Knick Fans

Rubio, far more potential, and he CAN attract certain FA’s next year to come to NY

On this site I have been critical of Rubio. But to me, If he is the easier player to get, I would go add Rubio. I think Sessions can provide more off the bat but I think Rubio for next season can provide us some flair and can provide another young player that NY can flaunt for Superstars to play with

On this site I have been critical of Rubio. But to me, If he is the easier player to get, I would go add Rubio. I think Sessions can provide more off the bat but I think Rubio for next season can provide us some flair and can provide another young player that NY can flaunt for Superstars to play with

have rubio because first hes 18. sessions is 23. rubio is compared to steve nash. we all no how nash ran dontonis system. rubio has potential thats for sure. he has a lot if wholes of his game aswell. but that will come in his time. his D will probably bebad. but i see him running a offense really well. his shooting will become GREAT. rubio will be an allstar. i see this move being great for thier future. if they get him and if he lives up to hype he will atract superstars. knicks will be dumb to go after anyone but sessions or rubio.

link plz

hoopshype

Ny better not trade Gallinari , I would be sick. I think they might trade Wilson

I would not be shocked if they did give up Chandler. Chandler is good but I think he is a good #3 option in his peak

Me neither I think it’s the most likely scenario, to get equal talent in return. The T’Wolves also need wing scoring and Dantoni has Gallinari for the future and he loves Rubio

Dantoni would resign if Walsh gave up Gallo….

I think you have to take Rubio if you get the chance over Sessions. I like Sessions a lot, but Rubio is the perfect fit for NY and for D’Antoni’s style. He’s flashy and the guy plays hard. I am thinking that any smart GM would want Chandler in a trade for him. That is also probably the only guy of substantial value to the T-Wolves that is on that roster though.

he would fit well but not sure he will draw free agents because he wont play yet. how much would they have to give?

If the Knicks trade for him, they will pay the buyout and he will play in 2009

they would not give up much. Maybe Chandler and Jefferies for Rubio and maybe Carney

yeah but im not sure hes ready for the Nba or at least to be more than a D-league or bench payer.

he will backup Duhon for a little bit and will earn the starting job.

Well the TWolves are not going to take Jefferies or Curry so scratch them out. Also the Knicks won’t trade Gallinari. The only options really are Wilson Chandler & Jordan Hill. The Knicks may have to give up both of them to get Rubio. Yeah I would take Rubio over Sessions. Rubio is a perfect fit for that system. I also don’t think Minnesota would want Larry Hughes or Harrington.

there has been lot of talk about rubio an NY and i first bellive rubio is traded and playing for NY when he wears the jersey!
but one thing: please keep chandler and trade that italo boy!

Would they take Nate?and Hill would come off the bench for basically his whole career there

I’m not so sure the Wolves wouldn’t take Curry or Jeffries. They could still use some size and Curry or Jeffries would both be at least serviceable big men. I can’t see the Wolves being a factor in 2010 free agency, so I don’t think it would kill them to take on a contract. Worst thing that happens is you have some trade bait for 2011.

The things is Minnesota is in great shape as far as their contracts are concerned. They don’t have a single bad contract on their team. Most of them expire after this season. TWolves definitely don’t want to take on any long term contracts unless they are getting a star. Knicks don’t have any stars. So really all the Knicks can offer is young talent…..which comes down to Hill &or Chandler.

As far as Nate is concerned it really comes down to what type of contract he is willing to sign. Minnesota probably doesn’t want to pay him much….they want to have as much cash as possible available for 2010 free agency. Sure Nate would be a fun player for the fans to watch but he wouldn’t help out that team significantly.

ckowalski- The TWolves are focused on 2010….wether they can land a big free agent then remains to be seen. Why would the TWolves want to take on one of those terrible contracts in Curry or Jefferies while giving up Rubio in the process? That doesn’t make sense.

they would take Jefferies….and Chandler.

PG-Flynn
SG-Chandler
SF-2010 1s round pick (maybe favors)
PF-Love
C-Jefferson

I think they can add a Joe Johnson for the right price.

I haven’t seen anything saying they were focused on trying to land a big name free agent in 2010, just figured with a young team they would give them a year or two to run together and see what they have. If they are focusing on 2010 then I wouldn’t take on Curry or Jeffries, if they aren’t I wouldn’t see a problem with it.

Haha no way would Minnesota trade Rubio for Jefferies & Chandler…..that is crazy. The TWolves are not that stupid. Rubio has more value than that. Rubio > Chandler….so why take on a bad contract in Jefferies which takes away money the Wolves could spend in 2010?

Rubio right now…is not better then Chandler

“At a minimum,” says Kahn, “I expect we’ll be $10 or $12 million under the cap in the summer of 2010. If we have that cap space, and we can spend judiciously on a player who will help our team, we are absolutely ready to spend that money.”

In deference to that cap space, Kahn says that he will not take on any more contracts that last beyond next summer, and is “pretty much done with major changes to the roster” beyond “some pruning and trimming.”

Here is the full article if you want to read it: It is pretty interesting.

http://myespn.go.com/blogs/truehoop/0-43-41/Ripping-the-Timberwolves-Down-to-the-Studs.html

QHaynes- man you are trippin right now……I promise you the TWolves will not give up the 5th pick in the draft with tons of potential for Chandler & a bad contract….that is ludicrous…absolutely makes 0 sense

i think this trade wud work out
dlee/chandler/jerffries for rubio and pieces to match it out

Dude, Chandler almost was traded for the 5th pick this year!

We have not seen Rubio play. I said before, I do not see him as this mega All-star. Chandler at best is a future #2 option for a team.

You haven’t seen Rubio play but NBA GMs & scouts have….that is what counts.

also Almost trades don’t count.

I have seen Rubio play a little bit actually.

He is good but the weaknesses are there- poor jumper, lack of strengh, below average defender….yea he played pro ball since he was 14…but has he seen a LBJ or a Wade overseas? I think….NOT!

we ALLMOST ccud have gotten KG for channing frye. when frye did so good his rookie year here.too bad hes done nothing since. but isiah doesnt care about that

Larry Hughes is making stupid money this season……that trade doesn’t workout financially.

What about this trade? Do you think both teams would do this deal?

Knicks get: Rubio, Corey Brewer, 2nd round pick 2010

Wolves get: Chandler, Jordan Hill

QHaynes- the Knicks can’t pay for the buyout for Rubio. A team is only allowed to pay about $500,000 of the buyout. Rubio has to pay the rest.

OH HELL NO

Guru…I hope that deal goes down

because Hill can play defense, he can also play PF/C, he also provides length in the post…….Minnesota needs all these things badly. Blount, Songaila, & Percherov aren’t going to be around for long. They are all non-facotrs anyways. TWolves need quality post depth for the future.

wether Hill starts or not is irrelevant. Lots of good players come off the bench. He isn’t ready to start now anyways.

I think the Knicks would trade Hill for a chance to get Rubio.

i would give Webster but not Rudy beausev of his amazing contract if we take in Lees contract we might have trouble resigning Aldridge and Oden soon.

thats you Bird…not portland management

the would probably think the same thing and i think Aldridge is the power forward of the future and they cant afford to pay both of them.

why is everyone so willing to trade chandler?

What about this trade? Do you think both teams would do this deal?

Knicks get: Rubio, Corey Brewer, 2nd round pick 2010

Wolves get: Chandler, Jordan Hill

I love this trade. thumbs up
but only if NY can keep Lee long term

all though im interested in sessions

guru trade is good hope that one goes down