This topic contains 4 replies, has 4 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar elevation1013 15 years ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #29664
    AvatarAvatar
    elevation1013
    Participant

    I know everyone hates those 4 team proposals but this one is actually realistic. Toronto will get Kanter/Knight, Cleveland will get Kyrie + DWill, Detroit gets rid of Rip and picks up young pg, while Minny gets Varejao, Jonas/Biyombo at 5 + Burks at 8, and Jose to bring Rubio over. Other players are for matching salaries, except I think Cleveland would keep Rip to play the 2 if they can dump Baron to TO to make room for Kyrie/Sessions.

    Raptors:

    Get: #4, Webster, B Diddy

    Give: #5, Calderon

    Cavaliers:

    Get: #2, Rip, Pekovic

    Give: #4, Varejao, Davis

    Pistons:

    Get: Flynn, Hayward

    Give: #8, Rip contract

    TWolves:

    Get: #5, #8, Jose, Varejao

    Give: #2, Pekovic, Webster, Hayward, Flynn

    0
  • #538244
    AvatarAvatar
    del90
    Participant

    I don’t see Raptors taking on Davis’ contract just to move up one spot in a weak draft.

    0
  • #538279
    AvatarAvatar
    Chilbert arenas
    Participant

     Would never happen but I appreciate the creativity

    0
  • #538347
    AvatarAvatar
    TRC1991
    Participant

    the raptors having involvement in this trade makes little sense but the rest isn’t awful so didnt give u -1

    0
  • #538492
    AvatarAvatar
    elevation1013
    Participant

    Well the Raps would likely much rather have Kanter or Knight than Walker or Jonas, so it’s not like there wouldn’t be an interest to move up a spot. Also Martell Webster would provide some 3-point shooting to the 2/3 positions which the Raps are desperate for after being worst in the league last year. Davis’s contract works out to $4mil more than Jose’s for the next two years. I dunno it seems like taking on $8mil total to aquire Webster and Kanter or Knight could be worth it if they really like one of them. Maybe I’m just down for this trade from their perspective cause I don’t like any of their projected options at #5.

    0

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login