This topic contains 14 replies, has 7 voices, and was last updated by King Calucha 10 years, 11 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 5:52am #49346
JmpasqParticipantI saw this on the Knick board thought it was interesting
http://apbr.org/metrics/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=8242&sid=17222ed7d791b18cf83c3bef2a08463aPrevious drafts
0 - Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 5:59am #782922
DipoTimeParticipantI think it’s interesting that Tony Mitchell has a 0% chance of being a star, a 5% chance of being a starter, and the highest percentage of busting at 26%, yet he is still 18th on their board lol
Other than that I can’t argue too much with it and it is a cool way of setting things up
0 - Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 5:59am #782990
DipoTimeParticipantI think it’s interesting that Tony Mitchell has a 0% chance of being a star, a 5% chance of being a starter, and the highest percentage of busting at 26%, yet he is still 18th on their board lol
Other than that I can’t argue too much with it and it is a cool way of setting things up
0 - Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 6:02am #782916
JmpasqParticipantWhats amazing is only 5 players have a better 50% chance of being a starter according to this
Nerlens Noel
Otto Porter
Victor Oladipo
Trey Burke
Kentavious Caldwell Pope
I bet the guys high on Shabazz Muhammad wont like this ranking. 41st overall 0% of being a star
0 - Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 6:02am #782983
JmpasqParticipantWhats amazing is only 5 players have a better 50% chance of being a starter according to this
Nerlens Noel
Otto Porter
Victor Oladipo
Trey Burke
Kentavious Caldwell Pope
I bet the guys high on Shabazz Muhammad wont like this ranking. 41st overall 0% of being a star
0 - Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 6:02am #782918
i’m jus so offendedParticipantNate Wolters huh? Prime example of sabermetrics not telling the whole story…and I like Nate a lot but come on now.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 6:02am #782985
i’m jus so offendedParticipantNate Wolters huh? Prime example of sabermetrics not telling the whole story…and I like Nate a lot but come on now.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 6:04am #782920
BasketBalAllanParticipantThis fits what I said about the Kings targeting the BPA with Porter, Oladipo, or Burke.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 6:04am #782988
BasketBalAllanParticipantThis fits what I said about the Kings targeting the BPA with Porter, Oladipo, or Burke.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 8:43am #782984
treytalkssports.comParticipantI love these kind of number systems in order to rank players, but this one seems weighted a little funny …
Mike Muscala has a better chance at becoming a star than Muhammad, Adams, and Len?
Mike Muscala has the same chance at becoming a star as Bennett?There are others that are more debatable, too.
I like the idea and the rating system. But it seems like the numbers should be tweaked.
I don’t understand what stats he used, either. It looks to me like he only used Rebounding Rate as far as advanced statistics go. It looks like the rest were averages, which would be weighted heavily toward a prospect playing in mid-major conferences.
What about one that compares the averages, advanced stats, team rpi, and athleticism/size?
0 - Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 8:43am #783051
treytalkssports.comParticipantI love these kind of number systems in order to rank players, but this one seems weighted a little funny …
Mike Muscala has a better chance at becoming a star than Muhammad, Adams, and Len?
Mike Muscala has the same chance at becoming a star as Bennett?There are others that are more debatable, too.
I like the idea and the rating system. But it seems like the numbers should be tweaked.
I don’t understand what stats he used, either. It looks to me like he only used Rebounding Rate as far as advanced statistics go. It looks like the rest were averages, which would be weighted heavily toward a prospect playing in mid-major conferences.
What about one that compares the averages, advanced stats, team rpi, and athleticism/size?
0 - Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 12:08pm #783119
machu46ParticipantAccording to this, Mike Bibby was one of the best prospects to ever come out lol
0 - Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 12:08pm #783188
machu46ParticipantAccording to this, Mike Bibby was one of the best prospects to ever come out lol
0 - Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 12:22pm #783128
King CaluchaParticipantWhat I like about this projection is that it’s presented in the form of scenarios. So it’s all a matter of probabilities. Just because Trey Burke has he highest star projection, it doesn’t mean he will be.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 05/25/2013 - 12:22pm #783196
King CaluchaParticipantWhat I like about this projection is that it’s presented in the form of scenarios. So it’s all a matter of probabilities. Just because Trey Burke has he highest star projection, it doesn’t mean he will be.
0 - AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |