This topic contains 19 replies, has 15 voices, and was last updated by azerton 5 years, 3 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Fri, 02/08/2019 - 7:23am #69683
SeattleSuperChronicsParticipantWho would you take if you had your pick between; Andrew Wiggins, Josh Jackson or Brandan Ingram?
0 - Posted on: Fri, 02/08/2019 - 7:42am #1129610
JordanC20ParticipantWiggins > Ingram > Jackson
0 - Posted on: Fri, 02/08/2019 - 7:46am #1129611
OhCanada-ParticipantEasily Ingram. The other two players havent improved one bit since entering the league. they havent even improved their bodies physically.
0- Posted on: Fri, 02/08/2019 - 7:57am #1129614
juves4783Participanti agree. ingram is more versatile and i think was going to make another leap if lebron wasn’t brought on. struggling from deep but still shooting a nice percentage overall. he has potential to be a real defensive stopper due to reach.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 02/08/2019 - 2:25pm #1129636
celtics1982ParticipantYour picking Ingram because Wiggins and Jackson haven’t improved their bodies? Is that a joke? Ingram has the worst body of all three. Ingram is the only one that needs to improve his body. There is nothing wrong with Wiggins or Jacksons bodies. They have issues, but it isn’t that.
0
- Posted on: Fri, 02/08/2019 - 7:48am #1129612
Blackhole1374Participantingram>wiggins>jackson
0 - Posted on: Fri, 02/08/2019 - 8:33am #1129618
Memphis MadnessParticipantOk, what about Ingram vs. TATUM for all you Kool-Aid drinking Celtics fans?
0- Posted on: Fri, 02/08/2019 - 9:21am #1129622
OhCanada-ParticipantIm gonna make another thread for this I’ve been wondering something else for a while.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 02/08/2019 - 2:29pm #1129637
celtics1982ParticipantThe whole world besides Lakers fan take Tatum. There’s like 30 articles on the Davis trade and everyone says the same thing. It’s not close, nor is it even a debate.
0
- Posted on: Fri, 02/08/2019 - 8:44am #1129619
BlueRivers25ParticipantIngram.. .He has the best trade value compared to Jackson and Wiggins.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 02/08/2019 - 8:57am #1129621
Scrooge McDuckParticipantJackson>Wiggins>Ingram. If I were a gm I would avoid all 3 players. Ingram most strongly, he’s just doesn’t compete. Jackson is a doofus as well but at least he gives effort
0- Posted on: Fri, 02/08/2019 - 1:20pm #1129634
The GoatParticipantAgree. You can’t teach guys to put the effort in and Jackson has the most heart. Wiggins has the most natural ability so that makes Ingram the bottom of this list for mine.
0
- Posted on: Fri, 02/08/2019 - 9:51am #1129625
90sNYKParticipantI take Jackson just due to the fact that hes been the most assertive. If he could become more efficient with his possessions he would become an elite wing.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 02/08/2019 - 3:07pm #1129640
r377ParticipantI take Josh Jackson. I would of taken him number 1 over Fultz.
He may never be a number 1 alpha dog as far as scoring goes, but he does alot other things compared to the other two
0 - Posted on: Fri, 02/08/2019 - 3:08pm #1129641
ChammesParticipantIngram, Wiggins, Jackson
0 - Posted on: Sat, 02/09/2019 - 11:31am #1129670
joe2324ParticipantI’m going with Ingram. He shows more upside and more desire to improve. Both Wiggins and Josh Jackson are disappointments.
0 - Posted on: Mon, 02/11/2019 - 6:51am #1129739
azertonParticipant - Posted on: Mon, 02/11/2019 - 7:02am #1129741
azertonParticipant - Posted on: Mon, 02/11/2019 - 7:03am #1129742
azertonParticipant - Posted on: Mon, 02/11/2019 - 7:04am #1129743
azertonParticipant - AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |