This topic contains 22 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by vvaatltl 13 years, 9 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Wed, 10/07/2009 - 3:58pm #9268
tjtehanskyParticipantsent you a trade.. let me know if you are interested in it or not.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 10/07/2009 - 4:34pm #219759
kaceyParticipanti’m not
0 - Posted on: Wed, 10/07/2009 - 4:39pm #219760
tjtehanskyParticipantnothing for even just mccoy?
0 - Posted on: Wed, 10/07/2009 - 4:44pm #219761
McWinningParticipantkacey you interested in a small trade?
0 - Posted on: Wed, 10/07/2009 - 4:51pm #219763

thetruthParticipantmust be still piss lol
0 - Posted on: Wed, 10/07/2009 - 5:38pm #219783

thetruthParticipantyou wanna do a small deal with me.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 10/07/2009 - 5:44pm #219788
tjtehanskyParticipantlike what though truth.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 10/07/2009 - 5:45pm #219790

thetruthParticipantwho are you willingy to trade
0 - Posted on: Wed, 10/07/2009 - 5:47pm #219793
tjtehanskyParticipanteveryone but rodgers and rivers.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 10/07/2009 - 5:54pm #219798

thetruthParticipantim intrested in greg jennings. any chance you would accpet this. mendenhall , or leon , plus nate washington and lee evans and campbell for him.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 10/07/2009 - 6:19pm #219803
tjtehanskyParticipantnah i can’t do that. evans just isn’t producing anything.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 10/07/2009 - 6:24pm #219805

thetruthParticipant? mendenhall, campbell and nate washington for him
0 - Posted on: Wed, 10/07/2009 - 6:30pm #219808
tjtehanskyParticipanti wouldn’t even start washington.. knox would play over him. campbell will just sit on the bench. mendenhall would be the only thing i get out of it so it isn’t worth it for me sorry
0 - Posted on: Wed, 10/07/2009 - 6:39pm #219810

thetruthParticipanti understand.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 10/08/2009 - 2:42pm #220023
kaceyParticipantPissed at what? If I don’t respond to something quick enough its because I’ve been working 12 hours non-stop and my spare time has went down the drain. I’m hoping I won’t have to work on Sunday. That would f’n suck.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 10/08/2009 - 2:48pm #220026

thetruthParticipantit was a joke. i understand you work because i work too. i have bills to pay. and i said its cool if you cant be on here like that just as long as your more active then lemons and lion pack
0 - Posted on: Thu, 10/08/2009 - 4:05pm #220072
kaceyParticipantAnd should atleast be more active than Lion Pack. From what I have seen, Lemons still makes changes to their lineup.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 10/08/2009 - 4:13pm #220075

thetruthParticipanthes been gettin active lately. still havent heard from lion pack. they should make a option where if a team aint active you can kick him out and bring in someone else.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 10/08/2009 - 4:40pm #220091
kaceyParticipantI know there is an option where if you are a manager of a team, you can add someone else to co-manage the team. So if you could get a hold of Lion Pack, then you could have someone take over his team as “co-manager.” I don’t know if you can make this happen or not. damn i need to go to bed.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 10/08/2009 - 4:44pm #220094

thetruthParticipanti dont blame you. i have to go to my stupid job tomorrow.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 10/08/2009 - 5:24pm #220110
McWinningParticipantlion pack was on once he offered me a trade.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 08/26/2012 - 7:47pm #709261
eookaomasaParticipantnothing for even just mccoy?
0 - Posted on: Sat, 09/01/2012 - 4:07pm #711113
vvaatltlParticipantPissed at what? If I don’t respond to something quick enough its because I’ve been working 12 hours non-stop and my spare time has went down the drain. I’m hoping I won’t have to work on Sunday. That would f’n suck.
0 - AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |