This topic contains 14 replies, has 13 voices, and was last updated by capecodder 14 years, 1 month ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Thu, 05/17/2012 - 9:21am #39225

Moon RiverParticipantInteresting twist on the draft to me, especially Beal at #2.
http://www.cbssports.com/nba/draft/mock-draft
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/17/2012 - 9:36am #670918

surveParticipanttrue…
to me, Beal too high, Barnes should be top 5 no less. Henson too high, the T-Wolves would be lucky if Ross fell in their lap, even still they probably would pick a PG. Everything else is OK. I would love to have Harkless or Miller, good value late in the 1st round.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/17/2012 - 9:36am #670921
rwd5035ParticipantOne thing I’ve been confused about NBA Mock Drafts for years is why some even bother justifying the picks for these teams, at least pre Lottery.
I do sort of like the mock. I don’t think Beal goes two, but I could see him going over Barnes at this point.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/17/2012 - 9:38am #670922

TRC1991Participanti mean Boston going with essentially 2 small forwards makes little sense
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/17/2012 - 9:49am #670926

Moon RiverParticipantI have also seen too many PJ3 to Milwaukee mocks. I think he could be something special, but has bust potential as well. Go in a different direction Milwaukee!
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/17/2012 - 9:53am #670929
JordanC20ParticipantTeams would be absolutely retarded to let Kendall Marshall slip that far.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/17/2012 - 10:05am #670930
Cosbysweater7ParticipantI dont think Kendall Marshall will slip all the way to #19.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/17/2012 - 10:05am #670931

Chilbert arenasParticipantWay too high for Sullinger IMO. And Ross and Marshall won’t slip that far
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/17/2012 - 10:10am #670933
Cosbysweater7ParticipantI dont think the Suns would draft Arnett Moultrie. They need guards. I would take Lamb, Rivers, Lillard, or Marshall if they’re available.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/17/2012 - 11:03am #670947

chocboywndrParticipantI am still confused why people have Austin Rivers ahead of Terrance Ross. Ross is a better athlete has better size and Ross shot better from field and from 3. Rivers has a better handle but Ross’s handle is solid, so I have no idea why I would pick Ross over Rivers at this point. Being from Toronto I feel like the US writers know very little about the team and its true needs and just throw random guys on into these mocks. If these writers research anything about the team or coaching staff there is no way they select Rivers.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/17/2012 - 11:18am #670952
acantareParticipantI dont think the Cs can take J Taylor while Harkelss is still on the board
0- Posted on: Thu, 05/17/2012 - 1:27pm #670990
capecodderParticipantCan’t see the C’s passing on Andrew Nicholson ……better pick than Green
0
- Posted on: Thu, 05/17/2012 - 11:25am #670958
TheDagger40ParticipantSullinger at 7? The last thing they need is another big who can’t protect the rim.
Don’t get why the Raptors would get Rivers unless they trade Derozan or more him down to SF.
Can’t imagine PJ3 going to Milwaukee
Dion Waiters might be pegged too high
Kendall Marshall and Terrence Ross are pegged too low.
Makes no sense why Boston would take two SFs, and from the 4 SFs take from picks 21-24, I think Harkless would be the first one taken.
And I think the Heats will grab a C.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/17/2012 - 11:42am #670962

Sharp ShooterParticipantIm still not sold on henson…he reminds me of a poor mans joakim noah…and its always scare me when players can’t add muscle to their frame…ala Daye..because most of the time they don’t/not willing to add weight to their frame…Im pretty sure you can find a player like in henson via free agency, who is nba ready…only way i wouldn’t be skeptical of henson is unless ben wallace stays for another year or so nd train him….but why not go for a player who can score down low? and someone who demands the ball..(Sullinger) he reminds me of a corliss williamson and he would be great coming off the bench for us.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 05/17/2012 - 12:15pm #670967

DolanCareParticipantAndrew Nicholson would actually be perfect with the Thunder. He would help them get easy buckets in the half-court. Always have said that OKC is missing a post-scorer.
0 - AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |