This topic contains 42 replies, has 20 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar Choppy 11 years, 11 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #57002
    AvatarAvatar
    BigChamp12
    Participant

    According to Adrian Woj’s twitter account, Jodie Meeks just agreed to a deal worth 19million over 3 years with the Pistons.

    I think its a good move for the Pistons. They wanted a shooter and found one in Meeks. I wonder what this contract means for other 2 guards on the market.

    0
  • #930668
    AvatarAvatar
    Afactor4
    Participant

    That’s a pretty sizeable contract…

    0
  • #930799
    AvatarAvatar
    Afactor4
    Participant

    That’s a pretty sizeable contract…

    0
  • #930672
    AvatarAvatar
    FearTheStache
    Participant

    That’s way too much for Jodie freaking Meeks. Get the need, don’t get the contract at all

     

    0
  • #930803
    AvatarAvatar
    FearTheStache
    Participant

    That’s way too much for Jodie freaking Meeks. Get the need, don’t get the contract at all

     

    0
  • #930674
    AvatarAvatar
    HobbyOG
    Participant

    Geesh 6 mill a year for Meeks?? I don’t know about that one..

    0
    • #930819
      AvatarAvatar
      kngojc
      Participant

      I like him as a player, but for the next three years he’ll have this hanging over his head trying to live up to that contract. 

      0
    • #930688
      AvatarAvatar
      kngojc
      Participant

      I like him as a player, but for the next three years he’ll have this hanging over his head trying to live up to that contract. 

      0
  • #930805
    AvatarAvatar
    HobbyOG
    Participant

    Geesh 6 mill a year for Meeks?? I don’t know about that one..

    0
  • #930676
    AvatarAvatar
    CavFanPR
    Participant

    First bad contract of this free agency frenzy, and it barely got started! I can imagine Meeks eyes when he signed that contract, how lucky.

    0
  • #930807
    AvatarAvatar
    CavFanPR
    Participant

    First bad contract of this free agency frenzy, and it barely got started! I can imagine Meeks eyes when he signed that contract, how lucky.

    0
  • #930680
    AvatarAvatar
    King Calucha
    Participant

     I really like Meeks, but this may be a little too much for him.

    0
  • #930811
    AvatarAvatar
    King Calucha
    Participant

     I really like Meeks, but this may be a little too much for him.

    0
  • #930682
    AvatarAvatar
    Malik-Universal
    Participant

     when i first saw the report i was upset for how much he was getting paid.. however the pistons are in desperate need of a shooter big time

    0
  • #930813
    AvatarAvatar
    Malik-Universal
    Participant

     when i first saw the report i was upset for how much he was getting paid.. however the pistons are in desperate need of a shooter big time

    0
  • #930817
    AvatarAvatar
    TRC1991
    Participant

    Detroit living up to its well-deserved reputation as a team that greatly overpays players.

    Meeks should have gotten $4m – $4.5m

    $6.33m for him is a little ambitious…

     

     

     

    0
  • #930686
    AvatarAvatar
    TRC1991
    Participant

    Detroit living up to its well-deserved reputation as a team that greatly overpays players.

    Meeks should have gotten $4m – $4.5m

    $6.33m for him is a little ambitious…

     

     

     

    0
  • #930823
    AvatarAvatar
    xJumpManx
    Participant

     Is Doomars still making the Fa decisions over there.

    0
  • #930692
    AvatarAvatar
    xJumpManx
    Participant

     Is Doomars still making the Fa decisions over there.

    0
  • #930829
    AvatarAvatar
    Jester87
    Participant

    I am a bit torn here. Pretty much every analyst on twitter is shocked. It’s definitely a lot of money. On the other hand: 1) Meeks is 26 so he might still have some upside
    2) Detroit desperately needs shooting at SG
    3) Shooting is more and more valuable in the Nba nowadays
    4) There are only 2 good shooters among FA SGs: Jodie Meeks and Anthony Morrow.

    I’m a bit biased here because I’ve always liked Meeks a lot, but those deals are not signed in a vacuum, they follow the basic laws of supply and demand. If a good is scarce and there’s a lot of demand, it’s going to be more expensive. 

    I still can’t make my mind up anyways, because even if I like the player and I can see some of the reasons why he got that much, it’s pretty obvious to me that it’s a big contract. Even if there wasn’t anything better available via free agency, they could’ve found at least a comparable player via trade. Also, it seems like the kind of short term move, they get a player to complete their starting lineup and to make their team better immediately, but I don’t think he’s a long term solution as a starter.

    0
  • #930698
    AvatarAvatar
    Jester87
    Participant

    I am a bit torn here. Pretty much every analyst on twitter is shocked. It’s definitely a lot of money. On the other hand: 1) Meeks is 26 so he might still have some upside
    2) Detroit desperately needs shooting at SG
    3) Shooting is more and more valuable in the Nba nowadays
    4) There are only 2 good shooters among FA SGs: Jodie Meeks and Anthony Morrow.

    I’m a bit biased here because I’ve always liked Meeks a lot, but those deals are not signed in a vacuum, they follow the basic laws of supply and demand. If a good is scarce and there’s a lot of demand, it’s going to be more expensive. 

    I still can’t make my mind up anyways, because even if I like the player and I can see some of the reasons why he got that much, it’s pretty obvious to me that it’s a big contract. Even if there wasn’t anything better available via free agency, they could’ve found at least a comparable player via trade. Also, it seems like the kind of short term move, they get a player to complete their starting lineup and to make their team better immediately, but I don’t think he’s a long term solution as a starter.

    0
  • #930839
    AvatarAvatar
    qDizzle32
    Participant

    I wonder what Detroit’s plans for Kentavious Caldwell-Pope are?

    0
  • #930708
    AvatarAvatar
    qDizzle32
    Participant

    I wonder what Detroit’s plans for Kentavious Caldwell-Pope are?

    0
  • #930856
    AvatarAvatar
    UnbiasedObserver
    Participant

    6.3 mil per year for a 3 point shooter and a hustle guy. Don’t get me wrong you need a guy like that to help you win games and is very important to an offense but that is what we call overpaying. You have to really convince someone to play in Detroit and throw a little more money at em. But if any team in the NBA needed a shooter as bad other than Chicago? That’s Detroit.

    0
  • #930725
    AvatarAvatar
    UnbiasedObserver
    Participant

    6.3 mil per year for a 3 point shooter and a hustle guy. Don’t get me wrong you need a guy like that to help you win games and is very important to an offense but that is what we call overpaying. You have to really convince someone to play in Detroit and throw a little more money at em. But if any team in the NBA needed a shooter as bad other than Chicago? That’s Detroit.

    0
  • #930864
    AvatarAvatar
    SmooveKRYPT
    Participant

     Lance Stephenson is smiling from ear to ear right now

    0
  • #930732
    AvatarAvatar
    SmooveKRYPT
    Participant

     Lance Stephenson is smiling from ear to ear right now

    0
  • #930866
    AvatarAvatar
    machu46
    Participant

    His agent is a beast.

    0
  • #930734
    AvatarAvatar
    machu46
    Participant

    His agent is a beast.

    0
  • #930872
    AvatarAvatar
    doubledribbler
    Participant

    I’m not sure Meeks could have signed that deal quick enough. Good for him, but I have the feeling they wouldn’t have had to offer him that much to get him, especially this early in free agency. I guess we will see how it turns out. He was obviously a priority for them and they need shooting badly. 

    0
  • #930740
    AvatarAvatar
    doubledribbler
    Participant

    I’m not sure Meeks could have signed that deal quick enough. Good for him, but I have the feeling they wouldn’t have had to offer him that much to get him, especially this early in free agency. I guess we will see how it turns out. He was obviously a priority for them and they need shooting badly. 

    0
  • #930870
    AvatarAvatar
    IndianaBasketball
    Participant

    Stan starting off w/ a bang lol

    0
  • #930738
    AvatarAvatar
    IndianaBasketball
    Participant

    Stan starting off w/ a bang lol

    0
  • #930900
    r377r377
    r377
    Participant

    This isn’t the sort of news i like to wake up and hear. There wouldn’t have been that much competition for his services, why did he have to over spend like that.

    Is SVG trying to do what he did in Orlando – have one or two inside post players and surround them with 3 point shooters….

    0
  • #930768
    r377r377
    r377
    Participant

    This isn’t the sort of news i like to wake up and hear. There wouldn’t have been that much competition for his services, why did he have to over spend like that.

    Is SVG trying to do what he did in Orlando – have one or two inside post players and surround them with 3 point shooters….

    0
  • #930885
    AvatarAvatar
    Sharp Shooter
    Participant

     Did the pistons over pay jodie meeks? Yes. What people don’t understand is that it is hard to lure FA to detroit….Detroit is not like LA, NY  or MIAMI.where there are many attractions..Nowadays, alot of players are not intrigued with Michigan regardless of the team..Not only Detroit but other cities as well. If you noticed, today players are always attracted to BIG NAME CITIES, CHI, NY, MIAMI, etc. Unless Detroit has won a championship (back in 05′) Detroit will continue to overpay these players like Gordon,  Villi, Smith,  Meeks. The best way to go about building the team is to go primarily through the draft. Having Drummond and Smith (Monroe?) on your team isn’t enough to lure FA.  Even when adressing their main off season priority (Shooting)  Meeks and Morrow are your only best options. So the question is now, is who do you want to overpay and who has more upside? 

