This topic contains 60 replies, has 10 voices, and was last updated by Stanford hoops 17 years, 1 month ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 8:18am #4527
Stanford hoopsParticipant“I got a chance to talk to a number of the top national recruiting gurus, Dave Telep, Van Coleman, Jerry Meyer, Brick Oettinger, Frank Burlison, Clark Francis, Evan Daniels, Gerry Freitas, Aggrey Sam, Joel Francisco, Patrick Stanwood, and Mark Maggard and get their take on a number of things including this year’s draft.
One of the things I asked a number of them about was two of the bigger mysteries of this year’s NBA draft: Jrue Holiday and Brandon Jennings.
Nearly everyone feels that Holiday is tremendously overrated. Guys like Burlison and Freitas make a living scouting West Coast talent and have seen these guys dozens of times in high school as well as college (Holiday). Burlison mentioned a number of factors including the fact that Holiday was never a point guard in high school (so why should we assume he’s one now?), the notion that he’s an athletic combo like Westbrook (not even close to being a freak athlete, like Westbrook) and the idea that he’s a lock down defender, he’s not (when UCLA played Washington State they had to take him off Klay Thompson because he was giving up too many points).
Everyone agreed that Holiday being considered a potential top 3 or 4 pick is absolutely absurd.The consensus about Jennings is that he’s a legit top 10 pick regardless of his play in Europe. He’s a tough kid with excellent skills and despite a rough finish to the season in Rome the fact that skinnier point guards like Aaron Brooks and Rajon Rondo are having success at the NBA level helps his cause.
According to Van Coleman, the high school class of 2010 is a down year but 2011 is excellent and the 2012 and 2013 classes could be special. So good news as far as future NBA talent on the horizon.”
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 8:20am #157557
QHaynes123where did u get this?
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 8:23am #157559
Stanford hoopsParticipant - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 8:25am #157562
Scott42444ParticipantDo you guys know the high school class of 2011 & 2012 very well? I don’t really start paying attention until they would be in next year’s mock (so once this year’s draft ends, the 2011 mock hits with some high schoolers on it). Unless of course someone catches my eye elsewhere, like Derrick Rose caught my eye when I watched a friend’s little brother just get destroyed trying to guard him. Ah, that’s a fond memory. You know that you are a pretty impressive player when the guys you just beat are going to tell their grandkids about you kicking their ass.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 8:27am #157564
Stanford hoopsParticipantnaw i dont look that far ahead unless i happen to see or play against some of them while at a gym..or if i hear a name over and over and have to check them out(d.wagner)
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 8:27am #157565

auberParticipantI just know laquinton ross is going to be something to remember
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsb4hsGH6kk
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 8:27am #157566
QHaynes123Scott42444- what r u talking about? I dunno about the 2011 and 2012 HS players
And Holiday…i think he could be a poor man’s D-wade
If you let him work as a PG and let him play PG and worry about playing D, the O will come later
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 8:34am #157573
Stanford hoopsParticipantpoor mans dwade..i wouldnt even say them in the same sentence…you need to say a poor mans (insert average play name)..not a superstars name..pretty much im not gonna say too much about holiday any more because my case it pretty much rested now…it just was interesting reading alot of post talking about how great a pg he was in highschool and how he played out of position in college when the truth is he never was a point guard so he played the position he usually plays( i cant argue with the scouts who actually seen him play alot of games in highschool compared to the dummies on here who claimed they had seen most of his games in highschool)…laquinton ross is nice auber but ive read from scouts he hasnt gotten much better since his freshman year and a couple players have caught and are catching up to him..hence why hes dropped in the rankings( started out as number 1)
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 8:36am #157574
xbadgerhustlerParticipantJosh, I know how you feel about Holiday… the jury is still out and it will stay that way till the season. I hope he proves you wrong.
I’m curious about your thoughts on Brandon Jennings… according to your standards for Judging Jrue (JJ) you shouldn’t be sold on him at all because, technically, he hasn’t shown you anything special… He hasn’t done SHIT in europe and anything you saw in high school is irrelevant… right? I myself would rather take a flier on Jennings than Jrue, but if you’re going to JJ so harshly you should also be pretty low on Jennings right?
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 8:37am #157575
QHaynes123Deron Williams didnt play PG in college, Dee Brown did…you have to get some guys a chance.
And in no way im I comparing Deron Williams and Jrue Holiday..im just sayin
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 8:37am #157576
QHaynes123Deron Williams didnt play PG in college, Dee Brown did…you have to get some guys a chance.
And in no way im I comparing Deron Williams and Jrue Holiday..im just sayin
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 8:47am #157582
Scott42444ParticipantSo I typed “2011 NBA mock draft” into a google search (I didn’t think that anyone would have one since you would be guessing that kids would grow but I gave it a shot) and went to this site I never heard of (and won’t bother naming). It had a list of the top 5 guys in the Class of 2011, which was nice.
Then, I looked at their Mock Draft for 2009 (they didn’t have one for 2011, stupid lying google). I skipped over everyone else, went straight to #16 (real surprise, huh?)
They have Jrue Holliday going to the Bulls at #16, what? Why? Why would they choose a guy at the ONE position they already have set for a decade with their first pick in 2009? That being said, I wouldn’t exactly hate it if they just put him at SG with a best player available kind of pick. But, there seems to be NO logic there whatsoever. It doesn’t go along with the “Final Four Players Only” stuff they usually do and it doesn’t address any team needs. Now, I don’t think that the Bulls should avoid drafting a PG, but with a NEAR lottery pick taking a “potential” kind of guy? It’s completely illogical.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 8:48am #157581
Stanford hoopsParticipantyou do have a point qhaynes about deron but deron also stayed and showed that he could holiday didnt so its more likely he cant then he can be a very good pg..the whole thing wit me starting on jru was people constantly saying he was going to be a superstar and hes one of the top pg in the draft..how can someone be a top three point guard when hes never been a pg was my question..then on top of that a top10 nba pg and dominate in year one…as far as jennings im kinda in the same boat but the difference is he actually played point guard all his life and i know how europe is with young guys they are comming off the bench for the most part and if they have any of that flash the euro coaches will not play them much ..its also rare to have good scoring stats over there in the top leauges because of the coaches…also ive seen jennings play..at first i hadnt seen holiday play except one game and he looked bad so i couldnt jump on his bandwagon till i did some research and watched some of his games…after doing that i still wasnt impressed enough to say some of the outlandish things some of these posters were saying about him
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 8:50am #157584
Scott42444ParticipantYou know, Deron Williams would slide down to SF (kinda) sometimes with Luther Head taking over the SG spot, too. It’s just because Luther Head has a hell of a jump shot.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 8:50am #157585
QHaynes123IMO…holiday wont bust…
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 8:51am #157586
Stanford hoopsParticipantprobably because they think jru would be a good back up pg..youre looking at it as him being a starting pg…and alot of people look at players getting drafted as a starter who go in the first round when in actuality alot of the teams are drafting the players for a backup role and not a starting role.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 8:52am #157587
Stanford hoopsParticipantimo i see him as a bust simple because expectations are way to high for a player who hasnt proved anything…i dont blame him for it..its the fans and peopel who praise him for shadow workouts
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 8:54am #157588
QHaynes123so why is jrue gonna bust
and derozan, evans, jennings, rubio wont?
tell me who you think will bust
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 8:54am #157589
xbadgerhustlerParticipantI think the point about Holiday and not playing “PG” that much in HS is that you can be a “SG” who basically has the ball all the time, you just don’t bring it up the court… it’s high school. He showed the ability to be a facilitator in HS and he still managed to average over 3 dimes at UCLA in his freshman year, despite the overwhelming amount of time DC had the ball…Brandon Roy hasn’t played PG EVER in his career but I still think that he’d be a Top 5 PG if he ever tried… it’s the ability to make other people better…
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 9:01am #157592
QHaynes123100 % agree with you pops
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 9:02am #157594
xbadgerhustlerParticipantyea, my comment about Jennings was towards josh cuz he said he has to see potential (not against HS competition) to say that a player can do well…. i definitely think jennings could become a game changer… i’d definitely pick him over Jrue
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 9:05am #157595
Stanford hoopsParticipantyeah i do because hes shown no evidence that hes gonna be a good pg or player..hes shown potenial to be a average player from what ive seen then on top of that and to be grossly overrated/hyped..at least with the other players they showed what they are capable of by scoring or passing or defense or whatever that showed there potenial.ive watched 2o games of holiday now and im just not seeing all this he will be this or that. i would think the people on here would come back with well in this game he did this to lead you believe he will be this type of player or that type of player but all i hear is he will be so good but no evidence to back up the statement..and badger how many other sg average 3ast or more a game?..plus he didnt show in those 20 games any great pg decisions..and yea id pick him over holiday too in a heart beat he put up around the same stats then jur playing sg just like jru in a hell of alot less minutes
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 9:05am #157591

iguapops420ParticipantJrue Holiday will be just fine. If you’re looking for Deron Williams, or Chrs Paulyou ar egreatly misaken. If you are drafting onthe idea of getting a goo solid point of the future in a mix of Kirk Hinrich/Rodney Stuckey, then he’s definitely your choice. As for his Defense….HE’S 18 years old. How many players come in and even give the effort on D that Holiday does. Not to mention terrific quickness and a nice wingpan and height to see over the O on offense.
As for Jennings, gt real, is there any question this kid is top 10. I don’t care how poorly he performed in Europe. Like i stated in another thread, Jennings poor numbers and sporadic playing time didn’t hurt his stock, only helped b/c everyone knew wat he could do before going over there and yet he played on one of the best teams and learned from a lot of veteans. The high ball IQ he left with has only been increased as he has learned more of the intangibles, and with there lack of touch fouls he had to learn to play through physicality. Flaw left is still decision making and a jumpshot. His build will not be a problem as his athleticism will make up for that. Decision making will come with experience and the jumper is the easiest thing to work on. The same realistically could be said about Holiday(to a much lesser extent of course). Jennings upside is at least all-star level if not franchise changer.
As for Holiday I’m still high on him for a team like LAL, but I’m much higher on Iman Shumpert out of Georgia Tech. Reall wish he had come out early so e’d have slipped to LA. Smart move staying thouh. Kid has some NICE potential. True DWADE potential. Not quite the athlete but in the most similar of molds.0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 9:07am #157597
Stanford hoopsParticipantok igu he will be fine based off of????? what…….hes also very lucky this isnt that strong of a draft and hes actually smart to come out this year
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 9:16am #157601
xbadgerhustlerParticipantFrom the games I watched, he got to the basket whenever he wanted, he just wasn’t a very effective finisher~ often times because I felt he was tryin to do too much to try and live up to expectations.
He showed in workouts that he can shoot the ball, but I think his confidence was so shot at UCLA that he just lost it. His shot has pretty good mechanics it just wasn’t going in… That can change. People get jump shots (see trevor ariza)
I also thought that while he wasn’t a LOCK down defender like Russell was (in his SOPH year) he definitely played solid defense against the other team’s best wing. I think that we forget that he was an 18 yr old freshman with huge expectations….
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 9:19am #157605
Stanford hoopsParticipanti just read his scouting report for the first time…one he doesnt have good mechanics when shooting in games he shots from the side of his head.2 after reading all of the scouting reports the concensous is he is not a tru point guard and is more of a combo and also his shot isnt that good( like i said before ignore workouts because a player isnt shooting against any defense so alot of people can look like great shooters)..nbadraft says he could be a flip murray.delonte west player..and other sites say more delonte west which i can agree with ..also notice he picks looked to be picked around 20-24 which i dotn disagree with either
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 9:22am #157608

Lemons4LifeParticipantI was a huge fan of that Illinois team and there’s no doubt Holiday is a poor man’s D-Wade. Holiday will be able to play in point guard or shooting guard stop doubting him. Oh, as for the classes of recruiting 2014 NBA Draft I’ll be the number one pick. Also look for names such as Chris & Nick Dietrich and Matthew McPherson.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 9:25am #157611
xbadgerhustlerParticipantthere’s not a chance Jrue slips by the Wolves at 18.
i acknowledged that they were just in workouts… it’s at least some indication that he can shoot
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 9:41am #157627
Scott42444ParticipantI agree with you about Brandon Jennings. That dude is a stud. I think that he had one way of REALLY hurting his draft stock and that’s if he would have quit, publicly denounced his team/coach, got into shouting matches with the coaching staff or his teammates, etc. He didn’t. He did everything that he was asked and acted like a professional. I know that one scout in particular thought one of Jennings’s question marks was that he was a bit immature. I think that he helped answer that question.
But, the point with Jrue, I don’t think that you draft a guy in the lottery and hope that you have a backup PG. Not in today’s NBA anyway. Of course, I guess that getting a guy who can play both guard positions, can defend both guard positions, and can score isn’t a terrible thing to put on your roster. It just seems to be a bad position to put a teenager who needs consistent playing time in order to reach his “potential”. Plus, I don’t think that Kirk Hinrich is a fair comparison. I like the idea behind it, just like what I said about playing both positions and playing defense. I just think the difference between the two and what justifies Kirk going #7 in the best draft of the century so far is that he didn’t need to reach his “potential”. He had played for years in college, succeeded on the National stage, and grew up with a coach as a father (which would lend some credence to him being able to easily transition from college to the pros). Jrue had a VERY hard time adjusting from high school to college where he wasn’t able to just be “the man”. That was with an NBA PG playing right next to him who was not only able to play well with a young, 6’4” SG/PG, he was able to help Westbrook succeed well enough to become the #4 pick in the draft. If Jrue has that much trouble adjusting to not having the ball in his hands all the time, how will he adjust to not even getting consistent minutes? Plus, no he is going to be asked to guard Derrick Rose/Chris Paul/Allen Iverson type of players without being in the flow of the game. It’s a HIGH risk to take. If Jrue has similar troubles adjusting to the NBA as he did to college, how could anyone not feel like it was an obvious result? He just showed that he has trouble adjusting and now you put him in the toughest league on the planet.
0- Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 9:51am #157630
xbadgerhustlerParticipantin this draft, there aren’t that many guys with huge upsides that can go in the lottery… tell me 14 guys you’d take over Jrue, Scott!
and Jrue’s ceiling isn’t backup PG, it’s what he is now.
0
- Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 9:55am #157632

iguapops420ParticipantAgai i show the comparison of Kirk Hinrich/Rodney Stuckey. You think Stuckey is a poor offensive player? Well he managed to drop 40 on your boyDerrick Rose in December. Is Kirk Hinrich a poor Defender? Well Ben Gordon has to disagree as Hinrich made him a defensive player by allowing him to guard the sg before Rose came around. Best Comparison, Delonte West…did he ever play PG in college?, no Jameer Nelson did, had he ever played PG prior to becoming the starting PG for Boston a few years back. Don’t yu see, in the league now, you can play pg as a sg who can distribute, i.e Delonte West,Rodney Stuckey,Gilbert Arenas,Dwayne Wade. Hell evenBrandon Roy, Andre Iguadala and Kobe Bryant could be legit pg’s now.
What have i based all my thoughts of Holiday being a nice safe bet? Here goes.
He’s a catch and shoot player who finishes decentlyaoundthe rim.Legit size at sg, great at the point to see over the D.Good vert both no step and max.Needs work on his pull-up J from 8′-18′, not really comfortable there,but can be fixed since he’s only 18. Has trouble squaring up going right or left when he pulls up off the dribble.How many rg handed players are good, o even able to uzitilize a jab step to the left that he WILL stick withshowing his ambidextrious abilities. His athleticism in iso is smooth. Good at everything, elite at none. His man defense is good as he shows to put the effort in and already has the qicks,length,and size to be a good-great defender. Plug in a defensive coach to help him with his fundamentals, you’re set. In fullcourt situations though, he will need some help.
0- Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 10:34am #157660
Scott42444ParticipantI don’t think poorly of Rodney Stuckey at all, I just know Kirk’s game a little better so I chose to talk about him. First of all, Rodney Stuckey dropping 40 against a rookie PG isn’t that HUGE of a surprise to me. The difference between Stuckey and Jrue are that Rodney averaged almost 25 points a game in college, which was fourth best in the country. Taking a guy who scored 25 ppg, with about 5 assists, 5 rebounds, and 2.5 steals a game. That’s college success, not all hopes and dreams based on high school performance. Same thing with Hinrich. He had college success. I don’t think that Hinrich is a poor defensive player at all either. I think the opposite. He was a good defender in college, it wasn’t just that he had “the physical tools to be a good defensive player”. Maybe I wasn’t clear in my post there, I am saying that the difference between Hinrich/Stuckey and Jrue is that Jrue was a relative disappointment in college (look, I know people are going to disagree but didn’t most people feel he would have a better season?) to a certain and he had the tools around him to succeed. Part of my reasoning is the fact that he stepped into the same spot as 2008 #4 pick Russell Westbrook and right next to the soon to be drafted DC, and didn’t succeed. Now, I think that Jrue Holiday is a legit NBA player but I feel that he REALLY needed another year in college to prove that he can take the step to the next level. He didn’t transition that well from high school to college, at least not for a lottery pick. I agree with PG’s being SG’s who distribute. Those guys all put up numbers that would warrant a team taking that chance. Out of all the guys you mentioned in your post, Hinrich, Stuckey, Jameer Nelson, Delonte West, Arenas, Wade, Roy, Iguadala, Bryant. Which one of them stepped into a situation like Jrue did and didn’t succeed? Well, Kobe didn’t have a chance really but the answer in my opinion is no one.
0
- Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 9:58am #157633
xbadgerhustlerParticipantDelonte West was much more of a stud at St. Joes than Jrue was at UCLA… Jrue was 18…
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 9:59am #157634

knicksfreakParticipantNice pops. I agree he might not be a perennial all-star but he can be a solid NBA guard for all the reasons you gave.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 10:01am #157635
xbadgerhustlerParticipantoff the top of my head, that’s my best comparison for Jrue…
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 10:05am #157636

iguapops420ParticipantYes at St.Joe’s, not UCLA, the same UCLA that had two seniors already established and a collison that had te ball in his hnds ALL the time. He was 18 year old fresh, was Westbrook a beast freshman year? Holiday at this pointisnt a great shooting threat nor post player therefore never being a legit scorer. And had he had the ball in his hands and played pseudo point with Darren in a Fisher,Chalmers,Duhon type role (as a catch and shoot guy who brings leadership and smart play) and been ale to drie the basket,you would have seen the true Jrue Holiday.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 10:10am #157640

iguapops420ParticipantA.D. would be a good comparison for Jrue now…everyone forgets that he’s still 18. What is he just not gonna get any better?
Let’s sto forgetting his biggest weaknesses ar thingsthat are either the easiest thing to improve upon i.e shooting or things that come with age and experience i.e. decision-making floor general presence….was nash a pg coming into the league? Or even his first few years for that matter0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 10:36am #157664
QHaynes123Also, Westbrook dominated his Sophomore year…everyone gotta get that right…he came out as a Sophomore and had a excellent Sophomore year
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 10:38am #157665
xbadgerhustlerParticipantI think that some people are discounting Love’s affect on that other UCLA team… he made everybody better.
I don’t like the Jrue and Russell comparison because RW is on a whole other level athletically… Also, Russell had the opportunity to play for the first couple games of his SOPH year (another reason the comparison is shotty) at PG and that built his confidence a lot…. IMO
For Jrue it was all about confidence and he didn’t have ANY at UCLA.
COME ON SCOTT! tell me 14 other guys you would take in the lottery before Jrue.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 10:43am #157670

iguapops420ParticipantJrue had the exact type of season i expected.Same kind as Westbrook did as a poor shooter beside of a ball dominant Collison. Are we forgetting that Westbrook only avg 10pts as well not sure of the exact numbers but im sure they were around 2-4 rbs and 2-4 ast. They were defensive guys.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 10:43am #157672

knicksfreakParticipantDoes anybody have Westbrook’s athletic measurements from last year?
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 10:44am #157673
Scott42444ParticipantNo, Nash wasn’t a superstar point guard in the NBA when he first started out. He of course was playing behind Kevin Johnson, Sam Cassell, and then Jason Kidd. 2 of those guys are 2 of the best PG’s of all time. Yes, I think that Kevin Johnson was one of the best PG I’ve ever seen play. Barkley just said a couple of weeks ago that KJ would have averaged 30 ppg with the new rules. Now, Barkley isn’t the end all be all of basketball player scouting, but he does have respected NBA knowledge. Nash also came out of college as an honorable mention All-American and was top 3 all-time in his school’s history in points, assists, 3-pointers, and free throw percentage. Now, I know that it was at Santa Clara, not UCLA, but he succeeded in the situation that he was put into. Jrue, who was put into a situation where other NBA players have recently succeeded, did not.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 10:56am #157681
deuce4offNice to see Aran talked to a handful of respected NBA scouts who said Jrue is highly overrated…..A tweener with average athleticism and a mediocre jumper. Hopefully this should put an end to all of these Holiday band-wagons and ridiculous comparisons.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 11:02am #157683

iguapops420ParticipantYes Jrue didn’t meet yor comparison’s but like someone stated above, Westbook was on a team that had Love and Mbah. Westbrook was able to slash with more success due his insane first step, vertical, length, and Love’s ability to find open cutters within the offense. Whodid the same things for Jrue Alfred Aboya? Josh Shipp? Darren Collison?…NOPE!!!
I agree about KJ though. Poin is that it just takes confidence, drive, and the right situation. Jrue seems to Show he wants to be the best which is a quality that makes players better, confidence will come. We’ll see about the right situation. I just don’t think you’re realizing that just b/ he didn’t play the title of pg in highschool doesnt man he didn’t play the role offensively.Rose wasn’t a point gurd going into College. And evn in college he didn’t ook that great outside of being the fastest out of an entire group of greyhounds. Yet he looks to be the next great pg in the pro’s. nd hestil lcks some of the mostbasic pg abilities such as pick and roll game. Not a floor general at all, hinrich is the vocal guy for that team. What kind of point guard isn’t te leader of his team and can’t run a simple pick and roll. Point is you can lackqualities the traditional player at your position did because the game is played so differently. BTW did Charlie Bell look like much of anything in college outside of a defender? Still not a pg but can step in when needed and his shooting has gotten worlds better. Due to his work ethic. Don’t underestimate drive/poise/passion/and work ethic.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 11:04am #157685
deuce4offno step vert: 30″
max vert: 36.5″
bench: 12 reps
lane agility: 10.98s
3/4 sprint: 3.08sno shoes: 6’2.25″
shoes: 6’3.5″
wingspan: 6’7.75″
standing reach: 8’4″0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 11:05am #157688

gatorheelsParticipantDude will be a lottery pick for a reason. Yall might as well stop hatin on him. Come draft night he is top 14 pick and will be getting paid. Jrue is a baller.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 11:12am #157692
QHaynes123In the end, I think a team will give him the keys to the team and let him be the PG.
I would. Expect him to go top 14
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 11:13am #157693
Scott42444ParticipantWell, here are just the PG’s that I think will be taken ahead of him:
Rubio, Jennings, Flynn, Stephen Curry, Tyreke Evans (those last 2 are PG/SG kind of guys too)
SG ahead of him:
James Harden, Demar DeRozan, Gerald Henderson, maybe…Chase Budinger
Others ahead of him:
Blake Griffin, Hasheem Thabeet, Jordan Hill, DeJuan Blair
There’s 12-13, with Chase being VERY iffy. I would put other guys, in my opinion I would rather have James Johnson, Earl Clark, Terrance Williams, and a few more. But, you are right that others would put him in at least the Top 15. I know that some people would say that DeRozan and Evans didn’t WOW people that much either. The difference, which Josh has said a few times, is that Demar and Tyreke had times where they took over games. Times where they looked like they could hang with the “big boys” in the NBA. I never saw that from Jrue. I only saw him play a few times, but I never saw it.
I would agree with you guys that Westbrook didn’t do a very good job in his freshman year at UCLA either. The difference is that he stayed in college so that he could improve. When someone gets to the NBA, or even Brandon Jennings in Europe, it’s hard to work on EVERYTHING you want to improve because you are getting PAID to do what the team needs from you. Also, Westbrook doesn’t blow Jrue out of the water physically either. Check this out:
Westbrook’s physical ability vs. Jrue Holiday’s physical ability
RW – Standing Reach 8’4”
JH – Standing Reach 8’4.5”RW – Max Vertical 36.5
JH – Max Vertical 34.0RW – Lane Agility 10.98
JH – Lane Agility 10.64RW – 3/4 sprint 3.08
JH – 3/4 sprint 3.21Now, that being said…I don’t hate Jrue Holiday, I just agree with Josh that I don’t see what it is that mock draft people (like us and this site) see in what Holiday has done to impress enough to warrant some people putting him in the Top 10 of the NBA Draft. I see potential, but can someone name a guy that has succeeded in the NBA in a similar situation as Jrue where they had they physical tools and went into a very successful college program next to an NBA level PG and didn’t do very much? Was that person a lottery pick? Was that pick a smart pick? If there is someone, I would like to know who it is. Then, I would like to know how many times that situation has backfired on an NBA team and they drafted a bust based solely on potential and physical tools (which in Jrue’s case, I don’t think by NBA standards are that spectacular).
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 11:39am #157714

iguapops420ParticipantWhy is everone here forgetting what kind of draft this is. And i disagree that Henderson is ahead of him as theay havesimilar size and athletic numbers an henderson is an undersized two.Also Blair just came out that his Knees are as put by a couple of scouts as being dreadfuland will hinder him as he had a tear in both ACL’s in college. From what I’ve read Most think he’s also moved ahead of Curry. And Derozan is even further behind Jrue in terms of being raw.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 12:17pm #157733
xbadgerhustlerParticipant“I see potential, but can someone name a guy that has succeeded in the NBA in a similar situation as Jrue where they had they physical tools and went into a very successful college program next to an NBA level PG and didn’t do very much? Was that person a lottery pick? Was that pick a smart pick? If there is someone, I would like to know who it is. Then, I would like to know how many times that situation has backfired on an NBA team and they drafted a bust based solely on potential and physical tools (which in Jrue’s case, I don’t think by NBA standards are that spectacular).”
That doesn’t happen very often, if ever… I think the only example I can think of is Russell Westbrook…. which is ironic.
WHY DIDN’T DC just come out last year, then this entire discussion would be moot cuz we would have been able to see Jrue play point!
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 1:13pm #157751
johnecoParticipantI think it’s misleading to say he wasn’t a point guard in college.
One guy above even said he was a SF, c’mon.In my mind he was definitely a PG.
Yea, they did play a 3 (small) guard alignment where Dee Brown often brought the ball up, and the roles were shared to some extent. But Williams also frequently brought the ball up, and was definitely the main distributor. He averaged 6 assists throughout his 3 year college career, and he was definitely playing the point – how are you guys defining it?0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/06/2009 - 4:37pm #157805

iguapops420Participant^^^There was a time when scouts wondered if Luther wasn’t the best on that team. And yes Deron was the Prima Facilitator on that team, but all three shared the duties. But that’s a poor comparison because anyone who watched deron knew he was a legit point guard.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/07/2009 - 5:39pm #158279
Stanford hoopsParticipantyou say henderson is a undersized 2 yet hes 6’5 good athlete and nice reach..i dont think thats a undersized 2 and right now jru is a sg who teams are hoping can make the transition to the pg…some one said something about delonte west not playing point…in highschool at elenor roosevelt in maryland he played pg most of the time so he has played some pg..but yea hes a combo guard and thats pretty much how i see jru panning out best case senerio..and like someone else said if he had confidence problems at ucla where the competetion is alot lower then whatever team he goes to then just imagin how his confidence is gonna be when he gets to the nba..some one else said something about looking at him he can tell. he has that drive to get better..lol..his drive doesnt look anymore better then just about ever other player out there i seen this year..it doesnt stand out..also the difference between these other guys yall keep saying didnt have good freshman years is that they came back to school and got better ..jru is gonn ahave a hard time getting better in game situations then he would have at ucla because hes gonna play alot less..plus he wasnt good at everything as someone noted and bad at nothing..he wasnt that good of a shooter and pretty average at everything( looked at the draft express comparision thing of other players..he was pretty average
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/07/2009 - 9:48pm #158406
Scott42444ParticipantI mentioned that Deron Williams played what would be considered a “3” sometimes at Illinois, with Dee Brown playing the “1” and Luther Head being the “2”, but I in no way thought he would ever have a hard time transitioning into an NBA PG. It was just the lineup that Bruce Webber ran out there sometimes. I mean, can you blame him? He just so happened to have 3 NBA caliber guards on the same team. I swear some people read every other word on this site and don’t bother trying to actually figure out the point someone’s trying to make. They just pick out a few words and run with it. But, if we are going to be sticklers with it, yes…sometimes in college Deron Williams was playing the “3”. Luther Head would be the “shooting guard” and Dee Brown would be the “point guard” sometimes. I guess it only really works that way if you insist on a basketball team having a PG, SG, SF, PF, and C. But, I guess that the 1990’s Bulls had Scottie Pippen as the SF and he was really the PG, so it’s not that different.
Hey, in a similar yet unrelated topic…Was it Scott Skiles who coached the Suns where they had a 4-guard set? I can’t remember exactly but I was remembering Antonio McDyess at the “Center”, with Nash, Kidd, Chapman, and KJ? Or am I mixing up eras here with the Suns? Anyone remember?
Or, was it Penny and not KJ? I can’t remember.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/07/2009 - 10:08pm #158409

iguapops420ParticipantOk josh, again i say that Jrue ran pg in highschool beside of another pg. Coming into college he had high expectations for some reason as a polished player. Didn’t meet them, but again i say what freshman outside of Tyreke did. Now look at Delonte West and tell me why it is you don’t see Jrue Holiday being able to become that good. In the pro’s he’s not gonna have those kind of expectations. He’ll be able to come along as he needs to. I’m done arguing this point, he’ll either make it or not. Your acting like everyone is sayinmg he’s gonna be some kind of stud. He’s not, he’s gonna be a solid starter who will D up create a bit and score a bit. Think your boy Hinrich is any kind of threat offensively outside of jumpshooting which over the past 2 1/2 year has become fairly poor. So to say he can’t become that is ridiculous. I really wish this kid would end up a Laker so you could see how good he could really become with a stud leader like Kobe beside him, and the pressure bein taken off. All i know is that A.D was a lotto pick and made a creer as a 3rd guard who would step in and be a solid starter any tim he was needed. I see the same type of career for Jrue. Same as West has had, and same as i see Stuckey. Difference being? Jrue truely wants to be a floor general and true pg. Let’s all root for him to fall to the Mavsat least so he can learn behnd Kidd.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/07/2009 - 10:32pm #158412
Scott42444ParticipantHow does someone come into the pros and come along as they need to? How would the pressure be taken off with the defending NBA champ Lakers, next to the biggest competitor in the NBA? If he thought UCLA, with a “stud” leader like DC next to him, was tough how is he going to feel playing for the most successful franchise in NBA history trying to defend a title?
Also, I don’t know if we are all on different pages or not but Rodney Stuckey had just ridiculous numbers as a freshman. Yes, he wasn’t at UCLA, but he transitioned to the next level very well both times. Both times being from high school to college, where he averaged nearly 25 points a game. Then, in the NBA, he started in the preseason averaging almost 32 ppg, 9 assists and 5 rebounds before getting injured and showed flashes of what he could do throughout the year and improved his numbers in the playoffs.
Jrue’s game did not get better during his transition from high school to college. He didn’t show flashes, he didn’t put up numbers that would make someone say, “Well, he obviously needs work on this and that but did you see that game against so and so? Hell, if he could give us half of that we would be happy!” He hasn’t done that anywhere but high school. Yes, UCLA isn’t some crappy little league. It’s tough and the transition can’t be easy. But, someone who is supposed to be one of the BEST basketball players in the entire world who are “first time eligible” in the 2009 NBA Draft, you would think he could show something.
Once again, I understand that you are saying he could be a GOOD to VERY GOOD player, but he’s a lottery pick. You could go out and get a bigger guy to play defense in the second round. There are just too many point guards who have shown the ability to become something more than good. I mean, is someone using a lottery pick to get Janerro Pargo? A couple of year ago he averaged almost 10 ppg playing for the Hornets. I think that you could get him for nothing right now. Or, you could get his brother Jeremy. If you are going to take a chance, you should take a guy who showed something spectacular and hope that he could recreate it.
He’ll probably go in the lottery though, and I will be one of the loudest voices to say “I knew it!” when he becomes an NBA journeyman and a few guys taken after him actually give the team who drafts them their money’s worth.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 06/08/2009 - 10:08am #158541
Stanford hoopsParticipanti think you read one of my post wrongs ( or maybe i wrote it wrong ) but im pretty sure i said holiday could be liek delonte west thats the ceiling i gave him…and alot of people are saying hes gonna be a superstar thats how my post and dislikes started…and yes he did have the ball alot but he wasnt the pg he had the ball alot because he was there scorer..its a bigger difference then people realize between having the ball and being a pg..most stars have the ball alot in higschool but that doesnt mean they can transition to the pg position..ron artest had the ball alot but hes not a pg..same with tmac
0 - Posted on: Mon, 06/08/2009 - 4:56pm #158864

iguapops420ParticipantMay have read it wrong. I agree Delonte is his ceiling, though i think he casn become a better pg than delonte merely for the fact he is only 18 and already wantingtodevelop as point guard. He’ll be a goo defender able to defend both pg/sf and in some cases sf. Similar to Delonte. He COULD become a stopper, BUT the ods say he just becomes a fire hose player. Like Delonte/Childress/Ariza/Shannon Brown/A.D. Not stopping anyone but playing d for an entire game making it hard on the man he’sdefending b/clike i said before he’s not elitely long or quickor explosive. He’s smooth.
In regards to the ron artest/tmac part, i agree about that, but again at such a young age he already ants to become a floor general, and i’ll take my floor general being at te sg position and a little turnover prone as long as he’s a leader. But overall yes if your point wa that’ll he’ll never be an all star true pg but to say he couldn’t become an allstar at least once in his career is a big overstatement. Especially if he gesto b a sixth man scorer type for a contender. Jason Terry was alway fmor of a sg, though he was pt in te position as starting point guard and he slowly got comforable and become IMO a very soid starting pg or sixth man.
0 - Posted on: Tue, 06/09/2009 - 4:53am #159062
Stanford hoopsParticipanti think he would have a better chance if he went back to school and developed..hough i cant be mad at him because if you are a lock to go lotto or first round then you gotta do it
0 - Posted on: Tue, 06/09/2009 - 5:09pm #159618
dwad123Participantjennings and jrue have the most upside besides grifftin
0 - Posted on: Wed, 06/10/2009 - 10:12am #160003
Stanford hoopsParticipantjennings i agree..jrue..i think there are a couple players with more upside
0 - AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |