This topic contains 14 replies, has 13 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar aamir543 15 years, 1 month ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #28421
    AvatarAvatar
    BouncyBall
    Participant

     http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=3entap2

    Toronto would have two good friends in Jennings and Derozan, which would add up to some serious ball.

    0
  • #526362
    AvatarAvatar
    PaulsJayhawks
    Participant

    Id rather keep Bayless I think he has more potential than Jennings.

    Kyrie is the hope still and then I would use Bayless late season performance and package him to get Bargs outta town..

    0
  • #526365
    AvatarAvatar
    LazarusMunoz
    Participant

    thats a worse idea than me trying to enter the nba draft

    0
  • #526366
    AvatarAvatar
    BKKnicksfan
    Participant

    Wow. That’s just a terrible deal man.

    0
  • #526367
    AvatarAvatar
    PrecociousNeophyte
    Participant

     The Bucks would never do that. Jennings is establishing himself as one of the best young pgs. I really like Bayless and I think he is a good player but I don’t know why the Bucks would trade for him when they already have an established pg and Bayless had never been a full time starter. I know that would be cool though for Jennings and DeMar because they have been friends for so long from Compton to the NBA.

    0
  • #526370
    AvatarAvatar
    OrangeJuiceJones
    Participant

     Bucks would be better off trying to get rid of Maggette’s bad contract and signing Derozan once he becomes a free agent.

    0
  • #526373
    AvatarAvatar
    WizardofOz
    Participant

    Don’t like that deal for the Bucks, and they wouldn’t take that deal straight up. Jennings might have not improved like many Bucks fans hoped, but he still has a lot of potential and is one of the most talented PGs in the league. Bayless is talented, but I think he’s a 6th man at best and doesn’t have Jennings’s potential.

    0
  • #526389
    AvatarAvatar
    Scottoant93
    Participant

    So you want to trade a potential allstar pg(if he realiazes his potential), for a player who constantly jacks up shots, Bayless has his moments where he might look like a pg, but he has the mentality of a sg, Jennings has a bad jump shit but at least he wants to get his teammates involved.

    0
  • #526390
    AvatarAvatar
    thparadox
    Participant

     

    Bayless may have similar potential to Jennings..

    But even so, Jennings is much further along defensively.

    Milwaukee doesn’t have an incentive to do this trade

    0
  • #526391
    AvatarAvatar
    sheltwon3
    Participant

    Bayless and Barg for Jennings and Salmons may not be a terrible deal.  Bucks could then draft Kemba Walker.  Bogut/Barg combo would be nice.  Bucks took the ball out of Jennings hands a lot this year so they really did not fully utilize his playmaking but were hurt by his bad shooting percentage.

    Bayless is not the playmaker and defensive player Jenning is but he is a better shooter and scorer

    0
  • #526392
    AvatarAvatar
    Scottoant93
    Participant

    Did they just bleep out Jumpshot wtf

    0
  • #526393
    AvatarAvatar
    Scottoant93
    Participant

    I like bargs/bogut combo, if they could make that happen without trading jennings, that would be a good team

    0
  • #526395
    AvatarAvatar
    joe360
    Participant

    I can’t even believe this thread has generated this much discussion! Ridiculous trade proposal

    0
  • #526399
    AvatarAvatar
    cward23
    Participant

    Horrible trade. Bayless is a career backup untill proven other wise and he’s shown he is not a PG

    0
  • #526407
    AvatarAvatar
    aamir543
    Participant

    dude what are you smoking? I agree Jennings did not improve much this year, but what are you thinking!!!!! Are you watching the right team? Are you sure you meant Bayless and Jennings? Are you sure you are not talking about Earl Boykins? Gosh, People these days!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 

    0

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login