This topic contains 16 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar rickybobby 12 years, 12 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • Posted on: Wed, 06/26/2013 - 1:02pm #50500
    AvatarAvatar
    Meditated States
    Participant

    Is he projected too low on draftnet?

    Yes or No, and why?

    0
  • Posted on: Wed, 06/26/2013 - 1:17pm #806402
    AvatarAvatar
    MagikKnick
    Participant

    I disagree with Aran’s mock ALOT, but this one I agree with

    I dont see Larkin as a top-15 pick that everyone has him

    early-20s seems right for him

    0
  • Posted on: Wed, 06/26/2013 - 1:17pm #806337
    AvatarAvatar
    MagikKnick
    Participant

    I disagree with Aran’s mock ALOT, but this one I agree with

    I dont see Larkin as a top-15 pick that everyone has him

    early-20s seems right for him

    0
    • Posted on: Wed, 06/26/2013 - 1:34pm #806412
      AvatarAvatar
      mamadou
      Participant

      Yep…but you should update your mock because you seems like everyone !!!,
      IMO he’ll end from 17 to…25, from the first hawks pick (whom anybody can buy easily) to the clipps one (as replacement due to the bledsoe trade waiting to happen).

      0
    • Posted on: Wed, 06/26/2013 - 1:34pm #806347
      AvatarAvatar
      mamadou
      Participant

      Yep…but you should update your mock because you seems like everyone !!!,
      IMO he’ll end from 17 to…25, from the first hawks pick (whom anybody can buy easily) to the clipps one (as replacement due to the bledsoe trade waiting to happen).

      0
    • Posted on: Wed, 06/26/2013 - 1:36pm #806414
      AvatarAvatar
      mamadou
      Participant

      .

      0
    • Posted on: Wed, 06/26/2013 - 1:36pm #806349
      AvatarAvatar
      mamadou
      Participant

      .

      0
  • Posted on: Wed, 06/26/2013 - 2:09pm #806447
    AvatarAvatar
    Meditated States
    Participant

    I think he is better than early 20’s. Could be a steal around 21. He has unlimited range and pulls up quick. Shoots a high percentage. Just lacks height but that’s not new for him. He has good NBA scoring potential. Does need work in other areas like running a halfcourt set, but pick and roll will work all day with him. He competes on D but that will hurt him some.

    0
  • Posted on: Wed, 06/26/2013 - 2:09pm #806381
    AvatarAvatar
    Meditated States
    Participant

    I think he is better than early 20’s. Could be a steal around 21. He has unlimited range and pulls up quick. Shoots a high percentage. Just lacks height but that’s not new for him. He has good NBA scoring potential. Does need work in other areas like running a halfcourt set, but pick and roll will work all day with him. He competes on D but that will hurt him some.

    0
  • Posted on: Wed, 06/26/2013 - 2:17pm #806457
    AvatarAvatar
    Ahkasi Clay
    Participant

    Larkins in the top 15 was to high. If the jazz want him there is a good chance they can get him at 21

    0
  • Posted on: Wed, 06/26/2013 - 2:17pm #806391
    AvatarAvatar
    Ahkasi Clay
    Participant

    Larkins in the top 15 was to high. If the jazz want him there is a good chance they can get him at 21

    0
  • Posted on: Wed, 06/26/2013 - 2:18pm #806459
    AvatarAvatar
    Ahkasi Clay
    Participant

    Larkins in the top 15 was to high. If the jazz want him there is a good chance they can get him at 21

    0
  • Posted on: Wed, 06/26/2013 - 2:18pm #806393
    AvatarAvatar
    Ahkasi Clay
    Participant

    Larkins in the top 15 was to high. If the jazz want him there is a good chance they can get him at 21

    0
  • Posted on: Wed, 06/26/2013 - 2:21pm #806463
    AvatarAvatar
    bloodshy
    Participant

    Larkin’s game is impressive, but it’s totally unknown if it can translate to the NBA. There is no one like him in the NBA. Yes, there are a few short players, but none of the NBA’s midgets have such short arms and/or slight frames. At best I think Larkin is a slightly more athletic Ty Lawson, but with less court vision and defense.

    I see Larkin very much like I see Gobert. He’s a guy that wows you in some ways, but has major downside risk in areas that are total unknowns. As a Jazz fan I would be disappointed if we picked him at 14, but OK taking him at 21. To me you need to go past 20 before the potential rewards balance out against the obvious downside.

    0
  • Posted on: Wed, 06/26/2013 - 2:21pm #806397
    AvatarAvatar
    bloodshy
    Participant

    Larkin’s game is impressive, but it’s totally unknown if it can translate to the NBA. There is no one like him in the NBA. Yes, there are a few short players, but none of the NBA’s midgets have such short arms and/or slight frames. At best I think Larkin is a slightly more athletic Ty Lawson, but with less court vision and defense.

    I see Larkin very much like I see Gobert. He’s a guy that wows you in some ways, but has major downside risk in areas that are total unknowns. As a Jazz fan I would be disappointed if we picked him at 14, but OK taking him at 21. To me you need to go past 20 before the potential rewards balance out against the obvious downside.

    0
  • Posted on: Wed, 06/26/2013 - 2:43pm #806407
    AvatarAvatar
    rickybobby
    Participant

    He’s my sleeper pick to be one of the top players out of this draft. Size is definitely gonna hurt him. But he got two important skills. Shooting and running the pick and roll. I’ll take him in the late lottery.

    0
  • Posted on: Wed, 06/26/2013 - 2:43pm #806473
    AvatarAvatar
    rickybobby
    Participant

    He’s my sleeper pick to be one of the top players out of this draft. Size is definitely gonna hurt him. But he got two important skills. Shooting and running the pick and roll. I’ll take him in the late lottery.

    0
  • Author
    Posts

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login