This topic contains 24 replies, has 11 voices, and was last updated by Malik-Universal 10 years, 6 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Wed, 10/16/2013 - 6:10am #52334
IknoBall12ParticipantI just read the espn basketball rankings and they have Kobe ranked as the #25 Ayer this year. I can’t begin to say how ridiculous this is. I understand his age and injury factor into this but are we really supposed to believe that bean Bryant isn’t going to come Back with a vengeance. He hears all the talk that he can’t come back and he won’t be the same player which may well be true but it’s no way in hell Kobe isn’t top 15.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 10/16/2013 - 6:50am #843839
Taylor Gang MikeParticipantHorrible
0 - Posted on: Wed, 10/16/2013 - 6:50am #843951
Taylor Gang MikeParticipantHorrible
0 - Posted on: Wed, 10/16/2013 - 8:21am #843851
TyroberParticipantIt seems crazy, but it also seems super hard to rate a guy. Nobody has any idea what to expect him from, but I would like to see him closer to #10-15 than #25 as well.
0- Posted on: Wed, 10/16/2013 - 10:16pm #843919
EntropyParticipantYeh i don’t think putting a number is a very good way of doing rankings.
They should compare players and discard the point system that they seem to be using.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 10/16/2013 - 10:16pm #844031
EntropyParticipantYeh i don’t think putting a number is a very good way of doing rankings.
They should compare players and discard the point system that they seem to be using.
0
- Posted on: Wed, 10/16/2013 - 8:21am #843963
TyroberParticipantIt seems crazy, but it also seems super hard to rate a guy. Nobody has any idea what to expect him from, but I would like to see him closer to #10-15 than #25 as well.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 10/16/2013 - 8:35am #843855
Toronto16ParticipantThere is no way that there are 25 players in the NBA I’d take over Kobe, regardless of age.
0- Posted on: Wed, 10/16/2013 - 10:14am #843867
Velvet HoopParticipantI would agree with that assessment if everyone in the league were 35 and also recovering from achilles injury. The age isn’t so much a factor as is the part where he could potentially miss half the season and not knowing at what level he will be able to perform when he is able to return. Too many variables.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 10/16/2013 - 10:14am #843979
Velvet HoopParticipantI would agree with that assessment if everyone in the league were 35 and also recovering from achilles injury. The age isn’t so much a factor as is the part where he could potentially miss half the season and not knowing at what level he will be able to perform when he is able to return. Too many variables.
0
- Posted on: Wed, 10/16/2013 - 8:35am #843967
Toronto16ParticipantThere is no way that there are 25 players in the NBA I’d take over Kobe, regardless of age.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 10/16/2013 - 8:49am #843859
SiggyParticipantThe track record for NBA players coming back from an achilles tear is not good at all. For Kobe, it’s not just the complete achilles tear that he suffered. Its the mileage + the tear.
0- Posted on: Wed, 10/16/2013 - 9:04pm #843913
SiggyParticipanthttp://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/27/us-nba-retire-achilles-tear-idUSBRE95Q0ZC20130627
———————————————
They found that from 1988 to 2011, 18 National Basketball Association (NBA) players suffered a tendon rupture. Of those, seven athletes never returned to play another game.
…
The overall performance of the 11 players who did return to basketball declined after their injury.Cerynik’s group used a metric called the “player efficiency rating,” which takes into account stats such as an athlete’s points, rebounds, assists and free throw attempts per game.
Following the injury, the eight players who returned for at least two seasons had an average efficiency rating of 11.69 – down more than four points from their pre-injury rating of 16.1.
In comparison, similarly rated basketball players of the same age – who did not suffer an Achilles injury – saw their efficiency rating decline by just over one point.
——————————————0 - Posted on: Wed, 10/16/2013 - 9:04pm #844025
SiggyParticipanthttp://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/27/us-nba-retire-achilles-tear-idUSBRE95Q0ZC20130627
———————————————
They found that from 1988 to 2011, 18 National Basketball Association (NBA) players suffered a tendon rupture. Of those, seven athletes never returned to play another game.
…
The overall performance of the 11 players who did return to basketball declined after their injury.Cerynik’s group used a metric called the “player efficiency rating,” which takes into account stats such as an athlete’s points, rebounds, assists and free throw attempts per game.
Following the injury, the eight players who returned for at least two seasons had an average efficiency rating of 11.69 – down more than four points from their pre-injury rating of 16.1.
In comparison, similarly rated basketball players of the same age – who did not suffer an Achilles injury – saw their efficiency rating decline by just over one point.
——————————————0
- Posted on: Wed, 10/16/2013 - 8:49am #843971
SiggyParticipantThe track record for NBA players coming back from an achilles tear is not good at all. For Kobe, it’s not just the complete achilles tear that he suffered. Its the mileage + the tear.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 10/16/2013 - 11:26am #843869
XYRYXParticipantThat’s the reason why I don’t read most of the espn stuff anymore. More and more it seems like all they do is sharing opinions. There is a fine line between journalism and posting opinions and statements. You can back up a lot of what your personal opinion but to tell only the side one side of the truth that’s in your favor is not really serious journalism with substance.
