This topic contains 18 replies, has 16 voices, and was last updated by sjcmr5Sam 14 years ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Thu, 06/21/2012 - 11:05am #40616

Wahoo757ParticipantThis is another pick where I find myself stuck. I think the two obvious top candidates if available are John Henson and Meyers Leonard. Henson’s more NBA ready and compliments skills nicely, while Meyers Leonard possesses more upside and will allow Monroe to slide to PF. Also, a dark horse candidate that I’ve read about is Arnett Moultrie. The Pistons really like his size, athleticism, and his rebounding ability. I found it interesting that Moultrie was the only 1s round prospect that the Pistons scheduled to work out, I’m not sure how much to read into that.
With that being said, who do you think the Pistons go with at 9?
0 - Posted on: Thu, 06/21/2012 - 11:10am #685261
SpacegrassParticipantSigns point to John Henson , but hell I don’t have any confidence in who is going where after 6 or 7 so my basis for Henson is based off the fact the general consensus from pundits is it’s him plus he worked out for them and spent a lot of time talking to Dumars and co.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 06/21/2012 - 11:14am #685268
TruettParticipant… he is not NBA ready. Who is taking him if the pistons do not take him at #9? If they really want him they should trade out of that position.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 06/21/2012 - 11:15am #685270
HeelsGuy25Participantmind see him in Detroit but I feel he slips to Milwaukee at 12 and Drummond lands at #9. A Monroe/Drummond front court would be interesting. I like Henson as more of a can contribute now player than Drummond, but who knows.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 06/21/2012 - 11:20am #685278

220ParticipantAs of right now I think they draft Meyers, but Henson is certainly a possibility. Tyler Zeller is a possibility too.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 06/21/2012 - 11:23am #685269

Moon RiverParticipantI see landing in Milwaukee at #12.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 06/21/2012 - 11:25am #685291

CodySLCParticipantI think they take Henson. His defensive shot blocking and run jump ability will complement Monroes game. Monroe already proved he’s very good at the 5 spot.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 06/21/2012 - 11:30am #685300

GrandmamaParticipantI’ve got them taking Henson, he should be a nice fit next to Monroe.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 06/21/2012 - 11:33am #685302

Wahoo757ParticipantI take it since no one’s mentioning Moultrie they’re not taking him as a serious candiate at 9?
0 - Posted on: Thu, 06/21/2012 - 11:34am #685293
sksa4y5abw4tParticipantThey should trade this pick because all the guys they need they could get later in the draft. But if they end up keeping it, probably either Henson or Leonard(or, as I’ve seen on a few mocks, Drummond, if he slips that low).
0 - Posted on: Thu, 06/21/2012 - 11:38am #685308

The Scare Crow RisesParticipantBut I changed it up since then…I could still them go a lot of ways…they are a Team that’s hard to lock in on…
0 - Posted on: Thu, 06/21/2012 - 12:12pm #685336
PulseGlazerParticipantLeonard fits best. They’ve shown they can develop bigs and he’s a much better prospect than Henson. Henson is similar to Mbah a Moute, so I don’t see why Milw would even look at him.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 06/21/2012 - 12:30pm #685342
Stojakovicfor3ParticipantHenson is NOTHING like Mbah a Moute.
But anyways, I think they take Henson.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 06/21/2012 - 12:45pm #685363
PulseGlazerParticipantIn terms of role, sure he is. A long, defensive minded, energy focussed 3/4 who can’t shoot.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 06/21/2012 - 12:53pm #685365
benny15ParticipantIm probably alone in this, but in my mock i have the pistons taking Jeremy Lamb. last year they took the best player that slipped and it worked out wonderfully for them, dont see why they dont take the same route. i know they dont need a shooting guard right now, but i dont think Gordon or Stuckey as long term fixtures in their team. this team will be built around Monroe(22), Knight(21), and another key young player to serve as part of their core. Stuckey who is 26 can help the pistons now but will be almost 30 when their young talent have honed their skills to make them relevant in the east play-off picture.
why not use this draft to take that 3rd scoring option. there will be other complementary players that they can plug into in future drafts or in free agency when the time comes that they acquire them, but before then, its important to build your young core of talents together. selecting Lamb at the 9th pick to fill in that void of a promising, young(20) swingman to develop and grow with their other two promising draftees could go a long way for them in the future.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 06/21/2012 - 2:08pm #685439
ReactionParticipantIf they take Lamb, they should move Stuckey for a pick or something. No need to overload on guards again. However I doubt Dumars will ever get rid of Stuckey since he’s obsessed with him
0 - Posted on: Thu, 06/21/2012 - 3:00pm #685464

Zeke313ParticipantWhy would they move Stuckey? If anything Gordon would be the guy that gets traded.
0- Posted on: Thu, 06/21/2012 - 6:32pm #685650
ReactionParticipantWith Gordon’s contract it will be a miracle to move him. Stuckey is the player on the Pistons with the most value outside of Knight and Monroe which are commonly viewed as untradeable
0
- Posted on: Fri, 06/22/2012 - 5:48am #685912
sjcmr5SamParticipantWith big men getting more versatile and smaller at the PF position I dont think Henson’s lack of girth will hurt him too much. He is extremely versatile and still rapidly improving as an offensive threat. How many PF’s in the NBA this day in age kill you in the post? There are way more mid range shooters and when henson gets his body filled out to around 230 he will be a dynamic combo with Monroe
0 - AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |