This topic contains 2 replies, has 3 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar bobbyb 16 years, 7 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • Posted on: Sun, 11/08/2009 - 6:01pm #9992
    marcusfizer21marcusfizer21
    marcusfizer21
    Participant

    What, nobody wants to trade for Stephen Jackson? No surprise that the disgruntled Warrior has not been moved. It’s not just that he is a pain to deal with, but few GMs want to take on his money, at his age and with his reputation. Besides getting $7.6 million this season, he has three years left and $27.6 million on his deal. “He’s 31,” said one GM. “Do you really want Stephen Jackson when he’s 34?”

    New York Daily News

    Well, the GM’s got a lot of points on that…LOL

    0
  • Posted on: Sun, 11/08/2009 - 6:24pm #227960
    AvatarAvatar
    nateoak10
    Participant

    warriors are looking for good offers. notthrow aways. hell be traded but not soon

    0
  • Posted on: Sun, 11/08/2009 - 10:28pm #228026
    AvatarAvatar
    bobbyb
    Participant

    who would want him, who wants a guy who signs a big contract, is the captain of your squad, then says for no reason he wants to be traded? Think about it, no contender wanted to deal with iverson’s crap and he is much better than jackson.

    0
  • Author
    Posts

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login