what if there were a3 team trade nuggets kings pelicans

This topic contains 52 replies, has 8 voices, and was last updated by XYRYX 13 years ago.

Author
Posts
Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 7:35am #50816

aivsdirk
Participant
Been hearing abou tyreke going to the pelicans. eric gordons not happy there. and the kings need have moved on from evans with bmac. heres my idea. nuggets kings and pelicans trade. kings receive Vasquez as a starting pg and Wilson chandler as a starting 3 pelicons in sign and trade receive evans as their starting 2 and nuggets receive eric Gordon alleviating the log jam at 2 guard for the pelicans and not forcing evans to play the 3. Gordon is a legitimate big time scorer and will look to score leaving room for Lawson to facilitate as he can do well and unlike with iggy he has a guy he can pass to and will put points on the board instead of play a second point guard. with money all these guys get payed evan will probally get around 10 mil a year so I think money wise its even as well as talent and fit.
0
Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 7:53am #812079

BasketBalAllan
Participant
Do you realize that if Tyreke signs with N.O. and the Kings do not match, they could keep Eric and G.V. to work on a trade for someone else?
This would be sort of a last resort for the Pelicans and I am not sure they would even consider it.
0
- Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 8:05am #812090
  
  aivsdirk
  Participant
  tyreke is restricted so the kings do have more power to use a sign and trade so then they are guaranteed to get something back which would probably be Vasquez that would allow the chips to fall into place adding a perfect scenario with the nuggets
  0
  - Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 8:08am #812097
    
    BasketBalAllan
    Participant
    Hence why I included “and the Kings do not match”
    It depends if the Kings think getting stuck with giving Tyreke a $44mil contract is worth trying to leverage away a player from the Pelicans, which they might not.
    Even in that case the Pelicans would still have E.G., meaning it would still be a better idea…
    0
    - Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 8:14am #812109
      
      aivsdirk
      Participant
      yea we both pretty much looking at the same coin but favor different sides. if treke signs without trade to new Orleans would you think new Orleans keeps both and put evans at 3 which he did not do well with the kings or give up Gordon in a trade?
      0
      - Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 8:22am #812129
        
        BasketBalAllan
        Participant
        It seems more like I am using a quarter and your looking at a Chuck E Cheese token…
        The Pelicans plan to use Tyreke off the bench (as he stated he will not play SF) and (IMO) possibly trade Gordon for a SF.
        I was simply pointing out that the original trade would benefit the Kings, be decent for the Nuggets and terrible for the Pelicans.
        0
        Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 8:28am #812139
        
        aivsdirk
        Participant
        yo we both seeing the same situation just a different way of going about it is what I meant. so if evan comes off the bench that means rivers would start. cant co-sign that. if I pay someone over 10 mi a year they are starting unless their amare you know and they can not stay healthy. but I do agree with trading Gordon for a small forward maybe for gallinari or say…chandler
        0
        Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 8:43am #812153
        
        BasketBalAllan
        Participant
        I can see I am going to have to be a bit more clear…
        The Pelicans would start Jrue Holiday (the PG the just traded for) and Eric Gordon, they would bring Tyreke off the bench to backup either guard position, this is their plan. I was saying that if this was the case then they should try and trade Eric for a SF so they could start Holiday and Tyreke together.
        0
        Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 8:43am #812218
        
        BasketBalAllan
        Participant
        I can see I am going to have to be a bit more clear…
        The Pelicans would start Jrue Holiday (the PG the just traded for) and Eric Gordon, they would bring Tyreke off the bench to backup either guard position, this is their plan. I was saying that if this was the case then they should try and trade Eric for a SF so they could start Holiday and Tyreke together.
        0
        Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 8:28am #812204
        
        aivsdirk
        Participant
        yo we both seeing the same situation just a different way of going about it is what I meant. so if evan comes off the bench that means rivers would start. cant co-sign that. if I pay someone over 10 mi a year they are starting unless their amare you know and they can not stay healthy. but I do agree with trading Gordon for a small forward maybe for gallinari or say…chandler
        0
      - Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 8:22am #812194
        
        BasketBalAllan
        Participant
        It seems more like I am using a quarter and your looking at a Chuck E Cheese token…
        The Pelicans plan to use Tyreke off the bench (as he stated he will not play SF) and (IMO) possibly trade Gordon for a SF.
        I was simply pointing out that the original trade would benefit the Kings, be decent for the Nuggets and terrible for the Pelicans.
        0
    - Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 8:14am #812174
      
      aivsdirk
      Participant
      yea we both pretty much looking at the same coin but favor different sides. if treke signs without trade to new Orleans would you think new Orleans keeps both and put evans at 3 which he did not do well with the kings or give up Gordon in a trade?
      0
  - Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 8:08am #812162
    
    BasketBalAllan
    Participant
    Hence why I included “and the Kings do not match”
    It depends if the Kings think getting stuck with giving Tyreke a $44mil contract is worth trying to leverage away a player from the Pelicans, which they might not.
    Even in that case the Pelicans would still have E.G., meaning it would still be a better idea…
    0
- Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 8:05am #812156
  
  aivsdirk
  Participant
  tyreke is restricted so the kings do have more power to use a sign and trade so then they are guaranteed to get something back which would probably be Vasquez that would allow the chips to fall into place adding a perfect scenario with the nuggets
  0
Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 7:53am #812144

BasketBalAllan
Participant
Do you realize that if Tyreke signs with N.O. and the Kings do not match, they could keep Eric and G.V. to work on a trade for someone else?
This would be sort of a last resort for the Pelicans and I am not sure they would even consider it.
0
Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 8:09am #812081

Raef LaFrentz
Participant
aivsdirk, you are on a roll, my friend. Things usually roll downhill…
0
- Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 8:06am #812094
  
  aivsdirk
  Participant
  that’s a good theory I like the play on words
  0
  - Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 8:21am #812113
    
    DolanCare
    Participant
    wow. you are an agent of destruction, aivsdirk
    0
    - Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 8:24am #812133
      
      aivsdirk
      Participant
      its awesome bruh people on here get so angry over this stuff its basketball we not discussing starvation, child trafficking or poverty.
      0
      - Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 8:47am #812147
        
        Raef LaFrentz
        Participant
        “we not discussing starvation, child trafficking or poverty.”
        That’s because this is a basketball website. Haha. Silly guy.
        0
        Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 8:41am #812151
        
        aivsdirk
        Participant
        for a jokster you sound like I got under your skin, im going to like your post give you a little vindication.
        0
        Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 8:41am #812216
        
        aivsdirk
        Participant
        for a jokster you sound like I got under your skin, im going to like your post give you a little vindication.
        0
      - Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 8:47am #812212
        
        Raef LaFrentz
        Participant
        “we not discussing starvation, child trafficking or poverty.”
        That’s because this is a basketball website. Haha. Silly guy.
        0
    - Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 8:24am #812198
      
      aivsdirk
      Participant
      its awesome bruh people on here get so angry over this stuff its basketball we not discussing starvation, child trafficking or poverty.
      0
  - Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 8:21am #812178
    
    DolanCare
    Participant
    wow. you are an agent of destruction, aivsdirk
    0
- Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 8:06am #812160
  
  aivsdirk
  Participant
  that’s a good theory I like the play on words
  0
Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 8:09am #812146

Raef LaFrentz
Participant
aivsdirk, you are on a roll, my friend. Things usually roll downhill…
0
Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 8:31am #812143

aivsdirk
Participant
I just realized something I got 9 dislikes and only 3 people commented, basketbalAlan great dialogue. who are the cowards who can dislike but not articulate enough to formulate it into words
0
- Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 11:12am #812335
  
  ItsVictorOladipo
  Participant
  Why would I waste my time picking apart each and every one of your asinine posts when it’s so much quicker to just click the thumbs down icon?
  0
- Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 11:12am #812271
  
  ItsVictorOladipo
  Participant
  Why would I waste my time picking apart each and every one of your asinine posts when it’s so much quicker to just click the thumbs down icon?
  0
  - Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 11:20am #812343
    
    aivsdirk
    Participant
    nice go for the easy way fitting why the dwight avatar
    0
  - Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 11:20am #812279
    
    aivsdirk
    Participant
    nice go for the easy way fitting why the dwight avatar
    0
    - Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 12:31pm #812326
      
      GottaBeTheShoes
      Participant
      That was a horrible attempt at a joke, shame on you.
      0
    - Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 12:31pm #812390
      
      GottaBeTheShoes
      Participant
      That was a horrible attempt at a joke, shame on you.
      0
Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 8:31am #812208

aivsdirk
Participant
I just realized something I got 9 dislikes and only 3 people commented, basketbalAlan great dialogue. who are the cowards who can dislike but not articulate enough to formulate it into words
0
Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 8:31am #812145

aivsdirk
Participant
I just realized something I got 9 dislikes and only 3 people commented, basketbalAlan great dialogue. who are the cowards who can dislike but not articulate enough to formulate it into words
0
Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 8:31am #812210

aivsdirk
Participant
I just realized something I got 9 dislikes and only 3 people commented, basketbalAlan great dialogue. who are the cowards who can dislike but not articulate enough to formulate it into words
0
Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 9:02am #812171

Mad Max
Participant
Can you please learn to format, spell, and use grammar correctly? Then I can read your posts. I would really appreciate that.
0
- Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 9:11am #812183
  
  aivsdirk
  Participant
  if you want to be so technical about grammer as we are not in the classroom I didn’t think I would have to be so perfect. Then needs a comma after it in your second sentence. It would also read better if you wrote it.”Then, I would be able to read your posts.” teamwork lets go
  0
  - Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 9:20am #812201
    
    Mad Max
    Participant
    I didn’t say it needs to be perfect, I’m not going to grade you. I’m just just asking to make your posts readable.
    0
    - Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 12:32pm #812328
      
      GottaBeTheShoes
      Participant
      He was wrong, it doesn’t always require a comma after “then”
      0
      - Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 2:12pm #812393
        
        aivsdirk
        Participant
        yes, it does. otherwise his second sentence would be a fragment. or he could combine the first two sentences but then would still nedd a coma after it. booyah again. you know im like a guy who doesnt try but when you bring it out of me i can hold my own.
        0
      - Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 2:12pm #812457
        
        aivsdirk
        Participant
        yes, it does. otherwise his second sentence would be a fragment. or he could combine the first two sentences but then would still nedd a coma after it. booyah again. you know im like a guy who doesnt try but when you bring it out of me i can hold my own.
        0
    - Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 12:32pm #812392
      
      GottaBeTheShoes
      Participant
      He was wrong, it doesn’t always require a comma after “then”
      0
  - Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 9:20am #812266
    
    Mad Max
    Participant
    I didn’t say it needs to be perfect, I’m not going to grade you. I’m just just asking to make your posts readable.
    0
- Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 9:11am #812249
  
  aivsdirk
  Participant
  if you want to be so technical about grammer as we are not in the classroom I didn’t think I would have to be so perfect. Then needs a comma after it in your second sentence. It would also read better if you wrote it.”Then, I would be able to read your posts.” teamwork lets go
  0
Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 9:02am #812237

Mad Max
Participant
Can you please learn to format, spell, and use grammar correctly? Then I can read your posts. I would really appreciate that.
0
Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 9:35am #812207

aivsdirk
Participant
well done with this thread just wanted to make a scenario where kings do not lose evans for nothing and feel the void at small forward while greivas goes somewhere he can still start whish he does deserve and nuggets get a scorer leaving them with something in the loss of iggy. I know many people will not agree with me, but overall my views tend to favor the interest of all or atleast I try
0
Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 9:35am #812272

aivsdirk
Participant
well done with this thread just wanted to make a scenario where kings do not lose evans for nothing and feel the void at small forward while greivas goes somewhere he can still start whish he does deserve and nuggets get a scorer leaving them with something in the loss of iggy. I know many people will not agree with me, but overall my views tend to favor the interest of all or atleast I try
0
Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 9:50am #812213

XYRYX
Participant
I know Mr. negative points collector and thread creator doesn’t make sense with his theory about his trade proposal but there might be a chance this somehow makes sense for the Pelicans. If they basically swap Rekes and EGs contracts they still have the cap space to aquire another free agent. It’s not really a secret Gordon wasn’t very happy so far and if they really believe he doesn’t want to be there they could ship him right now. If I’m the Pelicans I would try to see how a healthy Gordon and Holiday work out next season. But to get rid of Gordons contract (if they want to) could make sense if they feel they have a chance to get their hands on someone else like Iggy this year. I know this is a major reach and they probably want get get a future pick or two in any deal but this could make sense if they want to keep their financial flexibility this offseason or next year.
I wouldn’t do this if I’m the Pelicans but I see the point if they feel their investment in Gordon was a failure AND they want to keep their cap space. But still not worth the gamble. They can still move either Reke (if they get him) or Gordon midseason if it’s not working out.
In the end I wouldn’t make any more trades if I’m NO. If they can get Reke that’s fine and they are really trying to build a competing team. I they don’t get Reke they should go after Iggy or after AK-47 to round out the roster.
0
Posted on: Wed, 07/03/2013 - 9:50am #812278

XYRYX
Participant
I know Mr. negative points collector and thread creator doesn’t make sense with his theory about his trade proposal but there might be a chance this somehow makes sense for the Pelicans. If they basically swap Rekes and EGs contracts they still have the cap space to aquire another free agent. It’s not really a secret Gordon wasn’t very happy so far and if they really believe he doesn’t want to be there they could ship him right now. If I’m the Pelicans I would try to see how a healthy Gordon and Holiday work out next season. But to get rid of Gordons contract (if they want to) could make sense if they feel they have a chance to get their hands on someone else like Iggy this year. I know this is a major reach and they probably want get get a future pick or two in any deal but this could make sense if they want to keep their financial flexibility this offseason or next year.
I wouldn’t do this if I’m the Pelicans but I see the point if they feel their investment in Gordon was a failure AND they want to keep their cap space. But still not worth the gamble. They can still move either Reke (if they get him) or Gordon midseason if it’s not working out.
In the end I wouldn’t make any more trades if I’m NO. If they can get Reke that’s fine and they are really trying to build a competing team. I they don’t get Reke they should go after Iggy or after AK-47 to round out the roster.
0
Posted on: Fri, 07/05/2013 - 10:26am #813948

XYRYX
Participant
At least you’re trying to make points for your opinion but still you are wrong here. The original post is truely right. I love Jeff Green and he was the reason why I followed the Thunder in the beginning. He really had bad luck after his disappointing ending with the Thunder and had his Heart beeing repaired but learned on this strong Boston veteran team and will have some big games this year for a rebuilding franchise comming next season! Rubio is not 19 anymore and has grown into his own physically. Still not the most durable point in the league but a very underrated defender and a healthy tall flashy player with incredible feel for the game in a shooting team with only offense will do big damage and I can really see him having John Wall type of level next year for a whole season could earn him Most Improved. I know it’s a bold statement but his ceiling is still a very entertainment version of beeing an elite 2k14 masterpiece beeing a top level team motor and defender. Watch out for him.
Dear aivsdirk,
Somehow you discovered the wish to express your opinion on this draftboard and smashed every neg records in a dramatic timely fashing. I just found out that the reason for your unbelieveable fails here is you just have no clue about Basketball at all. You have the worst picture and Interpretation of this wonderful sport and I’ve never saw anything before here or in met someone in my personal life. I just can’t believe you grew so old with such a ridiculous view of perspective. I really wonder how a person survives in the wild. Please GO AWAY and DON’T COME BACK!!!
Find a new sport like Women Tennis and where Wimbledons German beauty finalists looks alone are worth watching it even you never heard of this sport in your life before. This should be a a realistic goal for a new beginning in the sports world to enjoy sharing your opinion on online forums.
It was somehow nice to meet you but it is time now to move on after this desaster around here.
Good bye,
a Basketball Fan who may not be always right with his opinions but just loves to follow the worlds best league in general worldwide and ever. We witness the platinum era of Baskeball in 2K14 mode and are looking into a fantastic future with two tons of talent and very young superstars entering their prime. KD, LeBron, Melo, CP3, Westrbook, Rose, Griffin, Marc Gasol, Noah, Ibaka, Harden, Aldridge, Rose, Love, George, J-Smooth, Wall, Irving, Curry, Davis, Griffin, Leonard, Parsons, Monroe are waiting for the generation change and are taking the league by storm and I can’t way to see how all of these players hit their prime and lead US into a incredible fast and modern era of NBA action.
aivsdirk — member for 2 days and 4 hours counting — can explain that to someone
0
Posted on: Fri, 07/05/2013 - 10:26am #814015

XYRYX
Participant
At least you’re trying to make points for your opinion but still you are wrong here. The original post is truely right. I love Jeff Green and he was the reason why I followed the Thunder in the beginning. He really had bad luck after his disappointing ending with the Thunder and had his Heart beeing repaired but learned on this strong Boston veteran team and will have some big games this year for a rebuilding franchise comming next season! Rubio is not 19 anymore and has grown into his own physically. Still not the most durable point in the league but a very underrated defender and a healthy tall flashy player with incredible feel for the game in a shooting team with only offense will do big damage and I can really see him having John Wall type of level next year for a whole season could earn him Most Improved. I know it’s a bold statement but his ceiling is still a very entertainment version of beeing an elite 2k14 masterpiece beeing a top level team motor and defender. Watch out for him.
Dear aivsdirk,
Somehow you discovered the wish to express your opinion on this draftboard and smashed every neg records in a dramatic timely fashing. I just found out that the reason for your unbelieveable fails here is you just have no clue about Basketball at all. You have the worst picture and Interpretation of this wonderful sport and I’ve never saw anything before here or in met someone in my personal life. I just can’t believe you grew so old with such a ridiculous view of perspective. I really wonder how a person survives in the wild. Please GO AWAY and DON’T COME BACK!!!
Find a new sport like Women Tennis and where Wimbledons German beauty finalists looks alone are worth watching it even you never heard of this sport in your life before. This should be a a realistic goal for a new beginning in the sports world to enjoy sharing your opinion on online forums.
It was somehow nice to meet you but it is time now to move on after this desaster around here.
Good bye,
a Basketball Fan who may not be always right with his opinions but just loves to follow the worlds best league in general worldwide and ever. We witness the platinum era of Baskeball in 2K14 mode and are looking into a fantastic future with two tons of talent and very young superstars entering their prime. KD, LeBron, Melo, CP3, Westrbook, Rose, Griffin, Marc Gasol, Noah, Ibaka, Harden, Aldridge, Rose, Love, George, J-Smooth, Wall, Irving, Curry, Davis, Griffin, Leonard, Parsons, Monroe are waiting for the generation change and are taking the league by storm and I can’t way to see how all of these players hit their prime and lead US into a incredible fast and modern era of NBA action.
aivsdirk — member for 2 days and 4 hours counting — can explain that to someone
0
Author
Posts

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.