This topic contains 18 replies, has 7 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar Mr_Jeans11 11 years ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #60238
    AvatarAvatar
    Mr_Jeans11
    Participant

    Hello all once again. Mr. Jeans here with your yearly precised, inside sourced, highly accurate NBA mock draft – 2015 edition. "Take it with a grain of salt!" http://www.nbadraft.net/nba_mock_drafts/comments/135678

    Hello all once again. Mr. Jeans here with your yearly precised, inside sourced, highly accurate NBA mock draft – 2015 edition. "Take it with a grain of salt!" http://www.nbadraft.net/nba_mock_drafts/comments/135678

    0
  • #987505
    AvatarAvatar
    goddag
    Participant

    I can’t see MN passing on Jordan Mickey if he’s around in the second round. He’s to good at defense to pass up;

    0
  • #987354
    AvatarAvatar
    goddag
    Participant

    I can’t see MN passing on Jordan Mickey if he’s around in the second round. He’s to good at defense to pass up;

    0
    • #994903
      AvatarAvatar
      Mr_Jeans11
      Participant

       Well they did.

      0
    • #994764
      AvatarAvatar
      Mr_Jeans11
      Participant

       Well they did.

      0
  • #987507
    AvatarAvatar
    mgreener_34
    Participant

     I’ll get the easy stuff out of the way, so that other posters don’t have to bring it up:

    1.) What are your sources?

    2.) Why no comments?

    3.) What makes it accurate? 

    On topic, as a Celtic fan, I just threw up all over my computer screen. The last thing this team needs is another unathletic big man who shoots well. I’ve had enough of these types of players, and I think we could do without a draft and stash at #28. I actually wouldn’t be opposed to Vaughn in the 2nd though, that’s good value. I would def. take Kaminski with #16, but I’m holding my breath for something more exciting as a C’s fan. 

    On the draft itself, I could 100% see it going something like this, and admire the creativity. People like to talk up players and belittle others for making bold moves in their mock, but at the end of the day most people don’t know **** after the top 5, and even then, who would have Guessed Bennett would go #1? Noel fall to #6? Westbrook #4? There are always surprise picks because at the end of the day they aren’t surprises. We have never seen these prospects as upclose and personal as these teams have, so at the end of the day the people who will come on here and say "OMFG Winslow WILL NOT drop that low!" need to realize someone is going to drop, and the draft order will def. be switched. It happens every year. 

    I really like the WCS pick to NY. It shapes the rest of your lottery, and actually makes sense as the only time the Knicks have had any success recently was with a player who people compare WCS too in Chandler. 

    The Turner pick to the Kings is also a good one, because a lot of people agree that he’s a top 10 talent, but none of us have really been able to peg where he goes. Kings might go for the homerun pick, but to be honest, in Karls system, I just don’t see a player like Myles fitting in or playing to the best of his abilities. I hope they pass on him, and probably would for Muiday. 

    picks #8 and 9 are interchangable to me, as I don’t think the distance between the two SF are as much as people like to make out. Both are high energy, defensive first players who have decent offense. I understand why you have it like this even though I think most people will call you crazy for having Winslow that low and after Stan. Personally, I think Winslow will be a top 8 pick. 

    Portis to Indy is such a good move, and makes sense on every level. Love that pick man.

    The only pick I 100% disagree with would be Booker to the Hawks. I get it, they need shooters, but I think it would be too hard for them to pass up Kaminski, who would give them another BIG body, and would fit into their offense like a glove. Would be shocked if they passed that man, esspecially at #15. 

    I also think MEM going small is so under rated. People hear the Gasol rumors and see KK as a FA and automatically think MEM will go big. People seem to forget their back up point is also a FA and is most likely going back to Europe, so they are going to need to fill that void. Would be interesting to see two Louiville scoring PGs on memphis.

     

    0
  • #987356
    AvatarAvatar
    mgreener_34
    Participant

     I’ll get the easy stuff out of the way, so that other posters don’t have to bring it up:

    1.) What are your sources?

    2.) Why no comments?

    3.) What makes it accurate? 

    On topic, as a Celtic fan, I just threw up all over my computer screen. The last thing this team needs is another unathletic big man who shoots well. I’ve had enough of these types of players, and I think we could do without a draft and stash at #28. I actually wouldn’t be opposed to Vaughn in the 2nd though, that’s good value. I would def. take Kaminski with #16, but I’m holding my breath for something more exciting as a C’s fan. 

    On the draft itself, I could 100% see it going something like this, and admire the creativity. People like to talk up players and belittle others for making bold moves in their mock, but at the end of the day most people don’t know **** after the top 5, and even then, who would have Guessed Bennett would go #1? Noel fall to #6? Westbrook #4? There are always surprise picks because at the end of the day they aren’t surprises. We have never seen these prospects as upclose and personal as these teams have, so at the end of the day the people who will come on here and say "OMFG Winslow WILL NOT drop that low!" need to realize someone is going to drop, and the draft order will def. be switched. It happens every year. 

    I really like the WCS pick to NY. It shapes the rest of your lottery, and actually makes sense as the only time the Knicks have had any success recently was with a player who people compare WCS too in Chandler. 

    The Turner pick to the Kings is also a good one, because a lot of people agree that he’s a top 10 talent, but none of us have really been able to peg where he goes. Kings might go for the homerun pick, but to be honest, in Karls system, I just don’t see a player like Myles fitting in or playing to the best of his abilities. I hope they pass on him, and probably would for Muiday. 

    picks #8 and 9 are interchangable to me, as I don’t think the distance between the two SF are as much as people like to make out. Both are high energy, defensive first players who have decent offense. I understand why you have it like this even though I think most people will call you crazy for having Winslow that low and after Stan. Personally, I think Winslow will be a top 8 pick. 

    Portis to Indy is such a good move, and makes sense on every level. Love that pick man.

    The only pick I 100% disagree with would be Booker to the Hawks. I get it, they need shooters, but I think it would be too hard for them to pass up Kaminski, who would give them another BIG body, and would fit into their offense like a glove. Would be shocked if they passed that man, esspecially at #15. 

    I also think MEM going small is so under rated. People hear the Gasol rumors and see KK as a FA and automatically think MEM will go big. People seem to forget their back up point is also a FA and is most likely going back to Europe, so they are going to need to fill that void. Would be interesting to see two Louiville scoring PGs on memphis.

     

    0
  • #987514
    AvatarAvatar
    Reptilian Monk
    Participant

     This is pretty off in alot of places, I dont know where to begin. 

    0
  • #987362
    AvatarAvatar
    Reptilian Monk
    Participant

     This is pretty off in alot of places, I dont know where to begin. 

    0
  • #987516
    AvatarAvatar
    Chilbert arenas
    Participant

     No way does Stan Johnson go ahead of Winslow

    0
  • #987364
    AvatarAvatar
    Chilbert arenas
    Participant

     No way does Stan Johnson go ahead of Winslow

    0
    • #994899
      AvatarAvatar
      Mr_Jeans11
      Participant

       Can you tell me where Stan Johnson went and who Miami got, I’m a huge fan of Miami?

      0
    • #994760
      AvatarAvatar
      Mr_Jeans11
      Participant

       Can you tell me where Stan Johnson went and who Miami got, I’m a huge fan of Miami?

      0
  • #987426
    AvatarAvatar
    ExumInferno
    Participant

     In just don’t understand how it says Hello all once again but the post count is only 1.

    Also, a double post in a single post.  

    If that is the actual draft then there will be some reasons to watch, people would be excited about the Mudiay slide, the UK twins ending up in Atlanta, and Sam Decker going to Dallas to be Chandler Parson’s stunt double.

     

     

    0
  • #987577
    AvatarAvatar
    ExumInferno
    Participant

     In just don’t understand how it says Hello all once again but the post count is only 1.

    Also, a double post in a single post.  

    If that is the actual draft then there will be some reasons to watch, people would be excited about the Mudiay slide, the UK twins ending up in Atlanta, and Sam Decker going to Dallas to be Chandler Parson’s stunt double.

     

     

    0
  • #987669
    AvatarAvatar
    shootingstar11
    Participant

    No way Knicks picking WSC @ 4th, no way Winslow slips to 9th, and even if he does, no way Bobcats wasting another of their draft picks on Winslow (merely a better version of Michael-Kidd Gilhcrist.

    This mock draft is as bad as it gets.

      

    0
  • #987517
    AvatarAvatar
    shootingstar11
    Participant

    No way Knicks picking WSC @ 4th, no way Winslow slips to 9th, and even if he does, no way Bobcats wasting another of their draft picks on Winslow (merely a better version of Michael-Kidd Gilhcrist.

    This mock draft is as bad as it gets.

      

    0
    • #994901
      AvatarAvatar
      Mr_Jeans11
      Participant

       I heard Winslow slipped to the 10th spot – is it true? 

      0
    • #994762
      AvatarAvatar
      Mr_Jeans11
      Participant

       I heard Winslow slipped to the 10th spot – is it true? 

      0

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login