4 Team trade Idea - NBADraft.net

This topic contains 28 replies, has 11 voices, and was last updated by TomShoe 10 years, 9 months ago.

Author
Posts
Posted on: Mon, 07/29/2013 - 11:21am #51529

jaycee24
Participant
I typically hate it when guys throw out these rediculous trade ideas…but its the dead stretch of the NBA and I really have a problem with the way the roster is set up for the Pistons right now so I figured I’d do Joe Dumars’ job for him. Here’s to messing around on the NBA trade machine
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=n5lg4md
0
Posted on: Mon, 07/29/2013 - 11:28am #826904

ProudGrandpa
Participant
Well, the Pistons wouldn’t do this. No point in giving up Monroe for another small forward and an aging, less-than-effective center with a not-so-good contract. The Nuggets certianly wouldn’t do this. Barely any return for Gallinari!
0
- Posted on: Mon, 07/29/2013 - 5:31pm #827153
  
  TomShoe
  Participant
  0
- Posted on: Mon, 07/29/2013 - 5:31pm #827050
  
  TomShoe
  Participant
  0
Posted on: Mon, 07/29/2013 - 11:28am #827006

ProudGrandpa
Participant
Well, the Pistons wouldn’t do this. No point in giving up Monroe for another small forward and an aging, less-than-effective center with a not-so-good contract. The Nuggets certianly wouldn’t do this. Barely any return for Gallinari!
0
Posted on: Mon, 07/29/2013 - 11:42am #826908

mike_r232
Participant
Wow! The Suns make out like bandits here! Them and OKC would definitely pull the trigger on this trade, but there is no way the Pistons give up Monroe. He is wayyyy too valuable. If they wouldn’t let him go for Rondo, they certainly won’t be letting him go for Perkins/Gallo. The Nuggets also get back junk for Gallo… he’s too important to their team right now to just straight up salary dump him.
0
Posted on: Mon, 07/29/2013 - 11:42am #827011

mike_r232
Participant
Wow! The Suns make out like bandits here! Them and OKC would definitely pull the trigger on this trade, but there is no way the Pistons give up Monroe. He is wayyyy too valuable. If they wouldn’t let him go for Rondo, they certainly won’t be letting him go for Perkins/Gallo. The Nuggets also get back junk for Gallo… he’s too important to their team right now to just straight up salary dump him.
0
Posted on: Mon, 07/29/2013 - 11:48am #826910

XYRYX
Participant
As a Thundet fan I would do this in a heartbeat but I doubt the Pistons want to flip one of the best skilled young and healthy big man into a player with a torn ACL and and the corpse of Perkins and I see no reason why the Nuggets would trade for Carlie V and Stuckey.
If and that’s a big if the Pistons really want to trade Monroe what I wouldn’t do unless Monroe and Drummond played one season together they should get more for him.
I have to admit that I don’t have a lot of faith in what the Nuggets are doing after all the changes this summer but this would be some kind of panic move which wouldn’t help at all.
The Suns by the way have like a trillion forwards on the roster and unless they ship out Beasley they just don’t have room for Monroe.
0
Posted on: Mon, 07/29/2013 - 11:48am #827013

XYRYX
Participant
As a Thundet fan I would do this in a heartbeat but I doubt the Pistons want to flip one of the best skilled young and healthy big man into a player with a torn ACL and and the corpse of Perkins and I see no reason why the Nuggets would trade for Carlie V and Stuckey.
If and that’s a big if the Pistons really want to trade Monroe what I wouldn’t do unless Monroe and Drummond played one season together they should get more for him.
I have to admit that I don’t have a lot of faith in what the Nuggets are doing after all the changes this summer but this would be some kind of panic move which wouldn’t help at all.
The Suns by the way have like a trillion forwards on the roster and unless they ship out Beasley they just don’t have room for Monroe.
0
Posted on: Mon, 07/29/2013 - 12:14pm #826916

GottaBeTheShoes
Participant
This trade is absolutely horrible for the Nuggets. They’d be absolutely screwing themselves. They already have 3 PG’s in Lawson, Nate, and Miller, and yet you get rid of none of them and add a combo guard that doesn’t solve our problems at the 2 at all.. Not only that but you add to the biggest logjam in the NBA at the Nuggets 4 spot by adding Villanueva. 1 neg is not enough for me to be satisfied with how horrible this post is.
0
- Posted on: Mon, 07/29/2013 - 1:09pm #826934
  
  Sewok15
  Participant
  Exactly the Nugs need perimeter shooting so why on earth would they trade their best shooter for Stuckey and Villanueva on the last year of their deals. Stuckey is a career 29% 3 pt shooter and Villanueva is a guy who was hardly able to get off the bench in Detroit.
  Gallo is 24 years old and coming off the best year of his career which was cut short by injury…why would you just give him away…especially when Denver is still a solid playoff team.
  0
- Posted on: Mon, 07/29/2013 - 1:09pm #827037
  
  Sewok15
  Participant
  Exactly the Nugs need perimeter shooting so why on earth would they trade their best shooter for Stuckey and Villanueva on the last year of their deals. Stuckey is a career 29% 3 pt shooter and Villanueva is a guy who was hardly able to get off the bench in Detroit.
  Gallo is 24 years old and coming off the best year of his career which was cut short by injury…why would you just give him away…especially when Denver is still a solid playoff team.
  0
Posted on: Mon, 07/29/2013 - 12:14pm #827019

GottaBeTheShoes
Participant
This trade is absolutely horrible for the Nuggets. They’d be absolutely screwing themselves. They already have 3 PG’s in Lawson, Nate, and Miller, and yet you get rid of none of them and add a combo guard that doesn’t solve our problems at the 2 at all.. Not only that but you add to the biggest logjam in the NBA at the Nuggets 4 spot by adding Villanueva. 1 neg is not enough for me to be satisfied with how horrible this post is.
0
Posted on: Mon, 07/29/2013 - 12:59pm #826926

SubZero
Participant
Lol Phoenix and OKC get away with murder in this trade. If we could essentially swap Perkins for Gortat and Jerebko, I would be extremely happy with that
0
Posted on: Mon, 07/29/2013 - 12:59pm #827029

SubZero
Participant
Lol Phoenix and OKC get away with murder in this trade. If we could essentially swap Perkins for Gortat and Jerebko, I would be extremely happy with that
0
Posted on: Mon, 07/29/2013 - 1:00pm #826930

frogman
Participant
I find it absurd that you are a Piston fan and throwing this trade around. And if the Suns can get Greg Monroe for Gortat who wants out anyway would be highway robbery.
0
Posted on: Mon, 07/29/2013 - 1:00pm #827033

frogman
Participant
I find it absurd that you are a Piston fan and throwing this trade around. And if the Suns can get Greg Monroe for Gortat who wants out anyway would be highway robbery.
0
Posted on: Mon, 07/29/2013 - 2:10pm #826948

Chilbert arenas
Participant
I don’t understand why the Nuggets would want to give up on Galo for Stucky and Charlie V and it’s Okc and Suns easily win this deal, but +1 for being creative and starting a new thread on this site, these truly are the dog days of summer.
0
Posted on: Mon, 07/29/2013 - 2:10pm #827051

Chilbert arenas
Participant
I don’t understand why the Nuggets would want to give up on Galo for Stucky and Charlie V and it’s Okc and Suns easily win this deal, but +1 for being creative and starting a new thread on this site, these truly are the dog days of summer.
0
Posted on: Mon, 07/29/2013 - 4:04pm #827005

jaycee24
Participant
Maybe I should of added in a Suns 1st rounder to Detroit and a conditional Piston 1st rounder to Denver as well as additional future picks? And why for Denver? Obviously you take off 17 mill off the salary cap next year, lose a (believe it or not) overpaid Galinari and you free up the opportunity to move Chandler to his natural position at the 3 while also freeing up space for Randolph to log some minutes. Didn’t think this was all that farfetched…
0
- Posted on: Mon, 07/29/2013 - 5:04pm #827147
  
  ProudGrandpa
  Participant
  So basically you’re saying that this trade just lets them play Chandler and randolph more at their ideal positions and helps them a tiny bit on the cap. 2 out of these 3 problems would be solved by just benching Gallinari. But that would make the team worse, now wouldn’t it?
  0
- Posted on: Mon, 07/29/2013 - 5:04pm #827044
  
  ProudGrandpa
  Participant
  So basically you’re saying that this trade just lets them play Chandler and randolph more at their ideal positions and helps them a tiny bit on the cap. 2 out of these 3 problems would be solved by just benching Gallinari. But that would make the team worse, now wouldn’t it?
  0
Posted on: Mon, 07/29/2013 - 4:04pm #827107

jaycee24
Participant
Maybe I should of added in a Suns 1st rounder to Detroit and a conditional Piston 1st rounder to Denver as well as additional future picks? And why for Denver? Obviously you take off 17 mill off the salary cap next year, lose a (believe it or not) overpaid Galinari and you free up the opportunity to move Chandler to his natural position at the 3 while also freeing up space for Randolph to log some minutes. Didn’t think this was all that farfetched…
0
Posted on: Mon, 07/29/2013 - 4:14pm #827016

jaycee24
Participant
You now have a versatile balanced inside outside offense. Imagine a lineup of: Knight Caldwell-Pope Gallo Smith Drummond. PHX gets a very solid future and provides playing time for Len. Since Monroe can play the 5 he wouldn’t even necessarily even have to be the starter. OKC gets an upgrade at Center and a hustle player off the bench
0
Posted on: Mon, 07/29/2013 - 4:14pm #827119

jaycee24
Participant
You now have a versatile balanced inside outside offense. Imagine a lineup of: Knight Caldwell-Pope Gallo Smith Drummond. PHX gets a very solid future and provides playing time for Len. Since Monroe can play the 5 he wouldn’t even necessarily even have to be the starter. OKC gets an upgrade at Center and a hustle player off the bench
0
Posted on: Mon, 07/29/2013 - 4:52pm #827030

jaycee24
Participant
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=l3vfpct
0
Posted on: Mon, 07/29/2013 - 4:52pm #827133

jaycee24
Participant
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=l3vfpct
0
Posted on: Mon, 07/29/2013 - 5:01pm #827139

Sharp Shooter
Participant
As a pistons fan, this is would be a bad trade. Why give up on monroe at PF. At least see how the smith-monroe-drummond pans out. Also why would we want Gallonari., when we have Datome? Not saying he’s gallonari, but he could be serviceable. If they do decide to part with Monroe, we can defintely get someone better. Overall, the issue isn’t at sf, its at the point guard spot, so if your gonna trade these pistons players it should be for a point guard in return. Plus perkins and drummond would be a non existent offense, FYI
0
Posted on: Mon, 07/29/2013 - 5:01pm #827036

Sharp Shooter
Participant
As a pistons fan, this is would be a bad trade. Why give up on monroe at PF. At least see how the smith-monroe-drummond pans out. Also why would we want Gallonari., when we have Datome? Not saying he’s gallonari, but he could be serviceable. If they do decide to part with Monroe, we can defintely get someone better. Overall, the issue isn’t at sf, its at the point guard spot, so if your gonna trade these pistons players it should be for a point guard in return. Plus perkins and drummond would be a non existent offense, FYI
0
Author
Posts

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.