This topic contains 32 replies, has 12 voices, and was last updated by The Scare Crow Returns 15 years, 8 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 9:45am #23048

llperezJordan Hill was their 8th overall pick in the 2009 draft. They traded him to houston before the season was over along with a draft pick and jared jeffries for tmac since they wanted tmac’s expiring deal. I have seen a number of people call him a bust on here. Obviously the knicks had better options at the number 8 pick where there were a bunch of pg’s like jennings, collison, holiday and lawson available. But since they did go with hill, maybe they should have stuck with him a little longer.
As soon as he arrived in houston last year he showed some solid defense even blocking 5 shots in one game. Now this year in season number 2, he has surpassed brad miller, chuck hayes and pattrick paterson for minutes as the first big man off the bench behind yao and scola.
In the last 3 games he has averaged 26 minutes with 8.3ppg…6.3rpg…2.3blocks and shooting solid numbers from both the field and ft line.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 9:51am #431959

JoeWolf1I think they did for sure, he’s a guy I’ve kinda followed since he came in the league and he’s shown some solid improvement even at the end of last season and he is a guy who as he gets older and bulks up a bit will be able to give his team minutes at power forward and center. I really think by year 3 or 4 he will be a just short of an all-star caliber player ( you know the 15 ppg 8 or 9 2 block type power forwards )
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 9:51am #431973

JoeWolf1I think they did for sure, he’s a guy I’ve kinda followed since he came in the league and he’s shown some solid improvement even at the end of last season and he is a guy who as he gets older and bulks up a bit will be able to give his team minutes at power forward and center. I really think by year 3 or 4 he will be a just short of an all-star caliber player ( you know the 15 ppg 8 or 9 2 block type power forwards )
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 9:52am #431966
td8118ParticipantThat was a bad, bad move by Walsh…Not only giving up on 8th overall pick, but giving up that 1st round pick which probably would have gotten them Melo already
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 9:52am #431979
td8118ParticipantThat was a bad, bad move by Walsh…Not only giving up on 8th overall pick, but giving up that 1st round pick which probably would have gotten them Melo already
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 9:54am #431968

llperezYeah, d’antoni didnt give him enough of a chance. I remember right after the trade someone asked d’antoni if he had a problem playing rookies in refernece to hill and he said he had no problem playing rookies if they were any good. That was a cheap shot on hs part.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 9:54am #431981

llperezYeah, d’antoni didnt give him enough of a chance. I remember right after the trade someone asked d’antoni if he had a problem playing rookies in refernece to hill and he said he had no problem playing rookies if they were any good. That was a cheap shot on hs part.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 9:54am #431970

HitsterParticipantHill has proved to be a useful asset for Houston, the Knicks took a gamble on T-Mac, my hunch has always been they hoped he could get back to his old form and they could then look for two top FA’s and would hence have 3 big names on the roster.
Coach D’Antoni was quoted as saying "I only play rookies when they are ready" which with Fields and to a lesser extent the older Mosgov does tend to be true. The Knicks needed height in 2009 and with Duhon in situ at PG then taking Hill as best available big was a fair call, no-one knew that Jennings would turn out to be so good so soon although DeRozan in a D’Antoni smallball 8 second offence team would have been a natural fit.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 9:54am #431983

HitsterParticipantHill has proved to be a useful asset for Houston, the Knicks took a gamble on T-Mac, my hunch has always been they hoped he could get back to his old form and they could then look for two top FA’s and would hence have 3 big names on the roster.
Coach D’Antoni was quoted as saying "I only play rookies when they are ready" which with Fields and to a lesser extent the older Mosgov does tend to be true. The Knicks needed height in 2009 and with Duhon in situ at PG then taking Hill as best available big was a fair call, no-one knew that Jennings would turn out to be so good so soon although DeRozan in a D’Antoni smallball 8 second offence team would have been a natural fit.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 9:55am #431976

kanyedabestParticipantfor some reason it feels like he has been in the league like 4 years….maybe its cuz of all the criticism or cuz he got traded in his rookie yr, but wen i seen hes a 2nd yr guy i said no way, then realized ya he is…huh
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 9:55am #431989

kanyedabestParticipantfor some reason it feels like he has been in the league like 4 years….maybe its cuz of all the criticism or cuz he got traded in his rookie yr, but wen i seen hes a 2nd yr guy i said no way, then realized ya he is…huh
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 10:35am #432006
fastdanParticipantI think the issue with Hill in NY was the lack of playing time for many reasons. He was stuck behind Lee and Harrington, naturally, but also Jeffries. Not to knock Jeffries, but Hill should have been seeing minutes over him, but the fact was they needed to show that Jeffries was a good rotation player in order to be able move his contract for the summer of 2010. I also believe Hill was drafted because he wasn`t as high of a risk as someone like Derozan or Jennings, since he had three years at Arizona, compared to shakey years at USC and Europe for Derozan and Jennings, respectively. They took what was considered the best player available in order for teams to be more interested. I think the second he was drafted the Knicks knew he was going to be packaged with a bad contract to free up cap space. With that in mind, there was no reason for the Knicks to develop him or give him steady play time. It`s a shame though, I hate seeing young guys like that being put in situations where they will never be able to show their worth.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 10:35am #432019
fastdanParticipantI think the issue with Hill in NY was the lack of playing time for many reasons. He was stuck behind Lee and Harrington, naturally, but also Jeffries. Not to knock Jeffries, but Hill should have been seeing minutes over him, but the fact was they needed to show that Jeffries was a good rotation player in order to be able move his contract for the summer of 2010. I also believe Hill was drafted because he wasn`t as high of a risk as someone like Derozan or Jennings, since he had three years at Arizona, compared to shakey years at USC and Europe for Derozan and Jennings, respectively. They took what was considered the best player available in order for teams to be more interested. I think the second he was drafted the Knicks knew he was going to be packaged with a bad contract to free up cap space. With that in mind, there was no reason for the Knicks to develop him or give him steady play time. It`s a shame though, I hate seeing young guys like that being put in situations where they will never be able to show their worth.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 10:38am #432010

JoeWolf1^
Funny how things work out, Hill is currently playing above Jefferies
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 10:38am #432022

JoeWolf1^
Funny how things work out, Hill is currently playing above Jefferies
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 10:44am #432016

apb540Participant@ The Knicks
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 10:44am #432028

apb540Participant@ The Knicks
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 12:33pm #432113

sheltwon3ParticipantThere are tons of power forwards in the league that are just as good as hill or better. I would take Favors over him right now and Favors is the rookie while Hill the 2nd year player. That trade had issues for other reasons but losing Hill was not that big of a deal. I think Randolph is better than Hill but maybe I am wrong.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 12:33pm #432124

sheltwon3ParticipantThere are tons of power forwards in the league that are just as good as hill or better. I would take Favors over him right now and Favors is the rookie while Hill the 2nd year player. That trade had issues for other reasons but losing Hill was not that big of a deal. I think Randolph is better than Hill but maybe I am wrong.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 12:43pm #432132
stanford hoopsyeah they could use hill wayy more then the russian rookie and turiuf who is just a hype/energy guy that isnt very skilled
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 12:43pm #432121
stanford hoopsyeah they could use hill wayy more then the russian rookie and turiuf who is just a hype/energy guy that isnt very skilled
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 1:27pm #432160
inukawaii8ParticipantAlthough the knicks did give up Hill a little bit too fast, I don think Hill would’ve fit into Mike D’Antoni’s system that well?
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 1:27pm #432169
inukawaii8ParticipantAlthough the knicks did give up Hill a little bit too fast, I don think Hill would’ve fit into Mike D’Antoni’s system that well?
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 6:09pm #432386
NYK2010ParticipantWell they gave up on him becaz they wanted to move Jeffries contract more than anything.
He’s not a stud player but might end up being a nice role player, he’s a good rebounder and shot blocker.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 6:09pm #432376
NYK2010ParticipantWell they gave up on him becaz they wanted to move Jeffries contract more than anything.
He’s not a stud player but might end up being a nice role player, he’s a good rebounder and shot blocker.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 6:32pm #432410

JNixonParticipantThe thing I like most about Hill besides his flashes of explosive finishing ability, is his fearlessness when it comes to seeking out contact. He’s not very strong in his core yet, but he has an impressive frame and he will be a good player when gets stronger. I could see him as a 14 and 8 player down the line.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 6:32pm #432417

JNixonParticipantThe thing I like most about Hill besides his flashes of explosive finishing ability, is his fearlessness when it comes to seeking out contact. He’s not very strong in his core yet, but he has an impressive frame and he will be a good player when gets stronger. I could see him as a 14 and 8 player down the line.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 6:34pm #432418
The Scare Crow ReturnsParticipantAny disagree???
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 6:34pm #432426
The Scare Crow ReturnsParticipantAny disagree???
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 6:36pm #432419

llperezi dont know what the deal was with hill tonight. he came in 6 minutes into the game as the first big off the bench and played the last 6 minutes of the first quarter and first 2 miutes of the second quarter but didnt reenter until the final 30 seconds of the game finishing with just 9 minutes. He looked solid while he was out there.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 6:36pm #432428

llperezi dont know what the deal was with hill tonight. he came in 6 minutes into the game as the first big off the bench and played the last 6 minutes of the first quarter and first 2 miutes of the second quarter but didnt reenter until the final 30 seconds of the game finishing with just 9 minutes. He looked solid while he was out there.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 6:51pm #432427
The Scare Crow ReturnsParticipantIt’s not looking good for the Rockets…
Bad Start, Tough Loses, Yao hobbled and recently injured, Brooks out for 4weeks, Battier aging, Martin looking average, Scola over extending himself early on….It looks like a Top 10 Pick Year for the Rockets who have a lot of questions to answer in the offseason…I the west a start like this is hard to overcome…
0 - Posted on: Wed, 11/10/2010 - 6:51pm #432435
The Scare Crow ReturnsParticipantIt’s not looking good for the Rockets…
Bad Start, Tough Loses, Yao hobbled and recently injured, Brooks out for 4weeks, Battier aging, Martin looking average, Scola over extending himself early on….It looks like a Top 10 Pick Year for the Rockets who have a lot of questions to answer in the offseason…I the west a start like this is hard to overcome…
0 - AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |