This topic contains 91 replies, has 9 voices, and was last updated by
Knicksboy34 16 years, 10 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 4:48am #7413

gatorheelsParticipantWizard DeShawn Stevenson, as quoted by the Washington Post’s Michael Lee: “I’ve been on this team four years — it depends on Gilbert Arenas. We can make as many trades as we want to. When he’s healthy and he’s playing, we’re a dangerous team. When we don’t have him, it makes it harder to move the ball; it’s hard to get things easy. That’s my point of view. If Gilbert is 70 percent, we’re going win a lot of games. If Gilbert is 80 percent, we’re going to be No. 1 in the East. If he’s 100 percent, we might win a championship.”
Yi Jianlian putting up big numbers in international play.
The New York Knicks claimed former Los Angeles Clipper Jason Williams(notes) off of waivers and can negotiate a new deal with him until Thursday but the word is that the Knicks will then try to trade the point guard elsewhere, according to CBSSports.com
But who will take Williams that wasn’t jumping at the chance when New York took him off the waiver wire? Nobody seems to know but the Knicks must have somebody in mind. At least one hopes so.The Latest: Free agency is really slowing down and while there are some named players still talking. Most of the action this week has involved the second and third tier free agents. Ryan Hollins and Shelden Williams both agreed to deals yesterday and if those two players don’t embody second and third tier not sure who does. Today we’ll run through the latest news and notes on the key free agents left on the board and where things stand with those players.
David Lee: It’s starting to look like David Lee won’t get his big payday, and sources close to the situation say he is crushed by how the market has treated him. His agent Mark Bartelstein has a small handful of teams that would gladly pay David the $10 million per season he’s seeking, but it would require a sign-and-trade and the Knicks just won’t take on the salary.
The Knicks are rumored to have a $7 million one-year offer on the table and it looks like that may be the best deal David’s camp gets. There is hope that either Memphis or Oklahoma City will do David a favor and make an offer at least putting New York on the clock to match, but neither team seems overly interested in Lee’s services, leaving him as one of the biggest names left in limbo. The smart money says he’ll take the Knicks one-year offer and hit unrestricted free agency again next summer when he’ll be free to talk to any team he chooses and the Knicks may be more open to a longer term deal once they know where things stand in 2010.Ramon Sessions: Ramon Sessions on the other hand may get his long-term deal. The Knicks and Sessions have been exchanging “proposals” and could get an offer sheet signed this week. Word is the deal will not be for the full median exception, rather a deal starting around $4.5 million. The Milwaukee Bucks retain the right to match any offers Sessions receives and the Bucks are playing their intentions pretty close to the vest. The belief is the Bucks will not match an offer over $4 million as that would put them into the NBA Luxury Tax, however the Bucks are not handcuffed by the Tax until the trade deadline, so matching Sessions is not out of the question because of the Tax today. The L.A. Clippers were rumored to be in the mix and sources close to the situation say the Clippers interest is not that high and that Sessions’ camp is likely leveraging talks with the Clippers to get Ramon the best deal possible.
Glen Davis: It seemed like Glen “Big Baby” Davis was headed towards a deal with the New Jersey Nets either as a free agent signing or in a sign and trade deal and now things have gone quiet. Sources close to the situation say the Celtics are not closed to matching an offer for Big Baby; it’s all about the dollars. A deal in the $3 to $4 million range is likely getting matched according to Celtic sources, a deal north of $5 million may not. The Celtics are rumored to have a four-year, $10 million offer on the table. The trick for Davis’ camp is to find someone willing to invest more than that into Davis and there appears to be a limited market for him. The Celtics have a $1 million Qualifying Offer out to Davis, so it’s not like he’ll be without a job, but like most restricted free agents his camp is finding the market extremely tough to get a deal.
Raymond Felton: Add Felton to the list of frustrated restricted free agents. Talks with the Charlotte Bobcats have come to a screeching halt. The talks were labeled as being at a “stalemate” by Bobcats’ GM Rod Higgins, a statement Felton’s agent Kevin Bradbury said implied the game was over, being clear that it was not. Felton is the lone restricted free agent with a sizable Qualifying Offer ($5.5 million) and his camp is looking for a deal in the neighborhoods established by Mike Bibby, Jason Kidd and Andre Miller – $6.5 million per season. The Bobcats just don’t seem open to that kind of number long-term. If Ramon Sessions inks an offer sheet in the $4 million range that may help Charlotte’s bargaining position but as things begin to slow down it does look like Felton will be in Charlotte next year, he just may not get a new contract this summer making him an unrestricted free agent next summer.
Nate Robinson: The New York Knicks are playing an interesting game of chicken with Nate Robinson. The word is that Nate has a one-year, $5 million offer on the table and has not accepted it. The Knicks this week picked up Jason Williams off of waivers from the Clippers, giving them until Thursday to ink a deal with the 33-year old point guard who will work out for the team today. If the Knicks and Williams can reach a deal, Robinson’s $5 million may disappear. Robinson flirted with the Sacramento Kings and the Golden State Warriors, but neither were willing to go long term for Robinson. The Orlando Magic got the sales pitch from Robinson’s agent Aaron Goodwin, but the Magic opted for Matt Barnes. Robinson received a two-year, $10 million offer from Olympiacos in Greece but turned that deal down. The Knicks Qualifying Offer is $2.9 million for next season, so it’s not like Nate is out of a job next season, he too may have to warm up to the idea that his payday is 11 months away.
Allen Iverson: The best financial deal on the table for the former MVP is a Greek offer from Olympiacos said to be worth $10 million for two seasons. Iverson is said to be considering the deal, but league sources said it’s far more likely Iverson picks Miami or Memphis before updating his passport. Several teams have talked with Iverson and sources close to his situation say it’s not about lack of interest, its finding the right situation. The Greek offer appeals to a wide range of areas for Iverson the business man; his star power would clearly change the perception of Olympiacos on the International stage and his marketing partners – namely Reebok – would love the exposure. It is not a stretch to think Iverson gives Olympiacos more than reasonable consideration, but sources say his heart is still in the NBA and finding the right NBA team is the goal.
Linas Kleiza: Linas wants to stay in the NBA, but the offers just are not there. The Nuggets have a $2.7 million Qualifying Offer out to Linas and will bring him back in a second at that price, much more than that has them thinking twice. The Pistons and the Raptors are both talking to Klezia and they may make an offer in the coming days. Olympiacos is also after Kleiza, and could be offering substantially more money, however Kleiza is not sold that’s the best move. His camp is waiting out the market and if previous seasons are any indication in late August some teams will start making offers hoping to catch a quality guy at a discount.
Joe Smith: With Marvin Williams out of the way it seemed the Joe Smith and the Atlanta Hawks were going to reach a deal and then things went quiet. Smith is considering several options with the Hawks and Cavaliers being the prime suitors for his services next season. Sources close to the situation say that Smith’s camp is looking for a two-year deal and dollars are not as important as years in this equation. There is little doubt Smith is no longer the player drafted #1 overall in 1995, however he still brings a lot of leadership and toughness to the table which is why teams are looking seriously at him as a veteran addition.
Von Wafer—Unrestricted Free Agent
Wafer can put the ball on the floor to create his own shot and can plug his open jumpers. Any team looking to bolster its bench offense can use Wafer. He’d be an auto-upgrade over Sasha Vujacic in Los Angeles, and would bring valuable offense back to Houston. Miami and Philadelphia would be his next best options.-The Orlando Magic will trade Marcin Gortat after December 15th
After the Magic surprisingly matched the Mavericks five-year $34 million offer to the polish Marcin Gortat, Magic fans immediately knew that GM Otis Smith was up to something, once again. Gortat will once again back-up the best center in the game today and his MPG will obviously remain at a minimum. With such an inflated contract and teams in desperate need of a starting center (Houston Rockets, Oklahoma City Thunder, Dallas Mavericks, Miami Heat, New York Knicks), Orlando will have no problem dealing Gortat away after December 15th (when Gortat is able to depart with the Magic) and trading up for an All-Star (with their $8 million trade exception).I just copy & pasted this…pretty interesting stuff
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 4:50am #195599

Knicksboy34ParticipantWith all the Guys the Knicks are looking at, we will be doing some trades and picking up a 1st rounder in 2010
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 4:57am #195606
BasketballGuru24ParticipantKleiza Will give The raptors A Crazy Bench….maybe one of the best in the league
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 4:59am #195607
FutureoftheGameDoes anyone see JWilliams going back to the Heat for a year or two?
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:00am #195608

Knicksboy34ParticipantNo, He’s going to NY.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:04am #195611
FutureoftheGameYou think he is really going to play for them? D’Antoni prolly dont even want him. He is old and probably looking for a long contract, which in NY is a no no, and wanting to start, which prolly wont happen there.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:07am #195612

Knicksboy34ParticipantJ-Williams is looking to come back into the NBA, on one article I was reading, the Knicks will sign him to a good deal and will most likely trade him.
The Knicks (if adding Sessions and Williams), will be making a whole bunch of trade deals.
If I was the Heat, why would I add J-Will for 2 years when your the front runner from A.I?
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:07am #195613
McWinningParticipanti could see the Knicks doing a midseason trade with Williams for an expiring contract. i think Gortat should be traded to the Thunder. he reminds me of Joel Pryzbilla and i think hed be a good fit there.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:09am #195614

Knicksboy34ParticipantGortat will be dealt to Houston most likely, that’s the only reason they match the offer.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:12am #195618
ckowalskiParticipantHouston needs help at center now. We can’t wait until December 15th
0- Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:17am #195625
trojans13Participantlet me start by saying david lee is probably my favorite player in the league BUT, this guy might be the toughest player to put a price tag in the league. his numbers are hugely inflated by the system he plays in because there are so many more possessions in knicks games than most others plus he’s the only capable of grabbing a rebound on that team. IMO, he is a big contract guy on a bad team or slightly above the midlevel for a really good team possibly as a 6th man. such a tough guy to to put the right price tag on in my opinion. thoughts?
0
- Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:14am #195620

Knicksboy34ParticipantWhat C is out there? Eddy Curry? Robert Swift?
They can wait, there gonna run a small lineup and by the 15th make a deal.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:14am #195621
FutureoftheGameWell because Williams is going to run an offence while Iverson is just going to take Wades shots. Im not an Iverson fan because every team he goes to is very subar unless he is the man. And that was 5 years ago.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:16am #195622
ckowalskiParticipantHaha I know there is pretty slim options out there, I’m just saying they really need a center now. If their season starts out rough they might not want to wait until december for a center, they might just take what they can get through a trade earlier.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:16am #195623
McWinningParticipantRobert Swift was signed by the Celtics. and im looking long term here i think if Gortot goes to the Thuder hell be there center of the future and fit his role. but if he goes to the Rockets he might only start for one year.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:16am #195624

Knicksboy34ParticipantListen, the Knicks will give him a nice deal. Not a big deal but maybe Vet’s minimum and plus the Heat wasn’t that interested in him since they didn’t try to win him on Waivers.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:18am #195626

Knicksboy34ParticipantI hope they rush for a C because we can give them Curry and slip another player there way and get more cap space.
Doesn’t matter. Gortat is not a C of the future, he is a backup at best so starting 1 season would be good for him.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:19am #195627
FutureoftheGameThe Heat are interested in a vetran PG. Williams helped them win a champinship and knows how to play with D-Wade. Just because they didnt try to get his waiver doesnt mean they arent interested. Im not saying they are getting him, but if they were interested in Tinsley, they are in Williams.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:20am #195628
ckowalskiParticipantI think the Rockets would make a move for Dalembert over Curry, maybe even go for someone like Dampier as a band-aid for a year.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:21am #195629

Knicksboy34ParticipantBut as of right now, why wait to get D-Will when you can get Tinsley?
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:21am #195630
McWinningParticipanthe fits the Thunders role better. i think of him as a center who can strt and be the 5 or 6th option on offence. hed be the 5th option behind Durant, Green, Westbrook, and Harden. all hell need to do is put up 5-10 points a night and rebound and play good D which is what hes best at.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:21am #195631

Knicksboy34ParticipantNoone is taking Dalembert’s contract and Dampier is a good idea but to do that you may have to give up a couple of good pieces for a 1 year fix.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:24am #195632
ckowalskiParticipantI think it would take Landry and a borderline rotation player with some cash as well. I honestly don’t know who they could give up though. They have good players but they all have small contracts. I think the Mavs would ask for either Shane or Ariza and I would be reluctant to do it.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:24am #195633
FutureoftheGameBecause Will knows where to put the ball. If I remeber Tisley (he hasnt played in like 2 years or somthin) he is a pretty shot happy PG. The plan in Miami is to develop Beasley more, Give Wade the ball, let Cook shoot every now and then. There arent many shots avaliable in Miami and Tinsley wont be down for that.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:28am #195634

Knicksboy34ParticipantI’m not trading Ariza, he will have a breakout season this year
Dampier is making 12 mil next season, to make a move
Battier has to be in the deal for at least his 6 mil then here are the other players that might be in the deal
Lowry, Brooks, Landry and Dorsey (everyone else is bad). none of those guys make over 4 mil so you may have to send 2 of those guys with Battier to add Dampier
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:29am #195635

Knicksboy34ParticipantBoth J-Will and Tinsley missed a season and Williams is older….so what are you talking about?
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:32am #195636
ckowalskiParticipantHayes, Cook, and Battier might work. I thought Dampier’s contract was expiring next year but he still has 2 years left. And if we’re giving up Battier I think we can dump a crappy player off on the Mavs (I would try to put Brian Cook in the deal somehow). Plus we are taking Dampier’s ridiculous contract off their books, it’s the least they can do.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:34am #195637
FutureoftheGameI just said that Tinsley will jack up lots of shots and JWill wont. That was the whole point of the post. What are you talking about?
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:35am #195638

Knicksboy34ParticipantCome on now, Dallas will not take that deal. Dampier is a exp contract you would have to have a better deal then 3 PF’s for Dampier. (The last year is not guaranteed)
The deal would have to be like Dampier & Cash for Battier, Landry, Buddinger and Lowry.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:38am #195640

Knicksboy34ParticipantOK, Let’s look at both of these guys last season
Tinsley- 11.9ppg- 3.6rpg and 8.4apg Age-27
Williams- 8.8ppg, 2rpg and 4.6apg Age-33Why would I add Williams? I would rather add Tinsley and put him on the bench over Williams. Tinsley can be your scoring point off the bench and Williams is older, his game was decreasing…dont even touch him.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:40am #195644
ckowalskiParticipantCook and Hayes are both expiring and Battier is a better player IMO than Dampier. Hayes played center for Houston last year as well. And since Dallas is looking to play with Dirk at center some of the time this year I don’t think it’s that big of a loss if they don’t have a true center. Idk how many player Dallas has under contract either, if you trade them too many players they are going to have to drop some of them.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:41am #195643
McWinningParticipantwilliams is a much easier player to coach and brings better defense and intangibles. hes not looking to score hes looking for his teammate to score. thats why i wouls rather take him.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:42am #195645

gatorheelsParticipantDallas has a lot of players under contract
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:42am #195646
FutureoftheGameDo you not understand chemistry? Tinsley is not going to accept a bench role with limited shots. Williams knows how to play with Wade. Williams knows Riley. Tinsley is only going to steal shots from the young core. He will demand to start and move Chalmers to the bench, thus, stunting his growth as the teams PG. I restpect what you are saying, I just dont agree.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:45am #195647

Knicksboy34Participantwilliams is a much easier player to coach and brings better defense and intangibles. hes not looking to score hes looking for his teammate to score.
So why did he averaged 4 assists? I highly disagree, Williams IS NOT a better defender then Tinsley. Your a numbers guy right?
Steals- Tinsley 1.7spg and Williams 1.2
And we dont know if Tinsley is still that guy who is tough to coach, he may comeback and is willing to listen. I would take the 27 year old PG rather then the 33 year old PG. Most people would…
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:47am #195648
McWinningParticipantanother factor is the Heat are a young team if Williams gets back to his old self he could get Beasley, more shots, and Wade wont have to be the creator anymore.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:48am #195649

gatorheelsParticipantI wouldn’t sign either of those guys lol seriously. Knicks need to sign Sessions & call it an offseason. Heat need to sign somebody like Big Baby that will actually help their team.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:49am #195650
FutureoftheGameHowever, we do know that Williams is coachable and you still arent getting the chemistry thing. You of all people know that steals are not a way to judge defensive ability. The lack of assist could be attributed to him not having great shooters aournd him often.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:49am #195651

Knicksboy34ParticipantJason Williams is 33, he has not averaged 6 assists since 2003! He’s old and his game is getting old. I rather have Tinsley who can score off the bench and pass very well (8 apg in 2007)
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:51am #195652
McWinningParticipantand another factor is Chalmers is the point guard of the future and if he sees Tnsley being greedy and looking to shoot all the time it could rub off on him.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:51am #195653

Knicksboy34ParticipantGator Heels- You love Big Baby, he is not a starter in the NBA, he had a ok season last year and showed me nothing to think he is a starter.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:53am #195654
FutureoftheGameGatorheels, how can you say that the Heat should sign a guy that is only going to try to take some shots and minutes from Beasley. And how can they call it an offseason when Chris Quinn is their backup PG?
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:53am #195655
FutureoftheGameSry, double post
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:54am #195657

gatorheelsParticipantYou need to watch some more games then Knicksboy. Glen Davis already proved he is a quality starter. Look what he did in the playoffs. Big Baby hit a game winning shot in the playoffs that many players haven’t done & never will. So you are telling me Tinsley & Williams would help out the Heat more than Big Baby? please.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:54am #195658

Knicksboy34Participantand another factor is Chalmers is the point guard of the future and if he sees Tnsley being greedy and looking to shoot all the time it could rub off on him.
Come on man, What if’s and Factors….Tinsley will come off the bench and will still be a scoring and passing threat. He is such a chucker he averaged more then 15ppg in 1 season and had average at least 5 assist in every season he played
Why go after Williams? Yea he maybe more coachable but he is slow, losing a step (Kinda why he retired) and not a good scorer. The Heat need another scorer off the bench/
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:55am #195659

gatorheelsParticipantFuture- Because Beasley needs to play SF. Also having Williams or Tinsley as a backup PG for the Heat is not going to make a difference as far as the success they will have this season.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:55am #195660
McWinningParticipantif the Heat get Big Baby it would take minutes away from Beasley, and hed become the backup small forward, not the backup sf/pf.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:56am #195661
FutureoftheGameKincksboy is right tho. He hasnt play an enitre year starting or playing lost of productive minutes yet. Lots of player have great runs then burn out. Jerome James is an example. Im not saying that Glen Davis will do that, im just saying that a good playoff doesnt mean anything as far as what he is going to do.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:56am #195662

Knicksboy34ParticipantSo your taking him as a starter because he hit a game winner? Ok….I saw alot of games he played (I live on the east coast) there’s a reason he still is a RFA, nobody is super high on him. He is a starter on a Bad team and a good bench option on a good team.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 5:58am #195663
FutureoftheGameThe reason he retired is because of family problems and his wife was having complications with her pregnancy.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 6:01am #195664
McWinningParticipantjust look at the difference trading Iverson made for the Nuggets. it saved Carmelo, and Jr from being greedy players. and changed the whole cultere of the team to a defense first team. Tinsley is a lot like Iverson in that sense. and you can compare Jr and Melo to Beasley, and Chalmers in that sense.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 6:02am #195666

Knicksboy34ParticipantStop Birdman, Come on now…..The Difference is Tinsley is not starting, Tinsley is not making big money so if he comes off the bench and scores, what’s the issue?
I agree with Gator, it wont make a difference but Tinsley is better and younger (I think that’s set in stone) so on a team with a leader like Wade, I rather take the Chance on Tinsley then go old and take Williams because he ” played well before”
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 6:03am #195667
billykParticipantI think Big Baby is an excellent 6th or 7th man off the bench……
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 6:04am #195668

gatorheelsParticipantI don’t love Big Baby Knicksboy haha really. I just feel like he could really help the Heat out.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 6:06am #195665

gatorheelsParticipantNo..but hitting a game winning shot in the conference semifinals of the playoffs is clutch. Also he averaged 16pts 6reb 2asst during the playoffs which is very good. That doesn’t sound like a bad player too me. I know he is way better than Tinsley or Williams. All restricted free agents are having trouble getting deals…that is the nature of the business…has nothing to do with teams not being high on him. I’ve seen Big Baby play in person I know what he is capable of. He is being slept on by alot of people on this website.
birdzilla- Beasley needs to be starting. James Jones isn’t even a good bench player.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 6:07am #195669
FutureoftheGameHow can you say Big Baby is better than Williams or Tinsley? That is like saying that Chris Paul is better than Dwight Howard.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 6:11am #195670

Knicksboy34ParticipantGatorheels- Would you have Big Baby as your starter? You would probably be losing close to 50 games that season.
Even on the teams that wanna add him (New Jersey, New Orleans) he wouldn’t start so I would not add him to start. People are sleeping on him because he is not that great. He is decent at best.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 6:12am #195672

Knicksboy34ParticipantI know you dont “Love” Big Baby, I think his role as the big off the bench fits him better then switching teams.
Also, I heard he may resign to Boston.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 6:22am #195674
McWinningParticipantif Tinsley was acting up in Indiana wh would he suddenly become a better person in Miami?
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 6:27am #195675

Knicksboy34ParticipantBecause he know this is a 2nd and final chance for him. Tinsley was embrassed he got deactived for a whole season, he will try to stay clean.
Think Steven Jackson- did you ever hear anything crazy since he left Indy? I dont think so.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 6:28am #195677

gatorheelsParticipantKnicksboy- If Big Baby went to the Heat then I absolutely would start him at PF & I would start Beasley at SF. This makes the Heat a better team IMO. If he went to New Jersey I think he should start there too. He wouldn’t start for New Orleans but he would still help them. Yes he may stay with the Celtics. I would like to see him leave though & get more playing time elsewhere.
Future- Paul & Dwight are stars. Big Baby is a good player while lets be honest Tinsley & Williams are pretty much scrubs at this point.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 6:36am #195678
FutureoftheGameI just dont like trying to compare when they are such different players. And, Big Baby would not start over Haslem. Who would rebound and play Defence??
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 6:45am #195681

Knicksboy34ParticipantYes, he’s smart he offered Tinsley a deal and didn’t even claim Williams off waivers. Say what you want, you dont know if Tinsley is still gonna act that way with D-Wade as the leader.
Tinsley talent wise is better then Williams.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 6:49am #195680
McWinningParticipantPat Rileys a smart man. he knows although Spoelstra has done a
good job hes going into his secong year of coaching.i dont think he would hand a headcase over to him in his second year. i think instead he would get Williams whos knows the system and has palyed with them before. and who is a much safer player. i think Riley knows that it would be had for a second year coach to get the respact of Tinsley. i think he should go to Charette where if Felon leaves they need a pg, and rown would be able to get his respect like he has done to Iverson, and Sheed.0- Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 7:46am #195697
trojans13Participantbig baby is an energy guy who shuold play no more than 20-25 minutes a night as a back up to both big spots. he brings great energy to the second unit and someone who can add scoring in spurts. he would become exposed in a role any greater than that. he would only be a starter for a team that is going to lose 50 games in a season
0
- Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 6:50am #195682
McWinningParticipantit takes years for a coach to get enough respect to get respect from players like that.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 6:56am #195684

gatorheelsParticipantFuture- I understand what you are saying about the comparisons. As fas as Big Baby vs. Halsem… I think Big Baby is the better player & would start over Haslem. Big Baby can rebound & defend just as well as Haslem can. Glen Davis is a better scorer.
You guys would honestly want Tinsley &or Williams on your team? I really would not sign either of these guys.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 6:58am #195685

Knicksboy34ParticipantHe has a 2nd chance, he may have changed his way and is trying to find a roster spot. We DONT KNOW.
All I know is, I saw both Williams and Tinsley’s numbers from the 2007-2008 seasons (both players last seasons) and they were not close. If Tinsley comes in committed, I would take Tinsley to be a scoring point off the bench who can pass.
You have a Bias on Tinsley because of the past, look at the numbers and how both players did. I rather have Tinsley because he is still in his prime and can contribute more than Jason Williams.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 8:14am #195703

gatorheelsParticipantHow do you explain the Celtics beating the Bulls in the playoffs? Celtcis even gave the Magic a very tough series with guess who starting?..Glen Davis. Put Big Baby as the starting PF for the Heat & they are not going to lose 50 games.
0- Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 8:24am #195708
trojans13Participanthis numbers were good for 2 series, i agree, but he is a 6-6 300lb pf who cant stay out fo foul trouble because of his body. he didnt go against one big/strong power forward in either series and thats why he was successful for those two series. when he matches up with long strong players his shot gets blocked repeatedly. in the long haul his weaknesses would be exposed
0
- Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 8:18am #195707
McWinningParticipantid take Big Baby but im worried they might decide to bring Beasley off the bench which would mean less minutes.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 9:09am #195721
FutureoftheGameIf ther past were causing the bias, we would not want Williams there either. He as had a terrible past. Just like Tinsley.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 9:18am #195726
McWinningParticipantyes he has had a bad past but hes not a greedy player like Tinsley.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 9:21am #195729

Knicksboy34ParticipantHow is Tinsley greedy if he never had less then 5 assist per game in any season?
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 9:22am #195730
billykParticipantUdonis Haslem > Glen Davis, I think they both are similar because they are both jumpshooters that like to bang in the paint but I give the edge to Haslem because you KNOW he can get it done as a starter and he can play at a champioship level… Big Baby is a question mark because people THINK he can he can be a successful PF… I dont think one you can judge if a player can be a good starting PF based on the performance in 1 postseason…. I wonder how his knees would hold up over 82 games playing 35 MPG (dude kinda heavy)….
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 9:34am #195733

gatorheelsParticipantHaslem does not play at a championship level anymore. He is a below average starter. Yes Haslem is a good rebounder but he did nothing in the playoffs for the Heat. Cmon man did you watch any of the games. Haslem averaged 8pts 0ast 0steals 0blocks…..Wow compared to Big Baby he looks like a scrub.
0- Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 11:01am #195789
billykParticipantI seen Haselm play with the Heat last year in the playoffs (he played aiight but he could have played better) He is a lunch pail type of player he isnt gonna be a second or third option and he isnt a playmaker but he is a solid defender (man and team) that is effective with talent around him… I think he is an average starting PF in the league you can count on him to rebound and defend because thats WHAT HE DOES… As far as saying Big Baby makes him look like a scrub im going to disagree… Haslem is a better defender, rebounds better, and his a tougher player (see Big Bay crying on the bench)… What PF did Big Baby match up against in the playoffs Tyrus Thomas???? Rashard Lewis??? I would like to see him produce as a starter… Udonis Haselm is almost a double double type player for his career, I doubt Big “Cry” Baby comes close to Haslem averages for his career… And at 29 years old he is still in his prime I dont think his numbers slipped that much (he just need to be on a contending team),,,,
0
- Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 9:36am #195734

d-grizzlyParticipanti think i’d rather have big baby over haslem. sure haslem has experience as well…but big baby is much more physical…has a jumpshot…and plays when it’s important…period.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 9:40am #195735

Knicksboy34ParticipantI dunno and to be honest…WE DONT KNOW if Big Baby can handle 35mpg for 82 games…he may tire out and disappoint near the end of the season.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 9:50am #195738
Michael.S.ParticipantBig Baby has a solid jumper but soo does Haslem, I would take Haslem because he is a workhoarse can bang ownlow , crash the boards, and he can also score a little, Big Baby is also very unathletic and slow , also sort of undersized
KnicksBoy lets start new, we dont even know each other im sure we would be good friends if we knew each othe rin person , and for real we argued over B.S.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 9:56am #195742

Knicksboy34ParticipantMike…I was never mad at you. Never, I love to disagree. I like to go the other way. To be honest, I wanna make a new account and start anew because I feel I hurt my rep (not because of you) but overall.
Were still cool man 100%
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 10:03am #195749

gatorheelsParticipantmikenike- Big Baby is a workhouse & can bang downlow too. Haslem is undersized. Big Baby isn’t near as slow as people think. Also for a guy his size he is pretty athletic & has very good footwork.
Like I said look what they both did in the playoffs when it really mattered & there is absolutely no comparison.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 10:12am #195756
Michael.S.Participanti respect your opinion but do you think Big Baby can guard the elite PF’s downlow and the combo Forwards on the perimeter ? i doubt it
I think Haslem can contain the Rashard Lewis’es of the NBA much more easily than Big Baby can, feel free to argue0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 10:26am #195759

gatorheelsParticipantBig Baby is just more effective when he is on the floor…..the #s prove it. At least they do in the playoffs. Haslem did have the better regular season but he obviously got a lot more playing time. I would rather have the player that performs better in the playoffs. Big Baby is also a lot younger & should continue to improve. Haslem is on the decline.
I do agree with you on that mikenike- Haslem can guard the perimeter better than Big Baby but in the post they are both undersized
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 10:28am #195762
McWinningParticipanti think most of us would know who you are even if you made a new account. and why do you think you’ve hurt your rep?
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 10:31am #195764

Knicksboy34Participantjust for a fresh start…
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 10:32am #195765
McWinningParticipanti disagree, i think you should keep your same acount. maybe you could change your username.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:37pm #195873
deuce4offYou already tried creating a new name QHaynes and everyone knew it was your dumb @ss…..you’re an easy mark to spot
Recent nonsense:
John Wall = Javaris Crittenton
Perry Jones = PF in NBA
Jrue Holiday = A top 5 pick0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:46pm #195884

Knicksboy34Participantwe can argue right now…I dont care.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:53pm #195890
McWinningParticipantignore him and he will stop acting like an idiot. but you would crush him in a contest.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:55pm #195895

Knicksboy34ParticipantI know…it’s not worth it.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 08/04/2009 - 12:55pm #195896

Knicksboy34ParticipantI know…it’s not worth it.
0 - AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |