This topic contains 11 replies, has 10 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar Chicago1980 16 years, 7 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #9830
    AvatarAvatar
    valentine

    lets say ur the portland GM. also Batum is healthy. now, bayless and webster are most likely just rotting on the bench, steve blake and travis outlaw have expiring contracts, u have a good amount of cap space. What moves do you make if any?

    0
  • #225868
    AvatarAvatar
    butidonthavemoney

    Trade everybody for the life-rights to the Balloon-Boy story.

    0
  • #225870
    AvatarAvatar
    Mr. Basketball
    Participant

    get an offensively capable big man for bayless and webster package. not sure who.

    0
  • #225873
    AvatarAvatar
    getacomb

    i mean lamarcus is pretty offensively capable big guy, he can shoot it, maybe could post up more but he has a nice hook shot. i think they need a really good SF and another big man to go with pryzbilla on the second unit

    0
  • #225874
    AvatarAvatar
    td8118
    Participant

    They don’t really need anything….but if its me i would trade Bayless to the Knicks for a 1st round draft pick and reload their talent

    0
  • #225881
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    I resign Webster, I like him alot. I think between him batum, fernandez, and outlaw, the sf/backup sg positions are on lock. The bigs are also taken care of with Odom, Aldridge, Przybilla and Outlaw geting some minutes. You already have your franchise guy in Roy. The one thing missing is a pg and I don’t think Miller is the answer. He doesn’t shoot well enough to play off Roy, and that was obvious in the amount of time they spent together so far. Blake is defenitely not the answer either.

    0
  • #225941
    AvatarAvatar
    IndianaBasketball
    Participant

    I’d keep Webster for sure. As a matter of fact, he should remain the starter at small forward, even when Batum returns. He brings offense and defense. He plays hungry, aggressive and is way more athletic than I realized.

    As far as point guard goes, Miller is not the answer. What they needed was an upgraded Blake… A point guard who can defend, play off of Roy, stretch the floor and shoot.

    What this team really needs is inside scoring. If Aldridge played more aggressive and added that dimension to his game, this team would be A LOT better. They also need to start playing better defense. As great as Roy is, he still isn’t a good defender.

    0
  • #225950
    AvatarAvatar
    Tyrober
    Participant

    Scola would be absolutely amazing as the backup PF

    0
  • #225968
    AvatarAvatar
    The8thDeadlySin
    Participant

    Ya cant trade him to the Knicks for first rounder. They dont have one.

    0
  • #226012
    AvatarAvatar
    TheAlchemist

    Future first rounder then. I agree about Miller, don’t think he really fits in. Apart from PG they are loaded.

    0
  • #226026
    AvatarAvatar
    rtbt
    Participant

    When you talk about Portland, you always have to factor in their draft choices still playing in Europe that they never bother to bring to the US.

    Joel Freeland – England [Center]
    Victor Claver – Spain [SF/PF]
    P. Kopponen – Finland [PG]
    Omer Asik – Turkey [Center]

    Apparently Asik, a mobile center, Claver, a high flying foward, and Kopponen, another PG, are all rated very highly. Of course Portland doesn’t need any more point guards.

    0
  • #226033
    AvatarAvatar
    Chicago1980
    Participant

    Webster is not rotting on the bench I think he is starting and he is shooting pretty good and playing good defense. I also like fernandez if im them i probably see what i can get for outlaw other than that i think they are pretty solid.

    0

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login