Trade: Jazz, Wolves - NBADraft.net

This topic contains 13 replies, has 11 voices, and was last updated by Hitster 15 years ago.

Author
Posts
Posted on: Mon, 06/20/2011 - 4:25pm #30741

WinterSoldier
Participant
Would you trade the #2 and #20 for the #3 and #12?
0
Posted on: Mon, 06/20/2011 - 4:27pm #548108

PulseGlazer
Participant
Not unless the Cavs take Williams. The Jazz have little to no use for Williams, but it’d be worth it to get Kyrie.
0
- Posted on: Mon, 06/20/2011 - 4:28pm #548111
  
  UNC44
  Participant
  Cavs are committed to Kyrie at 1 and this rumor came out after that so the Jazz deffinately want Williams more than Knight
  0
Posted on: Mon, 06/20/2011 - 4:30pm #548114

WinterSoldier
Participant
Thats what I have heard i think the Jazz definately want Williams they need to go after franchise talent.
0
Posted on: Mon, 06/20/2011 - 4:31pm #548115

Stojakovicfor3
Participant
I’d probably do it if I was the Wolves. They already said if they draft Derrick Williams, that they won’t look to trade Beasley or Randolph, so they won’t be able to use him all that much anyways. If they did this trade, they could select Enes Kanter and then select someone like Klay Thompson, Marshon Brooks or Jordan Hamilton. It also works out for the Jazz, who like Williams and could start him at SF if AK47 doesn’t come back next season. This is actually a good idea
0
- Posted on: Mon, 06/20/2011 - 4:33pm #548118
  
  hooverball
  Participant
  Draft Williams #2
  Trade Flynn, Johnson and #20 pick to DET for Hamilton #8 pick and next years 1st rounder.
  Draft Biyombo #8
  Starters:
  PG: Ridnour
  SG: Hamilton
  SF: Williams
  PF: Love
  C: Millic
  Bench:
  PG: Rubio
  SF/PF: Beasley
  SG/SF: Webster
  C: Biyombo
  PF: Randolph
  Suddenly the Wolves are no longer so incredibly young. They would have three solid veterans in the starting lineup to go with two all star calliber players at the forward spots. You would have to be optimistic about your team to have three potential laden talents coming off the bench. You could also play Love at the 5 and Beasley and Williams at the forwards to go small, but without getting killed on the boards as most teams do when they opt to go small. Beasley may not be best suited as a starter but rather a spark plug/loose cannon off the bench anyways. This would also take the pressure off Rubio to be a stud from day one. Ridnour is a serviceable PG that can show him the ropes. If your teams biggest weakness is a plataue of Hamilton and Webster at SG then you should win 40 – 50 games.
  Wolves would be playoff bound for an early first round exit.
  This gives DET an actual PG with some abilities and a nice player in Johnson while getting rid of Hamilton and his contract. They still have a top 20 pick as well. The talent between 8 and 20 is very similar, but Biyombo won’t amek it past GS, HOU and NY.
  0
Posted on: Mon, 06/20/2011 - 4:33pm #548117

chevilicous
Participant
personally I’d prefer to ship the 3 and 12 plus millsap to the bucks for Bogut and the 10, then you have a true defensive minded center to add alongside Jefferson for a season while Favors still develops, then draft Burks at the 10 slot to have a line up of Harris/Burks/Hayward/Jefferson/Bogut.
0
Posted on: Mon, 06/20/2011 - 5:11pm #548144

mds0549
Participant
As a wolves fan I don’t mind the idea of the 2 and 20 for 3 and 12, but I hate the idea of trading w/ Detroit to get Hamilton and two years of a bloated contract…Detroit needs to realize addition w/ subtraction if they want to dump that contract.
If you make the trade w/ Utah, get Kanter. Take the 12, Flynn and Johnson to GSW for Ellis
0
Posted on: Mon, 06/20/2011 - 5:56pm #548163

drk3351
Participant
WILLIAMS IS NOT A SF. Utah would have no use for him. Minny SHOULD get kanter at 2 or with a trade.
0
Posted on: Mon, 06/20/2011 - 6:05pm #548171

hooverball
Participant
Who cares about two years of a bloated contract. You really think they are gonna be big in the free agent market in the next two years other than with what a midlevel could get them? Then its off the books and they are ripe and ready. Rent Hamilton’s experience for two years.
0
Posted on: Mon, 06/20/2011 - 6:09pm #548173

Cliff
Participant
What about the #2 pick + Wesley Johnson for #3 pick + CJ Miles?
Wolves get a more experienced SG and they can draft Kanter for their C:
PG: Ridnour, Rubio/Flynn
SG: Miles, (#20: Hamilton/Honeycutt)
SF: Beasley, Webster
PF: Love, Randolph
C: Kanter, Milcic
Jazz fill their need at the SG and can still get a PG/SF with their 12 pick:
PG: Harris, (#12:Fredette/trade up to get Walker)
SG: Johnson/Hayward, Hayward/Johnson
SF: Williams, Evans/(#12: Singleton/Harris/Hamilton)
PF: Favors. Millsap
C: Jefferson, Okur
I’d probably throw in a disclaimer that these aren’t the only trades for both teams in the off season.
0
Posted on: Mon, 06/20/2011 - 6:12pm #548177

BallinlikeMJ23
Participant
drk3351 and mds0549 you both are exactly correct.
I’m not sold on DWilliams and I don’t think he’s near the talent as Beasley at the SF position…Beasley is going to be a top 5 scorer in the NBA someday soon and there’s no way I start DWilliams over KLove or Beasley, and I don’t agree with trading Beasley.
I also think the Wolves really like Kanter and I think Kanter will be there at #3 and at #12 you can look for a SG like Burks or Thompson, I like Thompson. I see this as getting much more value out of this years draft for the Wolves but if i’m a Jazz fan I don’t like this trade at all, unless they really love DWilliams.
0
Posted on: Mon, 06/20/2011 - 6:27pm #548194

WinterSoldier
Participant
Jazz fans really like Williams, I believe most Jazz fans would like this trade.
0
Posted on: Tue, 06/21/2011 - 2:58am #548279

Hitster
Participant
If the Jazz could use Williams at SF with Hayward at SG then the deal has some logic. The T-Wolves could then take maybe Kanter at 3 and BPA at 12 or trade that pick.
0
Author
Posts

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.