    0
  • #931018
    AvatarAvatar
    Sharp Shooter
    Participant

     Did the pistons over pay jodie meeks? Yes. What people don’t understand is that it is hard to lure FA to detroit….Detroit is not like LA, NY  or MIAMI.where there are many attractions..Nowadays, alot of players are not intrigued with Michigan regardless of the team..Not only Detroit but other cities as well. If you noticed, today players are always attracted to BIG NAME CITIES, CHI, NY, MIAMI, etc. Unless Detroit has won a championship (back in 05′) Detroit will continue to overpay these players like Gordon,  Villi, Smith,  Meeks. The best way to go about building the team is to go primarily through the draft. Having Drummond and Smith (Monroe?) on your team isn’t enough to lure FA.  Even when adressing their main off season priority (Shooting)  Meeks and Morrow are your only best options. So the question is now, is who do you want to overpay and who has more upside? 

    0
  • #930903
    AvatarAvatar
    King Calucha
    Participant

    Still trying to digest this. Overall I think it makes sense, since he’s not completely one-dimensional. He can play some D, handle the ball … and he’s only 26. He’s got a few good years ahead. Everyone will get overpaid this summer (well, maybe Mario Chalmers won’t, but you get my point).

    0
  • #931036
    AvatarAvatar
    King Calucha
    Participant

    Still trying to digest this. Overall I think it makes sense, since he’s not completely one-dimensional. He can play some D, handle the ball … and he’s only 26. He’s got a few good years ahead. Everyone will get overpaid this summer (well, maybe Mario Chalmers won’t, but you get my point).

    0
  • #930909
    r377r377
    r377
    Participant

    The secret is to find players that have upside and you can get under market value – just like shares and property.

    Back when they signed Ben Gordon and Charlie V, I would of personally signed Big Baby Davis and Marcin Gortat who were free agents at the time. Gortat was a backup in Orlando but you could see the potential. Same with Big Baby, he was not starting.

    Ben Gordon just came off a huge Celtics v Bulls playoff series so his stock was high. Charlie V was still developing, i dont’ really know why he played so poorly in Detroit.

    Both Davis and Gortat were about $6-7mill per year. Ben Gordon was signed for $10-11 and Charlie V about 7-8 mill.

    I REALLY REALLY hope they go after Jordan Hamilton. We need a SF. He shot 37% and 39% from 3 in college and about 37% in the pros. Roll the dice on Jordan Hamilton. Xavier Henry can also shoot the 3 ball and could still develop.

    Meeks may develop into a starter and a decent player, he just could of been had for less money. Over $6 mill is crazy. They could of got both Hamilton and Henry for that money…..

    0
  • #931042
    r377r377
    r377
    Participant

    The secret is to find players that have upside and you can get under market value – just like shares and property.

    Back when they signed Ben Gordon and Charlie V, I would of personally signed Big Baby Davis and Marcin Gortat who were free agents at the time. Gortat was a backup in Orlando but you could see the potential. Same with Big Baby, he was not starting.

    Ben Gordon just came off a huge Celtics v Bulls playoff series so his stock was high. Charlie V was still developing, i dont’ really know why he played so poorly in Detroit.

    Both Davis and Gortat were about $6-7mill per year. Ben Gordon was signed for $10-11 and Charlie V about 7-8 mill.

    I REALLY REALLY hope they go after Jordan Hamilton. We need a SF. He shot 37% and 39% from 3 in college and about 37% in the pros. Roll the dice on Jordan Hamilton. Xavier Henry can also shoot the 3 ball and could still develop.

    Meeks may develop into a starter and a decent player, he just could of been had for less money. Over $6 mill is crazy. They could of got both Hamilton and Henry for that money…..

    0
  • #930917
    AvatarAvatar
    Choppy
    Participant

     If he puts up similar numbers next year (15pts, 2rebs), is he worth 6mil? I think for that sort of production 6 mil is ok. Just not sure if his production will translate to a team with more options than the lakers. I don’t know how the deal is structured, but in 3 years with rises in the salary cap, 6 mil will seem a lot more palatable. And he will still only be 29. 

    0
  • #931050
    AvatarAvatar
    Choppy
    Participant

     If he puts up similar numbers next year (15pts, 2rebs), is he worth 6mil? I think for that sort of production 6 mil is ok. Just not sure if his production will translate to a team with more options than the lakers. I don’t know how the deal is structured, but in 3 years with rises in the salary cap, 6 mil will seem a lot more palatable. And he will still only be 29. 

    0

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login