This topic contains 11 replies, has 8 voices, and was last updated by
Mkadoza 13 years, 5 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Mon, 02/04/2013 - 7:28am #46235

For_Never_EverParticipant0 - Posted on: Mon, 02/04/2013 - 7:42am #744395
phila9012Participanthere are the two trades, hopefully this doesnt spoil it (he gives reasons why the trades work in the video)
1st
celtics get stephen jackson and tiago splitter
spurs get kevin Garnett
2nd
cetics get danny granger
pacers get paul pierceThe first trade seems pretty interesting to at least think about
0- Posted on: Mon, 02/04/2013 - 4:20pm #744513

MkadozaParticipantI can’t see the Spurs giving up Splitter. He offers what Garnett does, just cheaper, younger, and less or a distraction.
0
- Posted on: Mon, 02/04/2013 - 9:15am #744410
aarondsonixfanParticipantDoesn’t Duncan hate Garnett, though?
0- Posted on: Mon, 02/04/2013 - 2:05pm #744486
phila9012ParticipantJalen said that in the video, but they both complement each other. Garnett is more of a jump shooter and duncan is more of a post player. they also both want one more ring. They both work really hard. I am sure duncan could get over kevin garnett if it meant winning a championship. No one would have more experience than a line up of parker manu leonard garnett duncan. I am not sure if the celtics would do it though.
0
- Posted on: Mon, 02/04/2013 - 9:41am #744415

For_Never_EverParticipantI didn’t like either trade ideas for the Celtics side that Jalen said. If a contender wants Paul or KG to help them win a Ring, that team has to give up young promising talent for it to happen.
0- Posted on: Mon, 02/04/2013 - 12:19pm #744442
Kyrie IrvingDo you like this trade as a Boston fan?
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=a2znmbl0- Posted on: Mon, 02/04/2013 - 12:55pm #744448

For_Never_EverParticipantThe Rockets wouldn’t do the trade because they kinda are in a rebuilding mode them self. The Celtics wouldn’t want two bench players as well.
0
- Posted on: Mon, 02/04/2013 - 12:28pm #744443

ProudGrandpaParticipantJalen Rose needs to stop playing GM. These trades are bad and that Dwight Howard trade was horrible.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 02/04/2013 - 12:55pm #744449

sheltwon3ParticipantPierce does need to be moved. They need to move some of the pieced they picked up that are not working too well like Lee, Terry, Bass, etc. Green is their future 3 and needs more minutes.
KG if moved could get them a young Center and some picks. They need to get a better four man. Bradley should be enough a 2 for now but if they can upgrade maybe in the draft if they can get a lotto pick.Rondo
Bradley
Green(when Pierce retires)
?????
?????(KG trade)They need to get younger and more athletic.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 02/04/2013 - 3:14pm #744505

Meditated StatesParticipantThey have 1st rounder Bradley,1st rounder Sully, 1st rounder Melo. They been there and done that. KG is not ring chasing people so he is not coming to your favorite team. They gave him a 3 year deal because they love him and he can mentor talent. Bradley athletic, Green athletic,Lee athletic,Terry athletic,Rondo athletic. Thats not their issue. They need a shot blocker rebounder. They may feel they have that in Melo. They already have their Center of the future so why trade for one? They are good. They may make a small deal, but I don’t see what some of you are dreaming on. lol. They are a dangerous team right now and all the players will be better next year and more experienced. Celtics already prepaired for the future and already rebuilt. They have 9 new players this year. Thats a whole new team with lots of youth and the perfect mix of veterans for them to learn. C’s look good going forward IMO without making any deals to help your favorite teams.
0- Posted on: Mon, 02/04/2013 - 4:08pm #744511

Ny2daDeathOFmeParticipantAre you really calling a 24-23 team dangerous? And after reading your post I gotta admit you sound like a delusional fan bro
0
- AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |