Exum isn’t available by that point, then go with Stauskas.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 3:25pm #885496
HomerKangParticipantThey need either a good SF to play alongside Josh Smith, or a new good combo guard. If SF, then I think they should take Rodney Hood. If combo guard, then I think they should go with Dante Exum. If Exum isn’t available by that point, then go with Stauskas.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 3:28pm #885609
ReactionParticipantIf at 8 my draft order would be:
1. Exum
2. Smart
3. Kyle Anderson or Gary Harris
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 3:28pm #885498
ReactionParticipantIf at 8 my draft order would be:
1. Exum
2. Smart
3. Kyle Anderson or Gary Harris
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 4:05pm #885506
strobox88ParticipantPiston might want to look into drafting a true point guard (Kyle Anderson) or more depth at the 2 with Stucky off the books next year (Gary Harris). I like Gary Harris with the 8th pick. Harris and Caldwell-Pope are two promising young players at the 2 who can blossom if given the chance.
Anderson is a good pick as well, but as long as Jennings is there, he won’t play as much as I’d like him to. If they found some way to get rid of Jennings, Anderson would be my first choice if available.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 4:05pm #885617
strobox88ParticipantPiston might want to look into drafting a true point guard (Kyle Anderson) or more depth at the 2 with Stucky off the books next year (Gary Harris). I like Gary Harris with the 8th pick. Harris and Caldwell-Pope are two promising young players at the 2 who can blossom if given the chance.
Anderson is a good pick as well, but as long as Jennings is there, he won’t play as much as I’d like him to. If they found some way to get rid of Jennings, Anderson would be my first choice if available.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 4:15pm #885510
Rip255I think everyone expects Wiggins, Embiid and Parker to be gone by #8. I also think someone will reach for someone unexpected by the time #8 rolls around. That means one of the following will be available, and if I was the pistons, I’d take whichever is still there. I feel like there is a drop-off in talent after these guys so i’m using the "draft for talent, not need" philosophy. I like Gary Harris too, and he has Michigan love, so he’s my next choice.
Julius Randle
Dante Exum
Noah Vonleh
Marcus Smart
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 4:15pm #885621
Rip255I think everyone expects Wiggins, Embiid and Parker to be gone by #8. I also think someone will reach for someone unexpected by the time #8 rolls around. That means one of the following will be available, and if I was the pistons, I’d take whichever is still there. I feel like there is a drop-off in talent after these guys so i’m using the "draft for talent, not need" philosophy. I like Gary Harris too, and he has Michigan love, so he’s my next choice.
Julius Randle
Dante Exum
Noah Vonleh
Marcus Smart
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 4:35pm #885520
Magic JordanParticipantYeah sorry guys but they won’t be around at 8. I admire the wishful thinking though. I would say that have a legitimate shot at Harris, Hood etc. Randle most certainly won’t be around and neither will Exum. Vonleh could easily get picked ahead of Randle, I just don’t see any of the above mentioned falling. I think McDermott would be a nice fit next to the defensive minded Smith and Drummond. Or if they want someone more rounded Hood projects to be a better defender.
I guess it’s always possible they luck out in the lottery and jump into the top 3, but statistically speaking they will be looking at the 2nd tier of prospects, which definitely contains some good players.
0- Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 10:39pm #885577
Rip255You’re taking Mcdermott at 8 (Ridiculous) because you’re so sure that theres no chance of the Randle, Exum, Smart or Vonleh being around?
Mock Drafts aren’t an exact science. If one of those 3 isn’t available at 8 I’ll personally guarantee to leave this site and never come back, and I want you to hold me to that. It only takes 1 "reach" and one of them will be available. I’d be surprised if there wasn’t 2 of them available.
And when I use the term "reach", this site had Anthony Bennett at #10, and Alex Len at #1 last year.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 10:39pm #885689
Rip255You’re taking Mcdermott at 8 (Ridiculous) because you’re so sure that theres no chance of the Randle, Exum, Smart or Vonleh being around?
Mock Drafts aren’t an exact science. If one of those 3 isn’t available at 8 I’ll personally guarantee to leave this site and never come back, and I want you to hold me to that. It only takes 1 "reach" and one of them will be available. I’d be surprised if there wasn’t 2 of them available.
And when I use the term "reach", this site had Anthony Bennett at #10, and Alex Len at #1 last year.
0
- Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 4:35pm #885631
Magic JordanParticipantYeah sorry guys but they won’t be around at 8. I admire the wishful thinking though. I would say that have a legitimate shot at Harris, Hood etc. Randle most certainly won’t be around and neither will Exum. Vonleh could easily get picked ahead of Randle, I just don’t see any of the above mentioned falling. I think McDermott would be a nice fit next to the defensive minded Smith and Drummond. Or if they want someone more rounded Hood projects to be a better defender.
I guess it’s always possible they luck out in the lottery and jump into the top 3, but statistically speaking they will be looking at the 2nd tier of prospects, which definitely contains some good players.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 4:59pm #885530

Kokayne_DawkinzParticipantI’m sorry but why take Harris? I know he has Michigan State ties but why take a 2 gaurd in the top 10 two years in a row? It’s not like KCP is useless he is a good rebounded and shooter. I think they should target Kyle Anderson who would give them an point foward who could make every happy with his passing. I also think playing with Drummond with Smith could have cover up his defensive weaknesses.
0- Posted on: Fri, 04/04/2014 - 3:02am #885592
Kevin6CDParticipantis a pretty bad defender, aside from his shot blocking. Can’t defend the PNR to save his life and gets beat up in the post.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 04/04/2014 - 3:02am #885703
Kevin6CDParticipantis a pretty bad defender, aside from his shot blocking. Can’t defend the PNR to save his life and gets beat up in the post.
0
- Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 4:59pm #885641

Kokayne_DawkinzParticipantI’m sorry but why take Harris? I know he has Michigan State ties but why take a 2 gaurd in the top 10 two years in a row? It’s not like KCP is useless he is a good rebounded and shooter. I think they should target Kyle Anderson who would give them an point foward who could make every happy with his passing. I also think playing with Drummond with Smith could have cover up his defensive weaknesses.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 5:04pm #885532

GrandmamaParticipantI could see them taking Kyle Anderson.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 5:04pm #885643

GrandmamaParticipantI could see them taking Kyle Anderson.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 5:21pm #885536
KHAM83ParticipantI agree, no need to take a sg two years in a row. What do they need? A sf. I just don’t see Detroit being able to keep Monroe. And considering that they most likely cannot move Smith, their best chance to field a competitive team is to start Smith at pf alongside the man child. With that said, a sf is needed. McDermott brings the shooting they need, but I am just not a fan. I see him being an end of the bench player. Hood or Anderson will be the pick, giving the edge to Anderson bc his game is a poor man Tayshaun Price. We know how bad Dumars is trying to mimic that championship winning squad. As for Monroe, and I know it’s not the popular choice, I say they sign and trade him for some vets. A veteran sg and sf to man those positions told Pope and their rookie sf is ready.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 5:21pm #885647
KHAM83ParticipantI agree, no need to take a sg two years in a row. What do they need? A sf. I just don’t see Detroit being able to keep Monroe. And considering that they most likely cannot move Smith, their best chance to field a competitive team is to start Smith at pf alongside the man child. With that said, a sf is needed. McDermott brings the shooting they need, but I am just not a fan. I see him being an end of the bench player. Hood or Anderson will be the pick, giving the edge to Anderson bc his game is a poor man Tayshaun Price. We know how bad Dumars is trying to mimic that championship winning squad. As for Monroe, and I know it’s not the popular choice, I say they sign and trade him for some vets. A veteran sg and sf to man those positions told Pope and their rookie sf is ready.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 5:49pm #885544

Kokayne_DawkinzParticipantWhy am I getting negged and anyone else for that matter when we don’t think the pistons should take Harris? It makes almost no sense and would almost destroy KCP confidence? Those who negged please explain? I really just want someone to justify the harris pick for me
0- Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 6:01pm #885552
Lotto StudParticipantI take it those who negged you believed that the T’Wolves ’09 Draft made sense as well.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 6:01pm #885663
Lotto StudParticipantI take it those who negged you believed that the T’Wolves ’09 Draft made sense as well.
0
- Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 5:49pm #885655

Kokayne_DawkinzParticipantWhy am I getting negged and anyone else for that matter when we don’t think the pistons should take Harris? It makes almost no sense and would almost destroy KCP confidence? Those who negged please explain? I really just want someone to justify the harris pick for me
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 6:49pm #885559
PhillytheKidI am only writing this for the sake of getting back into the positive.
Gary Harris = Michael Jordan.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 6:49pm #885671
PhillytheKidI am only writing this for the sake of getting back into the positive.
Gary Harris = Michael Jordan.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 8:41pm #885567
canesboy6ParticipantI take Stauskas. They might be able to get more upside but they need shooting and just some overall solid floor play. I think he’d be the perfect fit there,
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/03/2014 - 8:41pm #885679
canesboy6ParticipantI take Stauskas. They might be able to get more upside but they need shooting and just some overall solid floor play. I think he’d be the perfect fit there,
0 - Posted on: Fri, 04/04/2014 - 4:09am #885618

TyroberParticipantI think they should just take the best player available. There are a lot of solid players available at eight, but maybe they should just take the player that falls to them.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 04/04/2014 - 4:09am #885729

TyroberParticipantI think they should just take the best player available. There are a lot of solid players available at eight, but maybe they should just take the player that falls to them.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 04/04/2014 - 4:53am #885632

OhCanada-ParticipantThey will take BPA they always have and always will under this management staff.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 04/04/2014 - 4:53am #885743

OhCanada-ParticipantThey will take BPA they always have and always will under this management staff.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 04/04/2014 - 4:56am #885634
juves4783Participanti like them taking a sf since they just selected kcp the previous year.
my preference would be:
1. kyle anderson – ability to let jennings play off the ball is something that could help ball movement on offense.
2. aaron gordon – high potential, his jump shot will improve, but he can play defense and rebound right away. drummond can’t offensive rebound all those smith and jennings bricks by himself.
3. rodney hood – they could use a shooter to spread the floor. hood poses less risk than doug mcdermott.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 04/04/2014 - 4:56am #885745
juves4783Participanti like them taking a sf since they just selected kcp the previous year.
my preference would be:
1. kyle anderson – ability to let jennings play off the ball is something that could help ball movement on offense.
2. aaron gordon – high potential, his jump shot will improve, but he can play defense and rebound right away. drummond can’t offensive rebound all those smith and jennings bricks by himself.
3. rodney hood – they could use a shooter to spread the floor. hood poses less risk than doug mcdermott.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 04/04/2014 - 5:19am #885638

SpartanGloryParticipantI think they go BPA here. Harris is a better player than KCP and if he’s there I wouldn’t fault them for that pick. Let’s be clear here, the pick is basically a gift that they didn’t plan on having. The real problems lie with the front office, coaching, and roster makeup. So basically everywhere else. Maybe they could package the pick with one of they’re Pf’s and balance out the roster..
0 - Posted on: Fri, 04/04/2014 - 5:19am #885749

SpartanGloryParticipantI think they go BPA here. Harris is a better player than KCP and if he’s there I wouldn’t fault them for that pick. Let’s be clear here, the pick is basically a gift that they didn’t plan on having. The real problems lie with the front office, coaching, and roster makeup. So basically everywhere else. Maybe they could package the pick with one of they’re Pf’s and balance out the roster..
0 - AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |