This topic contains 11 replies, has 10 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar DWadeBIW 16 years, 8 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • Posted on: Tue, 10/06/2009 - 2:25pm #9248
    AvatarAvatar
    Michael.S.
    Participant

    Brooklyn Nets, Its okay you can laugh

    0
  • Posted on: Tue, 10/06/2009 - 2:30pm #219518
    AvatarAvatar
    McWinning
    Participant

    wow.. they don’t need him they should spend their money on big men they already have Harris and Alston.

    0
  • Posted on: Tue, 10/06/2009 - 6:05pm #219590
    AvatarAvatar
    RickyRubio9
    Participant

    Alston wants out, trade Alston to the Heat for…Picks? something. Sign Starbury, strap ’em on and ride the bench. LOL. If he could take Dooling, CDR, and T-Will’s bench role then…wow. Why doesn’t he take the D-League offer and work his way back up, I know it’s hard for players that were once “Elite” to drop so low, but if he wants to get any chance, this is the way to go.

    0
  • Posted on: Tue, 10/06/2009 - 6:53pm #219600
    marcusfizer21marcusfizer21
    marcusfizer21
    Participant

    Don’t care about Marbury… All he is is nonsense and asinine…

    0
  • Posted on: Tue, 10/06/2009 - 7:02pm #219602
    AvatarAvatar
    bkballer
    Participant

    NO SUCH THING AS THE BROOKLYN NETS…if it ever happens, by the time it does marbury will be 40 years old

    0
  • Posted on: Tue, 10/06/2009 - 7:37pm #219612
    AvatarAvatar
    JNixon
    Participant

    They would have to want you back for it to work lol

    0
  • Posted on: Tue, 10/06/2009 - 7:53pm #219616
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    Unless Marbury has been an idiot with his finaces, then he should not need to play for the money. I think he still has some game in him, problem is you have to let him play HIS game and not try to mold him into something he is not. He’s very similar to Iverson in that regard. But not too many teams are gonna give him that type of freedom so he is best off just playing in the nbdl or overseas or something.

    0
  • Posted on: Wed, 10/07/2009 - 8:15am #219676
    AvatarAvatar
    td8118
    Participant

    the Nets will be in Brooklyn in 3 years, what are u talkin about

    0
  • Posted on: Wed, 10/07/2009 - 8:19am #219677
    AvatarAvatar
    JoeWolf1

    Yeah, the Nets new owner has expressed the move to Brooklyn as one of his top priorities, but the have no room for a washed up late 30’s headcase point guard with a star tattooed on his dome

    0
  • Posted on: Wed, 10/07/2009 - 10:15am #219696
    AvatarAvatar
    bkballer
    Participant

    3 years isnt a long time for an aging washed up point guard?

    0
  • Posted on: Wed, 10/07/2009 - 11:12am #219701
    AvatarAvatar
    QHaynes20

    I would not be shocked if that added him just to sell more tickets. Not that they will have a problem..

    0
  • Posted on: Wed, 10/07/2009 - 12:18pm #219706
    AvatarAvatar
    DWadeBIW
    Participant

    no

    0
  • Author
    Posts

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login