This topic contains 96 replies, has 14 voices, and was last updated by
hiphopismylife 15 years, 10 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 9:39am #21324

RUDEBOY_ParticipantWatching Knight during a few of Kentucky’s games this summer..
I see a little of Brandon Jennings game in Knight’s game…They both have Excellent Speed
Quick 1st Steps
Good Shooting Skills.
Solid Athletes
Fierceless Competitors
Good Passers
3 Point RangeThe only difference i see is Jennings is left handed and Knight depends alot on his right hand..But thats something i’m sure he will work on..
Just like he seem to have added a few pounds of muscle to his body….0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 9:44am #394562

JNixonParticipantBrandon Jennings is a bit more quick, flashy, a bit less strong (which hurts his efficiency more than it will Knight’s), and a bit worse as a defender.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 9:44am #394585

JNixonParticipantBrandon Jennings is a bit more quick, flashy, a bit less strong (which hurts his efficiency more than it will Knight’s), and a bit worse as a defender.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 9:52am #394568

RUDEBOY_ParticipantJennings said on his Twitter page..That he has added 10lbs of Muscles during the summer….
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 9:52am #394591

RUDEBOY_ParticipantJennings said on his Twitter page..That he has added 10lbs of Muscles during the summer….
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 9:55am #394570

JNixonParticipantThat would make him about 170-175 lbs, he’s still not as strong or physically gifted as Knight
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 9:55am #394593

JNixonParticipantThat would make him about 170-175 lbs, he’s still not as strong or physically gifted as Knight
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 9:59am #394573

RUDEBOY_ParticipantSo your saying Knight will be a better player than Jennings??
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 9:59am #394597

RUDEBOY_ParticipantSo your saying Knight will be a better player than Jennings??
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 10:01am #394576

JNixonParticipantLol, I’m saying Jennings isn’t as strong or as physically gifted as Knight.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 10:01am #394599

JNixonParticipantLol, I’m saying Jennings isn’t as strong or as physically gifted as Knight.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 10:08am #394582
stanford hoopsYea Jennings isn’t as big. But is a better athlete. Knight is a better defender and shooter. There are better comparisons out there. He kinda reminds me of dwill when he was a freshman
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 10:08am #394604
stanford hoopsYea Jennings isn’t as big. But is a better athlete. Knight is a better defender and shooter. There are better comparisons out there. He kinda reminds me of dwill when he was a freshman
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 10:10am #394584

Im Your FatherParticipantYou think Knight is more gifted physically? He’s definitely bigger and stronger, but Jennings is much quicker and has more hops.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 10:10am #394606

Im Your FatherParticipantYou think Knight is more gifted physically? He’s definitely bigger and stronger, but Jennings is much quicker and has more hops.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 10:11am #394586

JNixonParticipant“Jennings is much quicker and has more hops.”
Which would make him more ATHLETICALLY gifted.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 10:11am #394608

JNixonParticipant“Jennings is much quicker and has more hops.”
Which would make him more ATHLETICALLY gifted.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 10:19am #394605
stanford hoopsOh I see what he’s saying. Quickness and hops fall under physically gifted as well iggy and you said knight is more physically gifted. I’m guessing you just ment the size/strenght aspect
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 10:19am #394626
stanford hoopsOh I see what he’s saying. Quickness and hops fall under physically gifted as well iggy and you said knight is more physically gifted. I’m guessing you just ment the size/strenght aspect
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 10:24am #394615

JNixonParticipantPhysically gifted has to do with size. Athletically gifted as to do with athleticism. They are not the same things…
0- Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 11:25am #394688

hiphopismylifeParticipantI’ve always heard physically gifted used to athleticism more than strength because in most cases athleticism is in fact a natral gift whereas strength is moreso the by product of hard work than an actual gift. Id definitely give Jennings the nod in that department because of his athleticism as well as his natural lead guard skills that Knight is still developing. To answer Rudeboy’s questin I would cpare Knight to Chauncey Billups. Big, strong, high character, and a very good work ethic. He might not be the type to make a huge immediate splash as a true pg in the league but down the line his work ethic will make him a very solid pro. The same way that Chauncey struggled early on.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 11:25am #394706

hiphopismylifeParticipantI’ve always heard physically gifted used to athleticism more than strength because in most cases athleticism is in fact a natral gift whereas strength is moreso the by product of hard work than an actual gift. Id definitely give Jennings the nod in that department because of his athleticism as well as his natural lead guard skills that Knight is still developing. To answer Rudeboy’s questin I would cpare Knight to Chauncey Billups. Big, strong, high character, and a very good work ethic. He might not be the type to make a huge immediate splash as a true pg in the league but down the line his work ethic will make him a very solid pro. The same way that Chauncey struggled early on.
0
- Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 10:24am #394636

JNixonParticipantPhysically gifted has to do with size. Athletically gifted as to do with athleticism. They are not the same things…
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 10:30am #394621

IndianaBasketballParticipantI’ve always thought being physically and athletically gifted were two different things as well.
You can have a physically gifted player, who isn’t really all that athletic. Or an athletically gifted player who isn’t physically gifted. For example… John Bender when he was a rookie with the Pacers. He could jump out of the gym, but was like 7′ 0″ 200 lbs lol.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 10:30am #394642

IndianaBasketballParticipantI’ve always thought being physically and athletically gifted were two different things as well.
You can have a physically gifted player, who isn’t really all that athletic. Or an athletically gifted player who isn’t physically gifted. For example… John Bender when he was a rookie with the Pacers. He could jump out of the gym, but was like 7′ 0″ 200 lbs lol.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 10:31am #394623
stanford hoopsJumping and quickness falls under physical ability as well. Trust me I know this one for a fact because we talk about it constantly in my medical assistant/xray tech classes when I was getting my degree
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 10:31am #394643
stanford hoopsJumping and quickness falls under physical ability as well. Trust me I know this one for a fact because we talk about it constantly in my medical assistant/xray tech classes when I was getting my degree
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 10:32am #394625
stanford hoopsO used to think it as well untill proven other wise in class
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 10:32am #394645
stanford hoopsO used to think it as well untill proven other wise in class
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 10:34am #394629
stanford hoopsAthletics actually falls under physical. The two catagories is physical and mental if we go specifics
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 10:34am #394649
stanford hoopsAthletics actually falls under physical. The two catagories is physical and mental if we go specifics
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 10:34am #394631

lalailaParticipantwho knows Knight’s last update on size..he really looks like 6’4 200+ now.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 10:34am #394651

lalailaParticipantwho knows Knight’s last update on size..he really looks like 6’4 200+ now.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 10:36am #394635
stanford hoopsHe prob is bigger. Since my nephew has been at Stanford for training he’s gone from 200-223
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 10:36am #394655
stanford hoopsHe prob is bigger. Since my nephew has been at Stanford for training he’s gone from 200-223
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 10:43am #394639

JNixonParticipantYeah good example Indianabasketball.
Chauncey Billups is another guy. He’s not really very athletic, but he has outstanding physical ability.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 10:43am #394659

JNixonParticipantYeah good example Indianabasketball.
Chauncey Billups is another guy. He’s not really very athletic, but he has outstanding physical ability.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 10:48am #394646
Lotto StudParticipantHow can you even try to compare the 2….Young $ has a lot of flash & flare to his game, Knight just gets the job done.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 10:48am #394665
Lotto StudParticipantHow can you even try to compare the 2….Young $ has a lot of flash & flare to his game, Knight just gets the job done.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 11:02am #394660
stanford hoopsTrust me knight has flash. He may not show it much but he had it on display in Vegas a couple years back
the other topic is like conversate. Alot people thinks that’s right but converse is actually right
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 11:02am #394679
stanford hoopsTrust me knight has flash. He may not show it much but he had it on display in Vegas a couple years back
the other topic is like conversate. Alot people thinks that’s right but converse is actually right
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 1:45pm #394830

NJHooper95ParticipantI agree with anyone who used the Chauncey Billups comparison. Billups struggled early but part of that was Rick Pitino fault. I dnt know if Knight will ever be an elite player in the league, but at worst he should be very solid. Still Brandon Jennings game is a mix between Iverson, Kenny Anderson, and Tiny Archibald. Knight is also imo the least impressive out of Calipari’s one and done guards.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 1:45pm #394849

NJHooper95ParticipantI agree with anyone who used the Chauncey Billups comparison. Billups struggled early but part of that was Rick Pitino fault. I dnt know if Knight will ever be an elite player in the league, but at worst he should be very solid. Still Brandon Jennings game is a mix between Iverson, Kenny Anderson, and Tiny Archibald. Knight is also imo the least impressive out of Calipari’s one and done guards.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 1:58pm #394844
stanford hoopsI tHink knight will be the most impressive because he’s the only one out of the group that has a jumper and a good defender and better basketball IQ
0- Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 5:24pm #395065

gregoden08ParticipantYou’d rather have Knight over Rose? Lol are you kidding me? He’s on his way to being a top-10 player. Evans averaged 20, 5, and 5 for christ sakes and had one of the best rookie years ever (statistically). Wall already showed how dominant he was in college and the upside he possesses. I have a hard time seeing Knight doing in college what Wall did.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 5:24pm #395082

gregoden08ParticipantYou’d rather have Knight over Rose? Lol are you kidding me? He’s on his way to being a top-10 player. Evans averaged 20, 5, and 5 for christ sakes and had one of the best rookie years ever (statistically). Wall already showed how dominant he was in college and the upside he possesses. I have a hard time seeing Knight doing in college what Wall did.
0
- Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 1:58pm #394863
stanford hoopsI tHink knight will be the most impressive because he’s the only one out of the group that has a jumper and a good defender and better basketball IQ
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 5:35pm #395079
stanford hoopsThat makes no sense why would I
pick him over Evans and rose now when both have proven there games in the NBA? What reason can’t knight be a better freshman then those two? He’s fast smarter then both as hs sr better shooter then both as hs sr. Better defender. So what reason is there to not assume he could have a better Freeman year. Doesn’t mean he will be a better NBA player just means he can be a better freshman0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 5:35pm #395096
stanford hoopsThat makes no sense why would I
pick him over Evans and rose now when both have proven there games in the NBA? What reason can’t knight be a better freshman then those two? He’s fast smarter then both as hs sr better shooter then both as hs sr. Better defender. So what reason is there to not assume he could have a better Freeman year. Doesn’t mean he will be a better NBA player just means he can be a better freshman0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 5:45pm #395095

gregoden08ParticipantMy bad. Yes, I can see him having similar success in college. I thought you meant you’d rather pick him over the other 3 in terms of being an NBA player.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 5:45pm #395112

gregoden08ParticipantMy bad. Yes, I can see him having similar success in college. I thought you meant you’d rather pick him over the other 3 in terms of being an NBA player.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 7:00pm #395150
stanford hoopsI’d have to see him
play college ball first. Just like barely anyone would pick rose over cp3 before roses first college game. Or even think about trading kmart to get Evans before evens stepped on the court for Memphis0 - Posted on: Sun, 09/05/2010 - 7:00pm #395165
stanford hoopsI’d have to see him
play college ball first. Just like barely anyone would pick rose over cp3 before roses first college game. Or even think about trading kmart to get Evans before evens stepped on the court for Memphis0 - Posted on: Mon, 09/06/2010 - 7:38am #395310

WrecklessParticipantI’d acually pick him him over Evans, Rose , and Wall.
Ive been watching him for a while now and he is dfferent. He wont wow you with athleticsism even though he is athletic if you dont think he is. His vision is on the same levels as Rose’s if not better, and he has a better jumpshot than they did at the same stage. His rebounding ablity is great for a guard also. You guys will all be on his bandwagon soon. Just wait for it.You dont see him doing as good as Wall?
Imnpretty sure his pts, and shooting percentages will be higher.0 - Posted on: Mon, 09/06/2010 - 7:38am #395330

WrecklessParticipantI’d acually pick him him over Evans, Rose , and Wall.
Ive been watching him for a while now and he is dfferent. He wont wow you with athleticsism even though he is athletic if you dont think he is. His vision is on the same levels as Rose’s if not better, and he has a better jumpshot than they did at the same stage. His rebounding ablity is great for a guard also. You guys will all be on his bandwagon soon. Just wait for it.You dont see him doing as good as Wall?
Imnpretty sure his pts, and shooting percentages will be higher.0 - Posted on: Mon, 09/06/2010 - 10:14am #395383

LeroyJenkinsParticipantYou are so dumb wreckless
0 - Posted on: Mon, 09/06/2010 - 10:14am #395404

LeroyJenkinsParticipantYou are so dumb wreckless
0 - Posted on: Mon, 09/06/2010 - 10:41am #395399
stanford hoopsSo he’s dumb because he thinks knight will be better then wall in college? It’s not like wall was the best Freeman ever.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 09/06/2010 - 10:41am #395420
stanford hoopsSo he’s dumb because he thinks knight will be better then wall in college? It’s not like wall was the best Freeman ever.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 09/06/2010 - 10:44am #395403

LeroyJenkinsParticipantMy opinion of wreckless has nothing to do with john wall, brandon jennings, or kentucky. I just feel that as a person wreckless is dumb in general, and a jerk
0 - Posted on: Mon, 09/06/2010 - 10:44am #395424

LeroyJenkinsParticipantMy opinion of wreckless has nothing to do with john wall, brandon jennings, or kentucky. I just feel that as a person wreckless is dumb in general, and a jerk
0 - Posted on: Mon, 09/06/2010 - 10:51am #395409
stanford hoopsLol. Ok
0 - Posted on: Mon, 09/06/2010 - 10:51am #395430
stanford hoopsLol. Ok
0 - Posted on: Mon, 09/06/2010 - 11:19am #395435

hiphopismylifeParticipantHaha thats personal
0 - Posted on: Mon, 09/06/2010 - 11:19am #395456

hiphopismylifeParticipantHaha thats personal
0 - Posted on: Mon, 09/06/2010 - 11:56am #395522

RUDEBOY_ParticipantLeroy Jenkins-vs-Wreckless…
Where’s Don King,Bob Arum or Jerry Springer when you need them?
0 - Posted on: Mon, 09/06/2010 - 11:56am #395504

RUDEBOY_ParticipantLeroy Jenkins-vs-Wreckless…
Where’s Don King,Bob Arum or Jerry Springer when you need them?
0 - Posted on: Wed, 09/08/2010 - 6:59pm #397223

sc0rebuckets11Participanti heard from people who’ve seen knight play in hs, complain about how he takes so many shots, and such. I was expecting him to go playmaker happy in the mcdonalds/jordan brand games, but he didn’t.
that’s the difference. @ oak hill, jennings scored 30+ a game, but he was trying to break the assists records at these all-american games.
he handed out 23assists in the elite24 game, as a rising sr.
i just don’t see this natural, willing, playmaking ability in knight.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 09/08/2010 - 6:59pm #397238

sc0rebuckets11Participanti heard from people who’ve seen knight play in hs, complain about how he takes so many shots, and such. I was expecting him to go playmaker happy in the mcdonalds/jordan brand games, but he didn’t.
that’s the difference. @ oak hill, jennings scored 30+ a game, but he was trying to break the assists records at these all-american games.
he handed out 23assists in the elite24 game, as a rising sr.
i just don’t see this natural, willing, playmaking ability in knight.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 09/08/2010 - 7:15pm #397231

midwestbbscoutParticipantBrandon Knight could’ve put up 30 a game for Oak Hill…..his HS team was not very good….put him on the floor with Austin Rivers in AAU and they were Jordan and Pippen…..
but besides that point…..Knight could easily be better than anyone Calipari ever coached….especially because he has the winning attitude…..remember the one thing he DID do in the all-star games was drill the game winner at McDonalds…..its gonna be hard to win big without Kanter though….
0- Posted on: Thu, 09/09/2010 - 5:41am #397403

hiphopismylifeParticipantWhoa midwest you are really going out on a limb there. Easily better than three guys that could all be all stars? I do like Knight’s winning pedigree. He reminds me of OJ Mayo in the way that highlight reels don’s do him justice. He’s just a very good player. Not to mention the fact that he has been a top five player in the class since he was a freshman meang he developed well ahead of his classmates (like OJ) and after four years people are almost looking for negatives. I think how good a pro he will be will come down to howhigh his draft stock is and what kind of oppurtunity a team gives him, because given the minutes there is no doubt he can be productive in the NBA. No way he becaomes a total bust. That being said though, I don’t see any way he ends up being better than Rose, Reke, or Wall because they are simply much more dynamic. They are all a notch above him physically when it comes to Wall and Rose’s atheticism and Tyreke’s size and length. I think if Kentucky has a great year(which is in doubt atm) he will be in the top 10 and could fall somewhere between OJ Mayo and Chauncey Billups as an NBA player depending on what position he plays full time. I like him better as a 2 guard, but either way he is just a rock solid prospect and a good guy to have on your team.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/09/2010 - 5:41am #397414

hiphopismylifeParticipantWhoa midwest you are really going out on a limb there. Easily better than three guys that could all be all stars? I do like Knight’s winning pedigree. He reminds me of OJ Mayo in the way that highlight reels don’s do him justice. He’s just a very good player. Not to mention the fact that he has been a top five player in the class since he was a freshman meang he developed well ahead of his classmates (like OJ) and after four years people are almost looking for negatives. I think how good a pro he will be will come down to howhigh his draft stock is and what kind of oppurtunity a team gives him, because given the minutes there is no doubt he can be productive in the NBA. No way he becaomes a total bust. That being said though, I don’t see any way he ends up being better than Rose, Reke, or Wall because they are simply much more dynamic. They are all a notch above him physically when it comes to Wall and Rose’s atheticism and Tyreke’s size and length. I think if Kentucky has a great year(which is in doubt atm) he will be in the top 10 and could fall somewhere between OJ Mayo and Chauncey Billups as an NBA player depending on what position he plays full time. I like him better as a 2 guard, but either way he is just a rock solid prospect and a good guy to have on your team.
0
- Posted on: Wed, 09/08/2010 - 7:15pm #397247

midwestbbscoutParticipantBrandon Knight could’ve put up 30 a game for Oak Hill…..his HS team was not very good….put him on the floor with Austin Rivers in AAU and they were Jordan and Pippen…..
but besides that point…..Knight could easily be better than anyone Calipari ever coached….especially because he has the winning attitude…..remember the one thing he DID do in the all-star games was drill the game winner at McDonalds…..its gonna be hard to win big without Kanter though….
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/09/2010 - 5:42am #397407

hiphopismylifeParticipantDamn im tripping I didnt realize how long that was lol
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/09/2010 - 5:42am #397418

hiphopismylifeParticipantDamn im tripping I didnt realize how long that was lol
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/09/2010 - 7:53am #397519

midwestbbscoutParticipantI didn’t say he easily would be, I said he easily could be…..I am higher on Knight than I was any of those three except Rose coming out of HS…..and I admit I was even somewhat biased on Rose coming out of HS b/c he is from Chicago….Knight is the real fargin deal…..
0- Posted on: Thu, 09/09/2010 - 8:47am #397572

hiphopismylifeParticipantDont worry I got what you said I just worded it wrong. I like his game too but I expect the other 3 guys to be franchise talents for years to come and I just dont see that NBA star in Knight’s game. I dont see any one thing he does that alot of other point guards cant do better. And I say hes best at the 2spot. Idc how bad a team hes on an elite playmaker wouldn’t average under 4 assists per game
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/09/2010 - 8:47am #397581

hiphopismylifeParticipantDont worry I got what you said I just worded it wrong. I like his game too but I expect the other 3 guys to be franchise talents for years to come and I just dont see that NBA star in Knight’s game. I dont see any one thing he does that alot of other point guards cant do better. And I say hes best at the 2spot. Idc how bad a team hes on an elite playmaker wouldn’t average under 4 assists per game
0
- Posted on: Thu, 09/09/2010 - 7:53am #397530

midwestbbscoutParticipantI didn’t say he easily would be, I said he easily could be…..I am higher on Knight than I was any of those three except Rose coming out of HS…..and I admit I was even somewhat biased on Rose coming out of HS b/c he is from Chicago….Knight is the real fargin deal…..
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/09/2010 - 9:59am #397638
stanford hoopsIt’s kinda hard to say he will be better then those guys because we have already seen what they can do in the NBA and college. Other then wall in the NBA. So we are all kinda biased towards thr other guys. But he does have the talent to put up better numbers then the other guys
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/09/2010 - 9:59am #397648
stanford hoopsIt’s kinda hard to say he will be better then those guys because we have already seen what they can do in the NBA and college. Other then wall in the NBA. So we are all kinda biased towards thr other guys. But he does have the talent to put up better numbers then the other guys
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/09/2010 - 11:52am #397742

TooNice4TVParticipantI think that knight will be a better traditional PG in the NBA game than Jennings.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/09/2010 - 11:52am #397751

TooNice4TVParticipantI think that knight will be a better traditional PG in the NBA game than Jennings.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/09/2010 - 12:02pm #397766

Im Your FatherParticipantI think Jennings is much more of a pure point guard. Jennings has fantastic court vision.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/09/2010 - 12:02pm #397775

Im Your FatherParticipantI think Jennings is much more of a pure point guard. Jennings has fantastic court vision.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/09/2010 - 12:12pm #397778
stanford hoopsYea I agree Jennings is more of a pure pg. Knight can pass but he doesn’t have Jennings vision
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/09/2010 - 12:12pm #397787
stanford hoopsYea I agree Jennings is more of a pure pg. Knight can pass but he doesn’t have Jennings vision
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/09/2010 - 1:17pm #397888

hiphopismylifeParticipantI dont see Knight as a traditional pg. I think hes just a really skilled all around ballplayer who can pull it off right now. But his strength is his scoring ability
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/09/2010 - 1:17pm #397897

hiphopismylifeParticipantI dont see Knight as a traditional pg. I think hes just a really skilled all around ballplayer who can pull it off right now. But his strength is his scoring ability
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/09/2010 - 1:19pm #397892

hiphopismylifeParticipantThe beauty of this is we are only a year or so away from finding out
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/09/2010 - 1:19pm #397901

hiphopismylifeParticipantThe beauty of this is we are only a year or so away from finding out
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/09/2010 - 1:30pm #397900
stanford hoopsYea. As far as strength being scoring that’s how alot of pg start out. Billups Gary Payton Kenny Anderson etc
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/09/2010 - 1:30pm #397908
stanford hoopsYea. As far as strength being scoring that’s how alot of pg start out. Billups Gary Payton Kenny Anderson etc
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/09/2010 - 2:37pm #398006

WrecklessParticipantAlright leroy.
What are you mad at me for? Please tell me. Because you keep fucking with me and Im not even saying shit to your little ass. Go to bed because im pretty sure its your bedtime right about now.0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/09/2010 - 2:37pm #398016

WrecklessParticipantAlright leroy.
What are you mad at me for? Please tell me. Because you keep fucking with me and Im not even saying shit to your little ass. Go to bed because im pretty sure its your bedtime right about now.0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/09/2010 - 4:17pm #398095

hiphopismylifeParticipantGary Payton was actually the opposite. He became more of a scorer as he progressed. And i’ve compared Knight to Chauncey, but it took him 6-7 years to really excel in the league. He didn’t enjoy the immediate success that Rose, Evans, and Jennings have and Wall likely will. Btw I’m responding more to the whole idea of him being Cal’s best pg, not the Jennings comparison.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 09/09/2010 - 4:17pm #398106

hiphopismylifeParticipantGary Payton was actually the opposite. He became more of a scorer as he progressed. And i’ve compared Knight to Chauncey, but it took him 6-7 years to really excel in the league. He didn’t enjoy the immediate success that Rose, Evans, and Jennings have and Wall likely will. Btw I’m responding more to the whole idea of him being Cal’s best pg, not the Jennings comparison.
0 - AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |