This topic contains 67 replies, has 16 voices, and was last updated by
JNixon 16 years, 11 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 8:45am #7238
sakuragi84Participantjust wanted to see different perspective from each teams’ fans perspective. what’s the least favorite move of this offseason (can be anything, from coaches, players, changes to the venue, etc.) and why?
i’m a raptors fan and my least favourite move is jay triano getting an extension as the head coach. he may be respected by the players, but i don’t like his decision making and how he has no balls when arguing with refs. so timid.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 8:52am #193078

torontoraptors10ParticipantI’m a Raptors fan too and I can’t complain about the moves Colangelo has done for the Raptors. They were all stellar and I must say Raptors MIGHT end up if the 4th, only if they perform to the best they can be, but right now I can see them at a 5th or 6th seed.
I have to agree with you, the extension of Jay Triano was questionable and I would have preferred a different coach who is a certified winner. We’ll see if this move pans out.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 8:53am #193079

Howard Trey Thompkins IIIParticipantI wish we could’ve gotten Childress back this year. And if we win it all, does he get a ring?
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 8:59am #193082
sakuragi84ParticipantI really hope Triano pans out but I have strong doubts about it.
It would’ve been nice to see Childress back in the NBA but it’s hard to blame him for returning to Europe. He’s in a stage in his life where he can make the most money through his basketball career, and since they’re paying him in Europe, that’s where he needs to be if he wants money.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 9:04am #193086

Knicksboy34ParticipantAnd if we win it all, does he get a ring?
You dont need to worry about that…LOL
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 9:07am #193087

jojososaParticipantCeltics fan I think we could try harder to sign big baby he is a spark off tha bench a valuable part of our bench, also tha hawks won’t win it all sooooo tha question is irrelavent
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 9:12am #193088

RickyRubio9ParticipantI can’t say we’ve done any stupid moves…letting Ron-Ron go I guess, but we had a good offer, dude just wanted to win. I’m glad they didn’t try and overpay him just like they did with Gortat. It’s all good. I’m happy with the moves we made, we didn’t go and overpay anyone. Von Wafer…a fan favorite, I’ll miss him. I got the Von-Hawk man! Crazy, Houston had it all over, but I was one of the first. That Jermaine Taylor better be good. I like our draft, Chase Budinger is a stud and Segio Llull is someone who I look forward in the future. Young Athletic Point from Spain. The signing of Ariza was pretty good, a young talent who can replace Battier once he gets old, a real crucial part you need for a Championship Run. David Andersen? I don’t know much about him, but I hear he is a nice player, 11 Points and 4-5 Rebounds in 22 Minutes? Not bad, a real winner wherever he was and a top Center in Europe. I don’t expect much, but those numbers aren’t bad, maybe some more rebounds and he will get the playing time. I like our team and hopefully Elston Turner doesn’t leave us to go to Minny, good assistant.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 9:16am #193092
FutureoftheGameWow. I have to disagree with ya rubio. I think the Rockets made a stupid move in signing Ariza for so much money. The guy is a defender. He is basically the new eara Bruce Bowen. He cant create for himself and only played one solid year and a good playoffs. I guess a ring on a cursed team feels good tho.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 9:19am #193095

gatorheelsParticipantI have to disagree also… I think the Rockets shouldn’t have signed Ariza. Also Jermaine Taylor is OK but I think Budinger is a dud not a stud haha. He does nothing but shoot jumpshots…thats it. Lull is OK. People forget that the Rockets gave up a future 2nd round pick & 6 million dollars for those 3 2nd round picks….that was a stupid move in my eyes.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 9:20am #193097

Knicksboy34ParticipantTrevor Ariza will shock many people this year
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 9:22am #193099
ckowalskiParticipantAriza and Battier are essentially the same player, Ariza is just younger and more athletic. He will be a good replacement, especially if we can find a way to get both of them on the floor at the same time, maybe by sliding Ariza over to SG. I would rather overpay Ariza than overpay Ron and listen to him b!tch all season long about how it’s a down year.
Plus, when you spell out tRAitor it has Artest’s initials perfectly in it, so it makes for an awesome sign to hold up when the Fakers come to town.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 9:23am #193100
FutureoftheGameShock them how? Are you expecting T-Mac to create openings for him like Kobe did?? Nope. The only way he will supreise me is if he doesnt want out.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 9:24am #193101

Knicksboy34ParticipantLOL…Slow down.
People think all he is another Bruce Bowen. He is the new version of Ron Artest. Trust me, he will be a good slasher in a mid tempo team. Trust me.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 9:31am #193108
nateoak10Participantsooooooooooooooooooooooooo pointless
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 9:51am #193123

RickyRubio9ParticipantAriza is young and can be Battier’s replacement. They are making the same I believe. I haven’t checked it out so don’t go all crazy if I am wrong. Um…I doubt you know much about Llull, not to be mean or anything. I made a topic on him and no one responded…basically saying no one on this site knows nothing about him so they just stayed quiet. As for Jermaine Taylor and Budinger, one had a horrible Summer League while the other had a great SL. I know Summer League isn’t much, but if you can’t dominate there when you say you are a “Scorer” then how can you expect to do it at the NBA Level where all the players belong. Budinger shoots alot, but he also makes a good amount of them and he can rebound and create for others although that wasn’t really shown, he was suppose to focus on defense more then anything else.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 9:58am #193127

Howard Trey Thompkins IIIParticipantYou guys traded Rudy Gay for Battier…. we drafted Shelden Williams over Roy and Gay. How dumb were our gm’s?
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 9:59am #193128
FutureoftheGameHaha. Damn. Case closed anyone??
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 10:00am #193130
McWinningParticipantpassing op on Dejuan Blair three times as a blazers fan.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 10:15am #193138

RickyRubio9ParticipantThat wasn’t dumb at all as I’ve said numerous times. I’ll take Battier over Gay anyday of the week. I’m tired of that being called a bad deal. What team doesn’t want Battier? Sheesh.
Besides, it was this offseason and I don’t believe Morey was our GM 3 Seasons ago although I could be wrong. I was there on draft night at the Toyota Center where many fans were disappointed about the trade, but then my cousin helped explain it to me and afterwards I thought it was a great move and it has been up until this day and I’m sure many basketball fans would agree.
A bad trade for the Rockets would be Richard Jefferson for Eddie Griffin? I believe. Horrible.
Also trading Sam and Robert Horry0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 10:16am #193139

gatorheelsParticipantrickyrubio- I don’t know a ton about Llull but I know for a PG he doesn’t rebound well or have many asst. Not to mention he isn’t a great scorer. All I am saying is no way in he*l would I pay $6million dollars & give up a future 2nd round pick for three guys that I think at best will be 3 bench players.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 10:21am #193146

jerb2011Participanttrading for bj mullens!!!
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 10:22am #193150

Howard Trey Thompkins IIIParticipantRudy is a better shooter, ballhandler, and scorer than battier. Battier is a bust, good defender…. but a bust.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 10:43am #193167
ckowalskiParticipantThe Rockets knew all those things before they traded for Battier. I don’t think anyone was expecting Battier to average more points than Gay or take on any of the primary ballhandling duties. But he is a lockdown defender and a great locker room/ team chemistry guy, who wouldn’t want him on their team? In retrospect, you can say it was a bad trade when you look at what Gay has become and think about what he could have done in Houston, but who would guard the top player on the opposite team then? Houston already had scorers, they needed a perimeter defender, and they got a good one. Battier is not a bust, he is a solid player. Gay IMO is not a premier scorer or a #1 option kind of scorer and he won’t be the piece a championship team will build around, so I don’t think Houston gave up anything they are regretting right now. Battier is a premier defender and he gives you something that other players can’t provide. I think it is a lot easier to find a player who can give you 15-20 points a game than a player that can hold the other team’s best player to 15-20 points a game.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 10:43am #193168

RickyRubio9ParticipantLlull isn’t coming over for at least another 2 years where he can develop.
Our Owner wanted what he wanted! If he wants to spend his money to get his guys then so be it. He trusts our GM Morey as does most of Houston which is who convinced him and besides like you said 3 Guys that are probably bench, why do the 2nd Round Picks hurt us then? Who is to say they wouldn’t have been bench players as well? Chase Budinger, Jermaine Taylor, and Sergio Llull. I don’t think all of them will be scrubs on the bench.
Battier a Bust? I never heard of that, coming out of college what did they expect? He is a Great Defender, Great Leader, Good Shooter, occasionally looks for his offense, and I think Rudy Gay is overrrated. He is on a bad team where he was asked to score…I don’t hate on him, but how do we know if he would’ve developed into the Player he is today with the Rockets who already had their cornerstone pieces in Mac and Yao? We were looking good back then before the injuries. SO CHILL. All this hate on Battier.0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 10:45am #193169

festar35ParticipantI am a Pacers fan and I was hoping that Larry Bird was going to make some sort of move for a player that can come in and be a great second scoring option behind Granger. I know that we have now got more defense in the team but i really wanted Larry to get a Star quality player to go along with Danny.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 10:47am #193170

RickyRubio9ParticipantBINGO. You hit it right on the head. Hopefully these people will understand the whole point of that trade.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 10:49am #193171
FutureoftheGameHe could have helped all the times McGrady has gone down. He is an average defender too. With Yao, cant they just funnel the shooters down the lane and force them to the big man in the middle? A team only wants Battie if they are already really good.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 10:51am #193173

RickyRubio9ParticipantMcGrady hadn’t had the injuries yet! My goodness…we didn’t need an average defender. We were on the rise with the 1-2 Punch and Battier was a big aquisition for us that Summer. I think McGrady had just had his first injury, no one expected it to amount up to this.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 10:54am #193174
ckowalskiParticipantHouston was good! And Yao got stuffed by Nate and Kobe. He is my least favorite Rockets player. Aside from Yao Houston had no size though. Mutombo was strictly a shot blocker and both him and Yao are only average rebounders for how gigantic both of them are. If you are going to have shooters driving in the lane all game the defense is going to collapse and they would have gotten killed by teams from deep. Houston’s biggest problem was that they thought Yao could play 48 minutes a game until he was 42 so they never drafted a solid backup for him.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 10:55am #193175
FutureoftheGameNah. McGrady had been hurt at Orland and Toronto before he got to the Rockets.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 10:56am #193176

Howard Trey Thompkins IIIParticipantRudy Gay is A GOOD DEFENDER! Have you watched him play? The only part of his game where he seems lack is his offense because he floats around the wing alot, but that might be a coaching problem.
And Battier is a bust… he was selected like 5th or 6th and is half the player Gerald Wallace is.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 10:57am #193177

RickyRubio9Participantexpected Battier to be an All-Star…did he even play like one at Duke? I don’t believe so…wasn’t that a weak draft class as well. I don’t remember
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 11:00am #193180
FutureoftheGameThat was a bad trade. Why not let Gay develop into a GREAT third option for what you say was a “good” team?
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 11:02am #193181
UofAxWildcatsParticipantim a huge arizona fan,,and i watched pretty much every game he played,,and he does a lot more than just shoot js,,,he didnt really show many of his talents at the summer league besides shooting,,he avg 6 boards a gm last year with jhill on the team thats really good,,,give him time and he will start to do more,,,BUT to my twolves i think it was a mistake not drafting derozan as i see ellington doin the same thing tha mccants did for us,,,nothing
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 11:02am #193182
ckowalskiParticipantIf everyone got drafted where they were supposed to be then the League would be a lot different right now. Connecticut is my favorite team, I watch every Uconn player in the NBA. I never said Gay was a bad defender, but Battier is on another planet in terms of defensive ability. I would never look to Gay as a defensive stopper. If Blake Griffin puts up 17 and 6 as career averages is he a bust because he was the number one pick? Is Yao a bust because he has only been out of the first round once in 7 years because he was a top pick? The draft is all based on opinions and needs, whether a player is a bust or not depends on how you look at the situation he is placed in.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 11:04am #193184
ckowalskiParticipantWhy not let Al Jefferson develop into a great player for the Celtics? Because you have a chance to get KG and win NOW. And it worked out. If Houston had won a championship the year they traded for Battier we wouldn’t be having this conversation right now.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 11:06am #193186
FutureoftheGameWOW!!!! You are comparing trading Al Jefferson/KG to trading Rudy Gay/Shane Battier???? Get real man. If thats the kind of arguements you are going to use, go post on myspace or somethin.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 11:06am #193188

GreenLanternParticipantOKC NOT signing Milsap or D-Lee even though they need a double digit rebounder. I trust Presti though and know he is protecting the team’s cap space and since it’s clear OKC isn’t in championship contention WITH either of those two, let alone without them.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 11:08am #193190
ckowalskiParticipantI had a feeling you would say something like that. No I am not saying that Jefferson and Battier are the same type of player, I am saying the though process is the same. If you can get a player that you think can help you win now instead of waiting for a young player to develop why wouldn’t you do it? No one knew if Jefferson and Gay would live up to their potential, but you knew what you were getting with KG and Battier.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 11:11am #193195

RickyRubio9ParticipantI’m done discussing it…that was actually a good idea to compare that trade with the Celtics. Exactly, we knew what we were getting with Battier, but with Gay who knows if he would have been a bust, btw Battier can’t be considered a Bust being in the same draft class as Brown and Chandler.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 11:14am #193200
FutureoftheGameYea. In KG, you get one of the greatest PF of this time but you lose a chubby, back to the basket scorer with some upside. In Battier you get a locker room presence and a man to man defender but you lose a superb athlete with a killer J and like someone said, he too plays defence. Im pretty sure that the Rockets never thought that Battier was going to push them to the finals like the Celitcs thought KG was going to do for them. I get what you are saying but your argument material was probably the worst I could have though of.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 11:16am #193204

RickyRubio9ParticipantDid you just say “J” and Gay in the same sentence…I could’ve sworn everyone thought that he needed to drive more and stop shooting so much. He play defense, but even a UCONN Fan said that he isn’t on the same Planet as Battier.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 11:21am #193209
FutureoftheGameOk. You dont understand what im saying. The only time you trade a young player with all the upside you can find for a vetran who plays good D is when you are contending. OR if this guy is going to make you contend. Example: KG made the Celitcs contenders, this was a good trade. If the trade makes you lose a great prosect for a defender and it doesnt push you over the edge, its a neutral trade and you lose in the end if the player comes out, like Gay did. Rockets made a bad trade because they still didnt get out of the first round.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 11:25am #193212

RickyRubio9Participantthought it was going to make them contenders! Sheesh. Just because it failed doesn’t mean anything. We were trying to win.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 11:27am #193214
ckowalskiParticipantBattier is a championship piece, not that final piece, you’re right on that, but obviously neither is Gay because he was expendable. Houston is closer to winning a championship with Battier than Memphis is with Gay for the forseeable future.
What other argument should I use then? Everyone thinking Mo Williams would push LeBron to the championship, and now the same thought with Shaq? Shaq pushing Wade to a championship? People actually believing James Posey would make the Hornets title contenders from the bench?!? It’s all the same theory, bring in a player now that you think can help you win instead of trying to develop young players through the draft. (And I realize that all of these moves were through free agency besides the Shaq trades, but it doesn’t take away from the fact these teams would have tried to draft for their needs.)
Jefferson has a lot of skill, he was the centerpiece of the KG deal, and he could be a legitimate all-star. The Celtics would have had a sick lineup if they just brought in Ray Allen and kept all the other guys, not to mention they would have had a deep bench.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 11:33am #193219
FutureoftheGameGay was young and had a high ceiling. Battier was already the player he was going to be. Of course the Girzz arent going to win anytime soon. Make the trade back right now, let Yao get healthy and see if the Rockets arent better with Gay. BTW rubio, you said it wasnt a bad trade in the very begining of this post, however, it didnt work out, like you said, therefore, it was a bad trade.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 11:35am #193221

Howard Trey Thompkins IIIParticipantShane Battier averages 10/5/2/1/1
True, he’s a great defender… but do you think the grizzles drafted him because they wanted just a “stud” defender? No, he’s a bust. Is he a good role player yes, he plays defense… good job.
It was a BAD trade because Battier’s defense isn’t so great that is outweighs everything that Gay does. And the fact that Gay is a good defender further supports my argument.
I could see if Battier can come in an hold someone to 10 points everytime but thats not the case. His defense, in this case, is overated.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 11:38am #193222
ckowalskiParticipantGay was young and had a high ceiling. Battier was already the player he was going to be.
Exactly. There are soooo many players that don’t live up to their potential. I still don’t think it was a bad trade, and I think if it presented itself again both teams would do it. Potential to me is almost becoming a dirty word. I would go with a proven player over potential. It is just a matter of opinion and obviously we don’t agree.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 11:39am #193223
FutureoftheGameWait. You didnt even give they guy a chance. You traded him on draft night. You never even tried. It was a bad dea. I do agree about the potiental thing tho. I always say that the P word is the most dangerous word in basketball.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 11:46am #193228
ckowalskiParticipantHaha, true we didn’t give him a chance but it’s not like this is the first time it has happened. Atlanta trades Pau for Shareef (if you want to talk about a REALLY bad trade….), Phoenix gives up Nate and Rondo, Foye gets swapped for Roy, Mayo traded for Love. I’m not going to pretend I know why Houston traded Gay without playing him first but it didn’t make us any worse. True, we didn’t see if Gay could make us better but I’m not sure he would have worked on the Rockets. Battier didn’t need the ball and Bob Sura and Rafer Alston didn’t know how to pass at the time. Gay needs a setup man and Houston had a bad one. The offense honestly usually was Tmac brings it up and takes a contested jumper. Ironically Alston almost completely stopped being a ballhog and taking terrible 3’s after he got traded to Orlando. I just wish he played that way when we had him for more than 1 quarter at a time.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 11:46am #193229
sakuragi84Participanti don’t think the battier trade was a bad thing. houston thought he was the piece to the puzzle to allow them to win, it wasn’t because mcgrady keeps getting injured and they have to live with it. taking gay was a risk for the reason ckowalski said, he had great potential. he’s realizing it so it’s ok now, but at draft night, they didn’t want to risk it so they went for a player that they already knew what they were going to get out of him. in hindsight, it wasn’t the best idea, but at the time, it seemed like a good idea and it’s just too bad that’s the way things worked out.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 11:50am #193230
FutureoftheGameYou are defending the trade tho. Just leave it alone and admit it was a bad trade. I never said it was the first time either. Your last post is almost an inverse of every one of your previous posts. Every example you gave ended up being what kind of trade? Say it with me………A BAD ONE!! Good job!! Just like the trade at hand, it was a, do you want to say it with me again, a….BAD ONE!! Thats all im saying. The trade for Battier was bad.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 11:56am #193232

Howard Trey Thompkins IIIParticipantAnytime you think Shane Battier is the missing peace to the “puzzle”, then you’re insane.
Battiers defense doesn’t outweigh the things Gay does… and it’s not close.
I bet the franchise would be a little more optimistic about the season if Gay was on their roster and not Battier.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 11:56am #193234
ckowalskiParticipantWhy should I tell you the trade was bad if I don’t think it was? You believe the trade was bad, I don’t agree with you. It’s not like Houston just dumped Gay for sh*ts and giggles, the trade obviously had a point to it, just like all the other trades do. I don’t believe Gay is the player that would have pushed Houston to win a championship, so I don’t think it was a bad trade. Obviously Battier didn’t get them a championship either, but injuries undid that team the past 3 years so who knows what would have happened if they had been healthy.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 11:57am #193235
sakuragi84Participantwell i’ll give you that. now, it’s a bad trade. and i didn’t read that you didn’t say it was bad the first time.the message is just for Howard Trey, because he seems to be acting like Houston was absolutely retarded for doing the trade but there’s legitimate reasons for doing it. if you want a bad trade that you absolutely can’t deny was bad right from the beginning is vince carter to new jersey. looked bad then, looks bad now and always will be remembered as if not the worst, one of the worst trades ever.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 11:58am #193236
ckowalskiParticipantWhy would Houston be more optimistic because Gay is on their roster? Because he can score more points than Battier? The Spurs have a hard time cracking 95 points most nights and they won 4 championships with defense.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 12:00pm #193238

JNixonParticipantDRAFTING JRUE HOLIDAY!
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 12:00pm #193239
sakuragi84Participantpersonally, i don’t think battier was the answer. but that’s because i don’t think t-mac was the answer for them for their offence. but i understand where they were coming from when they did the move. i think the best i can do is meet you half way. it’s obviously a bad trade now, but at the time, it looked ok.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 12:04pm #193241
FutureoftheGameOk. It wasnt a bad trade, right??
Lets review.
The reason for the trade was to contend for a championship. Did that work? NO!
The reason it didnt work is because T-Mac kept getting hurt. Did Battier’s defence pull you through that hard time?? NO!
What did you need when T-Mac went down? Offence. Does Battier have offence?? NO!
Right now, the Rockets are pretty young. Gay would fit in perfectly because he is young too. He could have turned into another T-Mac with the real T-Mac training him. Did he help Battier develop into something special? NO!
Did the team get better after the trade. NObody kNOws for sure because you didnt give him a chance!
Could they use Gay now more than they can Battier? YES!!!!
Can you tell me any of this isnt true??? NO!!!After this review, how could this possibly be a good trade??
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 12:10pm #193245

Howard Trey Thompkins IIIParticipantAnd because Gay is like 22 or something, and because he score more points more effciently. And if thats not enough for you, his trade value is 22x Battier’s trade value. No one knows what T Mac can still do, so potentially seeing those two next to each other next year would be a plus. Right now, you guys have no pluses.
Battier is overated…. a bust. He is a great role player, but the fact that he was taken so high and in front of much better people, and didn’t become much more than a defensive player makes him a bust.
Rudy Gay> Battier
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 12:13pm #193248
sakuragi84Participanti’m not going to argue that now it looks bad. but at the time, i’m not a rockets fan so i’m not sure, i’m guessing they thought that t-mac and yao primary offence while they had the rest of the team to play D and get their shots from their spots. they had bonzi wells as well who was good the previous year. so at that moment when they made the trade, it didn’t look all that bad to them. my guess is that they thought they weren’t willing to risk getting gay, because from what i remember, they had questions about him for some reason so people were starting to get turned off by him (he was originally projected to go #1 i think).
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 12:16pm #193251
FutureoftheGameWhat are you debating then. If you dont know then why open your mount. Sry that this whole arguement I have sounded like a douche but i dont see how Rocket fans can find a positive here.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 12:25pm #193257
sakuragi84Participanti’m just trying to help the rocket’s fans. i understand where you’re coming from, that move was dumb, they should’ve thought about the future. you don’t sound like a douche because you’re right in that it was a bad move but from what i remember people were getting scared of drafting gay for some reason (i can’t remember anymore) so i guess that scared off the rockets and they made that trade. raptors didn’t draft him (i’m a raptors fan) but i remember they was initial interest but then they went all european. either way, all i’m saying is that on draft day, there were people scared and didn’t want to get burned and made a knee jerking decision, but at the time seemed logical. after the first year, it didn’t look too bad. but now, it just looks terrible. it basically only gave them one year of hope.
the best analogy i can give is the araujo draft. raptors should’ve taken iguodala but they had vince carter at the time so they didn’t get him and got a centre (what they needed). obviously they shouldn’t have done that with their draft pick but there’s at least logic to it. though it brings a tear to my eye to think about it…
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 1:00pm #193277

apb540ParticipantWhen that trade went down I remember thinking “what the hell is Houston thinking?” lol. Everyone except the Rockets knew it was a dumb trade but thats the type of thing we come to expect from the Rockets: solid team but not quite solid enough to make a deep run.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 2:20pm #193303
ckowalskiParticipantRudy Gay
Year Team GP GS MPG FG% 3P% FT% RPG APG SPG BPG PPG
07–08 Memphis 81 81 37.0 .461 .346 .785 6.2 2.0 1.4 1.0 20.1Shane Battier
Career 618 498 33.5 .447 .388 .751` 4.8 1.9 1.1 1.0 10.0
I just want to say one more thing on this and then I’m done arguing. We are never going to see eye to eye on this so there isn’t any point in trying. This is Gay’s best statistical season matched up with Battier’s career stats Gay gives you 10 more points and 1 more rebound and shoots marginally better in FGs and FTs in this year than Battier does for his career. This is exactly why I would take Battier. I get a player that plays 1st team all NBA defense on a regular basis and all I give up is 10 points and 1 rebound? Done deal. I can find 10 points and 1 rebound on my bench. Battier’s impact on the game exceeds Gay’s impact on the game, that is why I dont think this was a bad trade.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 2:22pm #193304

Knicksboy34ParticipantI think Rudy Gay is overhyped and overrated
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 2:23pm #193305
FutureoftheGameHaha…you said. Gay only gives you 10 more points per game and 1 rebound and shoots better, this is why i want Battier. That sounds kind of weird to me.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/30/2009 - 8:43pm #193465

JNixonParticipantTeams were scared Rudy Gay wasnt tough and he had a history of not being aggressive and disappearing for long stretches of games. Gay shouldve dominated in college, but he was an underachiever considering his talent. That is what scared teams away. But he is a very aggressive scorer now, and Houston looks foolish for trading him for Battier (even though Battier is a player you’d want for a championship team with his D and shooting.)
0 - AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |