This topic contains 34 replies, has 11 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar Hitster 15 years, 7 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #22728
    AvatarAvatar
    bkballer
    Participant

    43rd pick in the draft averaging 11 points and 7.3 rebounds per game shooting 50% three games into his rookie season. The guy has also shown to be one of the better defenders on the team and keeps a lot of plays alive using his athleticism.It is rumored that he started so early because he just understands the game so much that he immediately picked up on the plays. He plays the game smart and within his means… so he will never be a star, but seems like a great rotation player.

    I would just like to apologize for criticizing the pick and wanting the problem-child Lance Stephenson. This kid is really likeable, hustles out there and is extremely efficient on both ends of the floor.

    0
  • #424198
    AvatarAvatar
    tigers04
    Participant

    I second that I wanted stephenson but fields has made me eat every word I said and has looked good so far

    0
  • #424176
    AvatarAvatar
    tigers04
    Participant

    I second that I wanted stephenson but fields has made me eat every word I said and has looked good so far

    0
  • #424200
    AvatarAvatar
    RUDEBOY_
    Participant

    i felt he should’ve been a late 1st round pick…

    0
  • #424178
    AvatarAvatar
    RUDEBOY_
    Participant

    i felt he should’ve been a late 1st round pick…

    0
  • #424204
    AvatarAvatar
    bkballer
    Participant

    Why wouldnt I be excited if a week into the season the 43rd pick has been

    the 4th highest scoring rookie

    the 3rd highest rebounder

    the 3rd most efficicent

    4th if you add up rebounds, assists, and points

    tied for 2nd in shooting percentage for any rookie that has taken more than 10 shots

    and you can say hes had more opportunity than others but…. hes only had ONE turnover in 90 minutes.

     

    Its early and it sounds liek im just a knick fan jumping the gun but this kid looks like he’s an NBA player and at the 43rd pick thats a steal. I’m just surprised most people had him going undrafted.

    0
  • #424182
    AvatarAvatar
    bkballer
    Participant

    Why wouldnt I be excited if a week into the season the 43rd pick has been

    the 4th highest scoring rookie

    the 3rd highest rebounder

    the 3rd most efficicent

    4th if you add up rebounds, assists, and points

    tied for 2nd in shooting percentage for any rookie that has taken more than 10 shots

    and you can say hes had more opportunity than others but…. hes only had ONE turnover in 90 minutes.

     

    Its early and it sounds liek im just a knick fan jumping the gun but this kid looks like he’s an NBA player and at the 43rd pick thats a steal. I’m just surprised most people had him going undrafted.

    0
  • #424246
    marcusfizer21marcusfizer21
    marcusfizer21
    Participant

    You mean, 39th pick… Landry Fields was the 39th pick.. the 43rd pick was Devin Ebanks…

    Fields has been really impressive… People were right when they said "don’t sleep on this kid"…LOL…

    0
  • #424265
    marcusfizer21marcusfizer21
    marcusfizer21
    Participant

    You mean, 39th pick… Landry Fields was the 39th pick.. the 43rd pick was Devin Ebanks…

    Fields has been really impressive… People were right when they said "don’t sleep on this kid"…LOL…

    0
  • #424248
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    lots of people were criticizing the pick when it was made. FIelds was one of the most slept on players in america last year. I dont care how down the pac was, 22 and 9 while putting a mediocre team on your back every night is impressive. He was the best player in the conference last year but didnt get the recognition or the conference mvp becasue his team was bad.

    0
  • #424266
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    lots of people were criticizing the pick when it was made. FIelds was one of the most slept on players in america last year. I dont care how down the pac was, 22 and 9 while putting a mediocre team on your back every night is impressive. He was the best player in the conference last year but didnt get the recognition or the conference mvp becasue his team was bad.

    0
  • #424252
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    Rudeboy, you say you felt he should have gone 1st round last year, but i dont remember anybody stepping up and saying that before the draft. ANd i just checked your 2010 mock and you had him going undrafted.

    0
  • #424270
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    Rudeboy, you say you felt he should have gone 1st round last year, but i dont remember anybody stepping up and saying that before the draft. ANd i just checked your 2010 mock and you had him going undrafted.

    0
  • #424254
    marcusfizer21marcusfizer21
    marcusfizer21
    Participant

    perez, I was one of those guys who laughed at the pick and how the crazy Knicks fans reacted to it… They were happy to get Rautins but booed a little bit when they drafted Fields… The turn of the tide has come… Fields has been way more impressive so far compared to Rautins… I thought they’d be bringing another Luke Jackson type but clearly, he’s IQ is awesome not to mention he’s very coachable out there… good pick for the Knicks… I was wrong..

    0
  • #424272
    marcusfizer21marcusfizer21
    marcusfizer21
    Participant

    perez, I was one of those guys who laughed at the pick and how the crazy Knicks fans reacted to it… They were happy to get Rautins but booed a little bit when they drafted Fields… The turn of the tide has come… Fields has been way more impressive so far compared to Rautins… I thought they’d be bringing another Luke Jackson type but clearly, he’s IQ is awesome not to mention he’s very coachable out there… good pick for the Knicks… I was wrong..

    0
  • #424258
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    the thing i found funny was that out of 30 players picked in the second round including andy rautins who went ahead of him to the knicks. Nobody got the negative response on this site that fields did. I guess thats becasue aran didnt include him any mocks and he didnt play in the big east.

    0
  • #424276
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    the thing i found funny was that out of 30 players picked in the second round including andy rautins who went ahead of him to the knicks. Nobody got the negative response on this site that fields did. I guess thats becasue aran didnt include him any mocks and he didnt play in the big east.

    0
  • #424267
    AvatarAvatar
    Hitster
    Participant

    I cannot recall either Fields or Rautins being on any of the major mock drafts run by sites like these pre-draft and when NY took them both, a lot of people including myself were surprised as several well touted prospects were still on board then. But Donnie Walsh and his scouts must have seen something and for Landry to crack Mike D’Antoni’s roster let alone get a starting role is a major achievement as Coach D’Antoni is well known for only using guys he considers NBA ready.

    Whilst a lot of fans look at the Knicks major signings picking up hidden gems like Fields and Mosgov could be just as important long term as they add roster depth.

    0
  • #424284
    AvatarAvatar
    Hitster
    Participant

    I cannot recall either Fields or Rautins being on any of the major mock drafts run by sites like these pre-draft and when NY took them both, a lot of people including myself were surprised as several well touted prospects were still on board then. But Donnie Walsh and his scouts must have seen something and for Landry to crack Mike D’Antoni’s roster let alone get a starting role is a major achievement as Coach D’Antoni is well known for only using guys he considers NBA ready.

    Whilst a lot of fans look at the Knicks major signings picking up hidden gems like Fields and Mosgov could be just as important long term as they add roster depth.

    0
  • #424269
    AvatarAvatar
    mj23mj23bestever
    Participant

    true they missed out on other big fa signings but they have found two great sleepers in fields and mozgov

    0
  • #424286
    AvatarAvatar
    mj23mj23bestever
    Participant

    true they missed out on other big fa signings but they have found two great sleepers in fields and mozgov

    0
  • #424279
    AvatarAvatar
    kanyedabest
    Participant

    llperez w/ the knockout punch on rudeboy!!

    0
  • #424296
    AvatarAvatar
    kanyedabest
    Participant

    llperez w/ the knockout punch on rudeboy!!

    0
  • #424305
    AvatarAvatar
    Lotto Stud
    Participant

    Lance Stephenson is Stephon Marbury 2.0 as a problem child

    0
  • #424322
    AvatarAvatar
    Lotto Stud
    Participant

    Lance Stephenson is Stephon Marbury 2.0 as a problem child

    0
  • #424325
    AvatarAvatar
    sheltwon3
    Participant

    I did not knock on Fields but I did wish they would have picked up Ebanks or Stephenson.  I did not know who he was originally even though I saw him play as a freshmen randomly so once i found out who he was, I was not as off on the pick but I was wondering what New York was doing.

    0
  • #424342
    AvatarAvatar
    sheltwon3
    Participant

    I did not knock on Fields but I did wish they would have picked up Ebanks or Stephenson.  I did not know who he was originally even though I saw him play as a freshmen randomly so once i found out who he was, I was not as off on the pick but I was wondering what New York was doing.

    0
  • #424345
    AvatarAvatar
    OhCanada-
    Participant

    I think he is alot like Anthony Parker of the Cavs. Seems like he could easily average 15ppg or more with a bad percentage, but he uses his skills and effort on both ends of the floor, makes smart decisions, and plays within himself. High percantage shots, good athletisism, and solid defense is what every team wants from thier role playing SG.

    I personally think he can be a starting wing on a championship team

    0
  • #424362
    AvatarAvatar
    OhCanada-
    Participant

    I think he is alot like Anthony Parker of the Cavs. Seems like he could easily average 15ppg or more with a bad percentage, but he uses his skills and effort on both ends of the floor, makes smart decisions, and plays within himself. High percantage shots, good athletisism, and solid defense is what every team wants from thier role playing SG.

    I personally think he can be a starting wing on a championship team

    0
  • #424347
    AvatarAvatar
    stanford hoops

    Yea I remember arguing for him because alot of people on here said he wasn’t athletic enough and he only put up
    Good numbers because he was on a bad team. But if you really watches him you could see that he was a underrated athlete and he had a high basketball IQ. Even I didn’t think he would start in year one but I kept saying he’s gonna beat out Billy walker and get alot of time

    0
  • #424364
    AvatarAvatar
    stanford hoops

    Yea I remember arguing for him because alot of people on here said he wasn’t athletic enough and he only put up
    Good numbers because he was on a bad team. But if you really watches him you could see that he was a underrated athlete and he had a high basketball IQ. Even I didn’t think he would start in year one but I kept saying he’s gonna beat out Billy walker and get alot of time

    0
  • #424353
    AvatarAvatar
    bkballer
    Participant

     I don’t know if i want him starting on a championship caliber team… but he reminds me of a shane battier type of player, hard worker smart player and just does a ton of little things that really help the team. Not a great shooter, but a very smart shooter… picks his spots and take 7-8 shots per game but makes them at a high clip.

    0
  • #424370
    AvatarAvatar
    bkballer
    Participant

     I don’t know if i want him starting on a championship caliber team… but he reminds me of a shane battier type of player, hard worker smart player and just does a ton of little things that really help the team. Not a great shooter, but a very smart shooter… picks his spots and take 7-8 shots per game but makes them at a high clip.

    0
  • #424375
    AvatarAvatar
    Hitster
    Participant

    I like the Anthony Parker comparision and I can see the Battier comparision in so far as Landry makes the very most of his ability and whilst he may not be the most gifted athlete he knows he has to rely on his good basketball IQ and so will make the very most of his available skillset.

    I wonder how many people thought that the Knicks would have two rookies in their starting 5 let alone so early in the season!

    0
  • #424393
    AvatarAvatar
    Hitster
    Participant

    I like the Anthony Parker comparision and I can see the Battier comparision in so far as Landry makes the very most of his ability and whilst he may not be the most gifted athlete he knows he has to rely on his good basketball IQ and so will make the very most of his available skillset.

    I wonder how many people thought that the Knicks would have two rookies in their starting 5 let alone so early in the season!

    0

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login