This topic contains 12 replies, has 10 voices, and was last updated by spencerishawesome 16 years, 11 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Thu, 07/16/2009 - 7:05pm #6594

thetruthParticipantlets say you was a starter on the kings.
your a player who does it all on the court off and on. the fans love you, the ladies love you, your teammates like you, you like the fans, the city, your family does too. but on the downside your team hasnt been in the playoffs in three seasons you been there. you have been coach by 4 diffrent coaches, the mangerment sucks. now they hire a new gm. who promises you hes gonna change it around, and bring you some help. but he wants one you to do one thing first. and thats resign. for four years 80 million. but you have 3 other teams after you. the knicks- 4 yrs 45 mill , spurs mid-level, and the pacers 5 yrs 60 mill. now the knicks are still the knicks , the spurs almost won the west, the pacers just miss the playoffs barley. now who do yuo choose.0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/16/2009 - 7:15pm #183132

Knicksboy34ParticipantIn Order…which ones would you choose..
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/16/2009 - 7:16pm #183133

White ChocolateParticipantThe Kings offer if they will give you $20 Million a year, if they want you that bad you have to take it.
0- Posted on: Thu, 07/16/2009 - 7:17pm #183135

thetruthParticipantyou rather take the money and be on losing team.
0
- Posted on: Thu, 07/16/2009 - 7:19pm #183136

White ChocolateParticipantA losing team that has a promising team and their young.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/16/2009 - 7:23pm #183138

jojososaParticipantTake tha kings offer especially if I kno my team has a good yung nucleus and good chemistry
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/16/2009 - 7:29pm #183141
ricks17Participanthow old are you? if your early in your career, you obviously take the money, substantial difference from the other 3 options. if its later in your career and its all about the championship,and your hungry for the win, than you go spurs for your best shot at the title.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/16/2009 - 7:31pm #183143

MagikKnickParticipantI simply wouldnt turn down $20m a year…
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/16/2009 - 8:04pm #183147

llperezall day everyday. Anyone who answers different does’nt know what they are talking about.
0 - Posted on: Thu, 07/16/2009 - 8:08pm #183148

butidonthavemoneyIt doesn’t matter how old you are. 80 million dollars is 80 million dollars.
0 - Posted on: Fri, 07/17/2009 - 4:52am #183222

crazyknicksfanParticipanti would take the knicks cuz i simply would love the challenge of turning around a losing team and making them great again. plus i would love 2 play in d’antonis system
0 - Posted on: Fri, 07/17/2009 - 5:17am #183250

R-Dot-13Participanti take the 80 million
0 - Posted on: Fri, 07/17/2009 - 5:23am #183256
spencerishawesomethe knicks and pacers basically are two other losing teams.. and the spurs are not offering that much money. the choice is obvious..
0 - AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |