Reggie Jackson

 1)Your bucks trade (no way the bucks accept it imo) sets Jackson’s value extremely high, with arguably a package close to what was given out for Cousins with a recent lottery pick (hard to say who has the most value right now between Heild and Maker, Maker very unproven but apparently more upside) and a first rounder (Milwaukee’s pick should be lower and in a worse 2018 draft, but not that significantly given Boogie’s impact), rest of the package being way more significant and interesting in your deal (Snell+Delly is better than the Tyreke Golloway duo).

2) Knicks trade has credibility but I don’t think any of the two want to do it. Imo Knicks are winner in terms of play value, but you can argue there is a salary dump aspect with Jackson, and netting cheap decent backup O’Quinn might be worth it.

3)I don’t see it from the Pistons with Drummond-Baynes-Boban. This trade does not make sense for the sixers. No guarantee Jackson would fit better than McConnell, and salary difference is so big that TJ should be worth way more despite arguably lower play value. That’s too much to give for D-League regular Stanley Johnson.

4) That’s a fair-trade assuming that first round pick is absurdly protected and does not convey until the mavericks make the playoffs again. Otherwise (unprotected), you forgot Andre Drummond on that deal.

5)I don’t think either team would do that. It surely can be fair depending on the pick’s protections. It does not really make sense from the Nuggets after that Plumlee trade though.

6)That’s the rumored trade. Very lose-lose imo, probably fair though.

7)not possible (Kings pick situation with Bulls; Sixers) unless we are talking Newly acquired NOP pick, and then it is just beyond absurd: the kings would do it (they’re the kings!).

8) you forgot Andre Drummond.

9)You forgot Pistons 2017 first.

I was never high on Reggie Jackson – I called him “fools gold” here:

http://www.nbadraft.net/forum/knicks-trade-0

 I hope this isn’t your first post since then.  I say lots of things that I think will come off as profound but usually end with a negative total.  Where is fun in trying to attain points by being politically correct or only replying to threads when you agree with the OP.  I love the hot takes so keep them coming.

If he would’ve just stayed in his lane at OKC and been fine with being the 6th man, we could’ve really used him this year and last year in the playoffs

 IMO, he’s far too ball dominant. Shoots an ok percentage from 3 but should have averaged more assists last year. He goes hero ball when the game is close because he wants to be the man and has a chip on his shoulder. He’s got all the tools, just needs to figure it out. I think he’s a bit too stubborn. Not a comp in terms of play style, but I see similarities to Billups. Took him a while to figure out how to put it all together too. I hope he does soon, or I hope he nets us a good return in trade.