This topic contains 10 replies, has 11 voices, and was last updated by
FearTheStache 14 years ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Wed, 06/06/2012 - 3:30am #39832

HeGotBrainParticipantthe bigs will go 123, and Cleveland will mildly surprise us by picking Lamb at 4, PJ3 will slip and MKG to the warriors while Sully goes to T.O. Macchado to the bulls…
Hate on my picks if you have cause but please be constructive.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 06/06/2012 - 3:44am #677620

juice304ParticipantThis is a very good one for the most part. Don’t think Lamb gets taken 4, but its definetely possible cuz he does have that kind of talent. And PJ3, i just think someone will pull the trigger before 16, based off of his huge potential. Overall though this is definetely one of the better mocks i have looked at.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 06/06/2012 - 3:52am #677621

Allen_Iverson_3ParticipantHere are my thoughts:
-Damian Lillard and Dion Waiters should be higher, Austin Rivers should be a bit lower. Perry Jones at 16 would be a steal. I also doubt Lamb goes before Beal, and don’t understand why the Cavs select 2 SG’s. An SF is the call here.
-Toronto’s biggest needs are not at PF. They have a promising frontcourt. Expect them to draft a wing player (SG/SF) or even a PG (prepare future after Calderon) before a PF.
-Marquis Teague might be a little bit high, and the Celtics would rather target a C (to replace Jermaine O’Neal) than a PG (Rondo and Bradley, though he’s also used as a SG, are there) or than a PF (unless they know that Garnett will retire, cuz they already have him and Bass).
On the whole, decent mock, just learn to be a bit more humble 😉
0 - Posted on: Wed, 06/06/2012 - 4:24am #677625

sheltwon3Participantthere should be no quality Centers when Boston picks and also they have Bass and Jajuan Johnson. I will say this that Boston does not have many player under contract so they could go a lot of places.
0- Posted on: Wed, 06/06/2012 - 4:23am #677626
capecodderParticipantWoiuld prefer the 2 players you have directly after your Celtics pick…Harkless and Nicholson
0
- Posted on: Wed, 06/06/2012 - 5:13am #677636
SwatLakeCityParticipantIts not a bad mock, but there are a few things I don’t agree with:
- Perry Jones might slip, but not out of the lottery. The highest I see him going is 7 and the lowest is 12. He just has too much potential, too much height at the 3 to be passed on by that many teams. Actually some lottery teams who are looking to trade their pick, like the Warriors, might take Perry in order to entice other teams.
- Moultrie is too big, too mobile, and too versatile to slip out of the top 20. I bet he goes top 15.
- I would be very surprised if Toronto takes Sullinger at 8 when they already have Bargnani, Ed Davis, and Amir Johnson. They don’t need Sullinger. I bet they go for a wing player like Lamb or Beal (if available.) Since in your draft those two aren’t available, they could go for Austin Rivers or reach for Terrance Jones. But maybe your saying Toronto takes Sullinger intending to trade down for a wing.
- I also don’t think MKG will slip to 7. Warriors would be having a party and be drinking champaigne, even doing a toast if that were to happen. (Actually that might happen regardless, but that is beside the point) MKG is just too talented, too multifaceted to be passed on. He will go top 5. The Wizards could use a player like him, so could the Bobcats or the Kings, or even the Cavs would make sense. Even though he fits the Warriors very well, if they want him they will have trade up to get him.
- It doesn’t make much sense for the Wizards to take Drummond when they already have Nene, and with the improvement we saw in Seraphin at the end of the season. They could go for a wing like Beal or Kidd Gilchrist and let Seraphin develop as a 4 or 5.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 06/06/2012 - 6:05am #677655

Tight ButtholeParticipantCleveland will not skip on MKG, Beal, and Barnes for Lamb
0 - Posted on: Wed, 06/06/2012 - 7:00am #677672

Sewok15ParticipantThe Sixers would not take Harkless since he is a project and they are in need of immediate help. I would see them taking TJones, White, Moultrie, DLamb and Waiters all before him since they can come in and contribute right away.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 06/06/2012 - 7:17am #677684
joecheck88ParticipantNene is older and Seraphin is more of a PF or backup C. There is no reason why the Wizards couldn’t take Deummond.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 06/06/2012 - 11:55am #677756
aamir543ParticipantDecent Mock? Guys, he has MKG slipping to 7! As a Warriors fan I would love to see that happen, but it’s not going to happen at all, worst case scenario is if Cleveland, Wash, and Charlotte fall in love with Barnes and Drummond, and he slips to Sacramento at 5, which absolutly worst case. Other than that, he’s gonna go 2nd or 3rd, but definatly not 7th.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 06/06/2012 - 12:29pm #677763

FearTheStacheParticipantThe mock lost all credibility when Kendall Marshall went 29
0 - AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |