Lance Stephenson is BOOTY

This topic contains 20 replies, has 9 voices, and was last updated by Meditated States 10 years, 7 months ago.

Author
Posts
Posted on: Thu, 11/12/2015 - 6:47pm #61866

Mad Max
Participant
I’m watching this Clippers/Suns game, and wow Lance is just garbage or as The New Day would say, BOOTY! If he isn’t taking and missing terrible long range 2, he’s either missing a wide open (for a reason) 3 or turning the ball over. And on defense, the man is more lost than a blind man at sea. Frank Vogel should retro-activicly get awarded coach of the year for making this guy a qaulity NBA player.
0
Posted on: Thu, 11/12/2015 - 8:48pm #1024349

TRC1991
Participant
Haha. Yeah Lance is very bad, but oddly, every player on the Clippers bench is under-achieving
0
Posted on: Thu, 11/12/2015 - 8:48pm #1024210

TRC1991
Participant
Haha. Yeah Lance is very bad, but oddly, every player on the Clippers bench is under-achieving
0
Posted on: Thu, 11/12/2015 - 9:38pm #1024355

DrivingDownTheStreetinmy64
Saying booty while talking about a guy, is Just Plain ODD!!!!!!!!!!!!!
0
Posted on: Thu, 11/12/2015 - 9:38pm #1024216

DrivingDownTheStreetinmy64
Saying booty while talking about a guy, is Just Plain ODD!!!!!!!!!!!!!
0
- Posted on: Fri, 11/13/2015 - 4:41am #1024379
  
  ZachAttack
  Participant
  Maybe he wants it
  0
- Posted on: Fri, 11/13/2015 - 4:41am #1024240
  
  ZachAttack
  Participant
  Maybe he wants it
  0
  - Posted on: Fri, 11/13/2015 - 4:57am #1024381
    
    dcase
    Participant
    I thought describing Lance as BOOTY was hilarious.
    0
  - Posted on: Fri, 11/13/2015 - 4:57am #1024242
    
    dcase
    Participant
    I thought describing Lance as BOOTY was hilarious.
    0
Posted on: Fri, 11/13/2015 - 4:34am #1024375

Meditated States
Participant
PG made the boy look better.
0
Posted on: Fri, 11/13/2015 - 4:34am #1024236

Meditated States
Participant
PG made the boy look better.
0
Posted on: Fri, 11/13/2015 - 8:07am #1024272

laughin2dabanks
Participant
I think he was good for the Pacers because of their system and he had help with PG on his team to take attention away from him. The Clippers are probably gonna decline his team option and then he is gonna go back to the Pacers or a team like the Nets who just need players and hes from Brooklyn.
0
Posted on: Fri, 11/13/2015 - 8:07am #1024411

laughin2dabanks
Participant
I think he was good for the Pacers because of their system and he had help with PG on his team to take attention away from him. The Clippers are probably gonna decline his team option and then he is gonna go back to the Pacers or a team like the Nets who just need players and hes from Brooklyn.
0
Posted on: Fri, 11/13/2015 - 8:27am #1024282

TarHeelRaven
Participant
I’ve always said that Lance going to Indiana and having Larry Bird in his ear was the best thing that ever happened to him. Now he;s just lost. It’s sad because Lance has a lot of talent, he just needs strong veteran leadership around him to succeed. He’s obviously not getting that with the Clippers and Charlotte was a disaster last year.
0
Posted on: Fri, 11/13/2015 - 8:27am #1024421

TarHeelRaven
Participant
I’ve always said that Lance going to Indiana and having Larry Bird in his ear was the best thing that ever happened to him. Now he;s just lost. It’s sad because Lance has a lot of talent, he just needs strong veteran leadership around him to succeed. He’s obviously not getting that with the Clippers and Charlotte was a disaster last year.
0
Posted on: Fri, 11/13/2015 - 10:25am #1024308

tuck243
Participant
exists because he needs the ball in order to be effective. Also, he need to play through his mistakes. He’s not a player that you stick into a corner and play off other players. He’s more in the mold of Tyreke Evans if that make sense…
He worked well with the Pacers because George Hill wasn’t a prototypical PG. Kemba and Chris are similar because they always have the ball in their hands. I’m just realizing that Lance NEEDS the ball. I thought his game would’ve progressed last year as he was adding the 3pt shot to his game. Then I thought he just wasn’t a "good fit" for the Hornets because no one could really spread the floor and play off ball…. But so far this year, I see how he’s not an effective player with minimum touches (a lot of talented players are like this). It’s still only 10 games into the season though, so hopefully he can turn things around.

0
- Posted on: Fri, 11/13/2015 - 10:34am #1024318
  
  GBee
  Participant
  Doesn’t matter if he needs the ball to be effective. He’s not good for his team if he’s on the ball because he’s such an erratic, poor decision maker.
  0
- Posted on: Fri, 11/13/2015 - 10:34am #1024457
  
  GBee
  Participant
  Doesn’t matter if he needs the ball to be effective. He’s not good for his team if he’s on the ball because he’s such an erratic, poor decision maker.
  0
Posted on: Fri, 11/13/2015 - 10:25am #1024447

tuck243
Participant
exists because he needs the ball in order to be effective. Also, he need to play through his mistakes. He’s not a player that you stick into a corner and play off other players. He’s more in the mold of Tyreke Evans if that make sense…
He worked well with the Pacers because George Hill wasn’t a prototypical PG. Kemba and Chris are similar because they always have the ball in their hands. I’m just realizing that Lance NEEDS the ball. I thought his game would’ve progressed last year as he was adding the 3pt shot to his game. Then I thought he just wasn’t a "good fit" for the Hornets because no one could really spread the floor and play off ball…. But so far this year, I see how he’s not an effective player with minimum touches (a lot of talented players are like this). It’s still only 10 games into the season though, so hopefully he can turn things around.

0
Posted on: Fri, 11/13/2015 - 1:08pm #1024348

Meditated States
Participant
He has CP3 and The truth over there.
0
Posted on: Fri, 11/13/2015 - 1:08pm #1024486

Meditated States
Participant
He has CP3 and The truth over there.
0
Author
Posts

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.