This topic contains 14 replies, has 13 voices, and was last updated by aamir543 15 years, 1 month ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Thu, 04/28/2011 - 4:13pm #28421

BouncyBallParticipanthttp://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=3entap2
Toronto would have two good friends in Jennings and Derozan, which would add up to some serious ball.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/28/2011 - 4:23pm #526362
PaulsJayhawksParticipantId rather keep Bayless I think he has more potential than Jennings.
Kyrie is the hope still and then I would use Bayless late season performance and package him to get Bargs outta town..
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/28/2011 - 4:30pm #526365
LazarusMunozParticipantthats a worse idea than me trying to enter the nba draft
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/28/2011 - 4:31pm #526366

BKKnicksfanParticipantWow. That’s just a terrible deal man.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/28/2011 - 4:34pm #526367

PrecociousNeophyteParticipantThe Bucks would never do that. Jennings is establishing himself as one of the best young pgs. I really like Bayless and I think he is a good player but I don’t know why the Bucks would trade for him when they already have an established pg and Bayless had never been a full time starter. I know that would be cool though for Jennings and DeMar because they have been friends for so long from Compton to the NBA.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/28/2011 - 4:40pm #526370

OrangeJuiceJonesParticipantBucks would be better off trying to get rid of Maggette’s bad contract and signing Derozan once he becomes a free agent.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/28/2011 - 4:47pm #526373

WizardofOzParticipantDon’t like that deal for the Bucks, and they wouldn’t take that deal straight up. Jennings might have not improved like many Bucks fans hoped, but he still has a lot of potential and is one of the most talented PGs in the league. Bayless is talented, but I think he’s a 6th man at best and doesn’t have Jennings’s potential.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/28/2011 - 5:45pm #526389

Scottoant93ParticipantSo you want to trade a potential allstar pg(if he realiazes his potential), for a player who constantly jacks up shots, Bayless has his moments where he might look like a pg, but he has the mentality of a sg, Jennings has a bad jump shit but at least he wants to get his teammates involved.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/28/2011 - 5:45pm #526390

thparadoxParticipantBayless may have similar potential to Jennings..
But even so, Jennings is much further along defensively.
Milwaukee doesn’t have an incentive to do this trade
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/28/2011 - 5:45pm #526391

sheltwon3ParticipantBayless and Barg for Jennings and Salmons may not be a terrible deal. Bucks could then draft Kemba Walker. Bogut/Barg combo would be nice. Bucks took the ball out of Jennings hands a lot this year so they really did not fully utilize his playmaking but were hurt by his bad shooting percentage.
Bayless is not the playmaker and defensive player Jenning is but he is a better shooter and scorer
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/28/2011 - 5:46pm #526392

Scottoant93ParticipantDid they just bleep out Jumpshot wtf
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/28/2011 - 5:48pm #526393

Scottoant93ParticipantI like bargs/bogut combo, if they could make that happen without trading jennings, that would be a good team
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/28/2011 - 5:51pm #526395
joe360ParticipantI can’t even believe this thread has generated this much discussion! Ridiculous trade proposal
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/28/2011 - 6:10pm #526399
cward23ParticipantHorrible trade. Bayless is a career backup untill proven other wise and he’s shown he is not a PG
0 - Posted on: Thu, 04/28/2011 - 6:38pm #526407
aamir543Participantdude what are you smoking? I agree Jennings did not improve much this year, but what are you thinking!!!!! Are you watching the right team? Are you sure you meant Bayless and Jennings? Are you sure you are not talking about Earl Boykins? Gosh, People these days!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
0 - AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |