This topic contains 14 replies, has 13 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar capecodder 14 years, 1 month ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #39225
    AvatarAvatar
    Moon River
    Participant

    Interesting twist on the draft to me, especially Beal at #2.

    http://www.cbssports.com/nba/draft/mock-draft

    0
  • #670918
    AvatarAvatar
    surve
    Participant

     true…

    to me, Beal too high, Barnes should be top 5 no less.  Henson too high, the T-Wolves would be lucky if Ross fell in their lap, even still they probably would pick a PG.  Everything else is OK.   I would love to have Harkless or Miller, good value late in the 1st round.

    0
  • #670921
    AvatarAvatar
    rwd5035
    Participant

    One thing I’ve been confused about NBA Mock Drafts for years is why some even bother justifying the picks for these teams, at least pre Lottery.

    I do sort of like the mock. I don’t think Beal goes two, but I could see him going over Barnes at this point.

    0
  • #670922
    AvatarAvatar
    TRC1991
    Participant

    i mean Boston going with essentially 2 small forwards makes little sense

    0
  • #670926
    AvatarAvatar
    Moon River
    Participant

    I have also seen too many PJ3 to Milwaukee mocks.  I think he could be something special, but has bust potential as well.  Go in a different direction Milwaukee!

    0
  • #670929
    AvatarAvatar
    JordanC20
    Participant

     

     Teams would be absolutely retarded to let Kendall Marshall slip that far.

    0
  • #670930
    AvatarAvatar
    Cosbysweater7
    Participant

    I dont think Kendall Marshall will slip all the way to #19.

    0
  • #670931
    AvatarAvatar
    Chilbert arenas
    Participant

     Way too high for Sullinger IMO. And Ross and Marshall won’t slip that far

    0
  • #670933
    AvatarAvatar
    Cosbysweater7
    Participant

    I dont think the Suns would draft Arnett Moultrie. They need guards. I would take Lamb, Rivers, Lillard, or Marshall if they’re available.

    0
  • #670947
    AvatarAvatar
    chocboywndr
    Participant

    I am still confused why people have Austin Rivers ahead of Terrance Ross. Ross is a better athlete has better size and Ross shot better from field and from 3. Rivers has a better handle but Ross’s handle is solid, so I have no idea why I would pick Ross over Rivers at this point. Being from Toronto I feel like the US writers know very little about the team and its true needs and just throw random guys on into these mocks. If these writers research anything about the team or coaching staff there is no way they select Rivers.

    0
  • #670952
    AvatarAvatar
    acantare
    Participant

    I dont think the Cs can take J Taylor while Harkelss is still on the board

    0
    • #670990
      AvatarAvatar
      capecodder
      Participant

       Can’t see the C’s passing on Andrew Nicholson ……better pick than Green

      0
  • #670958
    AvatarAvatar
    TheDagger40
    Participant

    Sullinger at 7? The last thing they need is another big who can’t protect the rim.

    Don’t get why the Raptors would get Rivers unless they trade Derozan or more him down to SF.

    Can’t imagine PJ3 going to Milwaukee

    Dion Waiters might be pegged too high

    Kendall Marshall and Terrence Ross are pegged too low.

    Makes no sense why Boston would take two SFs, and from the 4 SFs take from picks 21-24, I think Harkless would be the first one taken.

    And I think the Heats will grab a C. 

    0
  • #670962
    AvatarAvatar
    Sharp Shooter
    Participant

    Im still not sold on henson…he reminds me of a poor mans joakim noah…and its always scare me when players can’t add muscle to their frame…ala Daye..because most of the time they don’t/not willing to add weight to their frame…Im pretty sure you can find a player like in henson via free agency, who is nba ready…only way i wouldn’t be skeptical of henson is unless ben wallace stays for another year or so nd train him….but why not go for a player who can score down low? and someone who demands the ball..(Sullinger) he reminds me of a corliss williamson and he would be great coming off the bench for us.

    0
  • #670967
    AvatarAvatar
    DolanCare
    Participant

     Andrew Nicholson would actually be perfect with the Thunder. He would help them get easy buckets in the half-court. Always have said that OKC is missing a post-scorer. 

    0

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login