This topic contains 5 replies, has 5 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar piratejp 16 years ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • Posted on: Thu, 06/24/2010 - 6:05am #17842
    AvatarAvatar
    BasterdInABasket
    Participant

    http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/ian_thomsen/06/23/mock.draft/index.html?eref=sihp

    I would suggest to not even waste your time looking at it but it makes you think how this guy got a job covering the nba for SI

    0
  • Posted on: Thu, 06/24/2010 - 6:12am #339456
    AvatarAvatar
    Stojakovicfor3
    Participant

    It sucks soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo bad

    0
  • Posted on: Thu, 06/24/2010 - 6:16am #339458
    AvatarAvatar
    Philthy
    Participant

    I wonder how old it is. He should really provide a date. It’s not the worst mock I’ve seen, but Favors probably won’t slip that far…especially past Greg Monroe who didn’t have the best workouts.

    0
  • Posted on: Thu, 06/24/2010 - 6:22am #339467
    AvatarAvatar
    willie wise fan
    Participant

    its not that aweful other than favors falling to 6 and pittman cracking the first round other than that its decent

    0
  • Posted on: Thu, 06/24/2010 - 6:28am #339475
    AvatarAvatar
    willie wise fan
    Participant

    luke babbit to low sanders to high overall a D-

    0
  • Posted on: Thu, 06/24/2010 - 7:51am #339562
    AvatarAvatar
    piratejp
    Participant

    I agree there is roughly a 0% chance of Favors slipping to 6, but otherwise it isn’t horrible. I don’t agree with much of it, but I like a lot of the guys he has going higher than projected (Sanders, Torrance), and there are always surprise picks.

    Plus, after the first five picks or so, this is such a flat draft in terms of talent that there are a bunch of guys that have like a 20+ pick range on when they’ll be selected; so who’s to say who’s right and who’s wrong? I guess we’ll find out in about 5 hours.

    0
  • Author
    Posts

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login