This topic contains 20 replies, has 8 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar aamir543 15 years ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #31178
    AvatarAvatar
    Lotto Stud
    Participant

    We all know how the 96 class went down as the "greatest" class, but if you could have a draft do over with taking in account to how the players careers are or ended where would you have drafted them today with the same order from 96?

    0
  • #555614
    AvatarAvatar
    surve
    Participant

    I dont think that is a good question because it really depends on the team and the need still.  The player that jumps out is Kobe, but you have to realize, although Garnett had a good year, he was no where near his potential so HS players were still risky in teams eyes.  So most picks made sense at that time.

    0
  • #555668
    AvatarAvatar
    surve
    Participant

    I dont think that is a good question because it really depends on the team and the need still.  The player that jumps out is Kobe, but you have to realize, although Garnett had a good year, he was no where near his potential so HS players were still risky in teams eyes.  So most picks made sense at that time.

    0
  • #555624
    AvatarAvatar
    Lotto Stud
    Participant

    How is it not a good question when we get the typical 08 class re-do just about every month

    0
  • #555678
    AvatarAvatar
    Lotto Stud
    Participant

    How is it not a good question when we get the typical 08 class re-do just about every month

    0
  • #555625
    AvatarAvatar
    highflyer0
    Participant

    ^because 1996 is a long time and it’s hard to remember what kind of prospects those players were considered at the time and how each team was structured.

     

    0
  • #555680
    AvatarAvatar
    highflyer0
    Participant

    ^because 1996 is a long time and it’s hard to remember what kind of prospects those players were considered at the time and how each team was structured.

     

    0
  • #555627
    AvatarAvatar
    Lotto Stud
    Participant

    Quite sure Steve Nash would have been a Top 5 pick over Marbury versus being #15 overall.

    0
  • #555682
    AvatarAvatar
    Lotto Stud
    Participant

    Quite sure Steve Nash would have been a Top 5 pick over Marbury versus being #15 overall.

    0
  • #555635
    AvatarAvatar
    Lotto Stud
    Participant

    "^because 1996 is a long time and it’s hard to remember what kind of prospects those players were considered at the time and how each team was structured."

    Hell, well taking all the factors in account I said in my opening post what would your Big Board look like since this would be the better question to ask.

    0
  • #555690
    AvatarAvatar
    Lotto Stud
    Participant

    "^because 1996 is a long time and it’s hard to remember what kind of prospects those players were considered at the time and how each team was structured."

    Hell, well taking all the factors in account I said in my opening post what would your Big Board look like since this would be the better question to ask.

    0
  • #555657
    AvatarAvatar
    GottaBeTheShoes
    Participant

    I would still take Allen Iverson number 1 in the draft. Such an amazing player to watch.

    0
  • #555712
    AvatarAvatar
    GottaBeTheShoes
    Participant

    I would still take Allen Iverson number 1 in the draft. Such an amazing player to watch.

    0
  • #555719
    AvatarAvatar
    TRC1991
    Participant

    i will list the top 5 if i were to re-draft right now

    1) PHI- Kobe Bryant

    2) TOR- Allen Iverson

    3) VAN- Steve Nash

    4) MIL- Ray Allen

    5) MIN- Shareef Abdur-Rahim

     

    but that comment is based off of nothing besides career accomplishments, i didnt take into consideration team needs going into the ’96 draft

    0
  • #555775
    AvatarAvatar
    TRC1991
    Participant

    i will list the top 5 if i were to re-draft right now

    1) PHI- Kobe Bryant

    2) TOR- Allen Iverson

    3) VAN- Steve Nash

    4) MIL- Ray Allen

    5) MIN- Shareef Abdur-Rahim

     

    but that comment is based off of nothing besides career accomplishments, i didnt take into consideration team needs going into the ’96 draft

    0
  • #555813
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    top 15 (not taking team needs into consideration at the time just top 15 careers i guess)

    1-kobe bryant.

    2-allen iverson.

    3-steve nash

    4-ray allen

    5-shareef abdur rahim

    6-stephon marbury

    7-ben wallace

    8-antoinne walker

    9-peja stojakovic

    10-jermaine oneal

    11-marcus camby

    12-zydrunas ilgauskas

    13-derek fisher

    14 kerry kittles

    15-eric dampier

    lots of guys had awesome primes but fazed out a little early. Marbury, walker, peja, oneal, and abdur rahim were all mulitple time all-stars and all nba claiber players for numerous seasons but might not have finished their careers very strong and maybe dont get the credit for how good they were that they should. Kerry kittles is another terrific guy who would have been a 15-18 ppg guy for a long time if not for injuries.

    0
  • #555757
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    top 15 (not taking team needs into consideration at the time just top 15 careers i guess)

    1-kobe bryant.

    2-allen iverson.

    3-steve nash

    4-ray allen

    5-shareef abdur rahim

    6-stephon marbury

    7-ben wallace

    8-antoinne walker

    9-peja stojakovic

    10-jermaine oneal

    11-marcus camby

    12-zydrunas ilgauskas

    13-derek fisher

    14 kerry kittles

    15-eric dampier

    lots of guys had awesome primes but fazed out a little early. Marbury, walker, peja, oneal, and abdur rahim were all mulitple time all-stars and all nba claiber players for numerous seasons but might not have finished their careers very strong and maybe dont get the credit for how good they were that they should. Kerry kittles is another terrific guy who would have been a 15-18 ppg guy for a long time if not for injuries.

    0
  • #555833
    AvatarAvatar
    frogman
    Participant

    wow thats a good draft class… I think you have to put Jermaine O’neal above Shareef.  I think he came like 4th in MVP voting one year and was the best player on a good playoff team.  I kinda want him to retire as it is borderline painful to watch him play now but if i was getting like $23,000,000 for playing like 8 mins a night i wouldnt retire either.  Not sure if Shareef ever played in a playoff game lol

    0
  • #555891
    AvatarAvatar
    frogman
    Participant

    wow thats a good draft class… I think you have to put Jermaine O’neal above Shareef.  I think he came like 4th in MVP voting one year and was the best player on a good playoff team.  I kinda want him to retire as it is borderline painful to watch him play now but if i was getting like $23,000,000 for playing like 8 mins a night i wouldnt retire either.  Not sure if Shareef ever played in a playoff game lol

    0
  • #555944
    AvatarAvatar
    aamir543
    Participant

    I do agree it is hard to do a redo while taking team needs into consideration,(hell, I wasn’t even born yet) but without taking team needs, injuries, and other factors into consideraion, here are the best flat out ballers at full health, and for some, motivation. 

    1 Kobe

    2 Iverson

    3 Allen

    4 Nash

    5 Marbury

    6 Shareef

    7 Antoine Walker

    8 Peja

    9 Jermaine Oneal

    10 Ben Wallac

    11.Camby

    12. Kittles

    13. Illugauskus

    14. Fish

    15 Dampier

    0
  • #556001
    AvatarAvatar
    aamir543
    Participant

    I do agree it is hard to do a redo while taking team needs into consideration,(hell, I wasn’t even born yet) but without taking team needs, injuries, and other factors into consideraion, here are the best flat out ballers at full health, and for some, motivation. 

    1 Kobe

    2 Iverson

    3 Allen

    4 Nash

    5 Marbury

    6 Shareef

    7 Antoine Walker

    8 Peja

    9 Jermaine Oneal

    10 Ben Wallac

    11.Camby

    12. Kittles

    13. Illugauskus

    14. Fish

    15 Dampier

    0

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login