This topic contains 19 replies, has 12 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar whiteflash 8 years, 1 month ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #68456
    AvatarAvatar
    DolanCare
    Participant

    As the NBA scout class drools over Mo Bamba’s wingspan, it’s become given fact that the big man goes in the top 10. But can someone explain why Bamba should be picked over Robert Williams?

    While Bamba’s rididulous measurements make him a better shot blocker, Williams is the better rebounder and perimeter defender. Not to mention Williams willed Texas A&M to impressive wins while Texas routinely disappointed. If I was looking for a 5 in the mid lottery, I would draft Williams over Bamba. Why am I wrong? 

    0
  • #1117322
    AvatarAvatar
    kobyz
    Participant

     Williams is a role player at best, not intelligent player, not much feel for the game, you need to define him his task on the court very simpley, doesn’t have own read of the game…

    0
  • #1117323
    AvatarAvatar
    KerouacJack
    Participant

    Bamba could be an All-NBA talent if he reaches even half of his defensive potential. It would be like drafting Mason Plumlee over Rudy Gobert. Which did happen… but we all know how that turned out. 

    0
    • #1117329
      AvatarAvatar
      DolanCare
      Participant

       I’m getting tired of the Rudy Gobert comparisons. Gobert is Bamba’s ceiling. And as dominant as Gobert under the rim, he can be a liability against smaller lineups because he can’t guard the perimeter. Williams can guard the perimeter. The dude covers a ridiculous amount of ground. He blocked jump shots nearly every game at Texas A&M. 

       

       

       

      0
      • #1117362
        AvatarAvatar
        KerouacJack
        Participant

        Yes it’s an old and tired comparison, I agree. Similar to the Trae Young to Stephen Curry comp that’s thrown around all the time. We all know that’s his absolute best case scenario ceiling that 99/100 times won’t happen. However with Williams you could throw out 25-50 names to compare, he is very good defensively and just plain sucks offensively outside of 3 feet…. but with Bamba there really is no other modern comparison than Gobert because Bamba has legendary otherworldly length. Wilt Chamberlian length. He will alter shots if he raises his arm, he doesn’t even have to  jump. 

        0
  • #1117326
    AvatarAvatar
    SeattleSuperChronics
    Participant

     The only thing separating these two prospects is potential 

    0
  • #1117328
    AvatarAvatar
    holefillers1
    Participant

    Quickest answer, you are not wrong.  Bamba has height and length but very little on court intelligence.  I saw him constantly out of position for defensive rebounds.  He is basically a Floating big who needs to be a monster on the boards to go along with his shot blocking.  Williams is pretty much the same thing but his knock is less about inability and more  about assertion. IMO Williams is more like Clint Capela with better  rim protection while Bamba is a Serge Ibaka type.  

    If you want to take a chance on Mo Bamba’s development then that’s on you but the dude will probably just float around on offense while giving you some good rim protection.  I am not sold on his ability to rebound at a high level in the NBA or switch and guard the perimeter.  

     

     

    0
  • #1117331
    AvatarAvatar
    OhCanada-
    Participant

     Okay let me explain the difference here excluding wingspan.

    Bamba shows more promise offensively. Robert Williams jumpshot has not improved after two years of college basketball. His FT% actually went from 59% as a freshman dropping to 47% as a sophmore this year. His best case scenerio offensively is Clint Capela as a rim running big that attacks offensive glass but even then he would need a great PG to be successful.

    Bamba is really impressing people in the predraft process with his iq. Everyone seems enjoy time spent with him because of his character and intelligence. Hes captivating. I heard Bamba he is trying to do as many interveiws as possible to get familiar with his future opponents and get a read on how they think. Hes done 15+ and hes a lock for the top 8 in the draft. Not saying Robert Williams lacks in this department but Mo’s got it for sureand he’s turning heads just like Jaylen Brown did 2 years ago.

    Players like Robert Williams are rare in todays NBA but I think they will make a comeback because everyone is getting soft and noone knows how to boxout. I think with Williams you get either Biyambo or Capela time will tell. Still think Bamba is the better prospect.

     

     

     

    0
    • #1117332
      AvatarAvatar
      OhCanada-
      Participant

      Worst case scenerio with Williams you get Biyambo best case scenerio Capela.

      Worst case scenerio with Bamba you get a longer Thon Maker but you could potential end up being Chris Bosh offensively and Rudy Gobert defensively best case scenerio however worst case scenerio is Thon Maker.

      So yeah Id say the projections for Bamba are alot better but we’ll see what happens.

      0
      • #1117333
        AvatarAvatar
        DolanCare
        Participant

         I think Bamba’s impressive oratory skills, and mouth dropping wingspan, are blinding people a bit. Bamba is no means a "smart player," he certainly doesn’t have better instincts than Williams. Perhaps Bamba gambles less on defense, but he makes mental errors too. 

        I agree that Bamba’s ceiling is Gobert and Williams ceiling is Capela. But are we sure that Gobert is a better modern day NBA center than Capela? Gobert is an elite rim protector, though Capela is no slouch in this department. Meanwhile, Capela defends the perimeter and is a better rim roller. I think the same dichotomy applies to our Williams vs. Bamba comparision. 

        I don’t think either of of these prospects will ever be putting the ball on the floor ala Porzingis or Anthony Davis. They’ll be expected to clean up around the rim and catch lobs. Assuming that’s the case, offensive polish and general playmaking ability ultimately don’t matter. 

         

         

         

         

        0
        • #1117334
          AvatarAvatar
          OhCanada-
          Participant

          To sum it up the biggest difference is Bamba hits his free throws and Williams doesnt. 

          0
        • #1117405
          AvatarAvatar
          whiteflash
          Participant

           Gotta agree with you here. Being well spoken doesn’t equal high basketball IQ. Haven’t seen a ton of Williams, but Bamba is Capela at best, and as a native Houstonian I promise you that Capela would struggle in damn near any other system. 

          0
    • #1117344
      AvatarAvatar
      kobyz
      Participant

       Williams is not Capela at all, he just doesn’t have that competivness and feel, he is not lazy but lack awareness, he has a lot Javell Macgee in him…

      0
    • #1117372
      AvatarAvatar
      KerouacJack
      Participant

       This might be the best summary on Bamba that I’ve read on any site. 

      This is in regards to OhCanada’s “ok let me explain” post 

       

      0
  • #1117337
    AvatarAvatar
    Rico
    Participant

     Remember when the Clippers had to take out DeAndre Jordan near the end of close games because of his poor FT shooting?  Yeah, it’s a problem when your defensive anchor can’t play during crunch time.

    0
  • #1117338
    AvatarAvatar
    The Goat
    Participant

     The wingspan cant be dismissed just because its his wingspan.. Just standing on court defensively his reach is so long that he buys perimeter defenders half a second of time to cheat .. Thats actually a really big deal. Thats why Utah defend the perimeter well. Williams is worth less immediately for not having the same size and wingspan. If he did, maybe you could argue the other way around as they will have a similar job to do as a 5 offensively. You’d still lose the argument though cos Bamba has a better shot.

    0
  • #1117356
    AvatarAvatar
    holefillers1
    Participant

    We are comparing these two players head-to-head.  Bamba will need to actualize more of his potential in his current draft slot.  If Williams slots in at the back end of the lottery to mid first round he is projected more as a backup big to start his career.  

    0
  • #1117357
    AvatarAvatar
    iguapops420
    Participant

     Robert Williams is a lazy and has low hoop IQ. Very little skills and is significantly older than Bamba. 

    Bamba moves his feet defensively, can step out and guard the perimeter on switches (needs a lot of development here still) and guard the paint better than anyone in the country. He’s not a great rebounder, but a lot of that has to do with his tall frame and skinny base. If you look at his build though, he actually has some serious muscle definition which seems like he will be able to add strength just like Giannis did. 

     

    Everyone.acts as if Bambas main upside is Gobert, but honestly to me that’s his average. You’re talking about a guy who IMO could protect the paint like Rudy, move around like he’s Tyson Chandler, finish lobs like he’s Dwight Howard, and hit the three like he’s Myles Turner.

    His low end? Clint Capella.

     

     

     

    0
  • #1117361
    AvatarAvatar
    Hitster
    Participant

     If you question why Williams isn’t as high as Bamba, you could ask why isn’t Williams as high as JJ, Carter even Bagley etc?

    Bamba in my opinion has way more upside he could be a guy who makes a team alter the shots they take, Williams is more an old school big who may crash the boards etc. Williams is still a good player but I had hoped he could push on by staying another year in college and become one of the top 3 bigs in this year’s draft. That is unlikely to happen now.

    Still I think he’ll go well inside the top 20 possibly inside lottery level. Clippers with two picks in his range if they want a big could well snap him up.

     

     

    0
  • #1117369
    AvatarAvatar
    bdiddy5115
    Participant

    Bamba actually has the lowest % of his shots assisted of all the top bigs in this class, which is interesting to note, because his offensive "rawness" is nitpicked the most of all the top bigs — when he had far fewer shots spoonfed to him on a fairly sparse UT roster (than Ayton, Bagley, JJJ and even Williams too).

    Even then, he still had very respectable percentages, and his stroke is natural and improving — which means he will be a strong FT shooter (I see him in the high-70s) and a capable shooter out to 3. Williams is a non-shooter who regressed to sub-50% from the line, and shows very little to suggest that he’ll ever be able to knock down open Js. Add in the size difference to the skill discrepency (Williams being 6’9" to 6’10" with a reported 7’4" wingspan, and Bamba being 7’0" with a record-breaking 7’10" wingspan) and that increases the gap right there.

    Lastly, Bamba is an elite rim-protector (not to be confused with shot-blocker), as he did a fantastic job of staying out of foul-trouble for a guy his age/size. He stays vertical, and can contest shots later than other bigs because of his ridiculous reach. Williams is more of a weak-side shot-blocker than a true rim-protector at this stage. 

    This isn’t to minimize Williams as a prospect — I think he could be a great modern rim-runner and shot-blocker, especially on a team with a strong PG. I just think Bamba is on a different level as a prospect.

     

     

    0

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login