We all know that Kobe needs to have a lot of luck additionally to his work ethic and incredible motor to ever be relevant again but no one really doubts the 2nd. This list doesn’t mean anything and all they want to do is to get attention for this and to start this discussion about this.
If you have to chose between a 35 year old Kobe and a 25 year old Harden for the next few years it’s pretty clear who to choose but this isn’t the question regarding this top whatever list. It’s just an opionion and I really don’t give a damn who is ranked where.
It’s the same with saying Jordan had the ultimate advantage over Bron cause the three point line was shortened for a few years. Of course this was a gift for MJ and he scored the majority of his points from downtown in this time but this still was just the minority of his points. And if you don’t take the handchecking rules and the traveling isolation plays into conversation it’s such a weak statement to this whole topic.
Espn is all about opinions and not about background information or knowledge let alone facts that it’s not worth seeing it as facts.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 10/16/2013 - 11:26am #843981
XYRYXParticipantThat’s the reason why I don’t read most of the espn stuff anymore. More and more it seems like all they do is sharing opinions. There is a fine line between journalism and posting opinions and statements. You can back up a lot of what your personal opinion but to tell only the side one side of the truth that’s in your favor is not really serious journalism with substance.
We all know that Kobe needs to have a lot of luck additionally to his work ethic and incredible motor to ever be relevant again but no one really doubts the 2nd. This list doesn’t mean anything and all they want to do is to get attention for this and to start this discussion about this.
If you have to chose between a 35 year old Kobe and a 25 year old Harden for the next few years it’s pretty clear who to choose but this isn’t the question regarding this top whatever list. It’s just an opionion and I really don’t give a damn who is ranked where.
It’s the same with saying Jordan had the ultimate advantage over Bron cause the three point line was shortened for a few years. Of course this was a gift for MJ and he scored the majority of his points from downtown in this time but this still was just the minority of his points. And if you don’t take the handchecking rules and the traveling isolation plays into conversation it’s such a weak statement to this whole topic.
Espn is all about opinions and not about background information or knowledge let alone facts that it’s not worth seeing it as facts.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 10/16/2013 - 1:31pm #843887
IndianaBasketballParticipantPersonally, I wish they would’ve ranked him outside of the top 50… More fuel to his fire.
I can understand the concerns about Kobe’s age/miles and the nature of this injury, but I think if ANY player deserves the benefit of the doubt when it comes to beating something like this… It’s Kobe. His work ethic, will and mental strength are impeccable.
As long as the Achilles has healed 100% and he’s built up the muscle (in BOTH legs), then the rest is all mental. And if it comes down to being a mental hurdle, I think Kobe will be just fine.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 10/16/2013 - 1:31pm #843999
IndianaBasketballParticipantPersonally, I wish they would’ve ranked him outside of the top 50… More fuel to his fire.
I can understand the concerns about Kobe’s age/miles and the nature of this injury, but I think if ANY player deserves the benefit of the doubt when it comes to beating something like this… It’s Kobe. His work ethic, will and mental strength are impeccable.
As long as the Achilles has healed 100% and he’s built up the muscle (in BOTH legs), then the rest is all mental. And if it comes down to being a mental hurdle, I think Kobe will be just fine.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 10/16/2013 - 2:45pm #843893
BrentSuriaga01ParticipantThat’s why I don’t watch or read anything from ESPN. They are full of crappy journalists who has 0 basketball knowledge. TNT guys (even with Shaq there) has much better basketball knowledge than this punks. Is that right Henry Abbott?
0 - Posted on: Wed, 10/16/2013 - 2:45pm #844005
BrentSuriaga01ParticipantThat’s why I don’t watch or read anything from ESPN. They are full of crappy journalists who has 0 basketball knowledge. TNT guys (even with Shaq there) has much better basketball knowledge than this punks. Is that right Henry Abbott?
0 - Posted on: Wed, 10/16/2013 - 10:11pm #843917
EntropyParticipantIts not wrong to put kobe at #25, im not saying its right either.
Its there opinion on how Kobe will perform in the upcoming season, and espn panel thinks he won’t perform well. This is not an outrageous claim seeing he is getting older, slower, and is coming off of a serious injury. Furthermore his team is weaker overall so defenses will be even more suffocating on Bryant.
0 - Posted on: Wed, 10/16/2013 - 10:11pm #844029
EntropyParticipantIts not wrong to put kobe at #25, im not saying its right either.
Its there opinion on how Kobe will perform in the upcoming season, and espn panel thinks he won’t perform well. This is not an outrageous claim seeing he is getting older, slower, and is coming off of a serious injury. Furthermore his team is weaker overall so defenses will be even more suffocating on Bryant.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 10/17/2013 - 12:57pm #844084
Malik-UniversalParticipantthere number system for it is dumb… they had al horford ranked ahead of wade and deron Williams…
0 - Posted on: Thu, 10/17/2013 - 12:57pm #843972
Malik-UniversalParticipantthere number system for it is dumb… they had al horford ranked ahead of wade and deron Williams…
0 - AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |