This topic contains 19 replies, has 15 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar azerton 5 years, 3 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #69683
    AvatarAvatar
    SeattleSuperChronics
    Participant

     Who would you take if you had your pick between; Andrew Wiggins, Josh Jackson or Brandan Ingram?

    0
  • #1129610
    AvatarAvatar
    JordanC20
    Participant

     Wiggins > Ingram > Jackson

    0
  • #1129611
    AvatarAvatar
    OhCanada-
    Participant

     Easily Ingram. The other two players havent improved one bit since entering the league. they havent even improved their bodies physically.

    0
    • #1129614
      AvatarAvatar
      juves4783
      Participant

      i agree.  ingram is more versatile and i think was going to make another leap if lebron wasn’t brought on.  struggling from deep but still shooting a nice percentage overall.  he has potential to be a real defensive stopper due to reach. 

      0
    • #1129636
      AvatarAvatar
      celtics1982
      Participant

       Your picking Ingram because Wiggins and Jackson haven’t improved their bodies? Is that a joke? Ingram has the worst body of all three. Ingram is the only one that needs to improve his body. There is nothing wrong with Wiggins or Jacksons bodies. They have issues, but it isn’t that.

      0
  • #1129612
    AvatarAvatar
    Blackhole1374
    Participant

     ingram>wiggins>jackson

    0
  • #1129618
    AvatarAvatar
    Memphis Madness
    Participant

     Ok, what about Ingram vs. TATUM for all you Kool-Aid drinking Celtics fans?

    0
    • #1129622
      AvatarAvatar
      OhCanada-
      Participant

       Im gonna make another thread for this I’ve been wondering something else for a while.

      0
    • #1129637
      AvatarAvatar
      celtics1982
      Participant

       The whole world besides Lakers fan take Tatum. There’s like 30 articles on the Davis trade and everyone says the same thing. It’s not close, nor is it even a debate.

      0
  • #1129619
    AvatarAvatar
    BlueRivers25
    Participant

     Ingram.. .He has the best trade value compared to Jackson and Wiggins. 

    0
  • #1129621
    AvatarAvatar
    Scrooge McDuck
    Participant

    Jackson>Wiggins>Ingram. If I were a gm I would avoid all 3 players. Ingram most strongly, he’s just doesn’t compete. Jackson is a doofus as well but at least he gives effort 

    0
    • #1129634
      AvatarAvatar
      The Goat
      Participant

       Agree. You can’t teach guys to put the effort in and Jackson has the most heart. Wiggins has the most natural ability so that makes Ingram the bottom of this list for mine. 

      0
  • #1129625
    AvatarAvatar
    90sNYK
    Participant

    I take Jackson just due to the fact that hes been the most assertive. If he could become more efficient with his possessions he would become an elite wing. 

    0
  • #1129640
    r377r377
    r377
    Participant

     I take Josh Jackson.  I would of taken him number 1 over Fultz.

    He may never be a number 1 alpha dog as far as scoring goes, but he does alot other things compared to the other two

     

    0
  • #1129641
    AvatarAvatar
    Chammes
    Participant

    Ingram, Wiggins, Jackson 

    0
  • #1129670
    AvatarAvatar
    joe2324
    Participant

    I’m going with Ingram. He shows more upside and more desire to improve. Both Wiggins and Josh Jackson are disappointments.  

    0
  • #1129739
    AvatarAvatar
    azerton
    Participant
  • #1129741
    AvatarAvatar
    azerton
    Participant
  • #1129742
    AvatarAvatar
    azerton
    Participant
  • #1129743
    AvatarAvatar
    azerton
    Participant

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login