This topic contains 16 replies, has 12 voices, and was last updated by UNCbasketballbum 11 years, 10 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Sat, 06/09/2012 - 1:22pm #39984
del90ParticipantBulls Get: Tyreke Evans, Kurt Thomas, Nolan Smith
Bulls Out: Joakim Noah
Guessing: PG-Rose/Smith
SG-Evans/Brewer/Hamilton
SF-Deng/Korver
PF-Boozer/Gibson
C-Asik/Thomas
—————–
Trailblazers Get: Joakim Noah
Trailblazers Out: Wesley Matthews, Luke Babbitt, Kurt Thomas, Nolan Smith
Guessing: PG-Felton/?
SG-Crawford/?
SF-Batum/?
PF-Aldridge/Hickson
C-Noah/Przybilla
—————–
Kings Get: Wesley Matthews, Luke Babbitt, Trailblazers’ 11th pick
Kings Out: Tyreke Evans
Guessing: PG-Marshall/Fredette/Thomas
SG-Matthews/Thornton
SF-Barnes/Salmons
PF-Thompson/Greene
C-Cousins/Hayes
————————————————————————————————
Bulls gets better defensively. Finds someone in Evans who can play lead-guard while Rose is out. Evans can effectively guard an aging Dwyane Wade in the playoffs. Bulls now has the upside to be the best defensive team in the league for years to come. Bulls resign Asik. Bulls get deeper and more versatile. Bulls address SG position longterm.
Trailblazers solidify front-court with Aldridge and Noah. Finds themselves off the radar for inquiring about prospects at Center. They still keep the sixth pick.
Kings can start to change the nucleus of the team. Find parts that can potentially match one another in terms of chemistry. Matthews, Barnes, and Marshall are all consistent in their behaviors on and off the court.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/09/2012 - 1:31pm #679154
MKG_AllDayParticipantthey would rather trade Boozer
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/09/2012 - 1:34pm #679150
joshinator1ParticipantBy pending do you mean this is going to happen or is this your idea?
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/09/2012 - 1:34pm #679151
NihochuParticipantNo way they would want to get rid of Joakim Noah
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/09/2012 - 1:38pm #679153
kobyzParticipantstop with the separation the Bulls trade ideas, their main core doesn’t go anywhere
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/09/2012 - 2:01pm #679168
CodySLCParticipantWait what? I’m confused? I wish when people wanted to make rediculous trades they would pop in NBA 2K.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/09/2012 - 2:11pm #679169
NihochuParticipantdo you know that the saleries actually have to match ?
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/09/2012 - 2:54pm #679196
LazarusMunozParticipantPeople who are negative in points shouldn’t be allowed to create threads!!!
I HATE your guts DEL90
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/09/2012 - 3:55pm #679234
UNCbasketballbumParticipantyes, I agree. If you are like in the negative 100-200 range, you should not be able to start threads. Respond to some posts to got somewhere near the positive mark so you look like you know what you’re talking about, then you can create threads.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/09/2012 - 4:05pm #679239
kobyzParticipanti don’t know why i always get negative for no reason, like in this case -4 for basically saying what others say, why everybody hate me?!!
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/09/2012 - 4:18pm #679245
Seamo15ParticipantThe -684 points might be a catalyst to the down votes. Being honest, I’d be less likely to up vote some one so far into the negatives , just because the huge negativity level sets me into a position to disregard what has been said by them.
Alternatively , you may have people you’ve annoyed following you and negging your posts.
I might only be new to the site, but my advice is to cross check every post and ask someone with a good opinion about it before you post.
Best of luck in future posts, have a +1 as encouragement for better posting.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/09/2012 - 4:31pm #679251
TomShoeParticipantSo McDunkin could talk about how OKC should trade Durant to the Heat for Udonis Haslem and stil get +20…
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/09/2012 - 4:40pm #679257
Seamo15ParticipantNot at all. There’s a reason why people such as him have high points level and that because their posts are thought out and refrain from outrageous theories such as trading Durant for Haslem. If McDunkin was to suggest that I’d say he would get +20 because based on the quality of his previous posts it would be considered a satirical version of similar ridiculous posts.
Also the same stigma for those with a high point total compared to a low one doesn’t apply as strongly IMO. People are much more drawn to negging a bad post.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/09/2012 - 4:49pm #679258
McDunkinMcDunkin gave everyone a +1 just for mentioning him
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/09/2012 - 5:02pm #679266
UNCbasketballbumParticipantIt’s superstars and veterans getting the calls on here. If you’ve been aound the site for a while and are a respected poster, you can get away with some controversial posts and not get negged like crazy. If you are a rookie poster and you say Austin Rivers will go down as one of the greatest to ever play the game, you most likely will get negged pretty bad.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 06/09/2012 - 6:43pm #679317
GrandmamaParticipantPending three-way???……damn I thought this was about a three-way with Amy Reid, Alexis Texas, and Ashlynn Brooke.
0 - Posted on: Sun, 06/10/2012 - 4:34am #679415
UNCbasketballbumParticipanthahahahahahahahahahaha……
0 - AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |