[valentine]

I know the usual egomaniacs will give me negatives, but tell me why the hell not.

Knight is not well suited to run the point anyway, and is a good shooter, defender, and strong enough to guard the SG.Plus he will be the best available player anyway.That will be a great dribble drive backcourt, and Jamison,Hickson. and Varejao are great finishers.

PG: Kyrie

SG: B.Knight

SF:Jamison

PF:Hickson

C:Varejao

 

I think that is good enough for 8th seed in the East next year

[Tobe BryantParticipant]

Why create one of the smallest backcourts in the league? But it may work since they are in the East. Just get Knight use to being manhandled by the Kobes, Joe Johnsons, and other big guards every now and then.

[Tobe BryantParticipant]

Why create one of the smallest backcourts in the league? But it may work since they are in the East. Just get Knight use to being manhandled by the Kobes, Joe Johnsons, and other big guards every now and then.

[SwatLakeCityParticipant]

Yeah, that makes alot of sense….if your David Kahn.

[SwatLakeCityParticipant]

Yeah, that makes alot of sense….if your David Kahn.

[apb540Participant]

You beat me to it WardB12.  Also, why do you say Knight isn’t a PG radartrade?  What kind of evidence do you have to support that argument? 

[apb540Participant]

You beat me to it WardB12.  Also, why do you say Knight isn’t a PG radartrade?  What kind of evidence do you have to support that argument? 

[surveParticipant]

I know you and I both are going to get some negatives for this, but thats not as bad an idea as people think.  They wont win many games by picking and playing both of those guys, but in a couple of years one of them will be real attractive trade bait and the other they can keep to be their lead guard.  Its just a matter of picking 2 great potential PGs and seeing which one develops quicker or fits the system better.  I do have to add that I would not start them both.

[surveParticipant]

I know you and I both are going to get some negatives for this, but thats not as bad an idea as people think.  They wont win many games by picking and playing both of those guys, but in a couple of years one of them will be real attractive trade bait and the other they can keep to be their lead guard.  Its just a matter of picking 2 great potential PGs and seeing which one develops quicker or fits the system better.  I do have to add that I would not start them both.

[kslack24Participant]

Cavs take Derrick Williams #1 and trade #4 to San Antonio in a parker deal.  Maybe something along the lines of #4 and Hickson, for Parker, Blair, Splitter and #29?

[kslack24Participant]

Cavs take Derrick Williams #1 and trade #4 to San Antonio in a parker deal.  Maybe something along the lines of #4 and Hickson, for Parker, Blair, Splitter and #29?

[TRC1991Participant]

They’ll end up going with a combo of Irving and Valanciunas/Thompson but in reality, a better combination would be to go with Williams #1 and Knight #4

[TRC1991Participant]

They’ll end up going with a combo of Irving and Valanciunas/Thompson but in reality, a better combination would be to go with Williams #1 and Knight #4

[kslack24Participant]

If they take Valanciunas I will no longer be a cavs fan.  He doesn’t help a team like Cleveland one bit, cus he won’t be over for probably 2 years. 

[kslack24Participant]

If they take Valanciunas I will no longer be a cavs fan.  He doesn’t help a team like Cleveland one bit, cus he won’t be over for probably 2 years. 

[LeroyJenkinsParticipant]

ಠ_ಠ

GTFO

NOW!

[LeroyJenkinsParticipant]

ಠ_ಠ

GTFO

NOW!

[Author]

Posts