This topic contains 8 replies, has 9 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar KHAM83 13 years, 9 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #43264
    AvatarAvatar
    kobyz
    Participant

    http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=9hxsktz

    why for Sacramento?
    become more conventional team to build on. fill the wing positions with two talanted and solid players in Wilson and Thompson, get valuable big man, defensive minded player to put alongside Cousins in Varejao, get good PG to shere the spot. backcourt of Thomas/Brooks/Jack, K.Thompson/Chandler/Salmons/J.Johnson, with 5 bigman rotation of Varejao/Cousins/T-Rob/J.Thompson/Hayes, i think that a promise core and suitable to become a playoff team.

    Why for GSW?
    some might raised an eyebrow about giving up K.Thompson for Tyreke, but ii think it’s a risk worth taking, now with Curry and Barnes shooting is not a problem and Tyreke could really upgrade the team with his slashing and ball skills where he could play the two.

    Why for Cavs?
    get rid of Varejao who is not in future plans and get for their poor SF position a legitimate player.

    Why for Denver?
    fill a bigger need with Thornton, Chandler is expendable with how the roster molded and adding a Thornton offensive player like Thornton wold be great privilege.

    0
  • #714104
    AvatarAvatar
    Lil B to GSW
    Participant

    A) I know GSW would not want to do this, for the most part we are excited about Klay.

    B) Although Denver has Iggy and Gallinari already and could spare Chandler, they dont get their value back with Thornton. Having said that, if thornton did play on Denver that would be a very exciting offense.

    C) I would hardly call Jefferson "a legitimate player" anymore.

    0
  • #714105
    AvatarAvatar
    NickWayne87
    Participant

     that made me go…HOLD UP….let me log in….JUST SO I CAN NEG THE SHXT OUTTA YO AZXXXX!

    0
    • #714116
      AvatarAvatar
      JoeyGladstone
      Participant

      LMAOOOOO

      0
  • #714112
    AvatarAvatar
    Chilbert arenas
    Participant

    ^LOL!!!!!  ….But really GState would never do this

    0
  • #714120
    AvatarAvatar
    Kinguy11
    Participant

     The only team to do this would be Sacremento imo. Cleveland would be giving away Varejao for Jefferson, for Denver it’s Chandler for Thornton (who’s good but not as good as Chandler) and GSW are giving away one of their future stars and a solid role player for another future star, I’ll you that, but Outlaw is deadweight and Fredette had a disapointing rookie season and would be stuck behind Curry.

    0
  • #714126
    AvatarAvatar
    frogman
    Participant

    You can get wayyy more for Varejao, I’m sure he’s more in their plans then Jefferson.

    And the rest of the trade is just a bunch of wing players flying around the league for no apparent reason.

    Not the best idea I’ve ever heard

    0
  • #714130
    AvatarAvatar
    Lebron’s Hairline
    Participant

    Never ever ever post a trade idea on here. You will get negged to hell especially one this bad

    0
  • #714190
    AvatarAvatar
    KHAM83
    Participant

    You make some good points, but disagree with the entire trade.

    1) Honestly, I do like Curry/Evans combo more than Curry/Thompson. They do have a shooter in Barnes, and I think Evan’s slashing/passing will make Curry/Barnes more effective.

    2) SF is a glaring weakness for Clev, but Richard Jefferson himself is a glaring weakness of a sf :-p   Ill like for Clev to go after Wilson Chandler. I think he fits well with the current roster. I can see Den being interested in swapping Chandler (who is expendable) for Verajo. Irving-Waiters-Chandler-Thompson-Zeller, youve got a border line playoff team of young players who will only get better. Den adds Verajo to the bench behind McGee and Faried. I think Mazgov in his final year is expendable.  Also thinking Denver will throw in Mazgov for Gibson plus future pick. Gibson will bring them shooting off the bench, which they do not have.

    0

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login