This topic contains 12 replies, has 5 voices, and was last updated by 
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Mon, 07/08/2013 - 8:18am #51045
jonus grumbyParticipantnot my idea and I would be surprised if Portland was that crazy. But let’s just for the sake of argument say that Portland would take Boozer off our hands. What else would the Bulls have to add to get the deal done? Would Boozer + Mirotic get it done? Boozer + Charlotte pick? Boozer + Butler + Mirotic? Boozer + Butler + Charlotte pick? Going with Boozer to Portland because that is the headline and adding Mirotic or Charlotte pick because that is what was in the article. I added Butler because even I am not crazy enough to think Portland would go for just one of the two and I sure don’t think Chicago would give up both.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 07/08/2013 - 8:50am #816750
OldSkoolBasketballParticipantYahoo Contributor is the same as bleacherreport, maybe even worse.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 07/08/2013 - 8:50am #816846
OldSkoolBasketballParticipantYahoo Contributor is the same as bleacherreport, maybe even worse.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 07/08/2013 - 8:51am #816746
Toronto16ParticipantWhy. Why would Portland do this? Why.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 07/08/2013 - 8:51am #816842
Toronto16ParticipantWhy. Why would Portland do this? Why.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 07/08/2013 - 12:41pm #816982
RickSlickCHIParticipantThe Bulls had the eyes on signing LBJ. They had so much cap space. But when that deal went south they just signed Boozer to a crazy 5 year/75 million deal and signed a bunch of role players which have totally changed.. And you also have to add Thibs was just hired so, he really didn’t have any say so,on getting a player who fits his system. We Bulls fans soon found out we was stuck. It’s not that Boozer isn’t a good player, it’s just the fact he doesn’t fit Thibs system well,and no ones want that contract. So all the Bulls can do is patiently wait till that outstanding contact is ending. I hope they will hold on to that first round pick and the overseas MVP. If the Bulls would of had Thibs in rotation, I feel the Boozer deal wouldn’t of went down or at least not for that crazy contract.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 07/08/2013 - 12:41pm #816885
RickSlickCHIParticipantThe Bulls had the eyes on signing LBJ. They had so much cap space. But when that deal went south they just signed Boozer to a crazy 5 year/75 million deal and signed a bunch of role players which have totally changed.. And you also have to add Thibs was just hired so, he really didn’t have any say so,on getting a player who fits his system. We Bulls fans soon found out we was stuck. It’s not that Boozer isn’t a good player, it’s just the fact he doesn’t fit Thibs system well,and no ones want that contract. So all the Bulls can do is patiently wait till that outstanding contact is ending. I hope they will hold on to that first round pick and the overseas MVP. If the Bulls would of had Thibs in rotation, I feel the Boozer deal wouldn’t of went down or at least not for that crazy contract.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 07/08/2013 - 7:54pm #817174
bouncem24949Participantmore realistic moves could be stoudemire to chi and boozer to ny
and aldridge to the warriors for barners and/or lee0 - Posted on: Mon, 07/08/2013 - 7:54pm #817077
bouncem24949Participantmore realistic moves could be stoudemire to chi and boozer to ny
and aldridge to the warriors for barners and/or lee0 - Posted on: Tue, 07/09/2013 - 2:56am #817219
RickSlickCHIParticipantHis contract is worst than Boozer’s plus he’s injured pprong
0 - Posted on: Tue, 07/09/2013 - 2:56am #817123
RickSlickCHIParticipantHis contract is worst than Boozer’s plus he’s injured pprong
0 - Posted on: Tue, 07/09/2013 - 10:44am #817447
bouncem24949Participantim just sick of looking at boozer under perform for a bulls team that’s really in need of front court production
0 - Posted on: Tue, 07/09/2013 - 10:44am #817352
bouncem24949Participantim just sick of looking at boozer under perform for a bulls team that’s really in need of front court production
0 - AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |